CERTA-2010-AVI-137
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
Plusieurs vulnérabilités dans les imprimantes laser Lexmark permettent à une personne malintentionnée de provoquer un déni de service ou une exécution de code arbitraire à distance.
Description
Deux vulnérabilités dans les imprimantes laser Lexmark ont été découvertes :
- une erreur dans le système de gestion des connexions TCP permet de provoquer un déni de service à distance (CVE-2010-0618) ;
- une exécution de code arbitraire à distance est possible par l'envoi d'une commande PJL (Printer Job Language) spécialement conçue (CVE-2010-0619).
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
NoneImpacted products
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Lexmark s\u00e9rie T ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Lexmark s\u00e9rie W ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Lexmark s\u00e9rie C ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Lexmark s\u00e9rie Z.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Lexmark s\u00e9rie X ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Lexmark s\u00e9rie N ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Lexmark s\u00e9rie E ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "N/A",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les imprimantes laser Lexmark ont \u00e9t\u00e9\nd\u00e9couvertes :\n\n- une erreur dans le syst\u00e8me de gestion des connexions TCP permet de\n provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance (CVE-2010-0618) ;\n- une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance est possible par l\u0027envoi\n d\u0027une commande PJL (Printer Job Language) sp\u00e9cialement con\u00e7ue\n (CVE-2010-0619).\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2010-0618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-0618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2010-0619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-0619"
}
],
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 HP TE84 du 22 mars 2010 :",
"url": "http://support.lexmark.com/index?page=content\u0026id=TE84\u0026locale=EN\u0026userlocale=EN_US"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 HP TE85 du 22 mars 2010 :",
"url": "http://support.lexmark.com/index?page=content\u0026id=TE85\u0026locale=EN\u0026userlocale=EN_US"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-137",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2010-03-26T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les imprimantes laser Lexmark permettent \u00e0\nune personne malintentionn\u00e9e de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service ou une\nex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les imprimantes laser Lexmark",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Lexmark TE84 et TE85 du 22 mars 2010",
"url": null
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…