cve-2017-14174
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2017-09-07 06:00
Modified
2024-08-05 19:20
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 7.0.7-0 Q16, a DoS in ReadPSDLayersInternal() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted PSD file, which claims a large "length" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over "length" would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/04a567494786d5bb50894fc8bb8fea0cf496bea8 | Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/f68a98a9d385838a1c73ec960a14102949940a64 | Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/714 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00015.html | Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/09/msg00007.html | Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-07 | Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1/ | Third Party Advisory |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T19:20:41.027Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "name": "USN-3681-1", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_UBUNTU", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1/" }, { "name": "GLSA-201711-07", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_GENTOO", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-07" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/f68a98a9d385838a1c73ec960a14102949940a64" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/04a567494786d5bb50894fc8bb8fea0cf496bea8" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/714" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20190514 [SECURITY] [DLA 1785-1] imagemagick security update", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00015.html" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20200907 [SECURITY] [DLA 2366-1] imagemagick security update", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/09/msg00007.html" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2017-09-07T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 7.0.7-0 Q16, a DoS in ReadPSDLayersInternal() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted PSD file, which claims a large \"length\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over \"length\" would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2020-09-07T23:06:10", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "name": "USN-3681-1", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_UBUNTU" ], "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1/" }, { "name": "GLSA-201711-07", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_GENTOO" ], "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-07" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/f68a98a9d385838a1c73ec960a14102949940a64" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/04a567494786d5bb50894fc8bb8fea0cf496bea8" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/714" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20190514 [SECURITY] [DLA 1785-1] imagemagick security update", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00015.html" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20200907 [SECURITY] [DLA 2366-1] imagemagick security update", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/09/msg00007.html" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2017-14174", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "In coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 7.0.7-0 Q16, a DoS in ReadPSDLayersInternal() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted PSD file, which claims a large \"length\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over \"length\" would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "USN-3681-1", "refsource": "UBUNTU", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1/" }, { "name": "GLSA-201711-07", "refsource": "GENTOO", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-07" }, { "name": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/f68a98a9d385838a1c73ec960a14102949940a64", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/f68a98a9d385838a1c73ec960a14102949940a64" }, { "name": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/04a567494786d5bb50894fc8bb8fea0cf496bea8", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/04a567494786d5bb50894fc8bb8fea0cf496bea8" }, { "name": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/714", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/714" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20190514 [SECURITY] [DLA 1785-1] imagemagick security update", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00015.html" }, { "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20200907 [SECURITY] [DLA 2366-1] imagemagick security update", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/09/msg00007.html" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2017-14174", "datePublished": "2017-09-07T06:00:00", "dateReserved": "2017-09-07T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T19:20:41.027Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-14174\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2017-09-07T06:29:00.390\",\"lastModified\":\"2020-10-23T18:16:50.530\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 7.0.7-0 Q16, a DoS in ReadPSDLayersInternal() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted PSD file, which claims a large \\\"length\\\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over \\\"length\\\" would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En coders/psd.c en ImageMagick 7.0.7-0 Q16, una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio en ReadPSDLayersInternal() por una falta de chequeos EOF (End of File) podr\u00eda provocar un enorme consumo de recursos de la CPU. Cuando se proporciona un archivo PSD manipulado que pide un campo \\\"length\\\" grande en la cabecera pero no contiene suficientes datos de respaldo, el bucle en \\\"length\\\" consumir\u00eda una gran cantidad de recursos de CPU, ya que el bucle no contiene ning\u00fan chequeo EOF.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"baseScore\":7.1},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-834\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:imagemagick:imagemagick:7.0.7-0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"ACD6A151-47EB-4305-B4CB-F9003BC2E5DE\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:14.04:*:*:*:esm:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"815D70A8-47D3-459C-A32C-9FEACA0659D1\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:16.04:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F7016A2A-8365-4F1A-89A2-7A19F2BCAE5B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:17.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9070C9D8-A14A-467F-8253-33B966C16886\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:18.04:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"23A7C53F-B80F-4E6A-AFA9-58EEA84BE11D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"07B237A9-69A3-4A9C-9DA0-4E06BD37AE73\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/04a567494786d5bb50894fc8bb8fea0cf496bea8\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/f68a98a9d385838a1c73ec960a14102949940a64\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/714\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00015.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/09/msg00007.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-07\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.