cve-2006-3778
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2006-07-21 18:00
Modified
2024-08-07 18:39
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) "Save As Draft" option is used or (2) a "," (comma) is inside the "phrase" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T18:39:54.132Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "name": "1016516", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_SECTRACK", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602" }, { "name": "1016819", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_SECTRACK", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386" }, { "name": "21096", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21096" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2006-07-18T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \"Save As Draft\" option is used or (2) a \",\" (comma) is inside the \"phrase\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2006-09-15T09:00:00", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "name": "1016516", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_SECTRACK" ], "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602" }, { "name": "1016819", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_SECTRACK" ], "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386" }, { "name": "21096", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21096" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2006-3778", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \"Save As Draft\" option is used or (2) a \",\" (comma) is inside the \"phrase\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "1016516", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516" }, { "name": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602" }, { "name": "1016819", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819" }, { "name": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386" }, { "name": "21096", "refsource": "SECUNIA", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21096" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2006-3778", "datePublished": "2006-07-21T18:00:00", "dateReserved": "2006-07-21T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T18:39:54.132Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "fkie_nvd": { "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"1E234AD1-7202-421E-82C8-880E84876021\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"1360A50E-C1E1-4690-874A-04CC7C1A77CC\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"68AEB13D-C7C6-426F-8484-85EFF7245DF5\"}]}]}]", "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \\\"Save As Draft\\\" option is used or (2) a \\\",\\\" (comma) is inside the \\\"phrase\\\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, y 7.0 no maneja adecuadamente las respuestas a mensajes de correo con nombres de usuario alternativo cuando la opci\\u00f3n(1) \\\"Guardar como borrador\\\" es utilizada o (2) una \\\",\\\" (coma) est\\u00e1 dentro de la porci\\u00f3n de una direcci\\u00f3n, la cual podr\\u00eda hacer que el email sea env\\u00edado a usuarios que fueron borrados desde los campos To, CC y BBC, lo cual permite a un atacante remotos obtener una lista de receptores originales.\"}]", "id": "CVE-2006-3778", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T00:14:24.230", "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}", "published": "2006-07-24T12:19:00.000", "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/21096\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/21096\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\"]}]", "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}]" }, "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2006-3778\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2006-07-24T12:19:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T00:14:24.230\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) \\\"Save As Draft\\\" option is used or (2) a \\\",\\\" (comma) is inside the \\\"phrase\\\" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, y 7.0 no maneja adecuadamente las respuestas a mensajes de correo con nombres de usuario alternativo cuando la opci\u00f3n(1) \\\"Guardar como borrador\\\" es utilizada o (2) una \\\",\\\" (coma) est\u00e1 dentro de la porci\u00f3n de una direcci\u00f3n, la cual podr\u00eda hacer que el email sea env\u00edado a usuarios que fueron borrados desde los campos To, CC y BBC, lo cual permite a un atacante remotos obtener una lista de receptores originales.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1E234AD1-7202-421E-82C8-880E84876021\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1360A50E-C1E1-4690-874A-04CC7C1A77CC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"68AEB13D-C7C6-426F-8484-85EFF7245DF5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/21096\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/21096\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016516\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://securitytracker.com/id?1016819\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21243602\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=899\u0026uid=swg21240386\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.