cve-2022-28220
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-09-08 07:40
Modified
2024-08-03 05:48
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
security@apache.org | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
security@apache.org | https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html | Patch, Release Notes, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html | Patch, Release Notes, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
▼ | Apache Software Foundation | Apache James |
Version: Apache James < |
|
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T05:48:37.476Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20220919 CVE-2022-28220: STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "Apache James", "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation", "versions": [ { "lessThanOrEqual": "3.6.2", "status": "affected", "version": "Apache James", "versionType": "custom" } ] } ], "credits": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Apache James PMC would like to thanks Benoit TELLIER for this report, and Fabian Ising for his support." } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests." } ], "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "other": "This can result in Man-in -the-middle command injection attacks, leading potentially to leakage of sensible information like user credentials. Exploit in IMAP requires a local account but SMTP exploit does not. Data integrity could be compromised in POP3." }, "type": "unknown" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-77", "description": "CWE-77 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2022-09-20T11:06:21", "orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09", "shortName": "apache" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20220919 CVE-2022-28220: STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1" } ], "source": { "defect": [ "JAMES-1862" ], "discovery": "UNKNOWN" }, "title": "STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES", "workarounds": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Upgrade to Apache James 3.7.1 or Apache James 3.6.3." } ], "x_generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9" }, "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org", "ID": "CVE-2022-28220", "STATE": "PUBLIC", "TITLE": "STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Apache James", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "\u003c=", "version_name": "Apache James", "version_value": "3.6.2" }, { "version_affected": "\u003c=", "version_name": "Apache James", "version_value": "3.7.0 +1" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation" } ] } }, "credit": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Apache James PMC would like to thanks Benoit TELLIER for this report, and Fabian Ising for his support." } ], "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests." } ] }, "generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9" }, "impact": [ { "other": "This can result in Man-in -the-middle command injection attacks, leading potentially to leakage of sensible information like user credentials. Exploit in IMAP requires a local account but SMTP exploit does not. Data integrity could be compromised in POP3." } ], "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-77 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20220919 CVE-2022-28220: STARTTLS command injection in Apache JAMES", "refsource": "MLIST", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1" } ] }, "source": { "defect": [ "JAMES-1862" ], "discovery": "UNKNOWN" }, "work_around": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Upgrade to Apache James 3.7.1 or Apache James 3.6.3." } ] } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09", "assignerShortName": "apache", "cveId": "CVE-2022-28220", "datePublished": "2022-09-08T07:40:09", "dateReserved": "2022-03-30T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T05:48:37.476Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "fkie_nvd": { "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apache:james:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"3.6.2\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"423D85DB-E258-4B34-B941-99C4458273E6\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apache:james:3.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"7D32CBE3-3A1D-4D8F-8C91-E127FAB55BFF\"}]}]}]", "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Apache James versiones anteriores a 3.6.3 y 3.7.1, es vulnerable a un ataque de almacenamiento en b\\u00fafer que depende del uso del comando STARTTLS.\u0026#xa0;La correcci\\u00f3n de CVE-2021-38542, que resolvi\\u00f3 un problema similar de Apache James versi\\u00f3n 3.6.1, est\\u00e1 sujeta a un diferencial de analizador y no toma en cuenta las peticiones simult\\u00e1neas\"}]", "id": "CVE-2022-28220", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:56:58.570", "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}", "published": "2022-09-08T08:15:07.813", "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1\", \"source\": \"security@apache.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html\", \"source\": \"security@apache.org\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Release Notes\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Release Notes\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}]", "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security@apache.org\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-77\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-77\"}]}]" }, "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-28220\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2022-09-08T08:15:07.813\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:56:58.570\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Apache James prior to release 3.6.3 and 3.7.1 is vulnerable to a buffering attack relying on the use of the STARTTLS command. Fix of CVE-2021-38542, which solved similar problem fron Apache James 3.6.1, is subject to a parser differential and do not take into account concurrent requests.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Apache James versiones anteriores a 3.6.3 y 3.7.1, es vulnerable a un ataque de almacenamiento en b\u00fafer que depende del uso del comando STARTTLS.\u0026#xa0;La correcci\u00f3n de CVE-2021-38542, que resolvi\u00f3 un problema similar de Apache James versi\u00f3n 3.6.1, est\u00e1 sujeta a un diferencial de analizador y no toma en cuenta las peticiones simult\u00e1neas\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-77\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-77\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:james:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"3.6.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"423D85DB-E258-4B34-B941-99C4458273E6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:james:3.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7D32CBE3-3A1D-4D8F-8C91-E127FAB55BFF\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Release Notes\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/20/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://james.apache.org/james/update/2022/08/26/james-3.7.1.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Release Notes\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.