CVE-2002-1623 (GCVE-0-2002-1623)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2005-03-26 05:00 – Updated: 2024-08-08 03:34
VLAI?
Summary
The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T03:34:54.964Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "20020903 Check Point statement on use of IKE Aggressive Mode",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20020911 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2"
          },
          {
            "name": "5607",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607"
          },
          {
            "name": "VU#886601",
            "tags": [
              "third-party-advisory",
              "x_refsource_CERT-VN",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20020903 SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202"
          },
          {
            "name": "20020905 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE  exchange",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2"
          },
          {
            "name": "fw1-ike-username-enumeration(10034)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2002-09-03T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-07-10T14:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "20020903 Check Point statement on use of IKE Aggressive Mode",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_FULLDISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "20020911 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2"
        },
        {
          "name": "5607",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607"
        },
        {
          "name": "VU#886601",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "x_refsource_CERT-VN"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "20020903 SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202"
        },
        {
          "name": "20020905 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE  exchange",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2"
        },
        {
          "name": "fw1-ike-username-enumeration(10034)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2002-1623",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20020903 Check Point statement on use of IKE Aggressive Mode",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "20020911 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2"
            },
            {
              "name": "5607",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607"
            },
            {
              "name": "VU#886601",
              "refsource": "CERT-VN",
              "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "20020903 SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202"
            },
            {
              "name": "20020905 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE  exchange",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2"
            },
            {
              "name": "fw1-ike-username-enumeration(10034)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2002-1623",
    "datePublished": "2005-03-26T05:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2005-03-26T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T03:34:54.964Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:vpn-1_firewall-1:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"B0F8A14A-F252-4454-A4FB-BB924FE66085\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:vpn-1_firewall-1:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"32896C31-7AEA-42B3-94E1-05A3E8E61317\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2002-1623",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-20T23:41:44.770",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2002-12-31T05:00:00.000",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"US Government Resource\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"US Government Resource\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2002-1623\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2002-12-31T05:00:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-03T01:03:51.193\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:vpn-1_firewall-1:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B0F8A14A-F252-4454-A4FB-BB924FE66085\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:vpn-1_firewall-1:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"32896C31-7AEA-42B3-94E1-05A3E8E61317\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"US Government Resource\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"US Government Resource\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.