CERTA-2010-AVI-201

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Une vulnérabilité dans les imprimantes laser Lexmark permet de provoquer un déni de service à distance.

Description

Une erreur dans le traitement d'entêtes HTTP d'authentification permet à une personne malintentionnée de provoquer un déni de service à distance des périphériques utilisant des services HTTP.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
N/A N/A Lexmark Laser Printer E-Series ;
N/A N/A Lexmark Laser Printer N-Series ;
N/A N/A Lexmark Laser Printer T-Series ;
N/A N/A Lexmark Laser Printer W-Series ;
N/A N/A Lexmark Laser Printer C-Series ;
N/A N/A Lexmark Laser Printer X-Series.
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Lexmark Laser Printer E-Series ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Lexmark Laser Printer N-Series ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Lexmark Laser Printer T-Series ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Lexmark Laser Printer W-Series ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Lexmark Laser Printer C-Series ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Lexmark Laser Printer X-Series.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne erreur dans le traitement d\u0027ent\u00eates HTTP d\u0027authentification permet \u00e0\nune personne malintentionn\u00e9e de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance\ndes p\u00e9riph\u00e9riques utilisant des services HTTP.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-0101",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-0101"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-201",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2010-04-26T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les imprimantes laser Lexmark permet de provoquer\nun d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les imprimantes laser Lexmark",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Lexmark TE87 du 26 avril 2010",
      "url": "http://support.lexmark.com/index?page=content\u0026id=TE87"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…