CVE-2017-5338 (GCVE-0-2017-5338)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-04-11 16:00 – Updated: 2017-04-11 15:57
VLAI?

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-04-11T15:57:02",
        "orgId": "79363d38-fa19-49d1-9214-5f28da3f3ac5",
        "shortName": "debian"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "79363d38-fa19-49d1-9214-5f28da3f3ac5",
    "assignerShortName": "debian",
    "cveId": "CVE-2017-5338",
    "datePublished": "2017-04-11T16:00:00",
    "dateRejected": "2017-04-11T15:57:02",
    "dateReserved": "2017-01-10T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2017-04-11T15:57:02",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2017-5338",
      "lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:49:23.747",
      "published": "2017-04-11T16:59:00.267",
      "sourceIdentifier": "security@debian.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-5338\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@debian.org\",\"published\":\"2017-04-11T16:59:00.267\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T02:49:23.747\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…