CVE-2009-2710 (GCVE-0-2009-2710)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-05-11 14:01 – Updated: 2017-05-11 13:57
VLAI?

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none

Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-05-11T13:57:01",
        "orgId": "bc94ec7e-8909-4cbb-83df-d2fc9330fa88",
        "shortName": "sgi"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "bc94ec7e-8909-4cbb-83df-d2fc9330fa88",
    "assignerShortName": "sgi",
    "cveId": "CVE-2009-2710",
    "datePublished": "2017-05-11T14:01:00",
    "dateRejected": "2017-05-11T13:57:01",
    "dateReserved": "2009-08-06T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2017-05-11T13:57:01",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2009-2710",
      "lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:04:14.527",
      "published": "2017-05-11T14:29:09.463",
      "sourceIdentifier": "bc94ec7e-8909-4cbb-83df-d2fc9330fa88",
      "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2009-2710\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"bc94ec7e-8909-4cbb-83df-d2fc9330fa88\",\"published\":\"2017-05-11T14:29:09.463\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:04:14.527\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…