CVE-2024-32017 (GCVE-0-2024-32017)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-01 06:14 – Updated: 2025-02-13 17:52
VLAI?
Title
Buffer overflows in RIOT
Summary
RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the `gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()` function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent `strcpy()`. In detail, the length of the `_uri` string is checked instead of the length of the `_proxy` string. The `_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()` function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the `cep->req_etag` buffer that is `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX` bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that `optlen` becomes larger than `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX`, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE
  • CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
RIOT-OS RIOT Affected: <= 2023.10
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:o:riot-os:riot:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "riot",
            "vendor": "riot-os",
            "versions": [
              {
                "lessThanOrEqual": "2023.10",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "0",
                "versionType": "custom"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-32017",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-05-01T15:40:30.827808Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-06-06T17:13:05.084Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T01:59:50.860Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/3"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/7"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "RIOT",
          "vendor": "RIOT-OS",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c= 2023.10"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the `gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()` function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent `strcpy()`. In detail, the length of the `_uri` string is checked instead of the length of the `_proxy` string. The `_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()` function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the `cep-\u003ereq_etag` buffer that is `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX` bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that `optlen` becomes larger than `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX`, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 9.8,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-120",
              "description": "CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-06-10T17:07:46.933Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352"
        },
        {
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/3"
        },
        {
          "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/7"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Buffer overflows in RIOT"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-32017",
    "datePublished": "2024-05-01T06:14:01.531Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-04-09T15:29:35.936Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T17:52:04.049Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the `gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()` function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent `strcpy()`. In detail, the length of the `_uri` string is checked instead of the length of the `_proxy` string. The `_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()` function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the `cep-\u003ereq_etag` buffer that is `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX` bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that `optlen` becomes larger than `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX`, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"RIOT es un sistema operativo multiproceso en tiempo real que admite una variedad de dispositivos que suelen ser microcontroladores de 8, 16 y 32 bits. La verificaci\\u00f3n de tama\\u00f1o en la funci\\u00f3n `gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()` contiene un peque\\u00f1o error tipogr\\u00e1fico que puede provocar un desbordamiento del b\\u00fafer en el `strcpy()` posterior. En detalle, se verifica la longitud de la cadena `_uri` en lugar de la longitud de la cadena `_proxy`. La funci\\u00f3n `_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()` no implementa una verificaci\\u00f3n de tama\\u00f1o expl\\u00edcita antes de copiar datos al buffer `cep-\u0026gt;req_etag` que tiene una longitud de bytes `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX`. Si un atacante puede crear una entrada para que \\\"optlen\\\" sea m\\u00e1s grande que \\\"COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX\\\", puede provocar un desbordamiento del b\\u00fafer. Si la entrada anterior est\\u00e1 controlada por un atacante y cruza un l\\u00edmite de seguridad, el impacto de las vulnerabilidades de desbordamiento del b\\u00fafer podr\\u00eda variar desde denegaci\\u00f3n de servicio hasta ejecuci\\u00f3n de c\\u00f3digo arbitrario. Este problema a\\u00fan no se ha solucionado. Se recomienda a los usuarios que agreguen la verificaci\\u00f3n manual de los l\\u00edmites.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2024-32017",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T09:14:20.203",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 5.9}]}",
      "published": "2024-05-01T07:15:39.280",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/7\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/3\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/7\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/3\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-120\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-32017\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2024-05-01T07:15:39.280\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-09-04T19:37:00.870\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the `gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()` function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent `strcpy()`. In detail, the length of the `_uri` string is checked instead of the length of the `_proxy` string. The `_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()` function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the `cep-\u003ereq_etag` buffer that is `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX` bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that `optlen` becomes larger than `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX`, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"RIOT es un sistema operativo multiproceso en tiempo real que admite una variedad de dispositivos que suelen ser microcontroladores de 8, 16 y 32 bits. La verificaci\u00f3n de tama\u00f1o en la funci\u00f3n `gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()` contiene un peque\u00f1o error tipogr\u00e1fico que puede provocar un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer en el `strcpy()` posterior. En detalle, se verifica la longitud de la cadena `_uri` en lugar de la longitud de la cadena `_proxy`. La funci\u00f3n `_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()` no implementa una verificaci\u00f3n de tama\u00f1o expl\u00edcita antes de copiar datos al buffer `cep-\u0026gt;req_etag` que tiene una longitud de bytes `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX`. Si un atacante puede crear una entrada para que \\\"optlen\\\" sea m\u00e1s grande que \\\"COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX\\\", puede provocar un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer. Si la entrada anterior est\u00e1 controlada por un atacante y cruza un l\u00edmite de seguridad, el impacto de las vulnerabilidades de desbordamiento del b\u00fafer podr\u00eda variar desde denegaci\u00f3n de servicio hasta ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo arbitrario. Este problema a\u00fan no se ha solucionado. Se recomienda a los usuarios que agreguen la verificaci\u00f3n manual de los l\u00edmites.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":6.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-120\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:riot-os:riot:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"2024.01\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2817153B-248F-4852-9999-DA4891E5EB30\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/7\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/3\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Product\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Product\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Product\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Product\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/3\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/7\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-02T01:59:50.860Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-32017\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-05-01T15:40:30.827808Z\"}}}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:o:riot-os:riot:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"vendor\": \"riot-os\", \"product\": \"riot\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"versionType\": \"custom\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"2023.10\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-05-01T15:41:23.067Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Buffer overflows in RIOT\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"RIOT-OS\", \"product\": \"RIOT\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c= 2023.10\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/security/advisories/GHSA-v97j-w9m6-c4h3\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/dns.c#L319-L325\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/application_layer/gcoap/forward_proxy.c#L352\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/3\"}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/7\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the `gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()` function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent `strcpy()`. In detail, the length of the `_uri` string is checked instead of the length of the `_proxy` string. The `_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()` function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the `cep-\u003ereq_etag` buffer that is `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX` bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that `optlen` becomes larger than `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX`, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-120\", \"description\": \"CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-06-10T17:07:46.933Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-32017\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-13T17:52:04.049Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-04-09T15:29:35.936Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-05-01T06:14:01.531Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.