cve-2023-4039
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-09-13 08:05
Modified
2024-08-02 07:17
Severity ?
4.8 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
GCC's-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64
References
arm-security@arm.comhttps://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64Exploit, Patch, Third Party Advisory
arm-security@arm.comhttps://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mfExploit, Patch, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Arm LtdArm GNU Toolchain
GNUGCC
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:17:11.837Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mf"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Arm GNU Toolchain",
          "vendor": "Arm Ltd",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All versions where option -fstack-protector is used"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "GCC",
          "vendor": "GNU",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All versions of GCC that target AArch64 when option -fstack-protector is used"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\nThe specific conditions where the stack-protector fails to give the desired level of protection are when:\n\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eusing GCC (all unpatched versions) targeting AArch64\u003c/li\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eand when the -fstack-protector option is used\u003c/li\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eand when the program uses C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or alloca()\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnd to be exploitable there must also be a prior vulnerability in the\n program such that an attacker can cause a buffer overflow in these \nlocal variables that overwrites saved register values in the stack.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The specific conditions where the stack-protector fails to give the desired level of protection are when:\n\n\n\n      *  using GCC (all unpatched versions) targeting AArch64\n\n      *  and when the -fstack-protector option is used\n\n      *  and when the program uses C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or alloca()\n\n\n\n\nAnd to be exploitable there must also be a prior vulnerability in the\n program such that an attacker can cause a buffer overflow in these \nlocal variables that overwrites saved register values in the stack.\n\n\n\n\n"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Tom Hebb from Meta Red Team X and Maria Markstedter from Azeria Labs"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2023-09-12T09:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e**DISPUTED** A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains \nthat target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer \noverflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application \nwithout this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies \nto C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using \nalloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized \nlocal variables.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe default behavior when the stack-protector \ndetects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in \ncontrolled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer \noverflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change \nprogram flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to\n go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "\n\n**DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains \nthat target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer \noverflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application \nwithout this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies \nto C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using \nalloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized \nlocal variables.\n\nThe default behavior when the stack-protector \ndetects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in \ncontrolled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer \noverflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change \nprogram flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to\n go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.\n\n\n\n\n\n"
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-693",
              "description": "CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-09-13T08:05:10.274Z",
        "orgId": "56a131ea-b967-4a0d-a41e-5f3549952846",
        "shortName": "Arm"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mf"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\nRecompile vulnerable code using an updated toolchain.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Recompile vulnerable code using an updated toolchain.\n\n\n"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "title": "GCC\u0027s-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      },
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "arm-security@arm.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2023-4039",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Arm GNU Toolchain",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "All versions of GCC that target AArch64 when option -fstack-protector is used"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "Arm Ltd"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "5.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "**DISPUTED** A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "GCC\u0027s-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "56a131ea-b967-4a0d-a41e-5f3549952846",
    "assignerShortName": "Arm",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-4039",
    "datePublished": "2023-09-13T08:05:10.274Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-08-01T10:38:03.032Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:17:11.837Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-4039\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"arm-security@arm.com\",\"published\":\"2023-09-13T09:15:15.690\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-08-02T08:15:14.993\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"arm-security@arm.com\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"\\n\\n**DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains \\nthat target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer \\noverflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application \\nwithout this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies \\nto C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using \\nalloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized \\nlocal variables.\\n\\nThe default behavior when the stack-protector \\ndetects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in \\ncontrolled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer \\noverflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change \\nprogram flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to\\n go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Una falla en la funci\u00f3n -fstack-protector en cadenas de herramientas basadas en GCC que apuntan a AArch64 permite a un atacante explotar un Desbordamiento de B\u00fafer existente en variables locales de tama\u00f1o din\u00e1mico en su aplicaci\u00f3n sin que esto sea detectado. Esta falla del protector de pila solo se aplica a variables locales de tama\u00f1o din\u00e1mico estilo C99 o aquellas creadas usando alloca(). El protector de pila funciona seg\u00fan lo previsto para variables locales de tama\u00f1o est\u00e1tico. El comportamiento predeterminado cuando el protector de pila detecta un desbordamiento es finalizar su aplicaci\u00f3n, lo que resulta en una p\u00e9rdida controlada de disponibilidad. Un atacante que pueda aprovechar un Desbordamiento del B\u00fafer sin activar el protector de pila podr\u00eda cambiar el control de flujo del programa para provocar una p\u00e9rdida incontrolada de disponibilidad o ir m\u00e1s all\u00e1 y afectar la confidencialidad o la integridad.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":4.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":2.5},{\"source\":\"arm-security@arm.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":4.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":2.5}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]},{\"source\":\"arm-security@arm.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-693\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:gnu:gcc:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2023-09-12\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C8373A25-594D-4F3F-981B-0D02056992FC\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64\",\"source\":\"arm-security@arm.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mf\",\"source\":\"arm-security@arm.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.