CERTA-2011-AVI-288

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans HP Intelligent Management Center, qui permettent à un attaquant d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.

Description

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans HP Intelligent Management Center :

  • plusieurs vulnérabilités de type dépassement de tampon,
  • une vulnérabilité permettant à un attaquant de déposer des fichiers arbitraires,
  • une vulnérabilité de type corruption de mémoire.

Ces vulnérabilités sont exploitables par l'envoi de paquets réseaux spécialement conçus, et peuvent toutes conduire à l'exécution de code arbitraire par l'attaquant.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Broadcom Management Center leurs versions antérieures.
Broadcom Management Center HP Intelligent Management Center PLAT 5.0 (E0101),
Broadcom Management Center HP Intelligent Management Center PLAT 5.0 (E0101L01),
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "leurs versions ant\u00e9rieures.",
      "product": {
        "name": "Management Center",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Broadcom",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "HP Intelligent Management Center PLAT 5.0 (E0101),",
      "product": {
        "name": "Management Center",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Broadcom",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "HP Intelligent Management Center PLAT 5.0 (E0101L01),",
      "product": {
        "name": "Management Center",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Broadcom",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nDe multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans HP Intelligent\nManagement Center :\n\n-   plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s de type d\u00e9passement de tampon,\n-   une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 permettant \u00e0 un attaquant de d\u00e9poser des fichiers\n    arbitraires,\n-   une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de type corruption de m\u00e9moire.\n\nCes vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s sont exploitables par l\u0027envoi de paquets r\u00e9seaux\nsp\u00e9cialement con\u00e7us, et peuvent toutes conduire \u00e0 l\u0027ex\u00e9cution de code\narbitraire par l\u0027attaquant.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1852",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1852"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1849",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1849"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1850",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1850"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1848",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1848"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1851",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1851"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1854",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1854"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-1853",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1853"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-288",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2011-05-12T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans HP Intelligent\nManagement Center, qui permettent \u00e0 un attaquant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code\narbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans HP Intelligent Management Center",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 HP c02822750 du 05 mai 2011",
      "url": "http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02822750"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.