CVE-2015-6067 (GCVE-0-2015-6067)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-05-11 14:01 – Updated: 2017-05-11 13:57
VLAI

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-05-11T13:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
        "shortName": "microsoft"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
    "assignerShortName": "microsoft",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-6067",
    "datePublished": "2017-05-11T14:01:00.000Z",
    "dateRejected": "2017-05-11T13:57:01.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2015-08-14T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2017-05-11T13:57:01.000Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none"
        }
      ],
      "id": "CVE-2015-6067",
      "lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:26:30.000",
      "published": "2017-05-11T14:29:48.060",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secure@microsoft.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2015. Notes: none"
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2015-6067",
        "lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:26:30.000",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2017-05-11T14:29:48.060",
        "references": [],
        "sourceIdentifier": "secure@microsoft.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.