CVE-2024-37032 (GCVE-0-2024-37032)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-31 00:00 – Updated: 2025-03-27 20:57
VLAI?
Summary
Ollama before 0.1.34 does not validate the format of the digest (sha256 with 64 hex digits) when getting the model path, and thus mishandles the TestGetBlobsPath test cases such as fewer than 64 hex digits, more than 64 hex digits, or an initial ../ substring.
Severity ?
8.8 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 8.8,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-37032",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-06-06T17:30:12.570473Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-22",
                "description": "CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-27T20:57:59.559Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T03:43:50.887Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/4175"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/ollama/ollama/compare/v0.1.33...v0.1.34"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/adeb40eaf29039b8964425f69a9315f9f1694ba8/server/modelpath_test.go#L41-L58"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/probllama-in-ollama-a-tale-of-a-yet-another-rce-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Ollama before 0.1.34 does not validate the format of the digest (sha256 with 64 hex digits) when getting the model path, and thus mishandles the TestGetBlobsPath test cases such as fewer than 64 hex digits, more than 64 hex digits, or an initial ../ substring."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-07-15T21:43:05.974Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/4175"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ollama/ollama/compare/v0.1.33...v0.1.34"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/adeb40eaf29039b8964425f69a9315f9f1694ba8/server/modelpath_test.go#L41-L58"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/probllama-in-ollama-a-tale-of-a-yet-another-rce-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-37032",
    "datePublished": "2024-05-31T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-05-31T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-03-27T20:57:59.559Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Ollama before 0.1.34 does not validate the format of the digest (sha256 with 64 hex digits) when getting the model path, and thus mishandles the TestGetBlobsPath test cases such as fewer than 64 hex digits, more than 64 hex digits, or an initial ../ substring.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Ollama anterior a 0.1.34 no valida el formato del resumen (sha256 con 64 d\\u00edgitos hexadecimales) al obtener la ruta del modelo y, por lo tanto, maneja mal los casos de prueba TestGetBlobsPath, como menos de 64 d\\u00edgitos hexadecimales, m\\u00e1s de 64 d\\u00edgitos hexadecimales o una inicial. ../ subcadena.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2024-37032",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T09:23:05.137",
      "published": "2024-05-31T04:15:09.617",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/adeb40eaf29039b8964425f69a9315f9f1694ba8/server/modelpath_test.go#L41-L58\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/compare/v0.1.33...v0.1.34\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/4175\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/probllama-in-ollama-a-tale-of-a-yet-another-rce-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/adeb40eaf29039b8964425f69a9315f9f1694ba8/server/modelpath_test.go#L41-L58\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/compare/v0.1.33...v0.1.34\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/4175\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/probllama-in-ollama-a-tale-of-a-yet-another-rce-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-37032\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2024-05-31T04:15:09.617\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-05-01T14:01:44.767\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Ollama before 0.1.34 does not validate the format of the digest (sha256 with 64 hex digits) when getting the model path, and thus mishandles the TestGetBlobsPath test cases such as fewer than 64 hex digits, more than 64 hex digits, or an initial ../ substring.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Ollama anterior a 0.1.34 no valida el formato del resumen (sha256 con 64 d\u00edgitos hexadecimales) al obtener la ruta del modelo y, por lo tanto, maneja mal los casos de prueba TestGetBlobsPath, como menos de 64 d\u00edgitos hexadecimales, m\u00e1s de 64 d\u00edgitos hexadecimales o una inicial. ../ subcadena.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-22\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ollama:ollama:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.1.34\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B6FFF9F3-E470-40F2-B950-615D4B263935\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/adeb40eaf29039b8964425f69a9315f9f1694ba8/server/modelpath_test.go#L41-L58\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Product\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/compare/v0.1.33...v0.1.34\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/4175\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/probllama-in-ollama-a-tale-of-a-yet-another-rce-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/adeb40eaf29039b8964425f69a9315f9f1694ba8/server/modelpath_test.go#L41-L58\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Product\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/compare/v0.1.33...v0.1.34\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/4175\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/probllama-in-ollama-a-tale-of-a-yet-another-rce-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/4175\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/compare/v0.1.33...v0.1.34\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/adeb40eaf29039b8964425f69a9315f9f1694ba8/server/modelpath_test.go#L41-L58\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/probllama-in-ollama-a-tale-of-a-yet-another-rce-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-02T03:43:50.887Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-37032\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-06-06T17:30:12.570473Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-22\", \"description\": \"CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-06-06T17:30:16.633Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"n/a\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/4175\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/compare/v0.1.33...v0.1.34\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/adeb40eaf29039b8964425f69a9315f9f1694ba8/server/modelpath_test.go#L41-L58\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/probllama-in-ollama-a-tale-of-a-yet-another-rce-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Ollama before 0.1.34 does not validate the format of the digest (sha256 with 64 hex digits) when getting the model path, and thus mishandles the TestGetBlobsPath test cases such as fewer than 64 hex digits, more than 64 hex digits, or an initial ../ substring.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\", \"description\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-07-15T21:43:05.974Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-37032\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-27T20:57:59.559Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-05-31T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-05-31T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.