cve-2011-0917
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2011-02-08 21:00
Modified
2024-08-06 22:05
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Buffer overflow in nLDAP.exe in IBM Lotus Domino allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in an LDAP Bind operation, aka SPR KLYH87LMVX.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T22:05:54.675Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-047/" }, { "name": "43224", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43224" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21461514" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=23\u0026Itemid=23" }, { "name": "16190", "tags": [ "exploit", "x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16190/" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2011-02-04T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Buffer overflow in nLDAP.exe in IBM Lotus Domino allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in an LDAP Bind operation, aka SPR KLYH87LMVX." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2011-02-23T10:00:00", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-047/" }, { "name": "43224", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43224" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21461514" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=23\u0026Itemid=23" }, { "name": "16190", "tags": [ "exploit", "x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB" ], "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16190/" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2011-0917", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Buffer overflow in nLDAP.exe in IBM Lotus Domino allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in an LDAP Bind operation, aka SPR KLYH87LMVX." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-047/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-047/" }, { "name": "43224", "refsource": "SECUNIA", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43224" }, { "name": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21461514", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21461514" }, { "name": "http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=23\u0026Itemid=23", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=23\u0026Itemid=23" }, { "name": "16190", "refsource": "EXPLOIT-DB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16190/" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2011-0917", "datePublished": "2011-02-08T21:00:00", "dateReserved": "2011-02-08T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T22:05:54.675Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "fkie_nvd": { "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_domino:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"BE9179CA-5855-4F19-BAA6-D0A6DF468B9B\"}]}]}]", "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Buffer overflow in nLDAP.exe in IBM Lotus Domino allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in an LDAP Bind operation, aka SPR KLYH87LMVX.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Desbordamiento de b\\u00fafer en nLDAP.exe en IBM Lotus Domino permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar c\\u00f3digo de su elecci\\u00f3n a trav\\u00e9s de una operaci\\u00f3n \\\"LDAP Bind\\\", tambi\\u00e9n conocido como SPR KLYH87LMVX.\"}]", "id": "CVE-2011-0917", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:25:09.690", "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\", \"baseScore\": 10.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 10.0, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}", "published": "2011-02-08T22:00:02.743", "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/43224\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21461514\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16190/\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=23\u0026Itemid=23\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-047/\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/43224\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21461514\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16190/\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=23\u0026Itemid=23\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-047/\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]", "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-119\"}]}]" }, "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2011-0917\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2011-02-08T22:00:02.743\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:25:09.690\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Buffer overflow in nLDAP.exe in IBM Lotus Domino allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in an LDAP Bind operation, aka SPR KLYH87LMVX.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en nLDAP.exe en IBM Lotus Domino permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s de una operaci\u00f3n \\\"LDAP Bind\\\", tambi\u00e9n conocido como SPR KLYH87LMVX.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\",\"baseScore\":10.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":10.0,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_domino:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"BE9179CA-5855-4F19-BAA6-D0A6DF468B9B\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/43224\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21461514\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16190/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=23\u0026Itemid=23\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-047/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/43224\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21461514\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/16190/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=23\u0026Itemid=23\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-047/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.