CVE-2021-24484 (GCVE-0-2021-24484)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-08-02 10:32 – Updated: 2024-08-03 19:35
VLAI?
Title
Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking < 2.6.7 - Authenticated Blind SQL Injections
Summary
The get_reports() function in the Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking WordPress plugin before 2.6.7 did not use whitelist or validate the orderby parameter before using it in SQL statements passed to the get_results() DB calls, leading to SQL injection issues in the admin dashboard
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-89 - SQL Injection
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ays Pro | Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking |
Affected:
2.6.7 , < 2.6.7
(custom)
|
Credits
To Quang Duong
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T19:35:19.550Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9ce0153d-4a8b-4215-b6b6-15ca68c4f52c"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking",
"vendor": "Ays Pro",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.6.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "To Quang Duong"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The get_reports() function in the Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking WordPress plugin before 2.6.7 did not use whitelist or validate the orderby parameter before using it in SQL statements passed to the get_results() DB calls, leading to SQL injection issues in the admin dashboard"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 SQL Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-08-02T10:32:23",
"orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"shortName": "WPScan"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9ce0153d-4a8b-4215-b6b6-15ca68c4f52c"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking \u003c 2.6.7 - Authenticated Blind SQL Injections",
"x_generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-24484",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking \u003c 2.6.7 - Authenticated Blind SQL Injections"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "2.6.7",
"version_value": "2.6.7"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Ays Pro"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "To Quang Duong"
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The get_reports() function in the Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking WordPress plugin before 2.6.7 did not use whitelist or validate the orderby parameter before using it in SQL statements passed to the get_results() DB calls, leading to SQL injection issues in the admin dashboard"
}
]
},
"generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-89 SQL Injection"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9ce0153d-4a8b-4215-b6b6-15ca68c4f52c",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9ce0153d-4a8b-4215-b6b6-15ca68c4f52c"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"assignerShortName": "WPScan",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-24484",
"datePublished": "2021-08-02T10:32:23",
"dateReserved": "2021-01-14T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T19:35:19.550Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:ays-pro:secure_copy_content_protection_and_content_locking:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"2.6.7\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"8002576B-CA34-4FC5-9619-E590EB6EFB22\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The get_reports() function in the Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking WordPress plugin before 2.6.7 did not use whitelist or validate the orderby parameter before using it in SQL statements passed to the get_results() DB calls, leading to SQL injection issues in the admin dashboard\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"La funci\\u00f3n get_reports() del plugin de WordPress Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking versiones anteriores a 2.6.7, no usaba la lista blanca o comprobaba el par\\u00e1metro orderby antes de usarlo en las sentencias SQL pasadas a las llamadas a la base de datos get_results(), conllevando a problemas de inyecci\\u00f3n SQL en el panel de administraci\\u00f3n\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2021-24484",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:53:09.483",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 7.2, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 1.2, \"impactScore\": 5.9}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"SINGLE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.0, \"impactScore\": 6.4, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
"published": "2021-08-02T11:15:10.777",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9ce0153d-4a8b-4215-b6b6-15ca68c4f52c\", \"source\": \"contact@wpscan.com\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9ce0153d-4a8b-4215-b6b6-15ca68c4f52c\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"contact@wpscan.com\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-89\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-24484\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"contact@wpscan.com\",\"published\":\"2021-08-02T11:15:10.777\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T05:53:09.483\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The get_reports() function in the Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking WordPress plugin before 2.6.7 did not use whitelist or validate the orderby parameter before using it in SQL statements passed to the get_results() DB calls, leading to SQL injection issues in the admin dashboard\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La funci\u00f3n get_reports() del plugin de WordPress Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking versiones anteriores a 2.6.7, no usaba la lista blanca o comprobaba el par\u00e1metro orderby antes de usarlo en las sentencias SQL pasadas a las llamadas a la base de datos get_results(), conllevando a problemas de inyecci\u00f3n SQL en el panel de administraci\u00f3n\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.2,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.2,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"SINGLE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"contact@wpscan.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-89\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ays-pro:secure_copy_content_protection_and_content_locking:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.6.7\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8002576B-CA34-4FC5-9619-E590EB6EFB22\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9ce0153d-4a8b-4215-b6b6-15ca68c4f52c\",\"source\":\"contact@wpscan.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9ce0153d-4a8b-4215-b6b6-15ca68c4f52c\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…