CNVD-2017-35676

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-11-30
VLAI Severity ?
Title
PluXml跨站脚本漏洞
Description
PluXml是一个用于安装容器系统的框架。 PluXml 5.6版本中存在跨站脚本漏洞。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞提升权限。
Severity
Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: http://www.pluxml.org/

Reference
https://github.com/pluxml/PluXml/issues/253
Impacted products
Name
Pluxml Pluxml 5.6
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2017-1001001"
    }
  },
  "description": "PluXml\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u7528\u4e8e\u5b89\u88c5\u5bb9\u5668\u7cfb\u7edf\u7684\u6846\u67b6\u3002\r\n\r\nPluXml 5.6\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u63d0\u5347\u6743\u9650\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Unknow",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.pluxml.org/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-35676",
  "openTime": "2017-11-30",
  "products": {
    "product": "Pluxml Pluxml 5.6"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://github.com/pluxml/PluXml/issues/253",
  "serverity": "\u4f4e",
  "submitTime": "2017-11-08",
  "title": "PluXml\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…