CVE-2022-28220 (GCVE-0-2022-28220)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-09-08 07:40 – Updated: 2024-08-03 05:48
VLAI?
Summary
Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-77 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache James |
Affected:
Apache James , ≤ 3.6.2
(custom)
|
Credits
Apache James PMC would like to thanks Benoit TELLIER for this report, and Fabian Ising for his support.
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T05:48:37.476Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20220919 CVE-2022-28220: STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Apache James",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.6.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Apache James",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Apache James PMC would like to thanks Benoit TELLIER for this report, and Fabian Ising for his support."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"other": "This can result in Man-in -the-middle command injection attacks, leading potentially to leakage of sensible information like user credentials. Exploit in IMAP requires a local account but SMTP exploit does not. Data integrity could be compromised in POP3."
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "CWE-77 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-09-20T11:06:21",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20220919 CVE-2022-28220: STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1"
}
],
"source": {
"defect": [
"JAMES-1862"
],
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to Apache James 3.7.1 or Apache James 3.6.3."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
"ID": "CVE-2022-28220",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Apache James",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_name": "Apache James",
"version_value": "3.6.2"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_name": "Apache James",
"version_value": "3.7.0 +1"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Apache James PMC would like to thanks Benoit TELLIER for this report, and Fabian Ising for his support."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": [
{
"other": "This can result in Man-in -the-middle command injection attacks, leading potentially to leakage of sensible information like user credentials. Exploit in IMAP requires a local account but SMTP exploit does not. Data integrity could be compromised in POP3."
}
],
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-77 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20220919 CVE-2022-28220: STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1"
}
]
},
"source": {
"defect": [
"JAMES-1862"
],
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to Apache James 3.7.1 or Apache James 3.6.3."
}
]
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-28220",
"datePublished": "2022-09-08T07:40:09",
"dateReserved": "2022-03-30T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T05:48:37.476Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apache:james:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"3.6.2\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"423D85DB-E258-4B34-B941-99C4458273E6\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apache:james:3.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"7D32CBE3-3A1D-4D8F-8C91-E127FAB55BFF\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Apache James versiones anteriores a 3.6.3 y 3.7.1, es vulnerable a un ataque de almacenamiento en b\\u00fafer que depende del uso del comando STARTTLS.\u0026#xa0;La correcci\\u00f3n de CVE-2021-38542, que resolvi\\u00f3 un problema similar de Apache James versi\\u00f3n 3.6.1, est\\u00e1 sujeta a un diferencial de analizador y no toma en cuenta las peticiones simult\\u00e1neas\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2022-28220",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:56:58.570",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}",
"published": "2022-09-08T08:15:07.813",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1\", \"source\": \"security@apache.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html\", \"source\": \"security@apache.org\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Release Notes\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Release Notes\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security@apache.org\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-77\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-77\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-28220\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2022-09-08T08:15:07.813\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:56:58.570\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Apache James versiones anteriores a 3.6.3 y 3.7.1, es vulnerable a un ataque de almacenamiento en b\u00fafer que depende del uso del comando STARTTLS.\u0026#xa0;La correcci\u00f3n de CVE-2021-38542, que resolvi\u00f3 un problema similar de Apache James versi\u00f3n 3.6.1, est\u00e1 sujeta a un diferencial de analizador y no toma en cuenta las peticiones simult\u00e1neas\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-77\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-77\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:james:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"3.6.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"423D85DB-E258-4B34-B941-99C4458273E6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:james:3.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7D32CBE3-3A1D-4D8F-8C91-E127FAB55BFF\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Release Notes\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Release Notes\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…