CVE-2017-16636 (GCVE-0-2017-16636)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-11-06 22:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 20:27- n/a
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T20:27:04.305Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2000"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-11-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Bludit v1.5.2 and v2.0.1, an XSS vulnerability is located in the new page, new category, and edit post function body message context. Remote attackers are able to bypass the basic editor validation to trigger cross site scripting. The XSS is persistent and the request method to inject via editor is GET. To save the editor context, the followup POST method request must be processed to perform the attack via the application side. The basic validation of the editor does not allow injecting script codes and blocks the context. Attackers can inject the code by using an editor tag that is not recognized by the basic validation. Thus allows a restricted user account to inject malicious script code to perform a persistent attack against higher privilege web-application user accounts."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2017-11-06T22:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2000"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-16636",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In Bludit v1.5.2 and v2.0.1, an XSS vulnerability is located in the new page, new category, and edit post function body message context. Remote attackers are able to bypass the basic editor validation to trigger cross site scripting. The XSS is persistent and the request method to inject via editor is GET. To save the editor context, the followup POST method request must be processed to perform the attack via the application side. The basic validation of the editor does not allow injecting script codes and blocks the context. Attackers can inject the code by using an editor tag that is not recognized by the basic validation. Thus allows a restricted user account to inject malicious script code to perform a persistent attack against higher privilege web-application user accounts."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2000",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2000"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-16636",
"datePublished": "2017-11-06T22:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2017-11-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T20:27:04.305Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2017-16636",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.00608",
"percentile": "0.49639"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bludit:bludit:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "40B340CA-98FF-4CCF-9FE3-C928576CCB77",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bludit:bludit:2.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "37B07315-A0FC-4855-BBA5-052E1A839E7E",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Bludit v1.5.2 and v2.0.1, an XSS vulnerability is located in the new page, new category, and edit post function body message context. Remote attackers are able to bypass the basic editor validation to trigger cross site scripting. The XSS is persistent and the request method to inject via editor is GET. To save the editor context, the followup POST method request must be processed to perform the attack via the application side. The basic validation of the editor does not allow injecting script codes and blocks the context. Attackers can inject the code by using an editor tag that is not recognized by the basic validation. Thus allows a restricted user account to inject malicious script code to perform a persistent attack against higher privilege web-application user accounts."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En Bludit v1.5.2 y v2.0.1, una vulnerabilidad de XSS se localiza en el contexto del mensaje de cuerpo new page, new category y edit post. Los atacantes remotos son capaces de omitir la validaci\u00f3n b\u00e1sica del editor para desencadenar Cross-Site Scripting. El XSS es persistente y el m\u00e9todo de petici\u00f3n que se debe emplear para inyectar a trav\u00e9s del editor es GET. Para guardar el contexto del editor, la petici\u00f3n de m\u00e9todo POST de seguimiento debe ser procesada para realizar el ataque mediante el lado de la aplicaci\u00f3n. La validaci\u00f3n b\u00e1sica del editor no permite la inyecci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo script y bloquea el contexto. Los atacantes pueden inyectar el c\u00f3digo mediante el uso de un editor de etiquetas que o\u00a1no est\u00e1 reconocido por la validaci\u00f3n b\u00e1sica. Esto permitir\u00eda que una cuenta de usuario restringida inyecte c\u00f3digo script malicioso para realizar un ataque persistente contra cuentas de usuario con mayores privilegios basados en web."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2017-16636",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:16:43.773",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 6.8,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
"impactScore": 2.7,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2017-11-06T22:29:00.460",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2000"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2000"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bludit:bludit:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "40B340CA-98FF-4CCF-9FE3-C928576CCB77",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bludit:bludit:2.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "37B07315-A0FC-4855-BBA5-052E1A839E7E",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Bludit v1.5.2 and v2.0.1, an XSS vulnerability is located in the new page, new category, and edit post function body message context. Remote attackers are able to bypass the basic editor validation to trigger cross site scripting. The XSS is persistent and the request method to inject via editor is GET. To save the editor context, the followup POST method request must be processed to perform the attack via the application side. The basic validation of the editor does not allow injecting script codes and blocks the context. Attackers can inject the code by using an editor tag that is not recognized by the basic validation. Thus allows a restricted user account to inject malicious script code to perform a persistent attack against higher privilege web-application user accounts."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En Bludit v1.5.2 y v2.0.1, una vulnerabilidad de XSS se localiza en el contexto del mensaje de cuerpo new page, new category y edit post. Los atacantes remotos son capaces de omitir la validaci\u00f3n b\u00e1sica del editor para desencadenar Cross-Site Scripting. El XSS es persistente y el m\u00e9todo de petici\u00f3n que se debe emplear para inyectar a trav\u00e9s del editor es GET. Para guardar el contexto del editor, la petici\u00f3n de m\u00e9todo POST de seguimiento debe ser procesada para realizar el ataque mediante el lado de la aplicaci\u00f3n. La validaci\u00f3n b\u00e1sica del editor no permite la inyecci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo script y bloquea el contexto. Los atacantes pueden inyectar el c\u00f3digo mediante el uso de un editor de etiquetas que o\u00a1no est\u00e1 reconocido por la validaci\u00f3n b\u00e1sica. Esto permitir\u00eda que una cuenta de usuario restringida inyecte c\u00f3digo script malicioso para realizar un ataque persistente contra cuentas de usuario con mayores privilegios basados en web."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2017-16636",
"lastModified": "2026-05-13T00:24:29.033",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 6.8,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
"impactScore": 2.7,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2017-11-06T22:29:00.460",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2000"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=2000"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.