CNVD-2015-00067

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-01-06
VLAI Severity ?
Title
Kandidat CMS存在多个跨站请求伪造漏洞
Description
Kandidat CMS 1.4.2 版本存在多个跨站请求伪造漏洞,允许远程攻击者利用漏洞劫持管理员的请求认证。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细的解决方案提供: http://cwe.mitre.org

Reference
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-5319 https://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB22648
Impacted products
Name
Kandidat CMS Kandidat CMS 1.4.2
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2010-5319"
    }
  },
  "description": "Kandidat CMS 1.4.2 \u7248\u672c\u5b58\u5728\u591a\u4e2a\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u52ab\u6301\u7ba1\u7406\u5458\u7684\u8bf7\u6c42\u8ba4\u8bc1\u3002",
  "discovererName": "High-Tech Bridge Security Research Lab",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://cwe.mitre.org",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-00067",
  "openTime": "2015-01-06",
  "products": {
    "product": "Kandidat CMS Kandidat CMS 1.4.2"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-5319\r\nhttps://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB22648",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-01-05",
  "title": "Kandidat CMS\u5b58\u5728\u591a\u4e2a\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…