CNVD-2015-00190

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-01-09
VLAI Severity ?
Title
Spitfire CMS跨站脚本漏洞
Description
Spitfire CMS是一套重量轻的基于PHP的内容管理系统(CMS)。 Spitfire CMS存在跨站脚本漏洞,允许远程攻击者利用此漏洞通过cms_username参数注入任意web脚本或HTML。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供: http://spitfire.clausmuus.de/

Reference
https://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB22903
Impacted products
Name
clausmuus Spitfire CMS 1.0436
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2011-5303"
    }
  },
  "description": "Spitfire CMS\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u91cd\u91cf\u8f7b\u7684\u57fa\u4e8ePHP\u7684\u5185\u5bb9\u7ba1\u7406\u7cfb\u7edf\uff08CMS\uff09\u3002\r\n\r\nSpitfire CMS\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u901a\u8fc7cms_username\u53c2\u6570\u6ce8\u5165\u4efb\u610fweb\u811a\u672c\u6216HTML\u3002",
  "discovererName": "High-Tech Bridge Security Research Lab",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://spitfire.clausmuus.de/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-00190",
  "openTime": "2015-01-09",
  "products": {
    "product": "clausmuus Spitfire CMS 1.0436"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB22903",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-01-08",
  "title": "Spitfire CMS\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…