CVE-2022-35936 (GCVE-0-2022-35936)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-08-05 12:55 – Updated: 2025-04-22 17:42
VLAI?
Summary
Ethermint is an Ethereum library. In Ethermint running versions before `v0.17.2`, the contract `selfdestruct` invocation permanently removes the corresponding bytecode from the internal database storage. However, due to a bug in the `DeleteAccount`function, all contracts that used the identical bytecode (i.e shared the same `CodeHash`) will also stop working once one contract invokes `selfdestruct`, even though the other contracts did not invoke the `selfdestruct` OPCODE. This vulnerability has been patched in Ethermint version v0.18.0. The patch has state machine-breaking changes for applications using Ethermint, so a coordinated upgrade procedure is required. A workaround is available. If a contract is subject to DoS due to this issue, the user can redeploy the same contract, i.e. with identical bytecode, so that the original contract's code is recovered. The new contract deployment restores the `bytecode hash -> bytecode` entry in the internal state.
Severity ?
8.2 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
CWE
  • CWE-668 - Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
evmos ethermint Affected: <= 0.17.2
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T09:51:59.105Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2022-35936",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-04-22T15:39:54.888649Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-04-22T17:42:50.952Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "ethermint",
          "vendor": "evmos",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c= 0.17.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Ethermint is an Ethereum library. In Ethermint running versions before `v0.17.2`, the contract `selfdestruct` invocation permanently removes the corresponding bytecode from the internal database storage. However, due to a bug in the `DeleteAccount`function, all contracts that used the identical bytecode (i.e shared the same `CodeHash`) will also stop working once one contract invokes `selfdestruct`, even though the other contracts did not invoke the `selfdestruct` OPCODE. This vulnerability has been patched in Ethermint version v0.18.0. The patch has state machine-breaking changes for applications using Ethermint, so a coordinated upgrade procedure is required. A workaround is available. If a contract is subject to DoS due to this issue, the user can redeploy the same contract, i.e. with identical bytecode, so that the original contract\u0027s code is recovered. The new contract deployment restores the `bytecode hash -\u003e bytecode` entry in the internal state."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.2,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-668",
              "description": "CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-08-05T12:55:11.000Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Ethermint DoS through Unintended Contract Selfdestruct",
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2022-35936",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC",
          "TITLE": "Ethermint DoS through Unintended Contract Selfdestruct"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "ethermint",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "\u003c= 0.17.2"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "evmos"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Ethermint is an Ethereum library. In Ethermint running versions before `v0.17.2`, the contract `selfdestruct` invocation permanently removes the corresponding bytecode from the internal database storage. However, due to a bug in the `DeleteAccount`function, all contracts that used the identical bytecode (i.e shared the same `CodeHash`) will also stop working once one contract invokes `selfdestruct`, even though the other contracts did not invoke the `selfdestruct` OPCODE. This vulnerability has been patched in Ethermint version v0.18.0. The patch has state machine-breaking changes for applications using Ethermint, so a coordinated upgrade procedure is required. A workaround is available. If a contract is subject to DoS due to this issue, the user can redeploy the same contract, i.e. with identical bytecode, so that the original contract\u0027s code is recovered. The new contract deployment restores the `bytecode hash -\u003e bytecode` entry in the internal state."
            }
          ]
        },
        "impact": {
          "cvss": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.2,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203"
            }
          ]
        },
        "source": {
          "advisory": "GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg",
          "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-35936",
    "datePublished": "2022-08-05T12:55:11.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2022-07-15T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-04-22T17:42:50.952Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:evmos:ethermint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"0.18.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"5715442E-55C7-4BFA-A571-0B2EEE375D93\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:kava:kava:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"0.18.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"A675E2F4-CA8D-4126-906B-B279839377C2\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:crypto:cronos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"0.7.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"7F1D7275-5477-4026-83F6-AFFA244561A8\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:evmos:evmos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"7.0.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"6F059647-951E-4EE7-A5F8-644353B214D4\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Ethermint is an Ethereum library. In Ethermint running versions before `v0.17.2`, the contract `selfdestruct` invocation permanently removes the corresponding bytecode from the internal database storage. However, due to a bug in the `DeleteAccount`function, all contracts that used the identical bytecode (i.e shared the same `CodeHash`) will also stop working once one contract invokes `selfdestruct`, even though the other contracts did not invoke the `selfdestruct` OPCODE. This vulnerability has been patched in Ethermint version v0.18.0. The patch has state machine-breaking changes for applications using Ethermint, so a coordinated upgrade procedure is required. A workaround is available. If a contract is subject to DoS due to this issue, the user can redeploy the same contract, i.e. with identical bytecode, so that the original contract\u0027s code is recovered. The new contract deployment restores the `bytecode hash -\u003e bytecode` entry in the internal state.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Ethermint es una biblioteca de Ethereum. En las versiones de Ethermint anteriores a \\\"v0.17.2\\\", la invocaci\\u00f3n del contrato \\\"selfdestruct\\\" elimina permanentemente el bytecode correspondiente del almacenamiento interno de la base de datos. Sin embargo, debido a un error en la funci\\u00f3n \\\"DeleteAccount\\\", todos los contratos que usaban el mismo bytecode (es decir, compart\\u00edan el mismo \\\"CodeHash\\\") tambi\\u00e9n dejar\\u00e1n de funcionar una vez que un contrato invoque \\\"selfdestruct\\\", aunque los dem\\u00e1s contratos no hayan invocado el OPCODE \\\"selfdestruct\\\". Esta vulnerabilidad ha sido parcheada en Ethermint versi\\u00f3n v0.18.0. El parche presenta cambios que rompen el estado de las aplicaciones que usan Ethermint, por lo que es requerido un procedimiento de actualizaci\\u00f3n coordinado. Se presenta una mitigaci\\u00f3n alternativa. Si un contrato es objeto de DoS debido a este problema, el usuario puede volver a desplegar el mismo contrato, es decir, con id\\u00e9ntico bytecode, de modo que sea recuperado el c\\u00f3digo del contrato original. El nuevo despliegue del contrato restaura la entrada \\\"bytecode hash -) bytecode\\\" en el estado interno\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2022-35936",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:12:00.103",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 8.2, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 4.2}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\", \"baseScore\": 5.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 1.4}]}",
      "published": "2022-08-05T13:15:08.137",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-668\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-35936\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2022-08-05T13:15:08.137\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T07:12:00.103\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Ethermint is an Ethereum library. In Ethermint running versions before `v0.17.2`, the contract `selfdestruct` invocation permanently removes the corresponding bytecode from the internal database storage. However, due to a bug in the `DeleteAccount`function, all contracts that used the identical bytecode (i.e shared the same `CodeHash`) will also stop working once one contract invokes `selfdestruct`, even though the other contracts did not invoke the `selfdestruct` OPCODE. This vulnerability has been patched in Ethermint version v0.18.0. The patch has state machine-breaking changes for applications using Ethermint, so a coordinated upgrade procedure is required. A workaround is available. If a contract is subject to DoS due to this issue, the user can redeploy the same contract, i.e. with identical bytecode, so that the original contract\u0027s code is recovered. The new contract deployment restores the `bytecode hash -\u003e bytecode` entry in the internal state.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Ethermint es una biblioteca de Ethereum. En las versiones de Ethermint anteriores a \\\"v0.17.2\\\", la invocaci\u00f3n del contrato \\\"selfdestruct\\\" elimina permanentemente el bytecode correspondiente del almacenamiento interno de la base de datos. Sin embargo, debido a un error en la funci\u00f3n \\\"DeleteAccount\\\", todos los contratos que usaban el mismo bytecode (es decir, compart\u00edan el mismo \\\"CodeHash\\\") tambi\u00e9n dejar\u00e1n de funcionar una vez que un contrato invoque \\\"selfdestruct\\\", aunque los dem\u00e1s contratos no hayan invocado el OPCODE \\\"selfdestruct\\\". Esta vulnerabilidad ha sido parcheada en Ethermint versi\u00f3n v0.18.0. El parche presenta cambios que rompen el estado de las aplicaciones que usan Ethermint, por lo que es requerido un procedimiento de actualizaci\u00f3n coordinado. Se presenta una mitigaci\u00f3n alternativa. Si un contrato es objeto de DoS debido a este problema, el usuario puede volver a desplegar el mismo contrato, es decir, con id\u00e9ntico bytecode, de modo que sea recuperado el c\u00f3digo del contrato original. El nuevo despliegue del contrato restaura la entrada \\\"bytecode hash -) bytecode\\\" en el estado interno\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.2,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":4.2},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-668\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:evmos:ethermint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.18.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5715442E-55C7-4BFA-A571-0B2EEE375D93\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:kava:kava:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.18.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A675E2F4-CA8D-4126-906B-B279839377C2\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:crypto:cronos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"0.7.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7F1D7275-5477-4026-83F6-AFFA244561A8\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:evmos:evmos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"7.0.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6F059647-951E-4EE7-A5F8-644353B214D4\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-03T09:51:59.105Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-35936\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-04-22T15:39:54.888649Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-22T15:39:56.757Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Ethermint DoS through Unintended Contract Selfdestruct\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.2, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"evmos\", \"product\": \"ethermint\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c= 0.17.2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Ethermint is an Ethereum library. In Ethermint running versions before `v0.17.2`, the contract `selfdestruct` invocation permanently removes the corresponding bytecode from the internal database storage. However, due to a bug in the `DeleteAccount`function, all contracts that used the identical bytecode (i.e shared the same `CodeHash`) will also stop working once one contract invokes `selfdestruct`, even though the other contracts did not invoke the `selfdestruct` OPCODE. This vulnerability has been patched in Ethermint version v0.18.0. The patch has state machine-breaking changes for applications using Ethermint, so a coordinated upgrade procedure is required. A workaround is available. If a contract is subject to DoS due to this issue, the user can redeploy the same contract, i.e. with identical bytecode, so that the original contract\u0027s code is recovered. The new contract deployment restores the `bytecode hash -\u003e bytecode` entry in the internal state.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-668\", \"description\": \"CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2022-08-05T12:55:11.000Z\"}, \"x_legacyV4Record\": {\"impact\": {\"cvss\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.2, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}, \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"affects\": {\"vendor\": {\"vendor_data\": [{\"product\": {\"product_data\": [{\"version\": {\"version_data\": [{\"version_value\": \"\u003c= 0.17.2\"}]}, \"product_name\": \"ethermint\"}]}, \"vendor_name\": \"evmos\"}]}}, \"data_type\": \"CVE\", \"references\": {\"reference_data\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/security/advisories/GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg\", \"refsource\": \"CONFIRM\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/commit/144741832007a26dbe950512acbda4ed95b2a451\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/blob/c9d42d667b753147977a725e98ed116c933c76cb/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L199-L203\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\"}]}, \"data_format\": \"MITRE\", \"description\": {\"description_data\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"Ethermint is an Ethereum library. In Ethermint running versions before `v0.17.2`, the contract `selfdestruct` invocation permanently removes the corresponding bytecode from the internal database storage. However, due to a bug in the `DeleteAccount`function, all contracts that used the identical bytecode (i.e shared the same `CodeHash`) will also stop working once one contract invokes `selfdestruct`, even though the other contracts did not invoke the `selfdestruct` OPCODE. This vulnerability has been patched in Ethermint version v0.18.0. The patch has state machine-breaking changes for applications using Ethermint, so a coordinated upgrade procedure is required. A workaround is available. If a contract is subject to DoS due to this issue, the user can redeploy the same contract, i.e. with identical bytecode, so that the original contract\u0027s code is recovered. The new contract deployment restores the `bytecode hash -\u003e bytecode` entry in the internal state.\"}]}, \"problemtype\": {\"problemtype_data\": [{\"description\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere\"}]}]}, \"data_version\": \"4.0\", \"CVE_data_meta\": {\"ID\": \"CVE-2022-35936\", \"STATE\": \"PUBLIC\", \"TITLE\": \"Ethermint DoS through Unintended Contract Selfdestruct\", \"ASSIGNER\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-35936\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-22T17:42:50.952Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-07-15T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2022-08-05T12:55:11.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.