CNVD-2016-07835
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-09-22
VLAI
Title
IBM Rational Quality Manager和Collaborative Lifecycle Management命令注入漏洞
Description
IBM Rational Quality Manager(RQM)和Collaborative Lifecycle Management(CLM)都是美国IBM公司的产品。前者是是一套协作的、基于Web的质量管理解决方案,后者是一套协作化生命周期管理解决方案。
IBM RQM和CLM中存在命令注入漏洞。攻击者可通过发送特制的HTML请求利用该漏洞注入命令。
Severity
高
Patch Name
IBM Rational Quality Manager和Collaborative Lifecycle Management命令注入漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
IBM Rational Quality Manager(RQM)和Collaborative Lifecycle Management(CLM)都是美国IBM公司的产品。前者是是一套协作的、基于Web的质量管理解决方案,后者是一套协作化生命周期管理解决方案。
IBM RQM和CLM中存在命令注入漏洞。攻击者可通过发送特制的HTML请求利用该漏洞注入命令。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description
目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题,补丁获取链接: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21989735
Reference
http://www.auscert.org.au/./render.html?it=38390
Impacted products
| Name | ['IBM Rational Quality Manager 4.0 - 4.0.7', 'IBM Rational Quality Manager 5.0 - 5.0.2', 'IBM Rational Quality Manager 6.0 - 6.0.1', 'IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management >=4.0.0,<=6.0.1', 'IBM Rational Quality Manager 3.0.1.6'] |
|---|
{
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2016-0326"
}
},
"description": "IBM Rational Quality Manager\uff08RQM\uff09\u548cCollaborative Lifecycle Management\uff08CLM\uff09\u90fd\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdIBM\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002\u524d\u8005\u662f\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u534f\u4f5c\u7684\u3001\u57fa\u4e8eWeb\u7684\u8d28\u91cf\u7ba1\u7406\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u540e\u8005\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u534f\u4f5c\u5316\u751f\u547d\u5468\u671f\u7ba1\u7406\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u3002\r\n\r\nIBM RQM\u548cCLM\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u547d\u4ee4\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u53d1\u9001\u7279\u5236\u7684HTML\u8bf7\u6c42\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6ce8\u5165\u547d\u4ee4\u3002",
"discovererName": "IBM",
"formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttp://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21989735",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2016-07835",
"openTime": "2016-09-22",
"patchDescription": "IBM Rational Quality Manager\uff08RQM\uff09\u548cCollaborative Lifecycle Management\uff08CLM\uff09\u90fd\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdIBM\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002\u524d\u8005\u662f\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u534f\u4f5c\u7684\u3001\u57fa\u4e8eWeb\u7684\u8d28\u91cf\u7ba1\u7406\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u540e\u8005\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u534f\u4f5c\u5316\u751f\u547d\u5468\u671f\u7ba1\u7406\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u3002\r\n\r\nIBM RQM\u548cCLM\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u547d\u4ee4\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u53d1\u9001\u7279\u5236\u7684HTML\u8bf7\u6c42\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6ce8\u5165\u547d\u4ee4\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
"patchName": "IBM Rational Quality Manager\u548cCollaborative Lifecycle Management\u547d\u4ee4\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
"products": {
"product": [
"IBM Rational Quality Manager 4.0 - 4.0.7",
"IBM Rational Quality Manager 5.0 - 5.0.2",
"IBM Rational Quality Manager 6.0 - 6.0.1",
"IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management \u003e=4.0.0\uff0c\u003c=6.0.1",
"IBM Rational Quality Manager 3.0.1.6"
]
},
"referenceLink": "http://www.auscert.org.au/./render.html?it=38390",
"serverity": "\u9ad8",
"submitTime": "2016-09-21",
"title": "IBM Rational Quality Manager\u548cCollaborative Lifecycle Management\u547d\u4ee4\u6ce8\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…