cve-2023-6237
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-04-25 06:27
Modified
2024-11-01 14:28
Severity ?
Summary
Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys
Impacted products
OpenSSLOpenSSL
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T08:21:18.096Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240115.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "3.0.13 git commit",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/18c02492138d1eb8b6548cb26e7b625fb2414a2a"
          },
          {
            "name": "3.1.5 git commit",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a830f551557d3d66a84bbb18a5b889c640c36294"
          },
          {
            "name": "3.2.1 git commit",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0b0f7abfb37350794a4b8960fafc292cd5d1b84d"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/11/1"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240531-0007/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 5.9,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2023-6237",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-08-20T14:44:52.382969Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-11-01T14:28:51.338Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.0.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.1.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.2.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.2.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "OSS-Fuzz"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Tomas Mraz"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take\u003cbr\u003ea long time.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()\u003cbr\u003eto check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that\u003cbr\u003eis being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead\u003cbr\u003eto a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhen function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,\u003cbr\u003ea computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.\u003cbr\u003eFor valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this\u003cbr\u003ecomputation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,\u003cbr\u003ethen this computation would take a long time.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key\u003cbr\u003eobtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service\u003cbr\u003eattack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL\u003cbr\u003efunctions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line\u003cbr\u003eapplication. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used\u003cbr\u003ewith the \u0027-pubin\u0027 and \u0027-check\u0027 options on untrusted data.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take\na long time.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nto check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that\nis being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead\nto a Denial of Service.\n\nWhen function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,\na computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.\nFor valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this\ncomputation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,\nthen this computation would take a long time.\n\nAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key\nobtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service\nattack.\n\nThe function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL\nfunctions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line\napplication. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used\nwith the \u0027-pubin\u0027 and \u0027-check\u0027 options on untrusted data.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Low"
            },
            "type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-606",
              "description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:56.955Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240115.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.0.13 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/18c02492138d1eb8b6548cb26e7b625fb2414a2a"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.1.5 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a830f551557d3d66a84bbb18a5b889c640c36294"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.2.1 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0b0f7abfb37350794a4b8960fafc292cd5d1b84d"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-6237",
    "datePublished": "2024-04-25T06:27:26.990Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-11-21T10:16:34.346Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-11-01T14:28:51.338Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-6237\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"published\":\"2024-04-25T07:15:45.270\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-01T15:35:06.920\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take\\na long time.\\n\\nImpact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()\\nto check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that\\nis being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead\\nto a Denial of Service.\\n\\nWhen function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,\\na computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.\\nFor valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this\\ncomputation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,\\nthen this computation would take a long time.\\n\\nAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key\\nobtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service\\nattack.\\n\\nThe function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL\\nfunctions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line\\napplication. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used\\nwith the \u0027-pubin\u0027 and \u0027-check\u0027 options on untrusted data.\\n\\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\\n\\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Resumen del problema: la comprobaci\u00f3n de claves p\u00fablicas RSA inv\u00e1lidas excesivamente largas puede llevar mucho tiempo. Resumen de impacto: las aplicaciones que utilizan la funci\u00f3n EVP_PKEY_public_check() para comprobar las claves p\u00fablicas RSA pueden experimentar grandes retrasos. Cuando la clave que se est\u00e1 verificando se obtuvo de una fuente que no es confiable, esto puede dar lugar a una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. Cuando se llama a la funci\u00f3n EVP_PKEY_public_check() en claves p\u00fablicas RSA, se realiza un c\u00e1lculo para confirmar que el m\u00f3dulo RSA, n, es compuesto. Para claves RSA v\u00e1lidas, n es un producto de dos o m\u00e1s n\u00fameros primos grandes y este c\u00e1lculo se completa r\u00e1pidamente. Sin embargo, si n es un n\u00famero primo demasiado grande, entonces este c\u00e1lculo llevar\u00eda mucho tiempo. Una aplicaci\u00f3n que llama a EVP_PKEY_public_check() y proporciona una clave RSA obtenida de una fuente que no es de confianza podr\u00eda ser vulnerable a un ataque de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. La funci\u00f3n EVP_PKEY_public_check() no se llama desde otras funciones de OpenSSL, sin embargo, se llama desde la aplicaci\u00f3n de l\u00ednea de comandos pkey de OpenSSL. Por esa raz\u00f3n, esa aplicaci\u00f3n tambi\u00e9n es vulnerable si se usa con las opciones \u0027-pubin\u0027 y \u0027-check\u0027 en datos que no son de confianza. La implementaci\u00f3n de OpenSSL SSL/TLS no se ve afectada por este problema. Los proveedores FIPS OpenSSL 3.0 y 3.1 se ven afectados por este problema.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-606\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0b0f7abfb37350794a4b8960fafc292cd5d1b84d\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/18c02492138d1eb8b6548cb26e7b625fb2414a2a\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a830f551557d3d66a84bbb18a5b889c640c36294\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240115.txt\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.