cve-2015-5315
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2018-02-21 16:00
Modified
2024-08-06 06:41
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
The eap_pwd_process function in eap_peer/eap_pwd.c in wpa_supplicant 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when EAP-pwd is enabled in a network configuration profile, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
secalert@redhat.com | http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt | Mitigation, Vendor Advisory | |
secalert@redhat.com | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10 | Mailing List, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
secalert@redhat.com | http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1 | Broken Link | |
secalert@redhat.com | https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397 | Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt | Mitigation, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10 | Mailing List, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1 | Broken Link | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397 | Third Party Advisory |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:41:09.525Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "name": "USN-2808-1", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_UBUNTU", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1" }, { "name": "DSA-3397", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_DEBIAN", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20151110 hostapd/wpa_supplicant: EAP-pwd missing last fragment length validation", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2015-11-10T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The eap_pwd_process function in eap_peer/eap_pwd.c in wpa_supplicant 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when EAP-pwd is enabled in a network configuration profile, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2018-02-22T10:57:01", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "name": "USN-2808-1", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_UBUNTU" ], "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1" }, { "name": "DSA-3397", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_DEBIAN" ], "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20151110 hostapd/wpa_supplicant: EAP-pwd missing last fragment length validation", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2015-5315", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The eap_pwd_process function in eap_peer/eap_pwd.c in wpa_supplicant 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when EAP-pwd is enabled in a network configuration profile, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "USN-2808-1", "refsource": "UBUNTU", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1" }, { "name": "DSA-3397", "refsource": "DEBIAN", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397" }, { "name": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20151110 hostapd/wpa_supplicant: EAP-pwd missing last fragment length validation", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2015-5315", "datePublished": "2018-02-21T16:00:00", "dateReserved": "2015-07-01T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T06:41:09.525Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "fkie_nvd": { "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:w1.fi:wpa_supplicant:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"2.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"2.6\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C0920644-8B05-465C-A1BE-BAC6344D990E\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"}]}]}]", "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The eap_pwd_process function in eap_peer/eap_pwd.c in wpa_supplicant 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when EAP-pwd is enabled in a network configuration profile, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"La funci\\u00f3n eap_pwd_process en eap_peer/eap_pwd.c en wpa_supplicant, en versiones 2.x anteriores a la 2.6, no valida que el b\\u00fafer de reensamblaje sea lo bastante grande para el fragmento final cuando EAP-pwd est\\u00e1 habilitado en un perfil de configuraci\\u00f3n de red. Esto permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegaci\\u00f3n de servicio (finalizaci\\u00f3n del proceso) mediante un fragmento final grande en un mensaje EAP-pwd.\"}]", "id": "CVE-2015-5315", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:32:46.793", "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}", "published": "2018-02-21T16:29:00.347", "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Mitigation\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mitigation\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]", "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-119\"}]}]" }, "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-5315\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2018-02-21T16:29:00.347\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:32:46.793\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The eap_pwd_process function in eap_peer/eap_pwd.c in wpa_supplicant 2.x before 2.6 does not validate that the reassembly buffer is large enough for the final fragment when EAP-pwd is enabled in a network configuration profile, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) via a large final fragment in an EAP-pwd message.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La funci\u00f3n eap_pwd_process en eap_peer/eap_pwd.c en wpa_supplicant, en versiones 2.x anteriores a la 2.6, no valida que el b\u00fafer de reensamblaje sea lo bastante grande para el fragmento final cuando EAP-pwd est\u00e1 habilitado en un perfil de configuraci\u00f3n de red. Esto permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (finalizaci\u00f3n del proceso) mediante un fragmento final grande en un mensaje EAP-pwd.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:w1.fi:wpa_supplicant:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"2.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.6\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C0920644-8B05-465C-A1BE-BAC6344D990E\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://w1.fi/security/2015-7/eap-pwd-missing-last-fragment-length-validation.txt\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/10\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.