CNVD-2015-00234

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-01-13
VLAI Severity ?
Title
TYPO3 Content Rating SQL注入漏洞
Description
TYPO3是瑞士TYPO3协会维护的一套免费开源的内容管理系统(框架)(CMS/CMF)。 TYPO3 Content Rating存在SQL注入漏洞,因为它未能正确过滤用户提供的输入。攻击者可以利用该漏洞危及应用程序,访问或修改数据库数据。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细的解决方案提供: http://typo3.org/

Reference
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71984
Impacted products
Name
TYPO3 Content Rating <=1.0.3
Show details on source website

{
  "bids": {
    "bid": {
      "bidNumber": "71984"
    }
  },
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-1403"
    }
  },
  "description": "TYPO3\u662f\u745e\u58ebTYPO3\u534f\u4f1a\u7ef4\u62a4\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u514d\u8d39\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u5185\u5bb9\u7ba1\u7406\u7cfb\u7edf(\u6846\u67b6)(CMS/CMF)\u3002 \r\n\r\nTYPO3 Content Rating\u5b58\u5728SQL\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u56e0\u4e3a\u5b83\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u8fc7\u6ee4\u7528\u6237\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u8f93\u5165\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u4ee5\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5371\u53ca\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\uff0c\u8bbf\u95ee\u6216\u4fee\u6539\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u6570\u636e\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Steffen Muller",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://typo3.org/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-00234",
  "openTime": "2015-01-13",
  "products": {
    "product": "TYPO3 Content Rating \u003c=1.0.3"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71984",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2015-01-12",
  "title": "TYPO3 Content Rating SQL\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…