CNVD-2015-01969

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-03-25
VLAI Severity ?
Title
ASUS RT-G32跨站请求伪造漏洞
Description
ASUS RT-G32 routers是一款路由器设备。 ASUS RT-G32 routers存在跨站请求伪造漏洞,允许远程攻击者构建恶意URI,诱使用户解析,可以目标用户上下文执行恶意操作。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供: http://www.asus.com

Reference
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-2676
Impacted products
Name
['ASUS RT-G32 2.0.2.6', 'ASUS RT-G32 2.0.3.2']
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-2676"
    }
  },
  "description": "ASUS RT-G32 routers\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u8def\u7531\u5668\u8bbe\u5907\u3002\r\n\r\nASUS RT-G32 routers\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u6784\u5efa\u6076\u610fURI\uff0c\u8bf1\u4f7f\u7528\u6237\u89e3\u6790\uff0c\u53ef\u4ee5\u76ee\u6807\u7528\u6237\u4e0a\u4e0b\u6587\u6267\u884c\u6076\u610f\u64cd\u4f5c\u3002",
  "discovererName": "ASUS",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.asus.com",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-01969",
  "openTime": "2015-03-25",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "ASUS RT-G32 2.0.2.6",
      "ASUS RT-G32 2.0.3.2"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-2676",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-03-24",
  "title": "ASUS RT-G32\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…