CERTA-2012-AVI-406
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
Plusieurs vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans ISC DHCP. Elle peuvent être exploitées pour effectuer des attaques par déni de service à distance.
La première vulnérabilité (CVE-2012-3570) concerne les serveurs fonctionnant en mode DHCPv6.
La seconde vulnérabilité (CVE-2012-3571) est due à une erreur lors du traitement d'identifiants client malformés.
La dernière vulnérabilité (CVE-2012-3954) est due à des fuites mémoire.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
NoneReferences
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "ISC DHCP 4.2.x.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "ISC",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "ISC DHCP 4.1.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "ISC",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2012-3570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-3570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-3571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-3571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-3954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-3954"
}
],
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ISC AA-00737 du 24 juillet 2012 :",
"url": "https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00737"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ISC AA-00714 du 24 juillet 2012 :",
"url": "https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00714"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ISC AA-00712 du 24 juillet 2012 :",
"url": "https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00712"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-406",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2012-07-26T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans ISC DHCP. Elle peuvent\n\u00eatre exploit\u00e9es pour effectuer des attaques par d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0\ndistance.\n\nLa premi\u00e8re vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 (CVE-2012-3570) concerne les serveurs\nfonctionnant en mode DHCPv6.\n\nLa seconde vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 (CVE-2012-3571) est due \u00e0 une erreur lors du\ntraitement d\u0027identifiants client malform\u00e9s.\n\nLa derni\u00e8re vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 (CVE-2012-3954) est due \u00e0 des fuites m\u00e9moire.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans ISC DHCP",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ISC AA-00712, AA-00714 et AA-00737 du 24 juillet 2012",
"url": null
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…