cve-2000-1022
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2001-01-22 05:00
Modified
2024-08-08 05:37
Severity ?
Summary
The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a n/a Version: n/a
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T05:37:32.356Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "1698",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698"
          },
          {
            "name": "cisco-pix-smtp-filtering(5277)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277"
          },
          {
            "name": "20001005 Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Mailguard Vulnerability",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_CISCO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml"
          },
          {
            "name": "20000920 Re: Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack) - Version 4.2(1) not exploitable",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20000919 Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack)",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2000-09-19T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2005-11-02T10:00:00",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "1698",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698"
        },
        {
          "name": "cisco-pix-smtp-filtering(5277)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277"
        },
        {
          "name": "20001005 Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Mailguard Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_CISCO"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml"
        },
        {
          "name": "20000920 Re: Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack) - Version 4.2(1) not exploitable",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "20000919 Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack)",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2000-1022",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "1698",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698"
            },
            {
              "name": "cisco-pix-smtp-filtering(5277)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277"
            },
            {
              "name": "20001005 Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Mailguard Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "CISCO",
              "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml"
            },
            {
              "name": "20000920 Re: Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack) - Version 4.2(1) not exploitable",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "20000919 Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack)",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2000-1022",
    "datePublished": "2001-01-22T05:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2000-11-24T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T05:37:32.356Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(1\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"B1C4F7D5-DCD0-409C-86BF-A96A5253DF64\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(2\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"8198D129-76D0-4983-BFC4-8EC724FE1B6A\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(5\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"6BEECFAA-9DD5-4950-B9F1-CF8582225314\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"49566EAC-05AF-4880-8000-351AF538E4CC\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.4\\\\(4\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"118CBF59-DAD8-468E-B279-F6359E4624F1\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"7AA2E425-904C-4070-8F5F-B81BCF3147F6\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"604CF950-5D4B-4DC6-819E-0528B22CB05C\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"999A0969-60EB-4B2E-A274-9F05D9F840E5\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2000-1022",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-20T23:33:49.960",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 6.4, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": true, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2000-12-11T05:00:00.000",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Patch\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Patch\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2000-1022\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2000-12-11T05:00:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-20T23:33:49.960\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":true,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(1\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B1C4F7D5-DCD0-409C-86BF-A96A5253DF64\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(2\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8198D129-76D0-4983-BFC4-8EC724FE1B6A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(5\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6BEECFAA-9DD5-4950-B9F1-CF8582225314\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"49566EAC-05AF-4880-8000-351AF538E4CC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.4\\\\(4\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"118CBF59-DAD8-468E-B279-F6359E4624F1\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7AA2E425-904C-4070-8F5F-B81BCF3147F6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"604CF950-5D4B-4DC6-819E-0528B22CB05C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"999A0969-60EB-4B2E-A274-9F05D9F840E5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.