CNVD-2017-03525

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-03-28
VLAI
Title
Pluck CMS信息泄露漏洞
Description
Pluck CMS是一套使用php编写的内容管理系统(CMS)。 Pluck CMS 4.7.2版本中存在信息泄露漏洞。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞获取敏感信息。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细的解决方案提供: https://www.pluck-cms.org

Reference
http://rossmarks.uk/whitepapers/pluck_cms_4.7.txt
Impacted products
Name
Pluck CMS Pluck CMS 4.7.2
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2014-8706",
      "cveUrl": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-8706"
    }
  },
  "description": "Pluck CMS\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u4f7f\u7528php\u7f16\u5199\u7684\u5185\u5bb9\u7ba1\u7406\u7cfb\u7edf\uff08CMS\uff09\u3002\r\n\r\nPluck CMS 4.7.2\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u4fe1\u606f\u6cc4\u9732\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u83b7\u53d6\u654f\u611f\u4fe1\u606f\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Ross Marks",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.pluck-cms.org",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-03525",
  "openTime": "2017-03-28",
  "products": {
    "product": "Pluck CMS Pluck CMS 4.7.2"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://rossmarks.uk/whitepapers/pluck_cms_4.7.txt",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2017-03-21",
  "title": "Pluck CMS\u4fe1\u606f\u6cc4\u9732\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…