GHSA-3G8X-WQFP-Q876

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-09 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 18:31
VLAI?
Details

RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-3596"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-354"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-09T12:15:20Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.",
  "id": "GHSA-3g8x-wqfp-q876",
  "modified": "2025-11-04T18:31:07Z",
  "published": "2024-07-09T12:30:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3596"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/456537"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…