CVE-2016-3181 (GCVE-0-2016-3181)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-02-20 00:02 – Updated: 2020-03-09 17:39
VLAI

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-3182. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-3182. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-3182 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2020-03-09T17:39:41.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-3182. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-3182. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-3182 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-3181",
    "datePublished": "2020-02-20T00:02:59.000Z",
    "dateRejected": "2020-02-20T00:02:59.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2016-03-15T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2020-03-09T17:39:41.000Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-3182. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-3182. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-3182 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2016-3181",
      "lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:32:12.310",
      "published": "2020-02-20T01:15:10.640",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-3181\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2020-02-20T01:15:10.640\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:32:12.310\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-3182. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-3182. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-3182 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "None",
      "current_release_date": "2025-11-21T11:34:04+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2016-3181",
      "id": "CVE-2016-3181",
      "initial_release_date": "2016-03-14T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "8",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "openjpeg: Out-of-bounds read in opj_tcd_free_tile function",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2016/cve-2016-3181.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-08-08T23:38:18Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2016-3181",
      "id": "CVE-2016-3181",
      "initial_release_date": "2023-02-15T05:04:48Z",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "77",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2016-3181",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2016-3181.json",
      "version": "16"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.