cve-2010-2631
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2010-07-06 15:00
Modified
2024-08-07 02:39
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
LibTIFF 3.9.0 ignores tags in certain situations during the first stage of TIFF file processing and does not properly handle this during the second stage, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2481.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T02:39:37.668Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2210" }, { "name": "GLSA-201209-02", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_GENTOO", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml" }, { "name": "50726", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50726" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2010-06-13T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "LibTIFF 3.9.0 ignores tags in certain situations during the first stage of TIFF file processing and does not properly handle this during the second stage, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2481." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2013-05-15T09:00:00", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2210" }, { "name": "GLSA-201209-02", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_GENTOO" ], "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml" }, { "name": "50726", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50726" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2010-2631", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "LibTIFF 3.9.0 ignores tags in certain situations during the first stage of TIFF file processing and does not properly handle this during the second stage, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2481." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2210", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2210" }, { "name": "GLSA-201209-02", "refsource": "GENTOO", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml" }, { "name": "50726", "refsource": "SECUNIA", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50726" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2010-2631", "datePublished": "2010-07-06T15:00:00", "dateReserved": "2010-07-06T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T02:39:37.668Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2010-2631\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2010-07-06T17:17:20.140\",\"lastModified\":\"2013-05-15T03:10:42.233\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"LibTIFF 3.9.0 ignores tags in certain situations during the first stage of TIFF file processing and does not properly handle this during the second stage, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2481.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"LibTIFF v3.9.0 ignora las etiquetas en ciertas situaciones durante la primera etapa del procesado de archivos TIFF y no los maneja adecuadamente durante la segunda etapa, lo cual permite a los atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (fallo de la aplicaci\u00f3n) a trav\u00e9s de ficheros manipulados, una vulnerabilidad distinta a CVE-2010-2481.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"baseScore\":4.3},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7D0901DF-4C9A-46A6-A5F9-6CFC945B39AE\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2210\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/50726\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}" } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.