CVE-2023-53760 (GCVE-0-2023-53760)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-08 01:19 – Updated: 2025-12-08 01:19
VLAI?
Title
scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &hwq->cq_lock deadlock issue
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &hwq->cq_lock deadlock issue
When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting
for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and
also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated
when &hwq->cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to
resolve the deadlock issue.
[name:lockdep&]WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[name:lockdep&]--------------------------------
[name:lockdep&]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[name:lockdep&]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffffff8028444600 (&hwq->cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
[name:lockdep&]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
_raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec
handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8
handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0
generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c
gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134
call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74
do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4
el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78
<snip>
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&hwq->cq_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&hwq->cq_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:
[name:lockdep&]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 PID: 260 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Tainted: G S W OE
6.1.17-mainline-android14-2-g277223301adb #1
Workqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x10c/0x160
show_stack+0x20/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xd8
dump_stack+0x20/0x60
print_usage_bug+0x584/0x76c
mark_lock_irq+0x488/0x510
mark_lock+0x1ec/0x25c
__lock_acquire+0x4d8/0xffc
lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
_raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
ufshcd_poll+0x68/0x1b0
ufshcd_transfer_req_compl+0x9c/0xc8
ufshcd_err_handler+0x3bc/0xea0
process_one_work+0x2f4/0x7e8
worker_thread+0x234/0x450
kthread+0x110/0x134
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2ce8c49c7b53e0a2258b833eeab16a6d78f732d1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ed975065c31c2a0372e13c19e8140b69814a98ba",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "948afc69615167a3c82430f99bfd046332b89912",
"status": "affected",
"version": "ed975065c31c2a0372e13c19e8140b69814a98ba",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.3",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.3.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.3.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.4",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.3.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix \u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock deadlock issue\n\nWhen ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting\nfor the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and\nalso in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated\nwhen \u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use\nufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to\nresolve the deadlock issue.\n\n[name:lockdep\u0026]WARNING: inconsistent lock state\n[name:lockdep\u0026]--------------------------------\n[name:lockdep\u0026]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -\u003e {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.\n[name:lockdep\u0026]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:\n ffffff8028444600 (\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:\nufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\n[name:lockdep\u0026]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:\n lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c\n _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c\n ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\n ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]\n __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec\n handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8\n handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0\n generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c\n gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134\n call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74\n do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4\n el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78\n\u003csnip\u003e\n\nPossible unsafe locking scenario:\n CPU0\n ----\n lock(\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock);\n \u003cInterrupt\u003e\n lock(\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock);\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:\n\n[name:lockdep\u0026]\n stack backtrace:\nCPU: 7 PID: 260 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Tainted: G S W OE\n6.1.17-mainline-android14-2-g277223301adb #1\nWorkqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler\n\n Call trace:\n dump_backtrace+0x10c/0x160\n show_stack+0x20/0x30\n dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xd8\n dump_stack+0x20/0x60\n print_usage_bug+0x584/0x76c\n mark_lock_irq+0x488/0x510\n mark_lock+0x1ec/0x25c\n __lock_acquire+0x4d8/0xffc\n lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c\n _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c\n ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\n ufshcd_poll+0x68/0x1b0\n ufshcd_transfer_req_compl+0x9c/0xc8\n ufshcd_err_handler+0x3bc/0xea0\n process_one_work+0x2f4/0x7e8\n worker_thread+0x234/0x450\n kthread+0x110/0x134\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-08T01:19:21.489Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ce8c49c7b53e0a2258b833eeab16a6d78f732d1"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/948afc69615167a3c82430f99bfd046332b89912"
}
],
"title": "scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix \u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock deadlock issue",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-53760",
"datePublished": "2025-12-08T01:19:21.489Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-08T01:18:04.280Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-08T01:19:21.489Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-53760\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2025-12-08T02:15:51.783\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-12-08T18:26:19.900\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nscsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix \u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock deadlock issue\\n\\nWhen ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting\\nfor the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and\\nalso in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated\\nwhen \u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use\\nufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to\\nresolve the deadlock issue.\\n\\n[name:lockdep\u0026]WARNING: inconsistent lock state\\n[name:lockdep\u0026]--------------------------------\\n[name:lockdep\u0026]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -\u003e {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.\\n[name:lockdep\u0026]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:\\n ffffff8028444600 (\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:\\nufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\\n[name:lockdep\u0026]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:\\n lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c\\n _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c\\n ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\\n ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]\\n __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec\\n handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8\\n handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0\\n generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c\\n gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134\\n call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74\\n do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4\\n el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78\\n\u003csnip\u003e\\n\\nPossible unsafe locking scenario:\\n CPU0\\n ----\\n lock(\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock);\\n \u003cInterrupt\u003e\\n lock(\u0026hwq-\u003ecq_lock);\\n *** DEADLOCK ***\\n2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:\\n\\n[name:lockdep\u0026]\\n stack backtrace:\\nCPU: 7 PID: 260 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Tainted: G S W OE\\n6.1.17-mainline-android14-2-g277223301adb #1\\nWorkqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler\\n\\n Call trace:\\n dump_backtrace+0x10c/0x160\\n show_stack+0x20/0x30\\n dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xd8\\n dump_stack+0x20/0x60\\n print_usage_bug+0x584/0x76c\\n mark_lock_irq+0x488/0x510\\n mark_lock+0x1ec/0x25c\\n __lock_acquire+0x4d8/0xffc\\n lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c\\n _raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c\\n ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0\\n ufshcd_poll+0x68/0x1b0\\n ufshcd_transfer_req_compl+0x9c/0xc8\\n ufshcd_err_handler+0x3bc/0xea0\\n process_one_work+0x2f4/0x7e8\\n worker_thread+0x234/0x450\\n kthread+0x110/0x134\\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ce8c49c7b53e0a2258b833eeab16a6d78f732d1\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/948afc69615167a3c82430f99bfd046332b89912\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…