CVE-2015-4334 (GCVE-0-2015-4334)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2015-12-07 20:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 06:11
VLAI?
Summary
The default configuration of SGOS in Blue Coat ProxySG before 6.2.16.5, 6.5 before 6.5.7.1, and 6.6 before 6.6.2.1 forwards authentication challenges from upstream origin content servers (OCS) when used in an explicit proxy deployment, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a 407 (aka Proxy Authentication Required) HTTP status code, as demonstrated when using NTLM authentication.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:11:12.842Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "1032149",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032149"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://twitter.com/bugch3ck/status/591492380294979585"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa93"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2015-04-14T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The default configuration of SGOS in Blue Coat ProxySG before 6.2.16.5, 6.5 before 6.5.7.1, and 6.6 before 6.6.2.1 forwards authentication challenges from upstream origin content servers (OCS) when used in an explicit proxy deployment, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a 407 (aka Proxy Authentication Required) HTTP status code, as demonstrated when using NTLM authentication."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2015-12-07T20:57:01",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "1032149",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032149"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://twitter.com/bugch3ck/status/591492380294979585"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa93"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2015-4334",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The default configuration of SGOS in Blue Coat ProxySG before 6.2.16.5, 6.5 before 6.5.7.1, and 6.6 before 6.6.2.1 forwards authentication challenges from upstream origin content servers (OCS) when used in an explicit proxy deployment, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a 407 (aka Proxy Authentication Required) HTTP status code, as demonstrated when using NTLM authentication."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "1032149",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032149"
},
{
"name": "https://twitter.com/bugch3ck/status/591492380294979585",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://twitter.com/bugch3ck/status/591492380294979585"
},
{
"name": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa93",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa93"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2015-4334",
"datePublished": "2015-12-07T20:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2015-06-04T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:11:12.842Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:symantec:proxysg_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"6.2\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"6.2.16.4\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"6D3DA59E-A652-4004-90FE-CD5399BDCB3E\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:symantec:proxysg_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"6.5\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"6.5.7.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"E843F4BA-412B-488E-B339-56C7C62CD311\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:symantec:proxysg_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"6.6\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"6.6.2.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"76F2C2E8-7811-457E-AFD8-B3504F97CD10\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The default configuration of SGOS in Blue Coat ProxySG before 6.2.16.5, 6.5 before 6.5.7.1, and 6.6 before 6.6.2.1 forwards authentication challenges from upstream origin content servers (OCS) when used in an explicit proxy deployment, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a 407 (aka Proxy Authentication Required) HTTP status code, as demonstrated when using NTLM authentication.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"La configuraci\\u00f3n por defecto de SGOS en Blue Coat ProxySG en versiones anteriores a 6.2.16.5, 6.5 en versiones anteriores a 6.5.7.1 y 6.6 en versiones anteriores a 6.6.2.1 reenv\\u00eda retos de autenticaci\\u00f3n desde los servidores de contenido de origen (OCS) de subida cuando se usa en el despliegue de un proxy expl\\u00edcito, lo que hace m\\u00e1s f\\u00e1cil para atacantes remotos obtener informaci\\u00f3n sensible a trav\\u00e9s de un c\\u00f3digo de estado HTTP 407 (tambi\\u00e9n conocido como Proxy Authentication Required), seg\\u00fan lo demostrado cuando se utiliza autenticaci\\u00f3n NTLM.\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2015-4334",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:30:50.950",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
"published": "2015-12-07T20:59:05.900",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032149\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa93\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://twitter.com/bugch3ck/status/591492380294979585\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032149\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa93\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://twitter.com/bugch3ck/status/591492380294979585\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-200\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-4334\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2015-12-07T20:59:05.900\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-12T10:46:40.837\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The default configuration of SGOS in Blue Coat ProxySG before 6.2.16.5, 6.5 before 6.5.7.1, and 6.6 before 6.6.2.1 forwards authentication challenges from upstream origin content servers (OCS) when used in an explicit proxy deployment, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a 407 (aka Proxy Authentication Required) HTTP status code, as demonstrated when using NTLM authentication.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La configuraci\u00f3n por defecto de SGOS en Blue Coat ProxySG en versiones anteriores a 6.2.16.5, 6.5 en versiones anteriores a 6.5.7.1 y 6.6 en versiones anteriores a 6.6.2.1 reenv\u00eda retos de autenticaci\u00f3n desde los servidores de contenido de origen (OCS) de subida cuando se usa en el despliegue de un proxy expl\u00edcito, lo que hace m\u00e1s f\u00e1cil para atacantes remotos obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible a trav\u00e9s de un c\u00f3digo de estado HTTP 407 (tambi\u00e9n conocido como Proxy Authentication Required), seg\u00fan lo demostrado cuando se utiliza autenticaci\u00f3n NTLM.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-200\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:symantec:proxysg_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.2\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"6.2.16.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6D3DA59E-A652-4004-90FE-CD5399BDCB3E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:symantec:proxysg_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.5\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"6.5.7.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E843F4BA-412B-488E-B339-56C7C62CD311\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:symantec:proxysg_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.6\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"6.6.2.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"76F2C2E8-7811-457E-AFD8-B3504F97CD10\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032149\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa93\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://twitter.com/bugch3ck/status/591492380294979585\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032149\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa93\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://twitter.com/bugch3ck/status/591492380294979585\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…