ghsa-3g8x-wqfp-q876
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-09 12:30
Modified
2024-07-23 09:30
Details

RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-3596"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-09T12:15:20Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.",
  "id": "GHSA-3g8x-wqfp-q876",
  "modified": "2024-07-23T09:30:39Z",
  "published": "2024-07-09T12:30:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3596"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.