CVE-2016-1000105 (GCVE-0-2016-1000105)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-01-31 21:38 – Updated: 2020-01-31 21:38
VLAI?
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-01-31T21:38:27",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-1000105",
"datePublished": "2020-01-31T21:38:27",
"dateRejected": "2020-01-31T21:38:27",
"dateReserved": "2016-07-18T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2020-01-31T21:38:27",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.0",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2016-1000105",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:29:26.130",
"published": "2020-01-31T22:15:11.370",
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-1000105\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2020-01-31T22:15:11.370\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:29:26.130\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…