CNVD-2020-36282

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2020-07-06
VLAI
Title
FarSite Communications FarLinX X25 Gateway任意写入漏洞
Description
FarSite Communications FarLinX X25 Gateway是英国FarSite Communications公司的一款网关产品。该产品具有浏览器界面、在线统计信息集、连接日志记录、活动会话显示和状态更改警报等功能。 FarSite Communications FarLinX X25 Gateway 2014-09-25及之前版本中存在任意写入漏洞,攻击者可借助fsSaveUIPersistence.php文件利用该漏洞将任意数据写入到fsUI.xyz。
Severity
高
Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: http://www.forlinx.net/

Reference
https://www.justanotherhacker.com/2016/09/jahx164_-_farlinx_x25_gateway_multiple_vulnerabilities.html
Impacted products
Name
FarSite Communications FarLinX X25 Gateway <=2014-09-25
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2014-7175"
    }
  },
  "description": "FarSite Communications FarLinX X25 Gateway\u662f\u82f1\u56fdFarSite Communications\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u7f51\u5173\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002\u8be5\u4ea7\u54c1\u5177\u6709\u6d4f\u89c8\u5668\u754c\u9762\u3001\u5728\u7ebf\u7edf\u8ba1\u4fe1\u606f\u96c6\u3001\u8fde\u63a5\u65e5\u5fd7\u8bb0\u5f55\u3001\u6d3b\u52a8\u4f1a\u8bdd\u663e\u793a\u548c\u72b6\u6001\u66f4\u6539\u8b66\u62a5\u7b49\u529f\u80fd\u3002\n\nFarSite Communications FarLinX X25 Gateway 2014-09-25\u53ca\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u4efb\u610f\u5199\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9fsSaveUIPersistence.php\u6587\u4ef6\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u5c06\u4efb\u610f\u6570\u636e\u5199\u5165\u5230fsUI.xyz\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.forlinx.net/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2020-36282",
  "openTime": "2020-07-06",
  "products": {
    "product": "FarSite Communications FarLinX X25 Gateway \u003c=2014-09-25"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://www.justanotherhacker.com/2016/09/jahx164_-_farlinx_x25_gateway_multiple_vulnerabilities.html",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2020-06-02",
  "title": "FarSite Communications FarLinX X25 Gateway\u4efb\u610f\u5199\u5165\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.