cve-2024-3596
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-07-09 12:02
Modified
2024-08-29 14:32
Severity ?
Summary
RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.
References
cret@cert.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4
cret@cert.orghttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/
cret@cert.orghttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865
cret@cert.orghttps://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf
cret@cert.orghttps://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014
cret@cert.orghttps://www.blastradius.fail/
Impacted products
IETFRFC
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:rfc:2865:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "rfc",
            "vendor": "ietf",
            "versions": [
              {
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "2865"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-3596",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-07-11T03:55:37.141738Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-07-24T20:18:28.202Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-29T14:32:14.851Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001/"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container",
        "x_generator": {
          "engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
        }
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "RFC",
          "vendor": "IETF",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2865"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Thanks to Sharon Goldberg, Miro Haller, Nadia Heninger, Mike Milano, Dan Shumow, Marc Stevens, and Adam Suhl who researched and reported this vulnerability"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-924 Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-07-09T14:08:23.145Z",
        "orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
        "shortName": "certcc"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail/"
        },
        {
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "VINCE 3.0.4",
        "env": "prod",
        "origin": "https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2024-3596"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
    "assignerShortName": "certcc",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-3596",
    "datePublished": "2024-07-09T12:02:53.001Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-04-10T15:09:45.391Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-29T14:32:14.851Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-3596\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"published\":\"2024-07-09T12:15:20.700\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-07-23T09:15:02.697\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El protocolo RADIUS seg\u00fan RFC 2865 es susceptible a ataques de falsificaci\u00f3n por parte de un atacante local que puede modificar cualquier respuesta v\u00e1lida (acceso-aceptaci\u00f3n, acceso-rechazo o acceso-desaf\u00edo) a cualquier otra respuesta utilizando un ataque de colisi\u00f3n de prefijo elegido contra la firma del autenticador de respuesta MD5. .\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.blastradius.fail/\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.