CVE-2020-15200 (GCVE-0-2020-15200)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-09-25 18:40 – Updated: 2024-08-04 13:08
VLAI?
Title
Segfault in Tensorflow
Summary
In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1.
Severity ?
5.9 (Medium)
CWE
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tensorflow | tensorflow |
Affected:
= 2.3.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T13:08:22.775Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "tensorflow",
"vendor": "tensorflow",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "= 2.3.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "{\"CWE-20\":\"Improper Input Validation\"}",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-122",
"description": "{\"CWE-122\":\"Heap-based Buffer Overflow\"}",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-09-25T18:40:15",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Segfault in Tensorflow",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2020-15200",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Segfault in Tensorflow"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "tensorflow",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "= 2.3.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "tensorflow"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "{\"CWE-20\":\"Improper Input Validation\"}"
}
]
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "{\"CWE-122\":\"Heap-based Buffer Overflow\"}"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2020-15200",
"datePublished": "2020-09-25T18:40:15",
"dateReserved": "2020-06-25T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T13:08:22.775Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:google:tensorflow:2.3.0:*:*:*:-:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"D0A7B69E-9388-48F0-B744-49453EBAF5D5\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"En Tensorflow anteriores a la versi\\u00f3n 2.3.1, la implementaci\\u00f3n de \\\"RaggedCountSparseOutput\\\" no comprueba que los argumentos de entrada formen un tensor irregular v\\u00e1lido.\u0026#xa0;En particular, no existe comprobaci\\u00f3n de que los valores en el tensor \\\"splits\\\" generen una partici\\u00f3n v\\u00e1lida del tensor \\\"values\\\".\u0026#xa0;Por lo tanto, el c\\u00f3digo establece las condiciones para causar un desbordamiento del b\\u00fafer de la pila.\u0026#xa0;Un \\\"BatchedMap\\\" es equivalente a un vector donde cada elemento es un mapa de hash.\u0026#xa0;Sin embargo, si el primer elemento de \\\"splits_values\\\" no es 0, \\\"batch_idx\\\" nunca ser\\u00e1 1, por lo que no habr\\u00e1 un hashmap en el \\u00edndice 0 en \\\"per_batch_counts\\\".\u0026#xa0;Intentar acceder a eso en el c\\u00f3digo de usuario resulta en un fallo de segmentaci\\u00f3n.\u0026#xa0;El problema es parcheado en el commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 y es publicado en TensorFlow versi\\u00f3n 2.3.1\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2020-15200",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:05:04.157",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 3.6}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
"published": "2020-09-25T19:15:15.260",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-20\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-122\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-787\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2020-15200\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2020-09-25T19:15:15.260\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T05:05:04.157\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En Tensorflow anteriores a la versi\u00f3n 2.3.1, la implementaci\u00f3n de \\\"RaggedCountSparseOutput\\\" no comprueba que los argumentos de entrada formen un tensor irregular v\u00e1lido.\u0026#xa0;En particular, no existe comprobaci\u00f3n de que los valores en el tensor \\\"splits\\\" generen una partici\u00f3n v\u00e1lida del tensor \\\"values\\\".\u0026#xa0;Por lo tanto, el c\u00f3digo establece las condiciones para causar un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer de la pila.\u0026#xa0;Un \\\"BatchedMap\\\" es equivalente a un vector donde cada elemento es un mapa de hash.\u0026#xa0;Sin embargo, si el primer elemento de \\\"splits_values\\\" no es 0, \\\"batch_idx\\\" nunca ser\u00e1 1, por lo que no habr\u00e1 un hashmap en el \u00edndice 0 en \\\"per_batch_counts\\\".\u0026#xa0;Intentar acceder a eso en el c\u00f3digo de usuario resulta en un fallo de segmentaci\u00f3n.\u0026#xa0;El problema es parcheado en el commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 y es publicado en TensorFlow versi\u00f3n 2.3.1\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-122\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:google:tensorflow:2.3.0:*:*:*:-:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D0A7B69E-9388-48F0-B744-49453EBAF5D5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…