CVE-2017-14222 (GCVE-0-2017-14222)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-09-09 01:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 19:20
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
In libavformat/mov.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3, a DoS in read_tfra() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU and memory consumption. When a crafted MOV file, which claims a large "item_count" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop would consume huge CPU and memory resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100701 | vdb-entryx_refsource_BID |
| https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_DEBIAN |
Date Public
2017-09-08 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T19:20:41.272Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "100701",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100701"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772839c5e1de2855d126bf74ff16d13382"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3996",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-09-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In libavformat/mov.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3, a DoS in read_tfra() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU and memory consumption. When a crafted MOV file, which claims a large \"item_count\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop would consume huge CPU and memory resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2017-11-03T18:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "100701",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100701"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772839c5e1de2855d126bf74ff16d13382"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3996",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-14222",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In libavformat/mov.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3, a DoS in read_tfra() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU and memory consumption. When a crafted MOV file, which claims a large \"item_count\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop would consume huge CPU and memory resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "100701",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100701"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772839c5e1de2855d126bf74ff16d13382",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772839c5e1de2855d126bf74ff16d13382"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3996",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-14222",
"datePublished": "2017-09-09T01:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2017-09-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T19:20:41.272Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2017-14222",
"date": "2026-09-16",
"epss": "0.02396",
"percentile": "0.83159"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:ffmpeg:ffmpeg:3.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"A97A44A7-DFB8-4DA8-8A4A-DBC1FF255D9A\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In libavformat/mov.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3, a DoS in read_tfra() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU and memory consumption. When a crafted MOV file, which claims a large \\\"item_count\\\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop would consume huge CPU and memory resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"En libavformat/mov.c en FFmpeg 3.3.3, una denegaci\\u00f3n de servicio en read_tfra() debido a una falta de comprobaci\\u00f3n EOE (End of File) podr\\u00eda provocar un gran consumo de CPU y memoria. Cuando se proporciona un archivo MOV manipulado, que reclama un gran campo \\\"item_count\\\" en el encabezado pero que no contiene datos de respaldo suficientes, el bucle consumir\\u00eda una gran cantidad de recursos de CPU y de memoria, ya que no existe una comprobaci\\u00f3n EOF dentro del bucle.\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2017-14222",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:12:21.420",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C\", \"baseScore\": 7.1, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"COMPLETE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 6.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": true}]}",
"published": "2017-09-09T01:29:02.737",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100701\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772839c5e1de2855d126bf74ff16d13382\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100701\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772839c5e1de2855d126bf74ff16d13382\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-834\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-14222\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2017-09-09T01:29:02.737\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-13T00:24:29.033\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In libavformat/mov.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3, a DoS in read_tfra() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU and memory consumption. When a crafted MOV file, which claims a large \\\"item_count\\\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop would consume huge CPU and memory resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En libavformat/mov.c en FFmpeg 3.3.3, una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio en read_tfra() debido a una falta de comprobaci\u00f3n EOE (End of File) podr\u00eda provocar un gran consumo de CPU y memoria. Cuando se proporciona un archivo MOV manipulado, que reclama un gran campo \\\"item_count\\\" en el encabezado pero que no contiene datos de respaldo suficientes, el bucle consumir\u00eda una gran cantidad de recursos de CPU y de memoria, ya que no existe una comprobaci\u00f3n EOF dentro del bucle.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C\",\"baseScore\":7.1,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-834\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ffmpeg:ffmpeg:3.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A97A44A7-DFB8-4DA8-8A4A-DBC1FF255D9A\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100701\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772839c5e1de2855d126bf74ff16d13382\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100701\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/9cb4eb772839c5e1de2855d126bf74ff16d13382\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-05T23:51:47Z",
"cve": "CVE-2017-14222",
"id": "CVE-2017-14222",
"initial_release_date": "2023-02-15T04:39:42Z",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "348",
"product_status:recommended": "701",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2017-14222",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2017-14222.json",
"version": "14"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…