Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-46689 (GCVE-0-2024-46689)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-09-13 05:29 – Updated: 2026-05-11 20:34| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d , < 0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278
(git)
Affected: 312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d , < f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374 (git) Affected: 312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d , < eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271 (git) Affected: 312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d , < d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf (git) Affected: 312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d , < ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70 (git) Affected: 312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d , < 62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4 (git) Affected: 312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d , < f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
4.18
Unaffected: 0 , < 4.18 (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.283 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.225 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.166 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.108 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.49 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.10.8 , ≤ 6.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.11 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T15:07:23.732311Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-29T15:07:38.504Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:16:27.670Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.18"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.18",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.283",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.225",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.166",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.108",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.49",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.283",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.225",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.166",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.108",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.49",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\n\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \"write\" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\n\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\n\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\n\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:34:30.215Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d"
}
],
"title": "soc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-46689",
"datePublished": "2024-09-13T05:29:19.713Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-11T15:12:18.249Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:34:30.215Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-46689",
"date": "2026-09-20",
"epss": "0.00253",
"percentile": "0.17057"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EFA0BA4B-B776-4FBB-9F15-2D51E78276EE",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.283",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C57B46A9-B105-4792-8481-1870DEFB436A",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.225",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "913ED6CD-8ACF-48AF-AA18-7880881DD402",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.166",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9B5BE381-F079-43D9-AEF2-931856B13219",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.108",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1191B7F1-F275-45F5-9E82-A012FF517BFA",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.49",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1B5D46C3-56A4-4380-9309-27BF73DF29A7",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8B3CE743-2126-47A3-8B7C-822B502CF119",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4DEB27E7-30AA-45CC-8934-B89263EF3551",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0005AEF-856E-47EB-BFE4-90C46899394D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "39889A68-6D34-47A6-82FC-CD0BF23D6754",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B8383ABF-1457-401F-9B61-EE50F4C61F4F",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\n\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \"write\" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\n\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\n\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\n\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: soc: qcom: cmd-db: Asignar memoria compartida como WC, no como WB Linux no escribe en la regi\u00f3n cmd-db. Esta regi\u00f3n de memoria est\u00e1 protegida contra escritura por XPU. En ocasiones, XPU puede detectar err\u00f3neamente la expulsi\u00f3n de cach\u00e9 limpia como \"escritura\" en la regi\u00f3n protegida contra escritura, lo que genera una interrupci\u00f3n segura que provoca un bucle sin fin en alg\u00fan lugar de la Zona de confianza. La \u00fanica raz\u00f3n por la que funciona en este momento es porque Qualcomm Hypervisor asigna la misma regi\u00f3n que la memoria no almacenable en cach\u00e9 en las tablas de traducci\u00f3n de la Etapa 2. El problema se manifiesta si queremos usar otro hipervisor (como Xen o KVM), que no sabe nada sobre esas asignaciones espec\u00edficas. Cambiar la asignaci\u00f3n de memoria cmd-db de MEMREMAP_WB a MEMREMAP_WT/WC elimina la dependencia de las asignaciones correctas en las tablas de la Etapa 2. Este parche corrige el problema actualizando la asignaci\u00f3n a MEMREMAP_WC. Prob\u00e9 esto en SA8155P con Xen."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"lastModified": "2024-09-20T15:52:23.727",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-09-13T06:15:13.653",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-02-21T01:42:35.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-46689",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2024-46689",
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-01T07:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "5",
"product_status:known_affected": "5",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "soc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC not WB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2024/msrc_cve-2024-46689.json",
"version": "3"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.18"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.18",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.283",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.225",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.166",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.108",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.49",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EFA0BA4B-B776-4FBB-9F15-2D51E78276EE",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.283",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C57B46A9-B105-4792-8481-1870DEFB436A",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.225",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "913ED6CD-8ACF-48AF-AA18-7880881DD402",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.166",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9B5BE381-F079-43D9-AEF2-931856B13219",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.108",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1191B7F1-F275-45F5-9E82-A012FF517BFA",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.49",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1B5D46C3-56A4-4380-9309-27BF73DF29A7",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8B3CE743-2126-47A3-8B7C-822B502CF119",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4DEB27E7-30AA-45CC-8934-B89263EF3551",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0005AEF-856E-47EB-BFE4-90C46899394D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "39889A68-6D34-47A6-82FC-CD0BF23D6754",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B8383ABF-1457-401F-9B61-EE50F4C61F4F",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\n\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \"write\" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\n\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\n\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\n\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: soc: qcom: cmd-db: Asignar memoria compartida como WC, no como WB Linux no escribe en la regi\u00f3n cmd-db. Esta regi\u00f3n de memoria est\u00e1 protegida contra escritura por XPU. En ocasiones, XPU puede detectar err\u00f3neamente la expulsi\u00f3n de cach\u00e9 limpia como \"escritura\" en la regi\u00f3n protegida contra escritura, lo que genera una interrupci\u00f3n segura que provoca un bucle sin fin en alg\u00fan lugar de la Zona de confianza. La \u00fanica raz\u00f3n por la que funciona en este momento es porque Qualcomm Hypervisor asigna la misma regi\u00f3n que la memoria no almacenable en cach\u00e9 en las tablas de traducci\u00f3n de la Etapa 2. El problema se manifiesta si queremos usar otro hipervisor (como Xen o KVM), que no sabe nada sobre esas asignaciones espec\u00edficas. Cambiar la asignaci\u00f3n de memoria cmd-db de MEMREMAP_WB a MEMREMAP_WT/WC elimina la dependencia de las asignaciones correctas en las tablas de la Etapa 2. Este parche corrige el problema actualizando la asignaci\u00f3n a MEMREMAP_WC. Prob\u00e9 esto en SA8155P con Xen."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:55:44.207",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T15:07:23.732311Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-09-13T06:15:13.653",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-13T08:51:29+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-46689",
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "303",
"product_status:known_affected": "98",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "14",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: soc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-46689.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-19T02:21:37Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-46689",
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-14T02:51:20Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "486",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "183",
"product_status:recommended": "681",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2024-46689.json",
"version": "56"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:16:27.670Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T15:07:23.732311Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-29T15:07:27.872Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.18"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.18",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.283",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.225",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.166",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.108",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.49",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.283",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.225",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.166",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.108",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.49",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\n\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \"write\" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\n\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\n\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\n\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T09:31:57.015Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d"
}
],
"title": "soc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-46689",
"datePublished": "2024-09-13T05:29:19.713Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-11T15:12:18.249Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:16:27.670Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Debian LTS bullseye versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.1.119-1~deb11u1",
"product": {
"name": "Debian",
"vendor": {
"name": "Debian",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-01-03T00:00:00.000000"
},
{
"description": "Changement r\u00e9f\u00e9rence ",
"revision_date": "2025-01-06T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et un d\u00e9ni de service.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-01-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Debian LTS DLA-4008-1",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.10",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50011"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-01-10T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-01-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7186-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7186-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7179-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7179-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7154-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7154-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7184-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7184-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7185-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7185-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7183-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7183-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7187-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7187-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7194-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7194-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7185-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7185-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7167-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7167-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7159-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7159-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7195-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7195-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7169-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7169-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7186-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7186-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7196-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7196-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7179-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7179-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7169-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7169-3"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions antérieures à V6.0 SP1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIPROTEC 5 versions antérieures à 10.0 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions antérieures à V3.19 P020 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions antérieures à 4.0.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions antérieures à V3.18 P032 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions antérieures à 5.2.1.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-40759. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions antérieures à V3.20 P008 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.3 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions antérieures à 4.78 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions antérieures à V20 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions antérieures à V7.0 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous modèles exceptés 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-52504. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions antérieures à V8.1 Update 3 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V6.0 SP1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIPROTEC 5 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.19 P020",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.18 P032",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.2.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-40759.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.20 P008",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.78",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V20 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V7.0 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous mod\u00e8les except\u00e9s 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-52504. ",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V8.1 Update 3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Siemens",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-707630",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-707630.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-331739",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331739.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-693808",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-693808.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-613116",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493396",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493396.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens ssa-400089",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-400089.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493787",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493787.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-894058",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-894058.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-355557",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-529291",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-529291.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-282044",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-282044.html"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-46689
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-09-13 06:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 07:55| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html | ||
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "312416d9171a1460b7ed8d182b5b540c910ce80d",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/soc/qcom/cmd-db.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.18"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.18",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.283",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.225",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.166",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.108",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.49",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EFA0BA4B-B776-4FBB-9F15-2D51E78276EE",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.283",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C57B46A9-B105-4792-8481-1870DEFB436A",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.225",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "913ED6CD-8ACF-48AF-AA18-7880881DD402",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.166",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9B5BE381-F079-43D9-AEF2-931856B13219",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.108",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1191B7F1-F275-45F5-9E82-A012FF517BFA",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.49",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1B5D46C3-56A4-4380-9309-27BF73DF29A7",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8B3CE743-2126-47A3-8B7C-822B502CF119",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4DEB27E7-30AA-45CC-8934-B89263EF3551",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0005AEF-856E-47EB-BFE4-90C46899394D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "39889A68-6D34-47A6-82FC-CD0BF23D6754",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B8383ABF-1457-401F-9B61-EE50F4C61F4F",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\n\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \"write\" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\n\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\n\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\n\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: soc: qcom: cmd-db: Asignar memoria compartida como WC, no como WB Linux no escribe en la regi\u00f3n cmd-db. Esta regi\u00f3n de memoria est\u00e1 protegida contra escritura por XPU. En ocasiones, XPU puede detectar err\u00f3neamente la expulsi\u00f3n de cach\u00e9 limpia como \"escritura\" en la regi\u00f3n protegida contra escritura, lo que genera una interrupci\u00f3n segura que provoca un bucle sin fin en alg\u00fan lugar de la Zona de confianza. La \u00fanica raz\u00f3n por la que funciona en este momento es porque Qualcomm Hypervisor asigna la misma regi\u00f3n que la memoria no almacenable en cach\u00e9 en las tablas de traducci\u00f3n de la Etapa 2. El problema se manifiesta si queremos usar otro hipervisor (como Xen o KVM), que no sabe nada sobre esas asignaciones espec\u00edficas. Cambiar la asignaci\u00f3n de memoria cmd-db de MEMREMAP_WB a MEMREMAP_WT/WC elimina la dependencia de las asignaciones correctas en las tablas de la Etapa 2. Este parche corrige el problema actualizando la asignaci\u00f3n a MEMREMAP_WC. Prob\u00e9 esto en SA8155P con Xen."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:55:44.207",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-46689",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T15:07:23.732311Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-09-13T06:15:13.653",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-9HW6-9FRH-HXRG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-13 06:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB
Linux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write protected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction as "write" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt which causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.
The only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor maps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation tables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like Xen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.
Changing the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC removes dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch fixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.
I tested this on SA8155P with Xen.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46689"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-13T06:15:13Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\n\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \"write\" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\n\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\n\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\n\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen.",
"id": "GHSA-9hw6-9frh-hxrg",
"modified": "2025-11-04T00:31:24Z",
"published": "2024-09-13T06:30:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ee9594c974368a17e85a431e9fe1c14fb65c278"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62c2d63605ca25b5db78a347ed303c0a0a77d5b4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d48d70e922b272875cda60d2ada89291c840cf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaff392c1e34fb77cc61505a31b0191e5e46e271"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80520be0ff78ae5ed44cb6eee1525e65bebe70"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5a5a5a0e95f36e2792d48e6e4b64e665eb01374"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9bb896eab221618927ae6a2f1d566567999839d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-25-226-07
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00ICSA-25-226-15
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00MSRC_CVE-2024-46689
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2024-09-01 07:00 - Updated: 2026-02-21 01:42OESA-2024-2296 (CVE-2023-52889)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-10-25 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: Fix null pointer deref when receiving skb during sock creation
The panic below is observed when receiving ICMP packets with secmark set while an ICMP raw socket is being created. SK_CTX(sk)->label is updated in apparmor_socket_post_create(), but the packet is delivered to the socket before that, causing the null pointer dereference. Drop the packet if label context is not set.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000004c
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 407 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.4.12-arch1-1 #1 3e6fa2753a2d75925c34ecb78e22e85a65d083df
Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 05/28/2020
RIP: 0010:aa_label_next_confined+0xb/0x40
Code: 00 00 48 89 ef e8 d5 25 0c 00 e9 66 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 66 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 89 f0 <8b> 77 4c 39 c6 7e 1f 48 63 d0 48 8d 14 d7 eb 0b 83 c0 01 48 83 c2
RSP: 0018:ffffa92940003b08 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000000e
RDX: ffffa92940003be8 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff8b57471e7800 R08: ffff8b574c642400 R09: 0000000000000002
R10: ffffffffbd820eeb R11: ffffffffbeb7ff00 R12: ffff8b574c642400
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007fb092ea7640(0000) GS:ffff8b577bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000000004c CR3: 00000001020f2005 CR4: 00000000007706f0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
? __die+0x23/0x70
? page_fault_oops+0x171/0x4e0
? exc_page_fault+0x7f/0x180
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
? aa_label_next_confined+0xb/0x40
apparmor_secmark_check+0xec/0x330
security_sock_rcv_skb+0x35/0x50
sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x250
sock_queue_rcv_skb_reason+0x20/0x60
raw_rcv+0x13c/0x210
raw_local_deliver+0x1f3/0x250
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x4f/0x2f0
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x76/0xa0
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x89/0xa0
netif_receive_skb+0x119/0x170
? __netdev_alloc_skb+0x3d/0x140
vmxnet3_rq_rx_complete+0xb23/0x1010 [vmxnet3 56a84f9c97178c57a43a24ec073b45a9d6f01f3a]
vmxnet3_poll_rx_only+0x36/0xb0 [vmxnet3 56a84f9c97178c57a43a24ec073b45a9d6f01f3a]
__napi_poll+0x28/0x1b0
net_rx_action+0x2a4/0x380
__do_softirq+0xd1/0x2c8
__irq_exit_rcu+0xbb/0xf0
common_interrupt+0x86/0xa0
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
RIP: 0010:apparmor_socket_post_create+0xb/0x200
Code: 08 48 85 ff 75 a1 eb b1 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 <55> 48 89 fd 53 45 85 c0 0f 84 b2 00 00 00 48 8b 1d 80 56 3f 02 48
RSP: 0018:ffffa92940ce7e50 EFLAGS: 00000286
RAX: ffffffffbc756440 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff8b574eaab740
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff8b57444cec70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffff8b574eaab740 R15: ffffffffbd8e4748
? __pfx_apparmor_socket_post_create+0x10/0x10
security_socket_post_create+0x4b/0x80
__sock_create+0x176/0x1f0
__sys_socket+0x89/0x100
__x64_sys_socket+0x17/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc(CVE-2023-52889)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout
Add a timestamp field at the beginning of the transaction, store it in the nftables per-netns area.
Update set backend .insert, .deactivate and sync gc path to use the timestamp, this avoids that an element expires while control plane transaction is still unfinished.
.lookup and .update, which are used from packet path, still use the current time to check if the element has expired. And .get path and dump also since this runs lockless under rcu read size lock. Then, there is async gc which also needs to check the current time since it runs asynchronously from a workqueue.(CVE-2024-27397)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: msft: fix slab-use-after-free in msft_do_close()
Tying the msft->data lifetime to hdev by freeing it in hci_release_dev() to fix the following case:
[use] msft_do_close() msft = hdev->msft_data; if (!msft) ...(1) <- passed. return; mutex_lock(&msft->filter_lock); ...(4) <- used after freed.
[free] msft_unregister() msft = hdev->msft_data; hdev->msft_data = NULL; ...(2) kfree(msft); ...(3) <- msft is freed.
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0x8f/0xc30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888106cbbca8 by task kworker/u5:2/309(CVE-2024-36012)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ppdev: Add an error check in register_device
In register_device, the return value of ida_simple_get is unchecked, in witch ida_simple_get will use an invalid index value.
To address this issue, index should be checked after ida_simple_get. When the index value is abnormal, a warning message should be printed, the port should be dropped, and the value should be recorded.(CVE-2024-36015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: qca: fix info leak when fetching fw build id
Add the missing sanity checks and move the 255-byte build-id buffer off the stack to avoid leaking stack data through debugfs in case the build-info reply is malformed.(CVE-2024-36032)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too
It is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the blamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a cycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of entry intervals.
We need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must be larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule entries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle time came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so we move the existing "cycle == 0" check outside the "if "(!new->cycle_time)" branch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.
Add a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: qca: add missing firmware sanity checks
Add the missing sanity checks when parsing the firmware files before downloading them to avoid accessing and corrupting memory beyond the vmalloced buffer.(CVE-2024-36880)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect
Christoph reported a splat hinting at a corrupted snd_una:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 38 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 __mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-gbbeac67456c9 #59 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 Code: be 06 01 00 00 bf 06 01 00 00 e8 a8 12 e7 fe e9 00 fe ff ff e8 8e 1a e7 fe 0f b7 ab 3e 02 00 00 e9 d3 fd ff ff e8 7d 1a e7 fe <0f> 0b 4c 8b bb e0 05 00 00 e9 74 fc ff ff e8 6a 1a e7 fe 0f 0b e9 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000013fd48 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881029bd280 RCX: ffffffff82382fe4 RDX: ffff8881003cbd00 RSI: ffffffff823833c3 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888138ba8000 R13: 0000000000000106 R14: ffff8881029bd908 R15: ffff888126560000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f604a5dae38 CR3: 0000000101dac002 CR4: 0000000000170ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1055 [inline] mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1062 [inline] __mptcp_retrans+0x7f/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2615 mptcp_worker+0x434/0x740 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2767 process_one_work+0x1e0/0x560 kernel/workqueue.c:3254 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline] worker_thread+0x3c7/0x640 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x121/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 </TASK>
When fallback to TCP happens early on a client socket, snd_nxt is not yet initialized and any incoming ack will copy such value into snd_una. If the mptcp worker (dumbly) tries mptcp-level re-injection after such ack, that would unconditionally trigger a send buffer cleanup using 'bad' snd_una values.
We could easily disable re-injection for fallback sockets, but such dumb behavior already helped catching a few subtle issues and a very low to zero impact in practice.
Instead address the issue always initializing snd_nxt (and write_seq, for consistency) at connect time.(CVE-2024-36889)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete
FFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue pending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the FFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a soft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks like the following:
DWC3 Gadget FFS Application
dwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ... --> dwc3_stop_active_transfers() --> dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN) --> ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel() --> usb_ep_free_request() --> usb_ep_dequeue()
There is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion handler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is running in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application. As the completion call frees the USB request (io_data->req) the FFS application is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can lead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.
commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently") relocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). However, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the spinlock can't be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as usb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the function driver's completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading into a deadlock.
Fix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to ffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data->req to NULL after freeing it within the ffs->eps_lock. This resolves the race condition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue attempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the ffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is done referencing it.
This fix depends on commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently")(CVE-2024-36894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Drivers: hv: vmbus: Don't free ring buffers that couldn't be re-encrypted
In CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
The VMBus ring buffer code could free decrypted/shared pages if set_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the struct vmbus_gpadl for the ring buffers to decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36909)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
uio_hv_generic: Don't free decrypted memory
In CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
The VMBus device UIO driver could free decrypted/shared pages if set_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the gpadl to decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36910)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hv_netvsc: Don't free decrypted memory
In CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
The netvsc driver could free decrypted/shared pages if set_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the gpadl to decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36911)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Drivers: hv: vmbus: Leak pages if set_memory_encrypted() fails
In CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
VMBus code could free decrypted pages if set_memory_encrypted()/decrypted() fails. Leak the pages if this happens.(CVE-2024-36913)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: llcp: fix nfc_llcp_setsockopt() unsafe copies
syzbot reported unsafe calls to copy_from_sockptr() [1]
Use copy_safe_from_sockptr() instead.
[1]
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nfc_llcp_setsockopt+0x6c2/0x850 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:255 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88801caa1ec3 by task syz-executor459/5078
CPU: 0 PID: 5078 Comm: syz-executor459 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] nfc_llcp_setsockopt+0x6c2/0x850 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:255 do_sock_setsockopt+0x3b1/0x720 net/socket.c:2311 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75 RIP: 0033:0x7f7fac07fd89 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 91 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fff660eb788 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f7fac07fd89 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000118 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000020000a80 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000(CVE-2024-36915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Check bloom filter map value size
This patch adds a missing check to bloom filter creating, rejecting values above KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. This brings the bloom map in line with many other map types.
The lack of this protection can cause kernel crashes for value sizes that overflow int's. Such a crash was caught by syzkaller. The next patch adds more guard-rails at a lower level.(CVE-2024-36918)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: mpi3mr: Avoid memcpy field-spanning write WARNING
When the "storcli2 show" command is executed for eHBA-9600, mpi3mr driver prints this WARNING message:
memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 128) of single field "bsg_reply_buf->reply_buf" at drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:1658 (size 1) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12760 at drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:1658 mpi3mr_bsg_request+0x6b12/0x7f10 [mpi3mr]
The cause of the WARN is 128 bytes memcpy to the 1 byte size array "__u8 replay_buf[1]" in the struct mpi3mr_bsg_in_reply_buf. The array is intended to be a flexible length array, so the WARN is a false positive.
To suppress the WARN, remove the constant number '1' from the array declaration and clarify that it has flexible length. Also, adjust the memory allocation size to match the change.(CVE-2024-36920)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: guard against invalid STA ID on removal
Guard against invalid station IDs in iwl_mvm_mld_rm_sta_id as that would result in out-of-bounds array accesses. This prevents issues should the driver get into a bad state during error handling.(CVE-2024-36921)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: read txq->read_ptr under lock
If we read txq->read_ptr without lock, we can read the same value twice, then obtain the lock, and reclaim from there to two different places, but crucially reclaim the same entry twice, resulting in the WARN_ONCE() a little later. Fix that by reading txq->read_ptr under lock.(CVE-2024-36922)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()
KMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb() tests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, HDRINCL can cause a race condition. If calling setsockopt(2) with IP_HDRINCL changes HDRINCL while __ip_make_skb() is running, the function will access icmphdr in the skb even if it is not included. This causes the issue reported by KMSAN.
Check FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl4->flowi4_flags instead of testing HDRINCL on the socket.
Also, fl4->fl4_icmp_type and fl4->fl4_icmp_code are not initialized. These are union in struct flowi4 and are implicitly initialized by flowi4_init_output(), but we should not rely on specific union layout.
Initialize these explicitly in raw_sendmsg().
[1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481 __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481 ip_finish_skb include/net/ip.h:243 [inline] ip_push_pending_frames+0x4c/0x5c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1508 raw_sendmsg+0x2381/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:654 inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f6/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35a/0x7c0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] __ip_append_data+0x49ab/0x68c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1128 ip_append_data+0x1e7/0x260 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1365 raw_sendmsg+0x22b1/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:648 inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 1 PID: 15709 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-11567-gb3603fcb79b1 #25 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-36927)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
efi/unaccepted: touch soft lockup during memory accept
Commit 50e782a86c98 ("efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by parallel memory acceptance") has released the spinlock so other CPUs can do memory acceptance in parallel and not triggers softlockup on other CPUs.
However the softlock up was intermittent shown up if the memory of the TD guest is large, and the timeout of softlockup is set to 1 second:
RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore Call Trace: ? __hrtimer_run_queues <IRQ> ? hrtimer_interrupt ? watchdog_timer_fn ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt </IRQ> ? __hrtimer_run_queues <TASK> ? hrtimer_interrupt ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt accept_memory try_to_accept_memory do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page get_page_from_freelist __handle_mm_fault __alloc_pages __folio_alloc ? __tdx_hypercall handle_mm_fault vma_alloc_folio do_user_addr_fault do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page exc_page_fault ? __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page asm_exc_page_fault __handle_mm_fault
When the local irq is enabled at the end of accept_memory(), the softlockup detects that the watchdog on single CPU has not been fed for a while. That is to say, even other CPUs will not be blocked by spinlock, the current CPU might be stunk with local irq disabled for a while, which hurts not only nmi watchdog but also softlockup.
Chao Gao pointed out that the memory accept could be time costly and there was similar report before. Thus to avoid any softlocup detection during this stage, give the softlockup a flag to skip the timeout check at the end of accept_memory(), by invoking touch_softlockup_watchdog().(CVE-2024-36936)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()
The "pctldev" struct is allocated in devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(). It's a devm_ managed pointer that is freed by devm_pinctrl_dev_release(), so freeing it in pinctrl_enable() will lead to a double free.
The devm_pinctrl_dev_release() function frees the pindescs and destroys the mutex as well.(CVE-2024-36940)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: nl80211: don't free NULL coalescing rule
If the parsing fails, we can dereference a NULL pointer here.(CVE-2024-36941)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phonet: fix rtm_phonet_notify() skb allocation
fill_route() stores three components in the skb:
- struct rtmsg
- RTA_DST (u8)
- RTA_OIF (u32)
Therefore, rtm_phonet_notify() should use
NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtmsg)) + nla_total_size(1) + nla_total_size(4)(CVE-2024-36946)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracefs: Reset permissions on remount if permissions are options
There's an inconsistency with the way permissions are handled in tracefs. Because the permissions are generated when accessed, they default to the root inode's permission if they were never set by the user. If the user sets the permissions, then a flag is set and the permissions are saved via the inode (for tracefs files) or an internal attribute field (for eventfs).
But if a remount happens that specify the permissions, all the files that were not changed by the user gets updated, but the ones that were are not. If the user were to remount the file system with a given permission, then all files and directories within that file system should be updated.
This can cause security issues if a file's permission was updated but the admin forgot about it. They could incorrectly think that remounting with permissions set would update all files, but miss some.
For example:
# cd /sys/kernel/tracing # chgrp 1002 current_tracer # ls -l [..] -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_size_kb -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_subbuf_size_kb -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_total_size_kb -rw-r----- 1 root lkp 0 May 1 21:25 current_tracer -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 dynamic_events -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 dyn_ftrace_total_info -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 enabled_functions
Where current_tracer now has group "lkp".
# mount -o remount,gid=1001 . # ls -l -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_size_kb -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_subbuf_size_kb -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_total_size_kb -rw-r----- 1 root lkp 0 May 1 21:25 current_tracer -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 dynamic_events -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 dyn_ftrace_total_info -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 enabled_functions
Everything changed but the "current_tracer".
Add a new link list that keeps track of all the tracefs_inodes which has the permission flags that tell if the file/dir should use the root inode's permission or not. Then on remount, clear all the flags so that the default behavior of using the root inode's permission is done for all files and directories.(CVE-2024-36963)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race
__dst_negative_advice() does not enforce proper RCU rules when sk->dst_cache must be cleared, leading to possible UAF.
RCU rules are that we must first clear sk->sk_dst_cache, then call dst_release(old_dst).
Note that sk_dst_reset(sk) is implementing this protocol correctly, while __dst_negative_advice() uses the wrong order.
Given that ip6_negative_advice() has special logic against RTF_CACHE, this means each of the three ->negative_advice() existing methods must perform the sk_dst_reset() themselves.
Note the check against NULL dst is centralized in __dst_negative_advice(), there is no need to duplicate it in various callbacks.
Many thanks to Clement Lecigne for tracking this issue.
This old bug became visible after the blamed commit, using UDP sockets.(CVE-2024-36971)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: stmmac: move the EST lock to struct stmmac_priv
Reinitialize the whole EST structure would also reset the mutex lock which is embedded in the EST structure, and then trigger the following warning. To address this, move the lock to struct stmmac_priv. We also need to reacquire the mutex lock when doing this initialization.
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 505 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 505 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-00053-g0106679839f7-dirty #29 Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 lr : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 sp : ffffffc0864e3570 x29: ffffffc0864e3570 x28: ffffffc0817bdc78 x27: 0000000000000003 x26: ffffff80c54f1808 x25: ffffff80c9164080 x24: ffffffc080d723ac x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc083bc3000 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: ffffffc08117b080 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: ffffff80d2d40000 x14: 00000000000002da x13: ffffff80d2d404b8 x12: ffffffc082b5a5c8 x11: ffffffc082bca680 x10: ffffffc082bb2640 x9 : ffffffc082bb2698 x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffffff8178fe0d48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027 x2 : ffffff8178fe0d50 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x34 tc_setup_taprio+0x118/0x68c stmmac_setup_tc+0x50/0xf0 taprio_change+0x868/0xc9c(CVE-2024-38594)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling
mlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns true. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via mlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED. In the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory leaks:
mlx5e_probe _mlx5e_resume mlx5e_attach_netdev mlx5e_nic_enable <-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach() register_netdev <-- failed for some reason. ERROR_FLOW: _mlx5e_suspend <-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren't freed :(
Hence, clean resources in this case as well.
[1] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x20/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0 ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60 mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core] mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib] __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib] ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90 auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80 ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0 device_add+0x637/0x840 __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0 add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core] mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core] mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core] probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core] local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90 pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210 ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0 ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80 pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320 sriov_enable+0x208/0x420 mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core] sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0 vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path
The error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the genl_unregister_family() isn't called.
This issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 ("ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel support"), and commit 5559cea2d5aa ("ipv6: sr: fix possible use-after-free and null-ptr-deref") replaced unregister_pernet_subsys() with genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency
Validate that first flag is set only for the first
descriptor in multi-buffer packets.
In case of an invalid descriptor, a reset will occur.
A new reset reason for RX data corruption has been added.(CVE-2024-40999)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries
Syzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of corrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata file inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn().
As Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file gets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(), tries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case).
The inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers of these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are read without checking.
Fix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as errors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages.
Also thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer analysis.(CVE-2024-42104)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
leds: an30259a: Use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization
In this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register() so they are automatically unregistered after module's remove() is done. led_classdev_unregister() calls module's led_set_brightness() to turn off the LEDs and that callback uses mutex which was destroyed already in module's remove() so use devm API instead.(CVE-2024-42128)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/pkey: Wipe sensitive data on failure
Wipe sensitive data from stack also if the copy_to_user() fails.(CVE-2024-42157)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: aead,cipher - zeroize key buffer after use
I.G 9.7.B for FIPS 140-3 specifies that variables temporarily holding cryptographic information should be zeroized once they are no longer needed. Accomplish this by using kfree_sensitive for buffers that previously held the private key.(CVE-2024-42229)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
libceph: fix race between delayed_work() and ceph_monc_stop()
The way the delayed work is handled in ceph_monc_stop() is prone to races with mon_fault() and possibly also finish_hunting(). Both of these can requeue the delayed work which wouldn't be canceled by any of the following code in case that happens after cancel_delayed_work_sync() runs -- __close_session() doesn't mess with the delayed work in order to avoid interfering with the hunting interval logic. This part was missed in commit b5d91704f53e ("libceph: behave in mon_fault() if cur_mon < 0") and use-after-free can still ensue on monc and objects that hang off of it, with monc->auth and monc->monmap being particularly susceptible to quickly being reused.
To fix this:
- clear monc->cur_mon and monc->hunting as part of closing the session in ceph_monc_stop()
- bail from delayed_work() if monc->cur_mon is cleared, similar to how it's done in mon_fault() and finish_hunting() (based on monc->hunting)
- call cancel_delayed_work_sync() after the session is closed(CVE-2024-42232)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: configfs: Prevent OOB read/write in usb_string_copy()
Userspace provided string 's' could trivially have the length zero. Left
unchecked this will firstly result in an OOB read in the form
if (str[0 - 1] == '\n') followed closely by an OOB write in the formstr[0 - 1] = '\0'`.
There is already a validating check to catch strings that are too long. Let's supply an additional check for invalid strings that are too short.(CVE-2024-42236)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()
Don't dereference sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(sp).(CVE-2024-42280)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nexthop: Initialize all fields in dumped nexthops
struct nexthop_grp contains two reserved fields that are not initialized by nla_put_nh_group(), and carry garbage. This can be observed e.g. with strace (edited for clarity):
# ip nexthop add id 1 dev lo
# ip nexthop add id 101 group 1
# strace -e recvmsg ip nexthop get id 101
...
recvmsg(... [{nla_len=12, nla_type=NHA_GROUP},
[{id=1, weight=0, resvd1=0x69, resvd2=0x67}]] ...) = 52
The fields are reserved and therefore not currently used. But as they are, they leak kernel memory, and the fact they are not just zero complicates repurposing of the fields for new ends. Initialize the full structure.(CVE-2024-42283)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: validate nvme_local_port correctly
The driver load failed with error message,
qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-ffff:0: register_localport failed: ret=ffffffef
and with a kernel crash,
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070
Workqueue: events_unbound qla_register_fcport_fn [qla2xxx]
RIP: 0010:nvme_fc_register_remoteport+0x16/0x430 [nvme_fc]
RSP: 0018:ffffaaa040eb3d98 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9dfb46b78c00 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff9dfb46b78da8 RSI: ffffaaa040eb3e08 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff9dfb612a0a58 R08: ffffffffaf1d6270 R09: 3a34303a30303030
R10: 34303a303030305b R11: 2078787832616c71 R12: ffff9dfb46b78dd4
R13: ffff9dfb46b78c24 R14: ffff9dfb41525300 R15: ffff9dfb46b78da8
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9dfc67c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000070 CR3: 000000018da10004 CR4: 00000000000206f0
Call Trace:
qla_nvme_register_remote+0xeb/0x1f0 [qla2xxx]
? qla2x00_dfs_create_rport+0x231/0x270 [qla2xxx]
qla2x00_update_fcport+0x2a1/0x3c0 [qla2xxx]
qla_register_fcport_fn+0x54/0xc0 [qla2xxx]
Exit the qla_nvme_register_remote() function when qla_nvme_register_hba() fails and correctly validate nvme_local_port.(CVE-2024-42286)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock
A crash was observed while performing NPIV and FW reset,
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 1 PREEMPT_RT SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 RSP: 0018:ffffc90026f47b88 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000002 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881041130d0 RBP: ffff8881041130d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000034 R10: ffffc90026f47c48 R11: 0000000000000031 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8881565e4a20 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f4c69ed3d00(0000) GS:ffff889faac80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000000288a50002 CR4: 00000000007706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x16f/0x4a0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x174/0x7f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x1a0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 ? preempt_count_sub+0x96/0xe0 qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x29f/0x3b0 [qla2xxx] qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x60/0x80 [qla2xxx] __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xa2/0x450 [qla2xxx]
The command completion was done early while aborting the commands in driver unload path but outside lock to avoid the WARN_ON condition of performing dma_free_attr within the lock. However this caused race condition while command completion via multiple paths causing system crash.
Hence complete the command early in unload path but within the lock to avoid race condition.(CVE-2024-42287)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly
During vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash because of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale I/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but I/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx] RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0 ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0 ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830 ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430 ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0 ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0 ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140 ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60 ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? kthread+0x156/0x180 ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK>
Send out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Handle runtime power management correctly
The power domain is automatically activated from clk_prepare(). However, on certain platforms like i.MX8QM and i.MX8QXP, the power-on handling invokes sleeping functions, which triggers the 'scheduling while atomic' bug in the context switch path during device probing:
BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u13:1/48/0x00000002 Call trace: __schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c __schedule+0x7f0/0xa94 schedule+0x5c/0xc4 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x2c0/0x540 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x20 mutex_lock+0x48/0x54 clk_prepare_lock+0x44/0xa0 clk_prepare+0x20/0x44 imx_irqsteer_resume+0x28/0xe0 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x44 __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0x80 genpd_runtime_resume+0xc8/0x2c0 __rpm_callback+0x48/0x1d8 rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78 rpm_resume+0x490/0x6b4 __pm_runtime_resume+0x50/0x94 irq_chip_pm_get+0x2c/0xa0 __irq_do_set_handler+0x178/0x24c irq_set_chained_handler_and_data+0x60/0xa4 mxc_gpio_probe+0x160/0x4b0
Cure this by implementing the irq_bus_lock/sync_unlock() interrupt chip callbacks and handle power management in them as they are invoked from non-atomic context.
tglx: Rewrote change log, added Fixes tag
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kobject_uevent: Fix OOB access within zap_modalias_env()
zap_modalias_env() wrongly calculates size of memory block to move, so will cause OOB memory access issue if variable MODALIAS is not the last one within its @env parameter, fixed by correcting size to memmove.(CVE-2024-42292)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: handle inconsistent state in nilfs_btnode_create_block()
Syzbot reported that a buffer state inconsistency was detected in nilfs_btnode_create_block(), triggering a kernel bug.
It is not appropriate to treat this inconsistency as a bug; it can occur if the argument block address (the buffer index of the newly created block) is a virtual block number and has been reallocated due to corruption of the bitmap used to manage its allocation state.
So, modify nilfs_btnode_create_block() and its callers to treat it as a possible filesystem error, rather than triggering a kernel bug.(CVE-2024-42295)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Update log->page_{mask,bits} if log->page_size changed
If an NTFS file system is mounted to another system with different PAGE_SIZE from the original system, log->page_size will change in log_replay(), but log->page_{mask,bits} don't change correspondingly. This will cause a panic because "u32 bytes = log->page_size - page_off" will get a negative value in the later read_log_page().(CVE-2024-42299)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed
Syzbot reports a issue as follows:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe PGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0 Call Trace: <TASK> make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451 ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline] ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214 [...] ============================================
The immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry for the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of bounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.
do_split
unsigned split
dx_make_map
count = 1
split = count/2 = 0;
continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;
---> map[4294967295]
The maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024, so it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or equal to 2 when do_split() is called.
But syzbot's crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry distribution in dirblock is as follows:
bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free |xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............| 0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024
So when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole nor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is called.
In make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the dirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root because they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved to the new leaf block. That's why count is equal to 1.
Therefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity checks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above issue.(CVE-2024-42305)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udf: Avoid using corrupted block bitmap buffer
When the filesystem block bitmap is corrupted, we detect the corruption while loading the bitmap and fail the allocation with error. However the next allocation from the same bitmap will notice the bitmap buffer is already loaded and tries to allocate from the bitmap with mixed results (depending on the exact nature of the bitmap corruption). Fix the problem by using BH_verified bit to indicate whether the bitmap is valid or not.(CVE-2024-42306)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-42308)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/gma500: fix null pointer dereference in psb_intel_lvds_get_modes
In psb_intel_lvds_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42309)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hfs: fix to initialize fields of hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode()
Syzbot reports uninitialized value access issue as below:
loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30 hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30 d_revalidate fs/namei.c:862 [inline] lookup_fast+0x89e/0x8e0 fs/namei.c:1649 walk_component fs/namei.c:2001 [inline] link_path_walk+0x817/0x1480 fs/namei.c:2332 path_lookupat+0xd9/0x6f0 fs/namei.c:2485 filename_lookup+0x22e/0x740 fs/namei.c:2515 user_path_at_empty+0x8b/0x390 fs/namei.c:2924 user_path_at include/linux/namei.h:57 [inline] do_mount fs/namespace.c:3689 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x66b/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x140 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline] hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366 block_read_full_folio+0x4ff/0x11b0 fs/buffer.c:2271 hfs_read_folio+0x55/0x60 fs/hfs/inode.c:39 filemap_read_folio+0x148/0x4f0 mm/filemap.c:2426 do_read_cache_folio+0x7c8/0xd90 mm/filemap.c:3553 do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:3595 [inline] read_cache_page+0xfb/0x2f0 mm/filemap.c:3604 read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:755 [inline] hfs_btree_open+0x928/0x1ae0 fs/hfs/btree.c:78 hfs_mdb_get+0x260c/0x3000 fs/hfs/mdb.c:204 hfs_fill_super+0x1fb1/0x2790 fs/hfs/super.c:406 mount_bdev+0x628/0x920 fs/super.c:1359 hfs_mount+0xcd/0xe0 fs/hfs/super.c:456 legacy_get_tree+0x167/0x2e0 fs/fs_context.c:610 vfs_get_tree+0xdc/0x5d0 fs/super.c:1489 do_new_mount+0x7a9/0x16f0 fs/namespace.c:3145 path_mount+0xf98/0x26a0 fs/namespace.c:3475 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x919/0x9e0 fs/namespace.c:3674 __ia32_sys_mount+0x15b/0x1b0 fs/namespace.c:3674 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 do_fast_syscall_32+0x37/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 do_SYSENTER_32+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82
Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x9a6/0xe00 mm/page_alloc.c:4590 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2190 [inline] allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2354 [inline] new_slab+0x2d7/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2407 slaballoc+0x16b5/0x3970 mm/slub.c:3540 slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3625 [inline] __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3678 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3850 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x64d/0xb30 mm/slub.c:3879 alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3018 [inline] hfs_alloc_inode+0x5a/0xc0 fs/hfs/super.c:165 alloc_inode+0x83/0x440 fs/inode.c:260 new_inode_pseudo fs/inode.c:1005 [inline] new_inode+0x38/0x4f0 fs/inode.c:1031 hfs_new_inode+0x61/0x1010 fs/hfs/inode.c:186 hfs_mkdir+0x54/0x250 fs/hfs/dir.c:228 vfs_mkdir+0x49a/0x700 fs/namei.c:4126 do_mkdirat+0x529/0x810 fs/namei.c:4149 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4164 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4162 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdirat+0xc8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4162 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
It missed to initialize .tz_secondswest, .cached_start and .cached_blocks fields in struct hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode(), fix it.(CVE-2024-42311)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: venus: fix use after free in vdec_close
There appears to be a possible use after free with vdec_close(). The firmware will add buffer release work to the work queue through HFI callbacks as a normal part of decoding. Randomly closing the decoder device from userspace during normal decoding can incur a read after free for inst.
Fix it by cancelling the work in vdec_close.(CVE-2024-42313)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service
Use pe directly to resolve sparse warning:
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1471:27: warning: dereference of noderef expression(CVE-2024-42322)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: keystone: Fix NULL pointer dereference in case of DT error in ks_pcie_setup_rc_app_regs()
If IORESOURCE_MEM is not provided in Device Tree due to any error, resource_list_first_type() will return NULL and pci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() will just emit a warning.
This will cause a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this bug by adding NULL return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit
When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable.
Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.
This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range().
Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
leds: trigger: Unregister sysfs attributes before calling deactivate()
Triggers which have trigger specific sysfs attributes typically store related data in trigger-data allocated by the activate() callback and freed by the deactivate() callback.
Calling device_remove_groups() after calling deactivate() leaves a window where the sysfs attributes show/store functions could be called after deactivation and then operate on the just freed trigger-data.
Move the device_remove_groups() call to before deactivate() to close this race window.
This also makes the deactivation path properly do things in reverse order of the activation path which calls the activate() callback before calling device_add_groups().(CVE-2024-43830)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi
Handle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi is valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xdp: fix invalid wait context of page_pool_destroy()
If the driver uses a page pool, it creates a page pool with page_pool_create(). The reference count of page pool is 1 as default. A page pool will be destroyed only when a reference count reaches 0. page_pool_destroy() is used to destroy page pool, it decreases a reference count. When a page pool is destroyed, ->disconnect() is called, which is mem_allocator_disconnect(). This function internally acquires mutex_lock().
If the driver uses XDP, it registers a memory model with xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(). The xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() internally increases a page pool reference count if a memory model is a page pool. Now the reference count is 2.
To destroy a page pool, the driver should call both page_pool_destroy() and xdp_unreg_mem_model(). The xdp_unreg_mem_model() internally calls page_pool_destroy(). Only page_pool_destroy() decreases a reference count.
If a driver calls page_pool_destroy() then xdp_unreg_mem_model(), we will face an invalid wait context warning. Because xdp_unreg_mem_model() calls page_pool_destroy() with rcu_read_lock(). The page_pool_destroy() internally acquires mutex_lock().
Splat looks like:
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 Tainted: G W
ethtool/1806 is trying to lock: ffffffff90387b90 (mem_id_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 3 locks held by ethtool/1806: stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1806 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 f916f41f172891c800f2fed Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z690-P D4, BIOS 0603 11/01/2021 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0 __lock_acquire+0x1681/0x4de0 ? _printk+0x64/0xe0 ? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfxlockacquire+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1b3/0x580 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x16/0xc0 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xc0 __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1690 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_prb_read_valid+0x10/0x10 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_llist_add_batch+0x10/0x10 ? console_unlock+0x193/0x1b0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbe/0x140 ? __pfxmutexlock+0x10/0x10 ? tick_nohz_tick_stopped+0x16/0x90 ? irq_work_queue_local+0x1e5/0x330 ? irq_work_queue+0x39/0x50 ? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x79/0xc0 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_mem_allocator_disconnect+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0 page_pool_release+0x36e/0x6d0 page_pool_destroy+0xd7/0x440 xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x1a7/0x2a0 ? __pfx_xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x10/0x10 ? kfree+0x125/0x370 ? bnxt_free_ring.isra.0+0x2eb/0x500 ? bnxt_free_mem+0x5ac/0x2500 xdp_rxq_info_unreg+0x4a/0xd0 bnxt_free_mem+0x1356/0x2500 bnxt_close_nic+0xf0/0x3b0 ? __pfx_bnxt_close_nic+0x10/0x10 ? ethnl_parse_bit+0x2c6/0x6d0 ? __pfxnlavalidate_parse+0x10/0x10 ? pfx_ethnl_parse_bit+0x10/0x10 bnxt_set_features+0x2a8/0x3e0 __netdev_update_features+0x4dc/0x1370 ? ethnl_parse_bitset+0x4ff/0x750 ? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bitset+0x10/0x10 ? __pfxnetdevupdate_features+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x70 ? pm_runtime_resume+0x7d/0x110 ethnl_set_features+0x32d/0xa20
To fix this problem, it uses rhashtable_lookup_fast() instead of rhashtable_lookup() with rcu_read_lock(). Using xa without rcu_read_lock() here is safe. xa is freed by __xdp_mem_allocator_rcu_free() and this is called by call_rcu() of mem_xa_remove(). The mem_xa_remove() is called by page_pool_destroy() if a reference count reaches 0. The xa is already protected by the reference count mechanism well in the control plane. So removing rcu_read_lock() for page_pool_destroy() is safe.(CVE-2024-43834)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf, arm64: Fix trampoline for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG
When BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is set, the trampoline calls __bpf_tramp_enter() and __bpf_tramp_exit() functions, passing them the struct bpf_tramp_image *im pointer as an argument in R0.
The trampoline generation code uses emit_addr_mov_i64() to emit instructions for moving the bpf_tramp_image address into R0, but emit_addr_mov_i64() assumes the address to be in the vmalloc() space and uses only 48 bits. Because bpf_tramp_image is allocated using kzalloc(), its address can use more than 48-bits, in this case the trampoline will pass an invalid address to __bpf_tramp_enter/exit() causing a kernel crash.
Fix this by using emit_a64_mov_i64() in place of emit_addr_mov_i64() as it can work with addresses that are greater than 48-bits.(CVE-2024-43840)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL
In imx_rproc_addr_init() "nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()" just counts number of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in the parsing loop (0 < a < nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced. Adjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr
Commit 73f576c04b94 ("mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after many small jobs") decoupled the memcg IDs from the CSS ID space to fix the cgroup creation failures. It introduced IDR to maintain the memcg ID space. The IDR depends on external synchronization mechanisms for modifications. For the mem_cgroup_idr, the idr_alloc() and idr_replace() happen within css callback and thus are protected through cgroup_mutex from concurrent modifications. However idr_remove() for mem_cgroup_idr was not protected against concurrency and can be run concurrently for different memcgs when they hit their refcnt to zero. Fix that.
We have been seeing list_lru based kernel crashes at a low frequency in our fleet for a long time. These crashes were in different part of list_lru code including list_lru_add(), list_lru_del() and reparenting code. Upon further inspection, it looked like for a given object (dentry and inode), the super_block's list_lru didn't have list_lru_one for the memcg of that object. The initial suspicions were either the object is not allocated through kmem_cache_alloc_lru() or somehow memcg_list_lru_alloc() failed to allocate list_lru_one() for a memcg but returned success. No evidence were found for these cases.
Looking more deeply, we started seeing situations where valid memcg's id is not present in mem_cgroup_idr and in some cases multiple valid memcgs have same id and mem_cgroup_idr is pointing to one of them. So, the most reasonable explanation is that these situations can happen due to race between multiple idr_remove() calls or race between idr_alloc()/idr_replace() and idr_remove(). These races are causing multiple memcgs to acquire the same ID and then offlining of one of them would cleanup list_lrus on the system for all of them. Later access from other memcgs to the list_lru cause crashes due to missing list_lru_one.(CVE-2024-43892)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: core: check uartclk for zero to avoid divide by zero
Calling ioctl TIOCSSERIAL with an invalid baud_base can result in uartclk being zero, which will result in a divide by zero error in uart_get_divisor(). The check for uartclk being zero in uart_set_info() needs to be done before other settings are made as subsequent calls to ioctl TIOCSSERIAL for the same port would be impacted if the uartclk check was done where uartclk gets set.
Oops: divide error: 0000 PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI RIP: 0010:uart_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:580) Call Trace: <TASK> serial8250_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2576 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2589) serial8250_do_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:502 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2741) serial8250_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2862) uart_change_line_settings (./include/linux/spinlock.h:376 ./include/linux/serial_core.h:608 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:222) uart_port_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:342) uart_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:368) uart_set_info (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1034) uart_set_info_user (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1059) tty_set_serial (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2637) tty_ioctl (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2647 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2791) __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:907 fs/ioctl.c:893 fs/ioctl.c:893) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
Rule: add(CVE-2024-43893)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/client: fix null pointer dereference in drm_client_modeset_probe
In drm_client_modeset_probe(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to modeset->mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-43894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()
Userspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio descriptor array. Users can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range. Offset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get the gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().
This change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using array_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative information leaks.
This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race
uevent_show() wants to de-reference dev->driver->name. There is no clean way for a device attribute to de-reference dev->driver unless that attribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the anti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks deadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding the lock.
This deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock() is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a local lockdep key for @dev->mutex to reveal reports of the form:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N
modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8c2270070de0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220
but task is already holding lock: ffff8c22016e88f8 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30 uevent_show+0xac/0x130 dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0 seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450 vfs_read+0x25b/0x340 ksys_read+0x67/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
-> #0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0 kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200 __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0 device_del+0x168/0x410 device_unregister+0x13/0x60 devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110 device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70 device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210 driver_detach+0x47/0x90 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0 cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer lived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless de-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a device. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use synchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential races. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to handle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.
Thanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok
We must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: flowtable: initialise extack before use
Fix missing initialisation of extack in flow offload.(CVE-2024-45018)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: pn533: Add poll mod list filling check
In case of im_protocols value is 1 and tm_protocols value is 0 this combination successfully passes the check 'if (!im_protocols && !tm_protocols)' in the nfc_start_poll(). But then after pn533_poll_create_mod_list() call in pn533_start_poll() poll mod list will remain empty and dev->poll_mod_count will remain 0 which lead to division by zero.
Normally no im protocol has value 1 in the mask, so this combination is not expected by driver. But these protocol values actually come from userspace via Netlink interface (NFC_CMD_START_POLL operation). So a broken or malicious program may pass a message containing a "bad" combination of protocol parameter values so that dev->poll_mod_count is not incremented inside pn533_poll_create_mod_list(), thus leading to division by zero. Call trace looks like: nfc_genl_start_poll() nfc_start_poll() ->start_poll() pn533_start_poll()
Add poll mod list filling check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-46676)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB
Linux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write protected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction as "write" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt which causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.
The only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor maps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation tables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like Xen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.
Changing the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC removes dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch fixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.
I tested this on SA8155P with Xen.(CVE-2024-46689)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: ucsi: Move unregister out of atomic section
Commit '9329933699b3 ("soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Make client-lock non-sleeping")' moved the pmic_glink client list under a spinlock, as it is accessed by the rpmsg/glink callback, which in turn is invoked from IRQ context.
This means that ucsi_unregister() is now called from atomic context, which isn't feasible as it's expecting a sleepable context. An effort is under way to get GLINK to invoke its callbacks in a sleepable context, but until then lets schedule the unregistration.
A side effect of this is that ucsi_unregister() can now happen after the remote processor, and thereby the communication link with it, is gone. pmic_glink_send() is amended with a check to avoid the resulting NULL pointer dereference. This does however result in the user being informed about this error by the following entry in the kernel log:
ucsi_glink.pmic_glink_ucsi pmic_glink.ucsi.0: failed to send UCSI write request: -5(CVE-2024-46691)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vmwgfx: Fix prime with external buffers
Make sure that for external buffers mapping goes through the dma_buf interface instead of trying to access pages directly.
External buffers might not provide direct access to readable/writable pages so to make sure the bo's created from external dma_bufs can be read dma_buf interface has to be used.
Fixes crashes in IGT's kms_prime with vgem. Regular desktop usage won't trigger this due to the fact that virtual machines will not have multiple GPUs but it enables better test coverage in IGT.(CVE-2024-46709)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor
Remove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role of msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with list_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.
This fixes the path: msgdma_free_chan_resources -> msgdma_free_descriptors -> msgdma_free_desc_list -> msgdma_free_descriptor
which does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not removed from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Ensure index calculation will not overflow
[WHY & HOW] Make sure vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx and vmax0p9_idx calculation will never overflow and exceess array size.
This fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46726)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.
The syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked via bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf() first.
Martin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL probably didn't work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a ("ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF"). The reason is that the per-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self test case but each BPF function expects it.
Remove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.(CVE-2024-46754)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: unset the binding mark of a reused connection
Steve French reported null pointer dereference error from sha256 lib. cifs.ko can send session setup requests on reused connection. If reused connection is used for binding session, conn->binding can still remain true and generate_preauth_hash() will not set sess->Preauth_HashValue and it will be NULL. It is used as a material to create an encryption key in ksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey. ->Preauth_HashValue cause null pointer dereference error from crypto_shash_update().
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 8 PID: 429254 Comm: kworker/8:39 Hardware name: LENOVO 20MAS08500/20MAS08500, BIOS N2CET69W (1.52 ) Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work [ksmbd] RIP: 0010:lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3] <TASK> ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80 ? __die+0x24/0x80 ? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2ee/0x6b0 ? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] ? lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3] ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] _sha256_update+0x77/0xa0 [sha256_ssse3] sha256_avx2_update+0x15/0x30 [sha256_ssse3] crypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40 hmac_update+0x12/0x20 crypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40 generate_key+0x234/0x380 [ksmbd] generate_smb3encryptionkey+0x40/0x1c0 [ksmbd] ksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey+0x72/0xa0 [ksmbd] ntlm_authenticate.isra.0+0x423/0x5d0 [ksmbd] smb2_sess_setup+0x952/0xaa0 [ksmbd] __process_request+0xa3/0x1d0 [ksmbd] __handle_ksmbd_work+0x1c4/0x2f0 [ksmbd] handle_ksmbd_work+0x2d/0xa0 [ksmbd] process_one_work+0x16c/0x350 worker_thread+0x306/0x440 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xef/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK>(CVE-2024-46795)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: fix the waring dereferencing hive
Check the amdgpu_hive_info *hive that maybe is NULL.(CVE-2024-46805)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/bridge: tc358767: Check if fully initialized before signalling HPD event via IRQ
Make sure the connector is fully initialized before signalling any HPD events via drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(), otherwise this may lead to NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-46810)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6
[Why] Coverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm initialize.
[How] Return failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: the warning dereferencing obj for nbio_v7_4
if ras_manager obj null, don't print NBIO err data(CVE-2024-46819)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/pm: Fix negative array index read
Avoid using the negative values for clk_idex as an index into an array pptable->DpmDescriptor.
V2: fix clk_index return check (Tim Huang)(CVE-2024-46821)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry
In a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where a check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was noted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index into a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.
If an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible for the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would then cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger this has not been established, harden this caller against the possibility.(CVE-2024-46822)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read
ELF loader uses "randomize_va_space" twice. It is sysctl and can change at any moment, so 2 loads could see 2 different values in theory with unpredictable consequences.
Issue exactly one load for consistent value across one exec.(CVE-2024-46826)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: Acquire kvm->srcu when handling KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
Grab kvm->srcu when processing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, as KVM will forcibly leave nested VMX/SVM if SMM mode is being toggled, and leaving nested VMX reads guest memory.
Note, kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events() can also be called from KVM_RUN via sync_regs(), which already holds SRCU. I.e. trying to precisely use kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock() around the problematic SMM code would cause problems. Acquiring SRCU isn't all that expensive, so for simplicity, grab it unconditionally for KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS.
============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Not tainted
include/linux/kvm_host.h:1027 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by repro/1071: #0: ffff88811e424430 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]
stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 1071 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0x90 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x13f/0x1a0 kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x168/0x190 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_read_guest+0x3e/0x90 [kvm] nested_vmx_load_msr+0x6b/0x1d0 [kvm_intel] load_vmcs12_host_state+0x432/0xb40 [kvm_intel] vmx_leave_nested+0x30/0x40 [kvm_intel] kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events+0x15d/0x2b0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x1107/0x1750 [kvm] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm] ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm] ? lock_acquire+0xba/0x2d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x40c/0x6f0 ? lock_release+0xb7/0x270 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7ff11eb1b539 </TASK>(CVE-2024-46830)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc
We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.
Found by static analysis.(CVE-2024-46836)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
userfaultfd: don't BUG_ON() if khugepaged yanks our page table
Since khugepaged was changed to allow retracting page tables in file mappings without holding the mmap lock, these BUG_ON()s are wrong - get rid of them.
We could also remove the preceding "if (unlikely(...))" block, but then we could reach pte_offset_map_lock() with transhuge pages not just for file mappings but also for anonymous mappings - which would probably be fine but I think is not necessarily expected.(CVE-2024-46838)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete
In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient incorrect answer. In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could happen if we have extent tree corruption. Change that to return -EUCLEAN. In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly, however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code. Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert that to proper error handling. Also adjust the error message so we can actually do something with the information.(CVE-2024-46840)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: dpaa: Pad packets to ETH_ZLEN
When sending packets under 60 bytes, up to three bytes of the buffer following the data may be leaked. Avoid this by extending all packets to ETH_ZLEN, ensuring nothing is leaked in the padding. This bug can be reproduced by running
$ ping -s 11 destination(CVE-2024-46854)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_socket: fix sk refcount leaks
We must put 'sk' reference before returning.(CVE-2024-46855)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync
There are two paths to access mptcp_pm_del_add_timer, result in a race condition:
CPU1 CPU2
==== ====
net_rx_action
napi_poll netlink_sendmsg
__napi_poll netlink_unicast
process_backlog netlink_unicast_kernel
__netif_receive_skb genl_rcv
__netif_receive_skb_one_core netlink_rcv_skb
NF_HOOK genl_rcv_msg
ip_local_deliver_finish genl_family_rcv_msg
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu genl_family_rcv_msg_doit
tcp_v4_rcv mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit
tcp_v4_do_rcv mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list
tcp_rcv_established mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows
tcp_data_queue remove_anno_list_by_saddr
mptcp_incoming_options mptcp_pm_del_add_timer
mptcp_pm_del_add_timer kfree(entry)
In remove_anno_list_by_saddr(running on CPU2), after leaving the critical zone protected by "pm.lock", the entry will be released, which leads to the occurrence of uaf in the mptcp_pm_del_add_timer(running on CPU1).
Keeping a reference to add_timer inside the lock, and calling sk_stop_timer_sync() with this reference, instead of "entry->add_timer".
Move list_del(&entry->list) to mptcp_pm_del_add_timer and inside the pm lock, do not directly access any members of the entry outside the pm lock, which can avoid similar "entry->x" uaf.(CVE-2024-46858)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses
The panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index values of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array is big enough.
Not all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example the Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only supports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.
Check that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC brightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.
For higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array does not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store() accessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe() and resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: stm32/cryp - call finalize with bh disabled
The finalize operation in interrupt mode produce a produces a spinlock recursion warning. The reason is the fact that BH must be disabled during this process.(CVE-2024-47658)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Error out instead on BUG_ON() in IBI DMA setup
Definitely condition dma_get_cache_alignment * defined value > 256 during driver initialization is not reason to BUG_ON(). Turn that to graceful error out with -EINVAL.(CVE-2024-47665)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix state management in error path of log writing function
After commit a694291a6211 ("nilfs2: separate wait function from nilfs_segctor_write") was applied, the log writing function nilfs_segctor_do_construct() was able to issue I/O requests continuously even if user data blocks were split into multiple logs across segments, but two potential flaws were introduced in its error handling.
First, if nilfs_segctor_begin_construction() fails while creating the second or subsequent logs, the log writing function returns without calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction(), so the writeback flag set on pages/folios will remain uncleared. This causes page cache operations to hang waiting for the writeback flag. For example, truncate_inode_pages_final(), which is called via nilfs_evict_inode() when an inode is evicted from memory, will hang.
Second, the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag set on normal inodes remain uncleared. As a result, if the next log write involves checkpoint creation, that's fine, but if a partial log write is performed that does not, inodes with NILFS_I_COLLECTED set are erroneously removed from the "sc_dirty_files" list, and their data and b-tree blocks may not be written to the device, corrupting the block mapping.
Fix these issues by uniformly calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction() on failure of each step in the loop in nilfs_segctor_do_construct(), having it clean up logs and segment usages according to progress, and correcting the conditions for calling nilfs_redirty_inodes() to ensure that the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag is cleared.(CVE-2024-47669)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: usbtmc: prevent kernel-usb-infoleak
The syzbot reported a kernel-usb-infoleak in usbtmc_write, we need to clear the structure before filling fields.(CVE-2024-47671)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don't wait for tx queues if firmware is dead
There is a WARNING in iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() (that was recently converted from just a message), that can be hit if we wait for TX queues to become empty after firmware died. Clearly, we can't expect anything from the firmware after it's declared dead.
Don't call iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() in this case. While it could be a good idea to stop the flow earlier, the flush functions do some maintenance work that is not related to the firmware, so keep that part of the code running even when the firmware is not running.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() If bpf_link_prime() fails, bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() goes to the error_free label and frees the array of bpf_uprobe's without calling bpf_uprobe_unregister(). This leaks bpf_uprobe->uprobe and worse, this frees bpf_uprobe->consumer without removing it from the uprobe->consumers list.(CVE-2024-47675)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers/perf: Fix ali_drw_pmu driver interrupt status clearing The alibaba_uncore_pmu driver forgot to clear all interrupt status in the interrupt processing function. After the PMU counter overflow interrupt occurred, an interrupt storm occurred, causing the system to hang. Therefore, clear the correct interrupt status in the interrupt handling function to fix it.(CVE-2024-47731)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race setting file private on concurrent lseek using same fd When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak. The race happens like this: 1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them task A and task B; 2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode; 3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file's private_data pointer into a local variable named 'private', which has a value of NULL; 4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also extracts file->private_data into its local variable 'private', which has a NULL value; 5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private structure and assigns to the file structure; 6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both tasks are using the same file descriptor. At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A. Besides the memory leak, there's also the detail that both tasks end up using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do range validation before using the cached state. Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while holding the inode's spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated the private, so that it's used only by that task in order to prevent user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially using it incorrectly in the future.(CVE-2024-47741)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\napparmor: Fix null pointer deref when receiving skb during sock creation\r\n\r\nThe panic below is observed when receiving ICMP packets with secmark set\nwhile an ICMP raw socket is being created. SK_CTX(sk)-\u0026gt;label is updated\nin apparmor_socket_post_create(), but the packet is delivered to the\nsocket before that, causing the null pointer dereference.\nDrop the packet if label context is not set.\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000004c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n CPU: 0 PID: 407 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.4.12-arch1-1 #1 3e6fa2753a2d75925c34ecb78e22e85a65d083df\n Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 05/28/2020\n RIP: 0010:aa_label_next_confined+0xb/0x40\n Code: 00 00 48 89 ef e8 d5 25 0c 00 e9 66 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 66 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 89 f0 \u0026lt;8b\u0026gt; 77 4c 39 c6 7e 1f 48 63 d0 48 8d 14 d7 eb 0b 83 c0 01 48 83 c2\n RSP: 0018:ffffa92940003b08 EFLAGS: 00010246\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000000e\n RDX: ffffa92940003be8 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\n RBP: ffff8b57471e7800 R08: ffff8b574c642400 R09: 0000000000000002\n R10: ffffffffbd820eeb R11: ffffffffbeb7ff00 R12: ffff8b574c642400\n R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 00007fb092ea7640(0000) GS:ffff8b577bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000004c CR3: 00000001020f2005 CR4: 00000000007706f0\n PKRU: 55555554\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x23/0x70\n ? page_fault_oops+0x171/0x4e0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x7f/0x180\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n ? aa_label_next_confined+0xb/0x40\n apparmor_secmark_check+0xec/0x330\n security_sock_rcv_skb+0x35/0x50\n sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x250\n sock_queue_rcv_skb_reason+0x20/0x60\n raw_rcv+0x13c/0x210\n raw_local_deliver+0x1f3/0x250\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x4f/0x2f0\n ip_local_deliver_finish+0x76/0xa0\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x89/0xa0\n netif_receive_skb+0x119/0x170\n ? __netdev_alloc_skb+0x3d/0x140\n vmxnet3_rq_rx_complete+0xb23/0x1010 [vmxnet3 56a84f9c97178c57a43a24ec073b45a9d6f01f3a]\n vmxnet3_poll_rx_only+0x36/0xb0 [vmxnet3 56a84f9c97178c57a43a24ec073b45a9d6f01f3a]\n __napi_poll+0x28/0x1b0\n net_rx_action+0x2a4/0x380\n __do_softirq+0xd1/0x2c8\n __irq_exit_rcu+0xbb/0xf0\n common_interrupt+0x86/0xa0\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40\n RIP: 0010:apparmor_socket_post_create+0xb/0x200\n Code: 08 48 85 ff 75 a1 eb b1 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 \u0026lt;55\u0026gt; 48 89 fd 53 45 85 c0 0f 84 b2 00 00 00 48 8b 1d 80 56 3f 02 48\n RSP: 0018:ffffa92940ce7e50 EFLAGS: 00000286\n RAX: ffffffffbc756440 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001\n RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff8b574eaab740\n RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: ffff8b57444cec70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003\n R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffff8b574eaab740 R15: ffffffffbd8e4748\n ? __pfx_apparmor_socket_post_create+0x10/0x10\n security_socket_post_create+0x4b/0x80\n __sock_create+0x176/0x1f0\n __sys_socket+0x89/0x100\n __x64_sys_socket+0x17/0x20\n do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90\n ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90\n ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90\n ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc(CVE-2023-52889)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout\r\n\r\nAdd a timestamp field at the beginning of the transaction, store it\nin the nftables per-netns area.\r\n\r\nUpdate set backend .insert, .deactivate and sync gc path to use the\ntimestamp, this avoids that an element expires while control plane\ntransaction is still unfinished.\r\n\r\n.lookup and .update, which are used from packet path, still use the\ncurrent time to check if the element has expired. And .get path and dump\nalso since this runs lockless under rcu read size lock. Then, there is\nasync gc which also needs to check the current time since it runs\nasynchronously from a workqueue.(CVE-2024-27397)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: msft: fix slab-use-after-free in msft_do_close()\r\n\r\nTying the msft-\u0026gt;data lifetime to hdev by freeing it in\nhci_release_dev() to fix the following case:\r\n\r\n[use]\nmsft_do_close()\n msft = hdev-\u0026gt;msft_data;\n if (!msft) ...(1) \u0026lt;- passed.\n return;\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;msft-\u0026gt;filter_lock); ...(4) \u0026lt;- used after freed.\r\n\r\n[free]\nmsft_unregister()\n msft = hdev-\u0026gt;msft_data;\n hdev-\u0026gt;msft_data = NULL; ...(2)\n kfree(msft); ...(3) \u0026lt;- msft is freed.\r\n\r\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common\nkernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0x8f/0xc30\nkernel/locking/mutex.c:752\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff888106cbbca8 by task kworker/u5:2/309(CVE-2024-36012)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nppdev: Add an error check in register_device\r\n\r\nIn register_device, the return value of ida_simple_get is unchecked,\nin witch ida_simple_get will use an invalid index value.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, index should be checked after ida_simple_get. When\nthe index value is abnormal, a warning message should be printed, the port\nshould be dropped, and the value should be recorded.(CVE-2024-36015)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: qca: fix info leak when fetching fw build id\r\n\r\nAdd the missing sanity checks and move the 255-byte build-id buffer off\nthe stack to avoid leaking stack data through debugfs in case the\nbuild-info reply is malformed.(CVE-2024-36032)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too\r\n\r\nIt is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the\nblamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a\ncycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of\nentry intervals.\r\n\r\nWe need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must\nbe larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule\nentries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle\ntime came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so\nwe move the existing \u0026quot;cycle == 0\u0026quot; check outside the \u0026quot;if \u0026quot;(!new-\u0026gt;cycle_time)\u0026quot;\nbranch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.\r\n\r\nAdd a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: qca: add missing firmware sanity checks\r\n\r\nAdd the missing sanity checks when parsing the firmware files before\ndownloading them to avoid accessing and corrupting memory beyond the\nvmalloced buffer.(CVE-2024-36880)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect\r\n\r\nChristoph reported a splat hinting at a corrupted snd_una:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 38 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 __mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-gbbeac67456c9 #59\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014\n Workqueue: events mptcp_worker\n RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005\n Code: be 06 01 00 00 bf 06 01 00 00 e8 a8 12 e7 fe e9 00 fe ff ff e8\n \t8e 1a e7 fe 0f b7 ab 3e 02 00 00 e9 d3 fd ff ff e8 7d 1a e7 fe\n \t\u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 4c 8b bb e0 05 00 00 e9 74 fc ff ff e8 6a 1a e7 fe 0f 0b e9\n RSP: 0018:ffffc9000013fd48 EFLAGS: 00010293\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881029bd280 RCX: ffffffff82382fe4\n RDX: ffff8881003cbd00 RSI: ffffffff823833c3 RDI: 0000000000000001\n RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888138ba8000\n R13: 0000000000000106 R14: ffff8881029bd908 R15: ffff888126560000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f604a5dae38 CR3: 0000000101dac002 CR4: 0000000000170ef0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1055 [inline]\n mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1062 [inline]\n __mptcp_retrans+0x7f/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2615\n mptcp_worker+0x434/0x740 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2767\n process_one_work+0x1e0/0x560 kernel/workqueue.c:3254\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x3c7/0x640 kernel/workqueue.c:3416\n kthread+0x121/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x44/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nWhen fallback to TCP happens early on a client socket, snd_nxt\nis not yet initialized and any incoming ack will copy such value\ninto snd_una. If the mptcp worker (dumbly) tries mptcp-level\nre-injection after such ack, that would unconditionally trigger a send\nbuffer cleanup using \u0026apos;bad\u0026apos; snd_una values.\r\n\r\nWe could easily disable re-injection for fallback sockets, but such\ndumb behavior already helped catching a few subtle issues and a very\nlow to zero impact in practice.\r\n\r\nInstead address the issue always initializing snd_nxt (and write_seq,\nfor consistency) at connect time.(CVE-2024-36889)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete\r\n\r\nFFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue\npending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the\nFFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a\nsoft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks\nlike the following:\r\n\r\n DWC3 Gadget FFS Application\ndwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ...\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_stop_active_transfers()\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN)\n --\u0026gt; ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel()\n --\u0026gt; usb_ep_free_request() --\u0026gt; usb_ep_dequeue()\r\n\r\nThere is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion\nhandler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is\nrunning in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application.\nAs the completion call frees the USB request (io_data-\u0026gt;req) the FFS\napplication is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can\nlead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.\r\n\r\ncommit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status consistently\u0026quot;)\nrelocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete().\nHowever, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the\nspinlock can\u0026apos;t be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as\nusb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the\nfunction driver\u0026apos;s completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading\ninto a deadlock.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to\nffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data-\u0026gt;req\nto NULL after freeing it within the ffs-\u0026gt;eps_lock. This resolves the race\ncondition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue\nattempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the\nffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is\ndone referencing it.\r\n\r\nThis fix depends on\n commit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status\n consistently\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-36894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nDrivers: hv: vmbus: Don\u0026apos;t free ring buffers that couldn\u0026apos;t be re-encrypted\r\n\r\nIn CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nThe VMBus ring buffer code could free decrypted/shared pages if\nset_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the struct\nvmbus_gpadl for the ring buffers to decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36909)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nuio_hv_generic: Don\u0026apos;t free decrypted memory\r\n\r\nIn CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nThe VMBus device UIO driver could free decrypted/shared pages if\nset_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the gpadl\nto decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36910)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhv_netvsc: Don\u0026apos;t free decrypted memory\r\n\r\nIn CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nThe netvsc driver could free decrypted/shared pages if\nset_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the gpadl\nto decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36911)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nDrivers: hv: vmbus: Leak pages if set_memory_encrypted() fails\r\n\r\nIn CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nVMBus code could free decrypted pages if set_memory_encrypted()/decrypted()\nfails. Leak the pages if this happens.(CVE-2024-36913)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: llcp: fix nfc_llcp_setsockopt() unsafe copies\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported unsafe calls to copy_from_sockptr() [1]\r\n\r\nUse copy_safe_from_sockptr() instead.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nfc_llcp_setsockopt+0x6c2/0x850 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:255\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88801caa1ec3 by task syz-executor459/5078\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 5078 Comm: syz-executor459 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n nfc_llcp_setsockopt+0x6c2/0x850 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:255\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x3b1/0x720 net/socket.c:2311\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\nRIP: 0033:0x7f7fac07fd89\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 91 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fff660eb788 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f7fac07fd89\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000118 RDI: 0000000000000004\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000020000a80 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000(CVE-2024-36915)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Check bloom filter map value size\r\n\r\nThis patch adds a missing check to bloom filter creating, rejecting\nvalues above KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. This brings the bloom map in line with\nmany other map types.\r\n\r\nThe lack of this protection can cause kernel crashes for value sizes\nthat overflow int\u0026apos;s. Such a crash was caught by syzkaller. The next\npatch adds more guard-rails at a lower level.(CVE-2024-36918)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: mpi3mr: Avoid memcpy field-spanning write WARNING\r\n\r\nWhen the \u0026quot;storcli2 show\u0026quot; command is executed for eHBA-9600, mpi3mr driver\nprints this WARNING message:\r\n\r\n memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 128) of single field \u0026quot;bsg_reply_buf-\u0026gt;reply_buf\u0026quot; at drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:1658 (size 1)\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12760 at drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:1658 mpi3mr_bsg_request+0x6b12/0x7f10 [mpi3mr]\r\n\r\nThe cause of the WARN is 128 bytes memcpy to the 1 byte size array \u0026quot;__u8\nreplay_buf[1]\u0026quot; in the struct mpi3mr_bsg_in_reply_buf. The array is intended\nto be a flexible length array, so the WARN is a false positive.\r\n\r\nTo suppress the WARN, remove the constant number \u0026apos;1\u0026apos; from the array\ndeclaration and clarify that it has flexible length. Also, adjust the\nmemory allocation size to match the change.(CVE-2024-36920)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: guard against invalid STA ID on removal\r\n\r\nGuard against invalid station IDs in iwl_mvm_mld_rm_sta_id as that would\nresult in out-of-bounds array accesses. This prevents issues should the\ndriver get into a bad state during error handling.(CVE-2024-36921)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: read txq-\u0026gt;read_ptr under lock\r\n\r\nIf we read txq-\u0026gt;read_ptr without lock, we can read the same\nvalue twice, then obtain the lock, and reclaim from there\nto two different places, but crucially reclaim the same\nentry twice, resulting in the WARN_ONCE() a little later.\nFix that by reading txq-\u0026gt;read_ptr under lock.(CVE-2024-36922)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()\r\n\r\nKMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb()\ntests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, HDRINCL can cause a\nrace condition. If calling setsockopt(2) with IP_HDRINCL changes HDRINCL\nwhile __ip_make_skb() is running, the function will access icmphdr in the\nskb even if it is not included. This causes the issue reported by KMSAN.\r\n\r\nCheck FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl4-\u0026gt;flowi4_flags instead of testing HDRINCL\non the socket.\r\n\r\nAlso, fl4-\u0026gt;fl4_icmp_type and fl4-\u0026gt;fl4_icmp_code are not initialized. These\nare union in struct flowi4 and are implicitly initialized by\nflowi4_init_output(), but we should not rely on specific union layout.\r\n\r\nInitialize these explicitly in raw_sendmsg().\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481\n __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481\n ip_finish_skb include/net/ip.h:243 [inline]\n ip_push_pending_frames+0x4c/0x5c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1508\n raw_sendmsg+0x2381/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:654\n inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f6/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35a/0x7c0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n __ip_append_data+0x49ab/0x68c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1128\n ip_append_data+0x1e7/0x260 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1365\n raw_sendmsg+0x22b1/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:648\n inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 15709 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-11567-gb3603fcb79b1 #25\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-36927)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nefi/unaccepted: touch soft lockup during memory accept\r\n\r\nCommit 50e782a86c98 (\u0026quot;efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by\nparallel memory acceptance\u0026quot;) has released the spinlock so other CPUs can\ndo memory acceptance in parallel and not triggers softlockup on other\nCPUs.\r\n\r\nHowever the softlock up was intermittent shown up if the memory of the\nTD guest is large, and the timeout of softlockup is set to 1 second:\r\n\r\n RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore\n Call Trace:\n ? __hrtimer_run_queues\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n ? hrtimer_interrupt\n ? watchdog_timer_fn\n ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn\n ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n ? __hrtimer_run_queues\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? hrtimer_interrupt\n ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore\n ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n accept_memory\n try_to_accept_memory\n do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page\n get_page_from_freelist\n __handle_mm_fault\n __alloc_pages\n __folio_alloc\n ? __tdx_hypercall\n handle_mm_fault\n vma_alloc_folio\n do_user_addr_fault\n do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page\n exc_page_fault\n ? __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page\n asm_exc_page_fault\n __handle_mm_fault\r\n\r\nWhen the local irq is enabled at the end of accept_memory(), the\nsoftlockup detects that the watchdog on single CPU has not been fed for\na while. That is to say, even other CPUs will not be blocked by\nspinlock, the current CPU might be stunk with local irq disabled for a\nwhile, which hurts not only nmi watchdog but also softlockup.\r\n\r\nChao Gao pointed out that the memory accept could be time costly and\nthere was similar report before. Thus to avoid any softlocup detection\nduring this stage, give the softlockup a flag to skip the timeout check\nat the end of accept_memory(), by invoking touch_softlockup_watchdog().(CVE-2024-36936)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()\r\n\r\nThe \u0026quot;pctldev\u0026quot; struct is allocated in devm_pinctrl_register_and_init().\nIt\u0026apos;s a devm_ managed pointer that is freed by devm_pinctrl_dev_release(),\nso freeing it in pinctrl_enable() will lead to a double free.\r\n\r\nThe devm_pinctrl_dev_release() function frees the pindescs and destroys\nthe mutex as well.(CVE-2024-36940)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: nl80211: don\u0026apos;t free NULL coalescing rule\r\n\r\nIf the parsing fails, we can dereference a NULL pointer here.(CVE-2024-36941)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphonet: fix rtm_phonet_notify() skb allocation\r\n\r\nfill_route() stores three components in the skb:\r\n\r\n- struct rtmsg\n- RTA_DST (u8)\n- RTA_OIF (u32)\r\n\r\nTherefore, rtm_phonet_notify() should use\r\n\r\nNLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtmsg)) +\nnla_total_size(1) +\nnla_total_size(4)(CVE-2024-36946)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntracefs: Reset permissions on remount if permissions are options\r\n\r\nThere\u0026apos;s an inconsistency with the way permissions are handled in tracefs.\nBecause the permissions are generated when accessed, they default to the\nroot inode\u0026apos;s permission if they were never set by the user. If the user\nsets the permissions, then a flag is set and the permissions are saved via\nthe inode (for tracefs files) or an internal attribute field (for\neventfs).\r\n\r\nBut if a remount happens that specify the permissions, all the files that\nwere not changed by the user gets updated, but the ones that were are not.\nIf the user were to remount the file system with a given permission, then\nall files and directories within that file system should be updated.\r\n\r\nThis can cause security issues if a file\u0026apos;s permission was updated but the\nadmin forgot about it. They could incorrectly think that remounting with\npermissions set would update all files, but miss some.\r\n\r\nFor example:\r\n\r\n # cd /sys/kernel/tracing\n # chgrp 1002 current_tracer\n # ls -l\n[..]\n -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_size_kb\n -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_subbuf_size_kb\n -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_total_size_kb\n -rw-r----- 1 root lkp 0 May 1 21:25 current_tracer\n -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 dynamic_events\n -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 dyn_ftrace_total_info\n -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 enabled_functions\r\n\r\nWhere current_tracer now has group \u0026quot;lkp\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\n # mount -o remount,gid=1001 .\n # ls -l\n -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_size_kb\n -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_subbuf_size_kb\n -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_total_size_kb\n -rw-r----- 1 root lkp 0 May 1 21:25 current_tracer\n -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 dynamic_events\n -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 dyn_ftrace_total_info\n -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 enabled_functions\r\n\r\nEverything changed but the \u0026quot;current_tracer\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nAdd a new link list that keeps track of all the tracefs_inodes which has\nthe permission flags that tell if the file/dir should use the root inode\u0026apos;s\npermission or not. Then on remount, clear all the flags so that the\ndefault behavior of using the root inode\u0026apos;s permission is done for all\nfiles and directories.(CVE-2024-36963)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fix __dst_negative_advice() race\r\n\r\n__dst_negative_advice() does not enforce proper RCU rules when\nsk-\u0026gt;dst_cache must be cleared, leading to possible UAF.\r\n\r\nRCU rules are that we must first clear sk-\u0026gt;sk_dst_cache,\nthen call dst_release(old_dst).\r\n\r\nNote that sk_dst_reset(sk) is implementing this protocol correctly,\nwhile __dst_negative_advice() uses the wrong order.\r\n\r\nGiven that ip6_negative_advice() has special logic\nagainst RTF_CACHE, this means each of the three -\u0026gt;negative_advice()\nexisting methods must perform the sk_dst_reset() themselves.\r\n\r\nNote the check against NULL dst is centralized in\n__dst_negative_advice(), there is no need to duplicate\nit in various callbacks.\r\n\r\nMany thanks to Clement Lecigne for tracking this issue.\r\n\r\nThis old bug became visible after the blamed commit, using UDP sockets.(CVE-2024-36971)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: stmmac: move the EST lock to struct stmmac_priv\r\n\r\nReinitialize the whole EST structure would also reset the mutex\nlock which is embedded in the EST structure, and then trigger\nthe following warning. To address this, move the lock to struct\nstmmac_priv. We also need to reacquire the mutex lock when doing\nthis initialization.\r\n\r\nDEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock-\u0026gt;magic != lock)\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 505 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 3 PID: 505 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-00053-g0106679839f7-dirty #29\n Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT)\n pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n lr : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n sp : ffffffc0864e3570\n x29: ffffffc0864e3570 x28: ffffffc0817bdc78 x27: 0000000000000003\n x26: ffffff80c54f1808 x25: ffffff80c9164080 x24: ffffffc080d723ac\n x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc083bc3000 x18: ffffffffffffffff\n x17: ffffffc08117b080 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: ffffff80d2d40000\n x14: 00000000000002da x13: ffffff80d2d404b8 x12: ffffffc082b5a5c8\n x11: ffffffc082bca680 x10: ffffffc082bb2640 x9 : ffffffc082bb2698\n x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001\n x5 : ffffff8178fe0d48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027\n x2 : ffffff8178fe0d50 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000\n Call trace:\n __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x34\n tc_setup_taprio+0x118/0x68c\n stmmac_setup_tc+0x50/0xf0\n taprio_change+0x868/0xc9c(CVE-2024-38594)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling\r\n\r\nmlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns\ntrue. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via\nmlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED.\nIn the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory\nleaks:\r\n\r\nmlx5e_probe\n _mlx5e_resume\n mlx5e_attach_netdev\n mlx5e_nic_enable \u0026lt;-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach()\n register_netdev \u0026lt;-- failed for some reason.\nERROR_FLOW:\n _mlx5e_suspend \u0026lt;-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren\u0026apos;t freed :(\r\n\r\nHence, clean resources in this case as well.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0010 [#1] SMP\nCPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:0x0\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6.\nRSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x20/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\n blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60\n mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib]\n __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib]\n ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90\n auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80\n ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0\n device_add+0x637/0x840\n __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0\n add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core]\n local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90\n pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210\n ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0\n ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80\n pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320\n sriov_enable+0x208/0x420\n mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0\n vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0\n ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n CR2: 0000000000000000\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path\r\n\r\nThe error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL\nis not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the\ngenl_unregister_family() isn\u0026apos;t called.\r\n\r\nThis issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: add option to control\nlwtunnel support\u0026quot;), and commit 5559cea2d5aa (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: fix possible\nuse-after-free and null-ptr-deref\u0026quot;) replaced unregister_pernet_subsys()\nwith genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency\r\n\r\nValidate that `first` flag is set only for the first\ndescriptor in multi-buffer packets.\nIn case of an invalid descriptor, a reset will occur.\nA new reset reason for RX data corruption has been added.(CVE-2024-40999)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of\ncorrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata\nfile inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn().\r\n\r\nAs Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file\ngets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(),\ntries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case).\r\n\r\nThe inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers\nof these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are\nread without checking.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as\nerrors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages.\r\n\r\nAlso thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer\nanalysis.(CVE-2024-42104)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nleds: an30259a: Use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization\r\n\r\nIn this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register()\nso they are automatically unregistered after module\u0026apos;s remove() is done.\nled_classdev_unregister() calls module\u0026apos;s led_set_brightness() to turn off\nthe LEDs and that callback uses mutex which was destroyed already\nin module\u0026apos;s remove() so use devm API instead.(CVE-2024-42128)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/pkey: Wipe sensitive data on failure\r\n\r\nWipe sensitive data from stack also if the copy_to_user() fails.(CVE-2024-42157)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: aead,cipher - zeroize key buffer after use\r\n\r\nI.G 9.7.B for FIPS 140-3 specifies that variables temporarily holding\ncryptographic information should be zeroized once they are no longer\nneeded. Accomplish this by using kfree_sensitive for buffers that\npreviously held the private key.(CVE-2024-42229)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlibceph: fix race between delayed_work() and ceph_monc_stop()\r\n\r\nThe way the delayed work is handled in ceph_monc_stop() is prone to\nraces with mon_fault() and possibly also finish_hunting(). Both of\nthese can requeue the delayed work which wouldn\u0026apos;t be canceled by any of\nthe following code in case that happens after cancel_delayed_work_sync()\nruns -- __close_session() doesn\u0026apos;t mess with the delayed work in order\nto avoid interfering with the hunting interval logic. This part was\nmissed in commit b5d91704f53e (\u0026quot;libceph: behave in mon_fault() if\ncur_mon \u0026lt; 0\u0026quot;) and use-after-free can still ensue on monc and objects\nthat hang off of it, with monc-\u0026gt;auth and monc-\u0026gt;monmap being\nparticularly susceptible to quickly being reused.\r\n\r\nTo fix this:\r\n\r\n- clear monc-\u0026gt;cur_mon and monc-\u0026gt;hunting as part of closing the session\n in ceph_monc_stop()\n- bail from delayed_work() if monc-\u0026gt;cur_mon is cleared, similar to how\n it\u0026apos;s done in mon_fault() and finish_hunting() (based on monc-\u0026gt;hunting)\n- call cancel_delayed_work_sync() after the session is closed(CVE-2024-42232)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: configfs: Prevent OOB read/write in usb_string_copy()\r\n\r\nUserspace provided string \u0026apos;s\u0026apos; could trivially have the length zero. Left\nunchecked this will firstly result in an OOB read in the form\n`if (str[0 - 1] == \u0026apos;\\n\u0026apos;) followed closely by an OOB write in the form\n`str[0 - 1] = \u0026apos;\\0\u0026apos;`.\r\n\r\nThere is already a validating check to catch strings that are too long.\nLet\u0026apos;s supply an additional check for invalid strings that are too short.(CVE-2024-42236)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()\r\n\r\nDon\u0026apos;t dereference *sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(*sp).(CVE-2024-42280)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: nexthop: Initialize all fields in dumped nexthops\r\n\r\nstruct nexthop_grp contains two reserved fields that are not initialized by\nnla_put_nh_group(), and carry garbage. This can be observed e.g. with\nstrace (edited for clarity):\r\n\r\n # ip nexthop add id 1 dev lo\n # ip nexthop add id 101 group 1\n # strace -e recvmsg ip nexthop get id 101\n ...\n recvmsg(... [{nla_len=12, nla_type=NHA_GROUP},\n [{id=1, weight=0, resvd1=0x69, resvd2=0x67}]] ...) = 52\r\n\r\nThe fields are reserved and therefore not currently used. But as they are, they\nleak kernel memory, and the fact they are not just zero complicates repurposing\nof the fields for new ends. Initialize the full structure.(CVE-2024-42283)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: validate nvme_local_port correctly\r\n\r\nThe driver load failed with error message,\r\n\r\nqla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-ffff:0: register_localport failed: ret=ffffffef\r\n\r\nand with a kernel crash,\r\n\r\n\tBUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070\n\tWorkqueue: events_unbound qla_register_fcport_fn [qla2xxx]\n\tRIP: 0010:nvme_fc_register_remoteport+0x16/0x430 [nvme_fc]\n\tRSP: 0018:ffffaaa040eb3d98 EFLAGS: 00010282\n\tRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9dfb46b78c00 RCX: 0000000000000000\n\tRDX: ffff9dfb46b78da8 RSI: ffffaaa040eb3e08 RDI: 0000000000000000\n\tRBP: ffff9dfb612a0a58 R08: ffffffffaf1d6270 R09: 3a34303a30303030\n\tR10: 34303a303030305b R11: 2078787832616c71 R12: ffff9dfb46b78dd4\n\tR13: ffff9dfb46b78c24 R14: ffff9dfb41525300 R15: ffff9dfb46b78da8\n\tFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9dfc67c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n\tCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n\tCR2: 0000000000000070 CR3: 000000018da10004 CR4: 00000000000206f0\n\tCall Trace:\n\tqla_nvme_register_remote+0xeb/0x1f0 [qla2xxx]\n\t? qla2x00_dfs_create_rport+0x231/0x270 [qla2xxx]\n\tqla2x00_update_fcport+0x2a1/0x3c0 [qla2xxx]\n\tqla_register_fcport_fn+0x54/0xc0 [qla2xxx]\r\n\r\nExit the qla_nvme_register_remote() function when qla_nvme_register_hba()\nfails and correctly validate nvme_local_port.(CVE-2024-42286)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock\r\n\r\nA crash was observed while performing NPIV and FW reset,\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 1 PREEMPT_RT SMP NOPTI\n RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n RSP: 0018:ffffc90026f47b88 EFLAGS: 00010246\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000002\n RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881041130d0\n RBP: ffff8881041130d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000034\n R10: ffffc90026f47c48 R11: 0000000000000031 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8881565e4a20 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 00007f4c69ed3d00(0000) GS:ffff889faac80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000000288a50002 CR4: 00000000007706e0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n PKRU: 55555554\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x16f/0x4a0\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x174/0x7f0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x1a0\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n ? preempt_count_sub+0x96/0xe0\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x29f/0x3b0 [qla2xxx]\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x60/0x80 [qla2xxx]\n __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xa2/0x450 [qla2xxx]\r\n\r\nThe command completion was done early while aborting the commands in driver\nunload path but outside lock to avoid the WARN_ON condition of performing\ndma_free_attr within the lock. However this caused race condition while\ncommand completion via multiple paths causing system crash.\r\n\r\nHence complete the command early in unload path but within the lock to\navoid race condition.(CVE-2024-42287)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly\r\n\r\nDuring vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash\nbecause of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale\nI/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but\nI/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx]\n RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001\n RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0\n RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8\n R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0\n ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0\n ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830\n ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430\n ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0\n ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0\n ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140\n ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60\n ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? kthread+0x156/0x180\n ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50\n ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nSend out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nirqchip/imx-irqsteer: Handle runtime power management correctly\r\n\r\nThe power domain is automatically activated from clk_prepare(). However, on\ncertain platforms like i.MX8QM and i.MX8QXP, the power-on handling invokes\nsleeping functions, which triggers the \u0026apos;scheduling while atomic\u0026apos; bug in the\ncontext switch path during device probing:\r\n\r\n BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u13:1/48/0x00000002\n Call trace:\n __schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c\n __schedule+0x7f0/0xa94\n schedule+0x5c/0xc4\n schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40\n __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x2c0/0x540\n __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x20\n mutex_lock+0x48/0x54\n clk_prepare_lock+0x44/0xa0\n clk_prepare+0x20/0x44\n imx_irqsteer_resume+0x28/0xe0\n pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x44\n __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0x80\n genpd_runtime_resume+0xc8/0x2c0\n __rpm_callback+0x48/0x1d8\n rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78\n rpm_resume+0x490/0x6b4\n __pm_runtime_resume+0x50/0x94\n irq_chip_pm_get+0x2c/0xa0\n __irq_do_set_handler+0x178/0x24c\n irq_set_chained_handler_and_data+0x60/0xa4\n mxc_gpio_probe+0x160/0x4b0\r\n\r\nCure this by implementing the irq_bus_lock/sync_unlock() interrupt chip\ncallbacks and handle power management in them as they are invoked from\nnon-atomic context.\r\n\r\n[ tglx: Rewrote change log, added Fixes tag ](CVE-2024-42290)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkobject_uevent: Fix OOB access within zap_modalias_env()\r\n\r\nzap_modalias_env() wrongly calculates size of memory block to move, so\nwill cause OOB memory access issue if variable MODALIAS is not the last\none within its @env parameter, fixed by correcting size to memmove.(CVE-2024-42292)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: handle inconsistent state in nilfs_btnode_create_block()\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported that a buffer state inconsistency was detected in\nnilfs_btnode_create_block(), triggering a kernel bug.\r\n\r\nIt is not appropriate to treat this inconsistency as a bug; it can occur\nif the argument block address (the buffer index of the newly created\nblock) is a virtual block number and has been reallocated due to\ncorruption of the bitmap used to manage its allocation state.\r\n\r\nSo, modify nilfs_btnode_create_block() and its callers to treat it as a\npossible filesystem error, rather than triggering a kernel bug.(CVE-2024-42295)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/ntfs3: Update log-\u0026gt;page_{mask,bits} if log-\u0026gt;page_size changed\r\n\r\nIf an NTFS file system is mounted to another system with different\nPAGE_SIZE from the original system, log-\u0026gt;page_size will change in\nlog_replay(), but log-\u0026gt;page_{mask,bits} don\u0026apos;t change correspondingly.\nThis will cause a panic because \u0026quot;u32 bytes = log-\u0026gt;page_size - page_off\u0026quot;\nwill get a negative value in the later read_log_page().(CVE-2024-42299)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed\r\n\r\nSyzbot reports a issue as follows:\n============================================\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe\nPGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341\n ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451\n ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline]\n ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214\n[...]\n============================================\r\n\r\nThe immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry\nfor the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of\nbounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.\r\n\r\n do_split\n unsigned split\n dx_make_map\n count = 1\n split = count/2 = 0;\n continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;\n ---\u0026gt; map[4294967295]\r\n\r\nThe maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024,\nso it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or\nequal to 2 when do_split() is called.\r\n\r\nBut syzbot\u0026apos;s crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry\ndistribution in dirblock is as follows:\r\n\r\n bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free\n|xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............|\n0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024\r\n\r\nSo when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole\nnor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is\ncalled.\r\n\r\nIn make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the\ndirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root\nbecause they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved\nto the new leaf block. That\u0026apos;s why count is equal to 1.\r\n\r\nTherefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity\nchecks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above\nissue.(CVE-2024-42305)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nudf: Avoid using corrupted block bitmap buffer\r\n\r\nWhen the filesystem block bitmap is corrupted, we detect the corruption\nwhile loading the bitmap and fail the allocation with error. However the\nnext allocation from the same bitmap will notice the bitmap buffer is\nalready loaded and tries to allocate from the bitmap with mixed results\n(depending on the exact nature of the bitmap corruption). Fix the\nproblem by using BH_verified bit to indicate whether the bitmap is valid\nor not.(CVE-2024-42306)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-42308)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/gma500: fix null pointer dereference in psb_intel_lvds_get_modes\r\n\r\nIn psb_intel_lvds_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference\non failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42309)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhfs: fix to initialize fields of hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode()\r\n\r\nSyzbot reports uninitialized value access issue as below:\r\n\r\nloop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64\n=====================================================\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30\n hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30\n d_revalidate fs/namei.c:862 [inline]\n lookup_fast+0x89e/0x8e0 fs/namei.c:1649\n walk_component fs/namei.c:2001 [inline]\n link_path_walk+0x817/0x1480 fs/namei.c:2332\n path_lookupat+0xd9/0x6f0 fs/namei.c:2485\n filename_lookup+0x22e/0x740 fs/namei.c:2515\n user_path_at_empty+0x8b/0x390 fs/namei.c:2924\n user_path_at include/linux/namei.h:57 [inline]\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3689 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x66b/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x140 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366\n hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline]\n hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366\n block_read_full_folio+0x4ff/0x11b0 fs/buffer.c:2271\n hfs_read_folio+0x55/0x60 fs/hfs/inode.c:39\n filemap_read_folio+0x148/0x4f0 mm/filemap.c:2426\n do_read_cache_folio+0x7c8/0xd90 mm/filemap.c:3553\n do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:3595 [inline]\n read_cache_page+0xfb/0x2f0 mm/filemap.c:3604\n read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:755 [inline]\n hfs_btree_open+0x928/0x1ae0 fs/hfs/btree.c:78\n hfs_mdb_get+0x260c/0x3000 fs/hfs/mdb.c:204\n hfs_fill_super+0x1fb1/0x2790 fs/hfs/super.c:406\n mount_bdev+0x628/0x920 fs/super.c:1359\n hfs_mount+0xcd/0xe0 fs/hfs/super.c:456\n legacy_get_tree+0x167/0x2e0 fs/fs_context.c:610\n vfs_get_tree+0xdc/0x5d0 fs/super.c:1489\n do_new_mount+0x7a9/0x16f0 fs/namespace.c:3145\n path_mount+0xf98/0x26a0 fs/namespace.c:3475\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x919/0x9e0 fs/namespace.c:3674\n __ia32_sys_mount+0x15b/0x1b0 fs/namespace.c:3674\n do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline]\n __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178\n do_fast_syscall_32+0x37/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203\n do_SYSENTER_32+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246\n entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n __alloc_pages+0x9a6/0xe00 mm/page_alloc.c:4590\n __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline]\n alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2190 [inline]\n allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2354 [inline]\n new_slab+0x2d7/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2407\n ___slab_alloc+0x16b5/0x3970 mm/slub.c:3540\n __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3625 [inline]\n __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3678 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3850 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x64d/0xb30 mm/slub.c:3879\n alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3018 [inline]\n hfs_alloc_inode+0x5a/0xc0 fs/hfs/super.c:165\n alloc_inode+0x83/0x440 fs/inode.c:260\n new_inode_pseudo fs/inode.c:1005 [inline]\n new_inode+0x38/0x4f0 fs/inode.c:1031\n hfs_new_inode+0x61/0x1010 fs/hfs/inode.c:186\n hfs_mkdir+0x54/0x250 fs/hfs/dir.c:228\n vfs_mkdir+0x49a/0x700 fs/namei.c:4126\n do_mkdirat+0x529/0x810 fs/namei.c:4149\n __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4164 [inline]\n __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4162 [inline]\n __x64_sys_mkdirat+0xc8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4162\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nIt missed to initialize .tz_secondswest, .cached_start and .cached_blocks\nfields in struct hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode(), fix it.(CVE-2024-42311)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: venus: fix use after free in vdec_close\r\n\r\nThere appears to be a possible use after free with vdec_close().\nThe firmware will add buffer release work to the work queue through\nHFI callbacks as a normal part of decoding. Randomly closing the\ndecoder device from userspace during normal decoding can incur\na read after free for inst.\r\n\r\nFix it by cancelling the work in vdec_close.(CVE-2024-42313)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service\r\n\r\nUse pe directly to resolve sparse warning:\r\n\r\n net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1471:27: warning: dereference of noderef expression(CVE-2024-42322)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI: keystone: Fix NULL pointer dereference in case of DT error in ks_pcie_setup_rc_app_regs()\r\n\r\nIf IORESOURCE_MEM is not provided in Device Tree due to\nany error, resource_list_first_type() will return NULL and\npci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() will just emit a warning.\r\n\r\nThis will cause a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this bug by adding NULL\nreturn check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43823)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit\r\n\r\nWhen doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an\nuninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does\nnot detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will\nreturn immediately without initializing the \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; variable.\r\n\r\nBecause \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an\ninfinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.\r\n\r\nThis commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure\nin function ext4_es_find_extent_range().\r\n\r\nThanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nleds: trigger: Unregister sysfs attributes before calling deactivate()\r\n\r\nTriggers which have trigger specific sysfs attributes typically store\nrelated data in trigger-data allocated by the activate() callback and\nfreed by the deactivate() callback.\r\n\r\nCalling device_remove_groups() after calling deactivate() leaves a window\nwhere the sysfs attributes show/store functions could be called after\ndeactivation and then operate on the just freed trigger-data.\r\n\r\nMove the device_remove_groups() call to before deactivate() to close\nthis race window.\r\n\r\nThis also makes the deactivation path properly do things in reverse order\nof the activation path which calls the activate() callback before calling\ndevice_add_groups().(CVE-2024-43830)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\r\n\r\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\nis valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxdp: fix invalid wait context of page_pool_destroy()\r\n\r\nIf the driver uses a page pool, it creates a page pool with\npage_pool_create().\nThe reference count of page pool is 1 as default.\nA page pool will be destroyed only when a reference count reaches 0.\npage_pool_destroy() is used to destroy page pool, it decreases a\nreference count.\nWhen a page pool is destroyed, -\u0026gt;disconnect() is called, which is\nmem_allocator_disconnect().\nThis function internally acquires mutex_lock().\r\n\r\nIf the driver uses XDP, it registers a memory model with\nxdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model().\nThe xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() internally increases a page pool\nreference count if a memory model is a page pool.\nNow the reference count is 2.\r\n\r\nTo destroy a page pool, the driver should call both page_pool_destroy()\nand xdp_unreg_mem_model().\nThe xdp_unreg_mem_model() internally calls page_pool_destroy().\nOnly page_pool_destroy() decreases a reference count.\r\n\r\nIf a driver calls page_pool_destroy() then xdp_unreg_mem_model(), we\nwill face an invalid wait context warning.\nBecause xdp_unreg_mem_model() calls page_pool_destroy() with\nrcu_read_lock().\nThe page_pool_destroy() internally acquires mutex_lock().\r\n\r\nSplat looks like:\n=============================\n[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]\n6.10.0-rc6+ #4 Tainted: G W\n-----------------------------\nethtool/1806 is trying to lock:\nffffffff90387b90 (mem_id_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\nother info that might help us debug this:\ncontext-{5:5}\n3 locks held by ethtool/1806:\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 0 PID: 1806 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 f916f41f172891c800f2fed\nHardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z690-P D4, BIOS 0603 11/01/2021\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\ndump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0\n__lock_acquire+0x1681/0x4de0\n? _printk+0x64/0xe0\n? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10\n? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10\nlock_acquire+0x1b3/0x580\n? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\n? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x16/0xc0\n? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10\n? dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xc0\n__mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1690\n? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\n? __pfx_prb_read_valid+0x10/0x10\n? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\n? __pfx_llist_add_batch+0x10/0x10\n? console_unlock+0x193/0x1b0\n? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbe/0x140\n? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10\n? tick_nohz_tick_stopped+0x16/0x90\n? __irq_work_queue_local+0x1e5/0x330\n? irq_work_queue+0x39/0x50\n? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x79/0xc0\n? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\nmem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\n? __pfx_mem_allocator_disconnect+0x10/0x10\n? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0\n? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0\npage_pool_release+0x36e/0x6d0\npage_pool_destroy+0xd7/0x440\nxdp_unreg_mem_model+0x1a7/0x2a0\n? __pfx_xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x10/0x10\n? kfree+0x125/0x370\n? bnxt_free_ring.isra.0+0x2eb/0x500\n? bnxt_free_mem+0x5ac/0x2500\nxdp_rxq_info_unreg+0x4a/0xd0\nbnxt_free_mem+0x1356/0x2500\nbnxt_close_nic+0xf0/0x3b0\n? __pfx_bnxt_close_nic+0x10/0x10\n? ethnl_parse_bit+0x2c6/0x6d0\n? __pfx___nla_validate_parse+0x10/0x10\n? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bit+0x10/0x10\nbnxt_set_features+0x2a8/0x3e0\n__netdev_update_features+0x4dc/0x1370\n? ethnl_parse_bitset+0x4ff/0x750\n? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bitset+0x10/0x10\n? __pfx___netdev_update_features+0x10/0x10\n? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0\n? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x70\n? __pm_runtime_resume+0x7d/0x110\nethnl_set_features+0x32d/0xa20\r\n\r\nTo fix this problem, it uses rhashtable_lookup_fast() instead of\nrhashtable_lookup() with rcu_read_lock().\nUsing xa without rcu_read_lock() here is safe.\nxa is freed by __xdp_mem_allocator_rcu_free() and this is called by\ncall_rcu() of mem_xa_remove().\nThe mem_xa_remove() is called by page_pool_destroy() if a reference\ncount reaches 0.\nThe xa is already protected by the reference count mechanism well in the\ncontrol plane.\nSo removing rcu_read_lock() for page_pool_destroy() is safe.(CVE-2024-43834)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf, arm64: Fix trampoline for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG\r\n\r\nWhen BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is set, the trampoline calls\n__bpf_tramp_enter() and __bpf_tramp_exit() functions, passing them\nthe struct bpf_tramp_image *im pointer as an argument in R0.\r\n\r\nThe trampoline generation code uses emit_addr_mov_i64() to emit\ninstructions for moving the bpf_tramp_image address into R0, but\nemit_addr_mov_i64() assumes the address to be in the vmalloc() space\nand uses only 48 bits. Because bpf_tramp_image is allocated using\nkzalloc(), its address can use more than 48-bits, in this case the\ntrampoline will pass an invalid address to __bpf_tramp_enter/exit()\ncausing a kernel crash.\r\n\r\nFix this by using emit_a64_mov_i64() in place of emit_addr_mov_i64()\nas it can work with addresses that are greater than 48-bits.(CVE-2024-43840)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nremoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL\r\n\r\nIn imx_rproc_addr_init() \u0026quot;nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()\u0026quot; just counts\nnumber of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in\nthe parsing loop (0 \u0026lt; a \u0026lt; nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced.\nAdjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters](CVE-2024-43860)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmemcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr\r\n\r\nCommit 73f576c04b94 (\u0026quot;mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after\nmany small jobs\u0026quot;) decoupled the memcg IDs from the CSS ID space to fix the\ncgroup creation failures. It introduced IDR to maintain the memcg ID\nspace. The IDR depends on external synchronization mechanisms for\nmodifications. For the mem_cgroup_idr, the idr_alloc() and idr_replace()\nhappen within css callback and thus are protected through cgroup_mutex\nfrom concurrent modifications. However idr_remove() for mem_cgroup_idr\nwas not protected against concurrency and can be run concurrently for\ndifferent memcgs when they hit their refcnt to zero. Fix that.\r\n\r\nWe have been seeing list_lru based kernel crashes at a low frequency in\nour fleet for a long time. These crashes were in different part of\nlist_lru code including list_lru_add(), list_lru_del() and reparenting\ncode. Upon further inspection, it looked like for a given object (dentry\nand inode), the super_block\u0026apos;s list_lru didn\u0026apos;t have list_lru_one for the\nmemcg of that object. The initial suspicions were either the object is\nnot allocated through kmem_cache_alloc_lru() or somehow\nmemcg_list_lru_alloc() failed to allocate list_lru_one() for a memcg but\nreturned success. No evidence were found for these cases.\r\n\r\nLooking more deeply, we started seeing situations where valid memcg\u0026apos;s id\nis not present in mem_cgroup_idr and in some cases multiple valid memcgs\nhave same id and mem_cgroup_idr is pointing to one of them. So, the most\nreasonable explanation is that these situations can happen due to race\nbetween multiple idr_remove() calls or race between\nidr_alloc()/idr_replace() and idr_remove(). These races are causing\nmultiple memcgs to acquire the same ID and then offlining of one of them\nwould cleanup list_lrus on the system for all of them. Later access from\nother memcgs to the list_lru cause crashes due to missing list_lru_one.(CVE-2024-43892)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: core: check uartclk for zero to avoid divide by zero\r\n\r\nCalling ioctl TIOCSSERIAL with an invalid baud_base can\nresult in uartclk being zero, which will result in a\ndivide by zero error in uart_get_divisor(). The check for\nuartclk being zero in uart_set_info() needs to be done\nbefore other settings are made as subsequent calls to\nioctl TIOCSSERIAL for the same port would be impacted if\nthe uartclk check was done where uartclk gets set.\r\n\r\nOops: divide error: 0000 PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nRIP: 0010:uart_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:580)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\nserial8250_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2576\n drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2589)\nserial8250_do_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:502\n drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2741)\nserial8250_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2862)\nuart_change_line_settings (./include/linux/spinlock.h:376\n ./include/linux/serial_core.h:608 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:222)\nuart_port_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:342)\nuart_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:368)\nuart_set_info (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1034)\nuart_set_info_user (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1059)\ntty_set_serial (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2637)\ntty_ioctl (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2647 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2791)\n__x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:907\n fs/ioctl.c:893 fs/ioctl.c:893)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52\n (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1))\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\nRule: add(CVE-2024-43893)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/client: fix null pointer dereference in drm_client_modeset_probe\r\n\r\nIn drm_client_modeset_probe(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to modeset-\u0026gt;mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer\ndereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-43894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()\r\n\r\nUserspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio\ndescriptor array.\nUsers can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range.\nOffset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get\nthe gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().\r\n\r\nThis change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using\narray_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative\ninformation leaks.\r\n\r\nThis bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis\nSecurity Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndriver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race\r\n\r\nuevent_show() wants to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver-\u0026gt;name. There is no clean\nway for a device attribute to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver unless that\nattribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the\nanti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks\ndeadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding\nthe lock.\r\n\r\nThis deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock()\nis marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a\nlocal lockdep key for @dev-\u0026gt;mutex to reveal reports of the form:\r\n\r\n ======================================================\n WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N\n ------------------------------------------------------\n modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffff8c2270070de0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\r\n\r\n but task is already holding lock:\n ffff8c22016e88f8 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210\r\n\r\n which lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\n the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30\n uevent_show+0xac/0x130\n dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40\n sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0\n seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450\n vfs_read+0x25b/0x340\n ksys_read+0x67/0xf0\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0\n lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0\n kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200\n __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\n kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0\n device_del+0x168/0x410\n device_unregister+0x13/0x60\n devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110\n device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70\n device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210\n driver_detach+0x47/0x90\n bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0\n cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi]\n __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\nThe observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer\nlived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless\nde-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a\ndevice. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use\nsynchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential\nraces. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to\nhandle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.\r\n\r\nThanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok\r\n\r\nWe must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: flowtable: initialise extack before use\r\n\r\nFix missing initialisation of extack in flow offload.(CVE-2024-45018)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: pn533: Add poll mod list filling check\r\n\r\nIn case of im_protocols value is 1 and tm_protocols value is 0 this\ncombination successfully passes the check\n\u0026apos;if (!im_protocols \u0026amp;\u0026amp; !tm_protocols)\u0026apos; in the nfc_start_poll().\nBut then after pn533_poll_create_mod_list() call in pn533_start_poll()\npoll mod list will remain empty and dev-\u0026gt;poll_mod_count will remain 0\nwhich lead to division by zero.\r\n\r\nNormally no im protocol has value 1 in the mask, so this combination is\nnot expected by driver. But these protocol values actually come from\nuserspace via Netlink interface (NFC_CMD_START_POLL operation). So a\nbroken or malicious program may pass a message containing a \u0026quot;bad\u0026quot;\ncombination of protocol parameter values so that dev-\u0026gt;poll_mod_count\nis not incremented inside pn533_poll_create_mod_list(), thus leading\nto division by zero.\nCall trace looks like:\nnfc_genl_start_poll()\n nfc_start_poll()\n -\u0026gt;start_poll()\n pn533_start_poll()\r\n\r\nAdd poll mod list filling check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-46676)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\r\n\r\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \u0026quot;write\u0026quot; into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\r\n\r\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\r\n\r\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\r\n\r\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen.(CVE-2024-46689)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: typec: ucsi: Move unregister out of atomic section\r\n\r\nCommit \u0026apos;9329933699b3 (\u0026quot;soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Make client-lock\nnon-sleeping\u0026quot;)\u0026apos; moved the pmic_glink client list under a spinlock, as it\nis accessed by the rpmsg/glink callback, which in turn is invoked from\nIRQ context.\r\n\r\nThis means that ucsi_unregister() is now called from atomic context,\nwhich isn\u0026apos;t feasible as it\u0026apos;s expecting a sleepable context. An effort is\nunder way to get GLINK to invoke its callbacks in a sleepable context,\nbut until then lets schedule the unregistration.\r\n\r\nA side effect of this is that ucsi_unregister() can now happen\nafter the remote processor, and thereby the communication link with it, is\ngone. pmic_glink_send() is amended with a check to avoid the resulting NULL\npointer dereference.\nThis does however result in the user being informed about this error by\nthe following entry in the kernel log:\r\n\r\n ucsi_glink.pmic_glink_ucsi pmic_glink.ucsi.0: failed to send UCSI write request: -5(CVE-2024-46691)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/vmwgfx: Fix prime with external buffers\r\n\r\nMake sure that for external buffers mapping goes through the dma_buf\ninterface instead of trying to access pages directly.\r\n\r\nExternal buffers might not provide direct access to readable/writable\npages so to make sure the bo\u0026apos;s created from external dma_bufs can be\nread dma_buf interface has to be used.\r\n\r\nFixes crashes in IGT\u0026apos;s kms_prime with vgem. Regular desktop usage won\u0026apos;t\ntrigger this due to the fact that virtual machines will not have\nmultiple GPUs but it enables better test coverage in IGT.(CVE-2024-46709)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nRemove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role\nof msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with\nlist_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the path:\n msgdma_free_chan_resources -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptors -\u0026gt;\n msgdma_free_desc_list -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nwhich does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not\nremoved from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Ensure index calculation will not overflow\r\n\r\n[WHY \u0026amp; HOW]\nMake sure vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx and vmax0p9_idx calculation will\nnever overflow and exceess array size.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46726)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.\r\n\r\nThe syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked\nvia bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf()\nfirst.\r\n\r\nMartin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL\nprobably didn\u0026apos;t work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a\n(\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF\u0026quot;). The reason is that the\nper-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self\ntest case but each BPF function expects it.\r\n\r\nRemove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.(CVE-2024-46754)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nksmbd: unset the binding mark of a reused connection\r\n\r\nSteve French reported null pointer dereference error from sha256 lib.\ncifs.ko can send session setup requests on reused connection.\nIf reused connection is used for binding session, conn-\u0026gt;binding can\nstill remain true and generate_preauth_hash() will not set\nsess-\u0026gt;Preauth_HashValue and it will be NULL.\nIt is used as a material to create an encryption key in\nksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey. -\u0026gt;Preauth_HashValue cause null pointer\ndereference error from crypto_shash_update().\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\n#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\nCPU: 8 PID: 429254 Comm: kworker/8:39\nHardware name: LENOVO 20MAS08500/20MAS08500, BIOS N2CET69W (1.52 )\nWorkqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work [ksmbd]\nRIP: 0010:lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3]\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n? show_regs+0x6d/0x80\n? __die+0x24/0x80\n? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0\n? do_user_addr_fault+0x2ee/0x6b0\n? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0\n? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n? lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3]\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n_sha256_update+0x77/0xa0 [sha256_ssse3]\nsha256_avx2_update+0x15/0x30 [sha256_ssse3]\ncrypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40\nhmac_update+0x12/0x20\ncrypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40\ngenerate_key+0x234/0x380 [ksmbd]\ngenerate_smb3encryptionkey+0x40/0x1c0 [ksmbd]\nksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey+0x72/0xa0 [ksmbd]\nntlm_authenticate.isra.0+0x423/0x5d0 [ksmbd]\nsmb2_sess_setup+0x952/0xaa0 [ksmbd]\n__process_request+0xa3/0x1d0 [ksmbd]\n__handle_ksmbd_work+0x1c4/0x2f0 [ksmbd]\nhandle_ksmbd_work+0x2d/0xa0 [ksmbd]\nprocess_one_work+0x16c/0x350\nworker_thread+0x306/0x440\n? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\nkthread+0xef/0x120\n? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\nret_from_fork+0x44/0x70\n? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\nret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n\u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-46795)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: fix the waring dereferencing hive\r\n\r\nCheck the amdgpu_hive_info *hive that maybe is NULL.(CVE-2024-46805)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/bridge: tc358767: Check if fully initialized before signalling HPD event via IRQ\r\n\r\nMake sure the connector is fully initialized before signalling any\nHPD events via drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(), otherwise this may\nlead to NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-46810)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6\r\n\r\n[Why]\nCoverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm\ninitialize.\r\n\r\n[How]\nReturn failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: the warning dereferencing obj for nbio_v7_4\r\n\r\nif ras_manager obj null, don\u0026apos;t print NBIO err data(CVE-2024-46819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/pm: Fix negative array index read\r\n\r\nAvoid using the negative values\nfor clk_idex as an index into an array pptable-\u0026gt;DpmDescriptor.\r\n\r\nV2: fix clk_index return check (Tim Huang)(CVE-2024-46821)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\narm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry\r\n\r\nIn a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where\na check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was\nnoted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index\ninto a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.\r\n\r\nIf an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible\nfor the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would\nthen cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger\nthis has not been established, harden this caller against the\npossibility.(CVE-2024-46822)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read\r\n\r\nELF loader uses \u0026quot;randomize_va_space\u0026quot; twice. It is sysctl and can change\nat any moment, so 2 loads could see 2 different values in theory with\nunpredictable consequences.\r\n\r\nIssue exactly one load for consistent value across one exec.(CVE-2024-46826)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: x86: Acquire kvm-\u0026gt;srcu when handling KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS\r\n\r\nGrab kvm-\u0026gt;srcu when processing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, as KVM will forcibly\nleave nested VMX/SVM if SMM mode is being toggled, and leaving nested VMX\nreads guest memory.\r\n\r\nNote, kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events() can also be called from KVM_RUN\nvia sync_regs(), which already holds SRCU. I.e. trying to precisely use\nkvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock() around the problematic SMM code would cause\nproblems. Acquiring SRCU isn\u0026apos;t all that expensive, so for simplicity,\ngrab it unconditionally for KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS.\r\n\r\n =============================\n WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Not tainted\n -----------------------------\n include/linux/kvm_host.h:1027 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\r\n\r\n other info that might help us debug this:\r\n\r\n rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n 1 lock held by repro/1071:\n #0: ffff88811e424430 (\u0026amp;vcpu-\u0026gt;mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]\r\n\r\n stack backtrace:\n CPU: 15 PID: 1071 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0x90\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x13f/0x1a0\n kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x168/0x190 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_read_guest+0x3e/0x90 [kvm]\n nested_vmx_load_msr+0x6b/0x1d0 [kvm_intel]\n load_vmcs12_host_state+0x432/0xb40 [kvm_intel]\n vmx_leave_nested+0x30/0x40 [kvm_intel]\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events+0x15d/0x2b0 [kvm]\n kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x1107/0x1750 [kvm]\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]\n ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm]\n ? lock_acquire+0xba/0x2d0\n ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x40c/0x6f0\n ? lock_release+0xb7/0x270\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0\n do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x170\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n RIP: 0033:0x7ff11eb1b539\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-46830)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc\r\n\r\nWe should verify the bound of the array to assure that host\nmay not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.\r\n\r\nFound by static analysis.(CVE-2024-46836)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nuserfaultfd: don\u0026apos;t BUG_ON() if khugepaged yanks our page table\r\n\r\nSince khugepaged was changed to allow retracting page tables in file\nmappings without holding the mmap lock, these BUG_ON()s are wrong - get\nrid of them.\r\n\r\nWe could also remove the preceding \u0026quot;if (unlikely(...))\u0026quot; block, but then we\ncould reach pte_offset_map_lock() with transhuge pages not just for file\nmappings but also for anonymous mappings - which would probably be fine\nbut I think is not necessarily expected.(CVE-2024-46838)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete\r\n\r\nIn reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren\u0026apos;t\nholding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient\nincorrect answer. In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which\ncould happen if we have extent tree corruption. Change that to return\n-EUCLEAN. In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,\nhowever we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.\nFinally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert\nthat to proper error handling. Also adjust the error message so we can\nactually do something with the information.(CVE-2024-46840)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: dpaa: Pad packets to ETH_ZLEN\r\n\r\nWhen sending packets under 60 bytes, up to three bytes of the buffer\nfollowing the data may be leaked. Avoid this by extending all packets to\nETH_ZLEN, ensuring nothing is leaked in the padding. This bug can be\nreproduced by running\r\n\r\n\t$ ping -s 11 destination(CVE-2024-46854)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nft_socket: fix sk refcount leaks\r\n\r\nWe must put \u0026apos;sk\u0026apos; reference before returning.(CVE-2024-46855)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync\r\n\r\nThere are two paths to access mptcp_pm_del_add_timer, result in a race\ncondition:\r\n\r\n CPU1\t\t\t\tCPU2\n ==== ====\n net_rx_action\n napi_poll netlink_sendmsg\n __napi_poll netlink_unicast\n process_backlog netlink_unicast_kernel\n __netif_receive_skb genl_rcv\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core netlink_rcv_skb\n NF_HOOK genl_rcv_msg\n ip_local_deliver_finish genl_family_rcv_msg\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu genl_family_rcv_msg_doit\n tcp_v4_rcv mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit\n tcp_v4_do_rcv mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list\n tcp_rcv_established mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows\n tcp_data_queue remove_anno_list_by_saddr\n mptcp_incoming_options mptcp_pm_del_add_timer\n mptcp_pm_del_add_timer kfree(entry)\r\n\r\nIn remove_anno_list_by_saddr(running on CPU2), after leaving the critical\nzone protected by \u0026quot;pm.lock\u0026quot;, the entry will be released, which leads to the\noccurrence of uaf in the mptcp_pm_del_add_timer(running on CPU1).\r\n\r\nKeeping a reference to add_timer inside the lock, and calling\nsk_stop_timer_sync() with this reference, instead of \u0026quot;entry-\u0026gt;add_timer\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nMove list_del(\u0026amp;entry-\u0026gt;list) to mptcp_pm_del_add_timer and inside the pm lock,\ndo not directly access any members of the entry outside the pm lock, which\ncan avoid similar \u0026quot;entry-\u0026gt;x\u0026quot; uaf.(CVE-2024-46858)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nplatform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses\r\n\r\nThe panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index\nvalues of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array\nis big enough.\r\n\r\nNot all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example\nthe Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only\nsupports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.\r\n\r\nCheck that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC\nbrightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.\r\n\r\nFor higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array\ndoes not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store()\naccessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe()\nand resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: stm32/cryp - call finalize with bh disabled\r\n\r\nThe finalize operation in interrupt mode produce a produces a spinlock\nrecursion warning. The reason is the fact that BH must be disabled\nduring this process.(CVE-2024-47658)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Error out instead on BUG_ON() in IBI DMA setup\r\n\r\nDefinitely condition dma_get_cache_alignment * defined value \u0026gt; 256\nduring driver initialization is not reason to BUG_ON(). Turn that to\ngraceful error out with -EINVAL.(CVE-2024-47665)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix state management in error path of log writing function\r\n\r\nAfter commit a694291a6211 (\u0026quot;nilfs2: separate wait function from\nnilfs_segctor_write\u0026quot;) was applied, the log writing function\nnilfs_segctor_do_construct() was able to issue I/O requests continuously\neven if user data blocks were split into multiple logs across segments,\nbut two potential flaws were introduced in its error handling.\r\n\r\nFirst, if nilfs_segctor_begin_construction() fails while creating the\nsecond or subsequent logs, the log writing function returns without\ncalling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction(), so the writeback flag set on\npages/folios will remain uncleared. This causes page cache operations to\nhang waiting for the writeback flag. For example,\ntruncate_inode_pages_final(), which is called via nilfs_evict_inode() when\nan inode is evicted from memory, will hang.\r\n\r\nSecond, the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag set on normal inodes remain uncleared. \nAs a result, if the next log write involves checkpoint creation, that\u0026apos;s\nfine, but if a partial log write is performed that does not, inodes with\nNILFS_I_COLLECTED set are erroneously removed from the \u0026quot;sc_dirty_files\u0026quot;\nlist, and their data and b-tree blocks may not be written to the device,\ncorrupting the block mapping.\r\n\r\nFix these issues by uniformly calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction()\non failure of each step in the loop in nilfs_segctor_do_construct(),\nhaving it clean up logs and segment usages according to progress, and\ncorrecting the conditions for calling nilfs_redirty_inodes() to ensure\nthat the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag is cleared.(CVE-2024-47669)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: usbtmc: prevent kernel-usb-infoleak\r\n\r\nThe syzbot reported a kernel-usb-infoleak in usbtmc_write,\nwe need to clear the structure before filling fields.(CVE-2024-47671)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don\u0026apos;t wait for tx queues if firmware is dead\r\n\r\nThere is a WARNING in iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() (that was\nrecently converted from just a message), that can be hit if we\nwait for TX queues to become empty after firmware died. Clearly,\nwe can\u0026apos;t expect anything from the firmware after it\u0026apos;s declared dead.\r\n\r\nDon\u0026apos;t call iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() in this case. While it could\nbe a good idea to stop the flow earlier, the flush functions do some\nmaintenance work that is not related to the firmware, so keep that part\nof the code running even when the firmware is not running.\r\n\r\n[edit commit message](CVE-2024-47672)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() If bpf_link_prime() fails, bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() goes to the error_free label and frees the array of bpf_uprobe\u0026apos;s without calling bpf_uprobe_unregister(). This leaks bpf_uprobe-\u0026gt;uprobe and worse, this frees bpf_uprobe-\u0026gt;consumer without removing it from the uprobe-\u0026gt;consumers list.(CVE-2024-47675)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers/perf: Fix ali_drw_pmu driver interrupt status clearing The alibaba_uncore_pmu driver forgot to clear all interrupt status in the interrupt processing function. After the PMU counter overflow interrupt occurred, an interrupt storm occurred, causing the system to hang. Therefore, clear the correct interrupt status in the interrupt handling function to fix it.(CVE-2024-47731)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race setting file private on concurrent lseek using same fd When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak. The race happens like this: 1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them task A and task B; 2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode; 3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file\u0026apos;s private_data pointer into a local variable named \u0026apos;private\u0026apos;, which has a value of NULL; 4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also extracts file-\u0026gt;private_data into its local variable \u0026apos;private\u0026apos;, which has a NULL value; 5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private structure and assigns to the file structure; 6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both tasks are using the same file descriptor. At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A. Besides the memory leak, there\u0026apos;s also the detail that both tasks end up using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do range validation before using the cached state. Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while holding the inode\u0026apos;s spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated the private, so that it\u0026apos;s used only by that task in order to prevent user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially using it incorrectly in the future.(CVE-2024-47741)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2296",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:46Z",
"published": "2024-10-25T11:07:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2296"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36913"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36963"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42128"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42283"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42286"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42287"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42290"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42292"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42295"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42299"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42305"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42306"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42308"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42309"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42311"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43830"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43834"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43840"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43860"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45018"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46691"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46709"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46795"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46805"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46810"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46821"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46838"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46854"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46855"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46858"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46859"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47665"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47671"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47672"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47675"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47731"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47741"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2023-52889",
"CVE-2024-27397",
"CVE-2024-36012",
"CVE-2024-36015",
"CVE-2024-36032",
"CVE-2024-36244",
"CVE-2024-36880",
"CVE-2024-36889",
"CVE-2024-36894",
"CVE-2024-36909",
"CVE-2024-36910",
"CVE-2024-36911",
"CVE-2024-36913",
"CVE-2024-36915",
"CVE-2024-36918",
"CVE-2024-36920",
"CVE-2024-36921",
"CVE-2024-36922",
"CVE-2024-36927",
"CVE-2024-36936",
"CVE-2024-36940",
"CVE-2024-36941",
"CVE-2024-36946",
"CVE-2024-36963",
"CVE-2024-36971",
"CVE-2024-38594",
"CVE-2024-38608",
"CVE-2024-38612",
"CVE-2024-40999",
"CVE-2024-42104",
"CVE-2024-42128",
"CVE-2024-42157",
"CVE-2024-42229",
"CVE-2024-42232",
"CVE-2024-42236",
"CVE-2024-42280",
"CVE-2024-42283",
"CVE-2024-42286",
"CVE-2024-42287",
"CVE-2024-42289",
"CVE-2024-42290",
"CVE-2024-42292",
"CVE-2024-42295",
"CVE-2024-42299",
"CVE-2024-42305",
"CVE-2024-42306",
"CVE-2024-42308",
"CVE-2024-42309",
"CVE-2024-42311",
"CVE-2024-42313",
"CVE-2024-42322",
"CVE-2024-43823",
"CVE-2024-43828",
"CVE-2024-43830",
"CVE-2024-43831",
"CVE-2024-43834",
"CVE-2024-43840",
"CVE-2024-43860",
"CVE-2024-43892",
"CVE-2024-43893",
"CVE-2024-43894",
"CVE-2024-44931",
"CVE-2024-44952",
"CVE-2024-44990",
"CVE-2024-45018",
"CVE-2024-46676",
"CVE-2024-46689",
"CVE-2024-46691",
"CVE-2024-46709",
"CVE-2024-46716",
"CVE-2024-46726",
"CVE-2024-46754",
"CVE-2024-46795",
"CVE-2024-46805",
"CVE-2024-46810",
"CVE-2024-46817",
"CVE-2024-46819",
"CVE-2024-46821",
"CVE-2024-46822",
"CVE-2024-46826",
"CVE-2024-46830",
"CVE-2024-46836",
"CVE-2024-46838",
"CVE-2024-46840",
"CVE-2024-46854",
"CVE-2024-46855",
"CVE-2024-46858",
"CVE-2024-46859",
"CVE-2024-47658",
"CVE-2024-47665",
"CVE-2024-47669",
"CVE-2024-47671",
"CVE-2024-47672",
"CVE-2024-47675",
"CVE-2024-47731",
"CVE-2024-47741"
]
}
OESA-2024-2321 (CVE-2022-48916)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-11-01 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/vt-d: Fix double list_add when enabling VMD in scalable mode
When enabling VMD and IOMMU scalable mode, the following kernel panic call trace/kernel log is shown in Eagle Stream platform (Sapphire Rapids CPU) during booting:
pci 0000:59:00.5: Adding to iommu group 42 ... vmd 0000:59:00.5: PCI host bridge to bus 10000:80 pci 10000:80:01.0: [8086:352a] type 01 class 0x060400 pci 10000:80:01.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x0001ffff 64bit] pci 10000:80:01.0: enabling Extended Tags pci 10000:80:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold pci 10000:80:01.0: DMAR: Setup RID2PASID failed pci 10000:80:01.0: Failed to add to iommu group 42: -16 pci 10000:80:03.0: [8086:352b] type 01 class 0x060400 pci 10000:80:03.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x0001ffff 64bit] pci 10000:80:03.0: enabling Extended Tags pci 10000:80:03.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:29! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc3+ #7 Hardware name: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650V3/SB27A86647, BIOS ESE101Y-1.00 01/13/2022 Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid.cold+0x26/0x3f Code: 9a 4a ab ff 4c 89 c1 48 c7 c7 40 0c d9 9e e8 b9 b1 fe ff 0f 0b 48 89 f2 4c 89 c1 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 f0 0c d9 9e e8 a2 b1 fe ff <0f> 0b 48 89 d1 4c 89 c6 4c 89 ca 48 c7 c7 98 0c d9 9e e8 8b b1 fe RSP: 0000:ff5ad434865b3a40 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000058 RBX: ff4d61160b74b880 RCX: ff4d61255e1fffa8 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000fffeffff RDI: ffffffff9fd34f20 RBP: ff4d611d8e245c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ff5ad434865b3888 R10: ff5ad434865b3880 R11: ff4d61257fdc6fe8 R12: ff4d61160b74b8a0 R13: ff4d61160b74b8a0 R14: ff4d611d8e245c10 R15: ff4d611d8001ba70 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff4d611d5ea00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff4d611fa1401000 CR3: 0000000aa0210001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> intel_pasid_alloc_table+0x9c/0x1d0 dmar_insert_one_dev_info+0x423/0x540 ? device_to_iommu+0x12d/0x2f0 intel_iommu_attach_device+0x116/0x290 __iommu_attach_device+0x1a/0x90 iommu_group_add_device+0x190/0x2c0 __iommu_probe_device+0x13e/0x250 iommu_probe_device+0x24/0x150 iommu_bus_notifier+0x69/0x90 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0x80 device_add+0x3db/0x7b0 ? arch_memremap_can_ram_remap+0x19/0x50 ? memremap+0x75/0x140 pci_device_add+0x193/0x1d0 pci_scan_single_device+0xb9/0xf0 pci_scan_slot+0x4c/0x110 pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x3a/0x290 vmd_enable_domain.constprop.0+0x63e/0x820 vmd_probe+0x163/0x190 local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 work_for_cpu_fn+0x13/0x20 process_one_work+0x1e2/0x3b0 worker_thread+0x1c4/0x3a0 ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370 kthread+0xc7/0xf0 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ... Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Kernel Offset: 0x1ca00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff) ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---
The following 'lspci' output shows devices '10000:80:*' are subdevices of the VMD device 0000:59:00.5:
$ lspci ... 0000:59:00.5 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation Volume Management Device NVMe RAID Controller (rev 20) ... 10000:80:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352a (rev 03) 10000:80:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352b (rev 03) 10000:80:05.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352c (rev 03) 10000:80:07.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352d (rev 03) 10000:81:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Intel Corporation NVMe Datacenter SSD [3DNAND, Beta Rock Controller] 10000:82:00 ---truncated---(CVE-2022-48916)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: mt7621: Add sentinel to quirks table Current driver is missing a sentinel in the struct soc_device_attribute array, which causes an oops when assessed by the soc_device_match(mt7621_pcie_quirks_match) call. This was only exposed once the CONFIG_SOC_MT7621 mt7621 soc_dev_attr was fixed to register the SOC as a device, in: commit 7c18b64bba3b ("mips: ralink: mt7621: do not use kzalloc too early") Fix it by adding the required sentinel.(CVE-2022-48952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntb: intel: Fix the NULL vs IS_ERR() bug for debugfs_create_dir() The debugfs_create_dir() function returns error pointers. It never returns NULL. So use IS_ERR() to check it.(CVE-2023-52917)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: pci: cx23885: check cx23885_vdev_init() return cx23885_vdev_init() can return a NULL pointer, but that pointer is used in the next line without a check. Add a NULL pointer check and go to the error unwind if it is NULL.(CVE-2023-52918)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
of: module: prevent NULL pointer dereference in vsnprintf()
In of_modalias(), we can get passed the str and len parameters which would cause a kernel oops in vsnprintf() since it only allows passing a NULL ptr when the length is also 0. Also, we need to filter out the negative values of the len parameter as these will result in a really huge buffer since snprintf() takes size_t parameter while ours is ssize_t...
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the Svace static analysis tool.(CVE-2024-35878)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma: xilinx_dpdma: Fix locking
There are several places where either chan->lock or chan->vchan.lock was not held. Add appropriate locking. This fixes lockdep warnings like
[ 31.077578] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 31.077831] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 40 at drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:834 xilinx_dpdma_chan_queue_transfer+0x274/0x5e0 [ 31.077953] Modules linked in: [ 31.078019] CPU: 2 PID: 40 Comm: kworker/u12:1 Not tainted 6.6.20+ #98 [ 31.078102] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) [ 31.078169] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 31.078272] pstate: 600000c5 (nZCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 31.078377] pc : xilinx_dpdma_chan_queue_transfer+0x274/0x5e0 [ 31.078473] lr : xilinx_dpdma_chan_queue_transfer+0x270/0x5e0 [ 31.078550] sp : ffffffc083bb2e10 [ 31.078590] x29: ffffffc083bb2e10 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffff880165a168 [ 31.078754] x26: ffffff880164e920 x25: ffffff880164eab8 x24: ffffff880164d480 [ 31.078920] x23: ffffff880165a148 x22: ffffff880164e988 x21: 0000000000000000 [ 31.079132] x20: ffffffc082aa3000 x19: ffffff880164e880 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 31.079295] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 31.079453] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffffff8802263dc0 x12: 0000000000000001 [ 31.079613] x11: 0001ffc083bb2e34 x10: 0001ff880164e98f x9 : 0001ffc082aa3def [ 31.079824] x8 : 0001ffc082aa3dec x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000516 [ 31.079982] x5 : ffffffc7f8d43000 x4 : ffffff88003c9c40 x3 : ffffffffffffffff [ 31.080147] x2 : ffffffc7f8d43000 x1 : 00000000000000c0 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 31.080307] Call trace: [ 31.080340] xilinx_dpdma_chan_queue_transfer+0x274/0x5e0 [ 31.080518] xilinx_dpdma_issue_pending+0x11c/0x120 [ 31.080595] zynqmp_disp_layer_update+0x180/0x3ac [ 31.080712] zynqmp_dpsub_plane_atomic_update+0x11c/0x21c [ 31.080825] drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes+0x20c/0x684 [ 31.080951] drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail+0x5c/0xb0 [ 31.081139] commit_tail+0x234/0x294 [ 31.081246] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1f8/0x210 [ 31.081363] drm_atomic_commit+0x100/0x140 [ 31.081477] drm_client_modeset_commit_atomic+0x318/0x384 [ 31.081634] drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x8c/0x24c [ 31.081725] drm_client_modeset_commit+0x34/0x5c [ 31.081812] __drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x104/0x168 [ 31.081899] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x50/0x70 [ 31.081971] fbcon_init+0x538/0xc48 [ 31.082047] visual_init+0x16c/0x23c [ 31.082207] do_bind_con_driver.isra.0+0x2d0/0x634 [ 31.082320] do_take_over_console+0x24c/0x33c [ 31.082429] do_fbcon_takeover+0xbc/0x1b0 [ 31.082503] fbcon_fb_registered+0x2d0/0x34c [ 31.082663] register_framebuffer+0x27c/0x38c [ 31.082767] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x5c0/0x91c [ 31.082939] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x50/0x74 [ 31.083012] drm_fbdev_dma_client_hotplug+0xb8/0x108 [ 31.083115] drm_client_register+0xa0/0xf4 [ 31.083195] drm_fbdev_dma_setup+0xb0/0x1cc [ 31.083293] zynqmp_dpsub_drm_init+0x45c/0x4e0 [ 31.083431] zynqmp_dpsub_probe+0x444/0x5e0 [ 31.083616] platform_probe+0x8c/0x13c [ 31.083713] really_probe+0x258/0x59c [ 31.083793] __driver_probe_device+0xc4/0x224 [ 31.083878] driver_probe_device+0x70/0x1c0 [ 31.083961] __device_attach_driver+0x108/0x1e0 [ 31.084052] bus_for_each_drv+0x9c/0x100 [ 31.084125] __device_attach+0x100/0x298 [ 31.084207] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20 [ 31.084292] bus_probe_device+0xd8/0xdc [ 31.084368] deferred_probe_work_func+0x11c/0x180 [ 31.084451] process_one_work+0x3ac/0x988 [ 31.084643] worker_thread+0x398/0x694 [ 31.084752] kthread+0x1bc/0x1c0 [ 31.084848] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 31.084932] irq event stamp: 64549 [ 31.084970] hardirqs last enabled at (64548): [<ffffffc081adf35c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x80/0x90 [ 31.085157] ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock() in instance_destroy_rcu()
syzbot reported that nf_reinject() could be called without rcu_read_lock() :
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02060-g5c1672705a1a #0 Not tainted
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:263 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 2 locks held by syz-executor.4/13427: #0: ffffffff8e334f60 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline] #0: ffffffff8e334f60 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2190 [inline] #0: ffffffff8e334f60 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_core+0xa86/0x1830 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2471 #1: ffff88801ca92958 (&inst->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #1: ffff88801ca92958 (&inst->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: nfqnl_flush net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:405 [inline] #1: ffff88801ca92958 (&inst->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: instance_destroy_rcu+0x30/0x220 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:172
stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 13427 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02060-g5c1672705a1a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x221/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6712 nf_reinject net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:323 [inline] nfqnl_reinject+0x6ec/0x1120 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:397 nfqnl_flush net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:410 [inline] instance_destroy_rcu+0x1ae/0x220 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:172 rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2196 [inline] rcu_core+0xafd/0x1830 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2471 handle_softirqs+0x2d6/0x990 kernel/softirq.c:554 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:588 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:428 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xf4/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:637 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:649 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043 </IRQ> <TASK>(CVE-2024-36286)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: core: Fix NULL module pointer assignment at card init
The commit 81033c6b584b ("ALSA: core: Warn on empty module") introduced a WARN_ON() for a NULL module pointer passed at snd_card object creation, and it also wraps the code around it with '#ifdef MODULE'. This works in most cases, but the devils are always in details. "MODULE" is defined when the target code (i.e. the sound core) is built as a module; but this doesn't mean that the caller is also built-in or not. Namely, when only the sound core is built-in (CONFIG_SND=y) while the driver is a module (CONFIG_SND_USB_AUDIO=m), the passed module pointer is ignored even if it's non-NULL, and card->module remains as NULL. This would result in the missing module reference up/down at the device open/close, leading to a race with the code execution after the module removal.
For addressing the bug, move the assignment of card->module again out of ifdef. The WARN_ON() is still wrapped with ifdef because the module can be really NULL when all sound drivers are built-in.
Note that we keep 'ifdef MODULE' for WARN_ON(), otherwise it would lead to a false-positive NULL module check. Admittedly it won't catch perfectly, i.e. no check is performed when CONFIG_SND=y. But, it's no real problem as it's only for debugging, and the condition is pretty rare.(CVE-2024-38605)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soundwire: cadence: fix invalid PDI offset
For some reason, we add an offset to the PDI, presumably to skip the PDI0 and PDI1 which are reserved for BPT.
This code is however completely wrong and leads to an out-of-bounds access. We were just lucky so far since we used only a couple of PDIs and remained within the PDI array bounds.
A Fixes: tag is not provided since there are no known platforms where the out-of-bounds would be accessed, and the initial code had problems as well.
A follow-up patch completely removes this useless offset.(CVE-2024-38635)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: prevent pt_regs corruption for secondary idle threads
Top of the kernel thread stack should be reserved for pt_regs. However this is not the case for the idle threads of the secondary boot harts. Their stacks overlap with their pt_regs, so both may get corrupted.
Similar issue has been fixed for the primary hart, see c7cdd96eca28 ("riscv: prevent stack corruption by reserving task_pt_regs(p) early"). However that fix was not propagated to the secondary harts. The problem has been noticed in some CPU hotplug tests with V enabled. The function smp_callin stored several registers on stack, corrupting top of pt_regs structure including status field. As a result, kernel attempted to save or restore inexistent V context.(CVE-2024-38667)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvmet: fix a possible leak when destroy a ctrl during qp establishment
In nvmet_sq_destroy we capture sq->ctrl early and if it is non-NULL we know that a ctrl was allocated (in the admin connect request handler) and we need to release pending AERs, clear ctrl->sqs and sq->ctrl (for nvme-loop primarily), and drop the final reference on the ctrl.
However, a small window is possible where nvmet_sq_destroy starts (as a result of the client giving up and disconnecting) concurrently with the nvme admin connect cmd (which may be in an early stage). But before kill_and_confirm of sq->ref (i.e. the admin connect managed to get an sq live reference). In this case, sq->ctrl was allocated however after it was captured in a local variable in nvmet_sq_destroy. This prevented the final reference drop on the ctrl.
Solve this by re-capturing the sq->ctrl after all inflight request has completed, where for sure sq->ctrl reference is final, and move forward based on that.
This issue was observed in an environment with many hosts connecting multiple ctrls simoutanuosly, creating a delay in allocating a ctrl leading up to this race window.(CVE-2024-42152)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dev/parport: fix the array out-of-bounds risk
Fixed array out-of-bounds issues caused by sprintf by replacing it with snprintf for safer data copying, ensuring the destination buffer is not overflowed.
Below is the stack trace I encountered during the actual issue:
[ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4]Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 [parport] [ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,5]CPU: 4 PID: 5118 Comm: QThread Tainted: G S W O 5.10.97-arm64-desktop #7100.57021.2 [ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,6]TGID: 5087 Comm: EFileApp [ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,7]Hardware name: HUAWEI HUAWEI QingYun PGUX-W515x-B081/SP1PANGUXM, BIOS 1.00.07 04/29/2024 [ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,8]Call trace: [ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,9] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0 [ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,0] show_stack+0x14/0x20 [ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,1] dump_stack+0xd4/0x10c [ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,2] panic+0x1d8/0x3bc [ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,3] __stack_chk_fail+0x2c/0x38 [ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4] do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 parport
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set
When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases, a deadlock for sbi->s_lock between the two processes may occur.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
kswapd balance_pgdat lock(fs_reclaim) exfat_iterate lock(&sbi->s_lock) exfat_readdir exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry exfat_get_dentry_set __exfat_get_dentry_set kmalloc_array ... lock(fs_reclaim) ... evict exfat_evict_inode lock(&sbi->s_lock)
To fix this, let's allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.(CVE-2024-42315)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: virt_wifi: avoid reporting connection success with wrong SSID
When user issues a connection with a different SSID than the one virt_wifi has advertised, the __cfg80211_connect_result() will trigger the warning: WARN_ON(bss_not_found).
The issue is because the connection code in virt_wifi does not check the SSID from user space (it only checks the BSSID), and virt_wifi will call cfg80211_connect_result() with WLAN_STATUS_SUCCESS even if the SSID is different from the one virt_wifi has advertised. Eventually cfg80211 won't be able to find the cfg80211_bss and generate the warning.
Fixed it by checking the SSID (from user space) in the connection code.(CVE-2024-43841)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diFree(CVE-2024-43858)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/nouveau: prime: fix refcount underflow
Calling nouveau_bo_ref() on a nouveau_bo without initializing it (and hence the backing ttm_bo) leads to a refcount underflow.
Instead of calling nouveau_bo_ref() in the unwind path of drm_gem_object_init(), clean things up manually.
(cherry picked from commit 1b93f3e89d03cfc576636e195466a0d728ad8de5)(CVE-2024-43867)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
devres: Fix memory leakage caused by driver API devm_free_percpu()
It will cause memory leakage when use driver API devm_free_percpu() to free memory allocated by devm_alloc_percpu(), fixed by using devres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within devm_free_percpu().(CVE-2024-43871)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/client: fix null pointer dereference in drm_client_modeset_probe
In drm_client_modeset_probe(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to modeset->mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-43894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: pm: only decrement add_addr_accepted for MPJ req
Adding the following warning ...
WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)
... before decrementing the add_addr_accepted counter helped to find a bug when running the "remove single subflow" subtest from the mptcp_join.sh selftest.
Removing a 'subflow' endpoint will first trigger a RM_ADDR, then the subflow closure. Before this patch, and upon the reception of the RM_ADDR, the other peer will then try to decrement this add_addr_accepted. That's not correct because the attached subflows have not been created upon the reception of an ADD_ADDR.
A way to solve that is to decrement the counter only if the attached subflow was an MP_JOIN to a remote id that was not 0, and initiated by the host receiving the RM_ADDR.(CVE-2024-45009)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: dwc3: core: Prevent USB core invalid event buffer address access
This commit addresses an issue where the USB core could access an invalid event buffer address during runtime suspend, potentially causing SMMU faults and other memory issues in Exynos platforms. The problem arises from the following sequence. 1. In dwc3_gadget_suspend, there is a chance of a timeout when moving the USB core to the halt state after clearing the run/stop bit by software. 2. In dwc3_core_exit, the event buffer is cleared regardless of the USB core's status, which may lead to an SMMU faults and other memory issues. if the USB core tries to access the event buffer address.
To prevent this hardware quirk on Exynos platforms, this commit ensures that the event buffer address is not cleared by software when the USB core is active during runtime suspend by checking its status before clearing the buffer address.(CVE-2024-46675)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB
Linux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write protected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction as "write" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt which causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.
The only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor maps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation tables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like Xen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.
Changing the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC removes dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch fixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.
I tested this on SA8155P with Xen.(CVE-2024-46689)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: fix mc_data out-of-bounds read warning
Clear warning that read mc_data[i-1] may out-of-bounds.(CVE-2024-46722)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix out-of-bounds read of df_v1_7_channel_number
Check the fb_channel_number range to avoid the array out-of-bounds read error(CVE-2024-46724)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hwmon: (nct6775-core) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large negative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user. Fix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46757)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: added NULL check at start of dc_validate_stream
[Why] prevent invalid memory access
[How] check if dc and stream are NULL(CVE-2024-46802)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: Acquire kvm->srcu when handling KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
Grab kvm->srcu when processing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, as KVM will forcibly leave nested VMX/SVM if SMM mode is being toggled, and leaving nested VMX reads guest memory.
Note, kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events() can also be called from KVM_RUN via sync_regs(), which already holds SRCU. I.e. trying to precisely use kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock() around the problematic SMM code would cause problems. Acquiring SRCU isn't all that expensive, so for simplicity, grab it unconditionally for KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS.
============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Not tainted
include/linux/kvm_host.h:1027 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by repro/1071: #0: ffff88811e424430 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]
stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 1071 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0x90 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x13f/0x1a0 kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x168/0x190 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_read_guest+0x3e/0x90 [kvm] nested_vmx_load_msr+0x6b/0x1d0 [kvm_intel] load_vmcs12_host_state+0x432/0xb40 [kvm_intel] vmx_leave_nested+0x30/0x40 [kvm_intel] kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events+0x15d/0x2b0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x1107/0x1750 [kvm] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm] ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm] ? lock_acquire+0xba/0x2d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x40c/0x6f0 ? lock_release+0xb7/0x270 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7ff11eb1b539 </TASK>(CVE-2024-46830)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spi: nxp-fspi: fix the KASAN report out-of-bounds bug
Change the memcpy length to fix the out-of-bounds issue when writing the data that is not 4 byte aligned to TX FIFO.
To reproduce the issue, write 3 bytes data to NOR chip.
dd if=3b of=/dev/mtd0 [ 36.926103] ================================================================== [ 36.933409] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nxp_fspi_exec_op+0x26ec/0x2838 [ 36.940514] Read of size 4 at addr ffff00081037c2a0 by task dd/455 [ 36.946721] [ 36.948235] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 455 Comm: dd Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-gc7b0e37c8434 #1070 [ 36.956185] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QM MEK (DT) [ 36.961260] Call trace: [ 36.963723] dump_backtrace+0x90/0xe8 [ 36.967414] show_stack+0x18/0x24 [ 36.970749] dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90 [ 36.974451] print_report+0x114/0x5cc [ 36.978151] kasan_report+0xa4/0xf0 [ 36.981670] __asan_report_load_n_noabort+0x1c/0x28 [ 36.986587] nxp_fspi_exec_op+0x26ec/0x2838 [ 36.990800] spi_mem_exec_op+0x8ec/0xd30 [ 36.994762] spi_mem_no_dirmap_read+0x190/0x1e0 [ 36.999323] spi_mem_dirmap_write+0x238/0x32c [ 37.003710] spi_nor_write_data+0x220/0x374 [ 37.007932] spi_nor_write+0x110/0x2e8 [ 37.011711] mtd_write_oob_std+0x154/0x1f0 [ 37.015838] mtd_write_oob+0x104/0x1d0 [ 37.019617] mtd_write+0xb8/0x12c [ 37.022953] mtdchar_write+0x224/0x47c [ 37.026732] vfs_write+0x1e4/0x8c8 [ 37.030163] ksys_write+0xec/0x1d0 [ 37.033586] __arm64_sys_write+0x6c/0x9c [ 37.037539] invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258 [ 37.041327] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c [ 37.046244] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c [ 37.049589] el0_svc+0x38/0x78 [ 37.052681] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 [ 37.057077] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ 37.060775] [ 37.062274] Allocated by task 455: [ 37.065701] kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x54 [ 37.069570] kasan_save_track+0x20/0x3c [ 37.073438] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x40/0x54 [ 37.077736] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xb8 [ 37.081515] __kmalloc_noprof+0x158/0x2f8 [ 37.085563] mtd_kmalloc_up_to+0x120/0x154 [ 37.089690] mtdchar_write+0x130/0x47c [ 37.093469] vfs_write+0x1e4/0x8c8 [ 37.096901] ksys_write+0xec/0x1d0 [ 37.100332] __arm64_sys_write+0x6c/0x9c [ 37.104287] invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258 [ 37.108064] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c [ 37.112972] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c [ 37.116319] el0_svc+0x38/0x78 [ 37.119401] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 [ 37.123788] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ 37.127474] [ 37.128977] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff00081037c2a0 [ 37.128977] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 [ 37.141177] The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of [ 37.141177] allocated 3-byte region [ffff00081037c2a0, ffff00081037c2a3) [ 37.153465] [ 37.154971] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [ 37.160559] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x89037c [ 37.168596] flags: 0xbfffe0000000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff) [ 37.175149] page_type: 0xfdffffff(slab) [ 37.179021] raw: 0bfffe0000000000 ffff000800002500 dead000000000122 0000000000000000 [ 37.186788] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080800080 00000001fdffffff 0000000000000000 [ 37.194553] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 37.200144] [ 37.201647] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 37.206460] ffff00081037c180: fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc [ 37.213701] ffff00081037c200: fa fc fc fc 05 fc fc fc 03 fc fc fc 02 fc fc fc [ 37.220946] >ffff00081037c280: 06 fc fc fc 03 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 37.228186] ^ [ 37.232473] ffff00081037c300: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 37.239718] ffff00081037c380: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 37.246962] ============================================================== ---truncated---(CVE-2024-46853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: keystone: Add workaround for Errata #i2037 (AM65x SR 1.0)
Errata #i2037 in AM65x/DRA80xM Processors Silicon Revision 1.0 (SPRZ452D_July 2018_Revised December 2019 [1]) mentions when an inbound PCIe TLP spans more than two internal AXI 128-byte bursts, the bus may corrupt the packet payload and the corrupt data may cause associated applications or the processor to hang.
The workaround for Errata #i2037 is to limit the maximum read request size and maximum payload size to 128 bytes. Add workaround for Errata #i2037 here.
The errata and workaround is applicable only to AM65x SR 1.0 and later versions of the silicon will have this fixed.
[1] -> https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz452i/sprz452i.pdf(CVE-2024-47667)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix state management in error path of log writing function
After commit a694291a6211 ("nilfs2: separate wait function from nilfs_segctor_write") was applied, the log writing function nilfs_segctor_do_construct() was able to issue I/O requests continuously even if user data blocks were split into multiple logs across segments, but two potential flaws were introduced in its error handling.
First, if nilfs_segctor_begin_construction() fails while creating the second or subsequent logs, the log writing function returns without calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction(), so the writeback flag set on pages/folios will remain uncleared. This causes page cache operations to hang waiting for the writeback flag. For example, truncate_inode_pages_final(), which is called via nilfs_evict_inode() when an inode is evicted from memory, will hang.
Second, the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag set on normal inodes remain uncleared. As a result, if the next log write involves checkpoint creation, that's fine, but if a partial log write is performed that does not, inodes with NILFS_I_COLLECTED set are erroneously removed from the "sc_dirty_files" list, and their data and b-tree blocks may not be written to the device, corrupting the block mapping.
Fix these issues by uniformly calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction() on failure of each step in the loop in nilfs_segctor_do_construct(), having it clean up logs and segment usages according to progress, and correcting the conditions for calling nilfs_redirty_inodes() to ensure that the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag is cleared.(CVE-2024-47669)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: check skb is non-NULL in tcp_rto_delta_us() We have some machines running stock Ubuntu 20.04.6 which is their 5.4.0-174-generic kernel that are running ceph and recently hit a null ptr dereference in tcp_rearm_rto(). Initially hitting it from the TLP path, but then later we also saw it getting hit from the RACK case as well. Here are examples of the oops messages we saw in each of those cases: Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.780353] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.787572] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.792971] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.798362] PGD 0 P4D 0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.801164] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.805091] CPU: 0 PID: 9180 Comm: msgr-worker-1 Tainted: G W 5.4.0-174-generic #193-Ubuntu Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.814996] Hardware name: Supermicro SMC 2x26 os-gen8 64C NVME-Y 256G/H12SSW-NTR, BIOS 2.5.V1.2U.NVMe.UEFI 05/09/2023 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.825952] RIP: 0010:tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.830656] Code: 87 ca 04 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d c3 c3 49 8b bc 24 40 06 00 00 eb 8d 48 bb cf f7 53 e3 a5 9b c4 20 4c 89 ef e8 0c fe 0e 00 <48> 8b 78 20 48 c1 ef 03 48 89 f8 41 8b bc 24 80 04 00 00 48 f7 e3 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.849665] RSP: 0018:ffffb75d40003e08 EFLAGS: 00010246 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.855149] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 20c49ba5e353f7cf RCX: 0000000000000000 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.862542] RDX: 0000000062177c30 RSI: 000000000000231c RDI: ffff9874ad283a60 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.869933] RBP: ffffb75d40003e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff987605e20aa8 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.877318] R10: ffffb75d40003f00 R11: ffffb75d4460f740 R12: ffff9874ad283900 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.884710] R13: ffff9874ad283a60 R14: ffff9874ad283980 R15: ffff9874ad283d30 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.892095] FS: 00007f1ef4a2e700(0000) GS:ffff987605e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.900438] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.906435] CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000003e450ba003 CR4: 0000000000760ef0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.913822] PKRU: 55555554 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.916786] Call Trace: Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.919488] Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.921765] ? show_regs.cold+0x1a/0x1f Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.925859] ? __die+0x90/0xd9 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.929169] ? no_context+0x196/0x380 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.933088] ? ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x4e0/0x4e0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.938216] ? ip6_sublist_rcv_finish+0x3d/0x50 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.943000] ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x50/0x1a0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.947873] ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x16/0x20 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.952486] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x267/0x450 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.957104] ? ipv6_list_rcv+0x112/0x140 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.961279] ? __do_page_fault+0x58/0x90 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.965458] ? do_page_fault+0x2c/0xe0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.969465] ? page_fault+0x34/0x40 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.973217] ? tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.977313] ? tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.981408] tcp_send_loss_probe+0x10b/0x220 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.985937] tcp_write_timer_handler+0x1b4/0x240 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.990809] tcp_write_timer+0x9e/0xe0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.994814] ? tcp_write_timer_handler+0x240/0x240 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.999866] call_timer_fn+0x32/0x130 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.003782] __run_timers.part.0+0x180/0x280 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.008309] ? recalibrate_cpu_khz+0x10/0x10 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.012841] ? native_x2apic_icr_write+0x30/0x30 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.017718] ? lapic_next_even ---truncated---(CVE-2024-47684)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_reject_ipv6: fix nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() syzbot reported that nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() was possibly sending garbage on the four reserved tcp bits (th->res1) Use skb_put_zero() to clear the whole TCP header, as done in nf_reject_ip_tcphdr_put() BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x688/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:255 nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x688/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:255 nf_send_reset6+0xd84/0x15b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:344 nft_reject_inet_eval+0x3c1/0x880 net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.c:48 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x438/0x22a0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_inet+0x41a/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:161 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x29b/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x4ad/0xa50 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xe7/0x980 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0xa5a/0x19b0 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x1ce/0x800 kernel/softirq.c:554 __do_softirq+0x14/0x1a kernel/softirq.c:588 do_softirq+0x9a/0x100 kernel/softirq.c:455 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9f/0xb0 kernel/softirq.c:382 local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline] rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2692/0x5610 net/core/dev.c:4450 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline] neigh_resolve_output+0x9ca/0xae0 net/core/neighbour.c:1565 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:542 [inline] ip6_finish_output2+0x2347/0x2ba0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:141 __ip6_finish_output net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:215 [inline] ip6_finish_output+0xbb8/0x14b0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:226 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:303 [inline] ip6_output+0x356/0x620 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:247 dst_output include/net/dst.h:450 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_xmit+0x1ba6/0x25d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:366 inet6_csk_xmit+0x442/0x530 net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c:135 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x3b07/0x4880 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1484 [inline] tcp_connect+0x35b6/0x7130 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4143 tcp_v6_connect+0x1bcc/0x1e40 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:333 __inet_stream_connect+0x2ef/0x1730 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:679 inet_stream_connect+0x6a/0xd0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:750 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2061 [inline] __sys_connect+0x606/0x690 net/socket.c:2078 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2088 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2085 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x91/0xe0 net/socket.c:2085 x64_sys_call+0x27a5/0x3ba0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:43 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was stored to memory at: nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x60c/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:249 nf_send_reset6+0xd84/0x15b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:344 nft_reject_inet_eval+0x3c1/0x880 net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.c:48 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x438/0x22a0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_inet+0x41a/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:161 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x29b/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core ---truncated---(CVE-2024-47685)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: return -EINVAL when namelen is 0 When we have a corrupted main.sqlite in /var/lib/nfs/nfsdcld/, it may result in namelen being 0, which will cause memdup_user() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR. When we access the name.data that has been assigned the value of ZERO_SIZE_PTR in nfs4_client_to_reclaim(), null pointer dereference is triggered. [ T1205] ================================================================== [ T1205] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] Read of size 1 at addr 0000000000000010 by task nfsdcld/1205 [ T1205] [ T1205] CPU: 11 PID: 1205 Comm: nfsdcld Not tainted 5.10.0-00003-g2c1423731b8d #406 [ T1205] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 [ T1205] Call Trace: [ T1205] dump_stack+0x9a/0xd0 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] __kasan_report.cold+0x34/0x84 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 [ T1205] nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_release_lockowner+0x410/0x410 [ T1205] cld_pipe_downcall+0x5ca/0x760 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_cld_tracking_exit+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ T1205] ? down_write_killable_nested+0x170/0x170 [ T1205] ? avc_policy_seqno+0x28/0x40 [ T1205] ? selinux_file_permission+0x1b4/0x1e0 [ T1205] rpc_pipe_write+0x84/0xb0 [ T1205] vfs_write+0x143/0x520 [ T1205] ksys_write+0xc9/0x170 [ T1205] ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xfe/0x110 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa2/0x110 [ T1205] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ T1205] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1 [ T1205] RIP: 0033:0x7fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] Code: 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 514 [ T1205] RSP: 002b:00007fff8c4b7248 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000042b RCX: 00007fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] RDX: 000000000000042b RSI: 00007fff8c4b75f0 RDI: 0000000000000008 [ T1205] RBP: 00007fdbdb761bb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000042b [ T1205] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 00007fff8c4b75f0 R15: 0000000000000000 [ T1205] ================================================================== Fix it by checking namelen.(CVE-2024-47692)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rtrs-clt: Reset cid to con_num - 1 to stay in bounds In the function init_conns(), after the create_con() and create_cm() for loop if something fails. In the cleanup for loop after the destroy tag, we access out of bound memory because cid is set to clt_path->s.con_num. This commits resets the cid to clt_path->s.con_num - 1, to stay in bounds in the cleanup loop later.(CVE-2024-47695)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2832: fix an out-of-bounds write error Ensure index in rtl2832_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access. dev->filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index > 32 to index >= 32 to resolve this issue. hverkuil: added fixes tag, rtl2830_pid_filter -> rtl2832_pid_filter in logmsg
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: bcm: Clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry(). syzbot reported a warning in bcm_release(). [0] The blamed change fixed another warning that is triggered when connect() is issued again for a socket whose connect()ed device has been unregistered. However, if the socket is just close()d without the 2nd connect(), the remaining bo->bcm_proc_read triggers unnecessary remove_proc_entry() in bcm_release(). Let's clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry() in bcm_notify(). [0] name '4986' WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5234 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5234 Comm: syz-executor606 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00178-g5517ae241919 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Code: ff eb 05 e8 cb 1e 5e ff 48 8b 5c 24 10 48 c7 c7 e0 f7 aa 8e e8 2a 38 8e 09 90 48 c7 c7 60 3a 1b 8c 48 89 de e8 da 42 20 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 8b 44 24 18 48 c7 44 24 40 0e 36 e0 45 49 c7 04 07 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000345fa20 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 2a2d0aee2eb64600 RBX: ffff888032f1f548 RCX: ffff888029431e00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000345fb08 R08: ffffffff8155b2f2 R09: 1ffff1101710519a R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed101710519b R12: ffff888011d38640 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fcfb52722f0 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> bcm_release+0x250/0x880 net/can/bcm.c:1578 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline] do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:882 do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1031 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1042 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1040 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1040 x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fcfb51ee969 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcfb51ee93f. RSP: 002b:00007ffce0109ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fcfb51ee969 RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R08: ffffffffffffffb8 R09: 0000555500000000 R10: 0000555500000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fcfb5271ee0 R15: 00007fcfb51bf160 </TASK>(CVE-2024-47709)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sock_map: Add a cond_resched() in sock_hash_free() Several syzbot soft lockup reports all have in common sock_hash_free() If a map with a large number of buckets is destroyed, we need to yield the cpu when needed.(CVE-2024-47710)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add null check for set_output_gamma in dcn30_set_output_transfer_func This commit adds a null check for the set_output_gamma function pointer in the dcn30_set_output_transfer_func function. Previously, set_output_gamma was being checked for nullity at line 386, but then it was being dereferenced without any nullity check at line 401. This could potentially lead to a null pointer dereference error if set_output_gamma is indeed null. To fix this, we now ensure that set_output_gamma is not null before dereferencing it. We do this by adding a nullity check for set_output_gamma before the call to set_output_gamma at line 401. If set_output_gamma is null, we log an error message and do not call the function. This fix prevents a potential null pointer dereference error. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn30/dcn30_hwseq.c:401 dcn30_set_output_transfer_func() error: we previously assumed 'mpc->funcs->set_output_gamma' could be null (see line 386) drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn30/dcn30_hwseq.c 373 bool dcn30_set_output_transfer_func(struct dc dc, 374 struct pipe_ctx pipe_ctx, 375 const struct dc_stream_state stream) 376 { 377 int mpcc_id = pipe_ctx->plane_res.hubp->inst; 378 struct mpc mpc = pipe_ctx->stream_res.opp->ctx->dc->res_pool->mpc; 379 const struct pwl_params params = NULL; 380 bool ret = false; 381 382 / program OGAM or 3DLUT only for the top pipe/ 383 if (pipe_ctx->top_pipe == NULL) { 384 /program rmu shaper and 3dlut in MPC/ 385 ret = dcn30_set_mpc_shaper_3dlut(pipe_ctx, stream); 386 if (ret == false && mpc->funcs->set_output_gamma) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If this is NULL 387 if (stream->out_transfer_func.type == TF_TYPE_HWPWL) 388 params = &stream->out_transfer_func.pwl; 389 else if (pipe_ctx->stream->out_transfer_func.type == 390 TF_TYPE_DISTRIBUTED_POINTS && 391 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format( 392 &stream->out_transfer_func, 393 &mpc->blender_params, false)) 394 params = &mpc->blender_params; 395 / there are no ROM LUTs in OUTGAM */ 396 if (stream->out_transfer_func.type == TF_TYPE_PREDEFINED) 397 BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER(); 398 } 399 } 400 --> 401 mpc->funcs->set_output_gamma(mpc, mpcc_id, params); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Then it will crash 402 return ret; 403 }(CVE-2024-47720)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix spin_unlock_irqrestore() called with IRQs enabled Fix missuse of spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() when spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() was hold. This was discovered through the lock debugging, and the corresponding log is as follows: raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled WARNING: CPU: 96 PID: 2074 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10 warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 ... Call trace: warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x84/0xc8 add_qp_to_list+0x11c/0x148 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp_common.constprop.0+0x240/0x780 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp+0x98/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] create_qp+0x138/0x258 ib_create_qp_kernel+0x50/0xe8 create_mad_qp+0xa8/0x128 ib_mad_port_open+0x218/0x448 ib_mad_init_device+0x70/0x1f8 add_client_context+0xfc/0x220 enable_device_and_get+0xd0/0x140 ib_register_device.part.0+0xf4/0x1c8 ib_register_device+0x34/0x50 hns_roce_register_device+0x174/0x3d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_init+0xfc/0x2c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] __hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x7c/0x1d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x9c/0x180 hns_roce_hw_v2
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: call cache_put if xdr_reserve_space returns NULL If not enough buffer space available, but idmap_lookup has triggered lookup_fn which calls cache_get and returns successfully. Then we missed to call cache_put here which pairs with cache_get. Reviwed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>(CVE-2024-47737)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix potential oob read in nilfs_btree_check_delete() The function nilfs_btree_check_delete(), which checks whether degeneration to direct mapping occurs before deleting a b-tree entry, causes memory access outside the block buffer when retrieving the maximum key if the root node has no entries. This does not usually happen because b-tree mappings with 0 child nodes are never created by mkfs.nilfs2 or nilfs2 itself. However, it can happen if the b-tree root node read from a device is configured that way, so fix this potential issue by adding a check for that case.(CVE-2024-47757)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/timerlat: Fix a race during cpuhp processing There is another found exception that the "timerlat/1" thread was scheduled on CPU0, and lead to timer corruption finally: ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object: ffff888237c2e108 object type: hrtimer hint: timerlat_irq+0x0/0x220 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 426 at lib/debugobjects.c:518 debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 426 Comm: timerlat/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #45 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x7c/0x110 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1d0 ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20 ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? __pfx_timerlat_irq+0x10/0x10 __debug_object_init+0x110/0x150 hrtimer_init+0x1d/0x60 timerlat_main+0xab/0x2d0 ? __pfx_timerlat_main+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xb7/0xe0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> After tracing the scheduling event, it was discovered that the migration of the "timerlat/1" thread was performed during thread creation. Further analysis confirmed that it is because the CPU online processing for osnoise is implemented through workers, which is asynchronous with the offline processing. When the worker was scheduled to create a thread, the CPU may has already been removed from the cpu_online_mask during the offline process, resulting in the inability to select the right CPU: T1 | T2 [CPUHP_ONLINE] | cpu_device_down() osnoise_hotplug_workfn() | | cpus_write_lock() | takedown_cpu(1) | cpus_write_unlock() [CPUHP_OFFLINE] | cpus_read_lock() | start_kthread(1) | cpus_read_unlock() | To fix this, skip online processing if the CPU is already offline.(CVE-2024-49866)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: wait for fixup workers before stopping cleaner kthread during umount During unmount, at close_ctree(), we have the following steps in this order: 1) Park the cleaner kthread - this doesn't destroy the kthread, it basically halts its execution (wake ups against it work but do nothing); 2) We stop the cleaner kthread - this results in freeing the respective struct task_struct; 3) We call btrfs_stop_all_workers() which waits for any jobs running in all the work queues and then free the work queues. Syzbot reported a case where a fixup worker resulted in a crash when doing a delayed iput on its inode while attempting to wake up the cleaner at btrfs_add_delayed_iput(), because the task_struct of the cleaner kthread was already freed. This can happen during unmount because we don't wait for any fixup workers still running before we call kthread_stop() against the cleaner kthread, which stops and free all its resources. Fix this by waiting for any fixup workers at close_ctree() before we call kthread_stop() against the cleaner and run pending delayed iputs. The stack traces reported by syzbot were the following: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x77/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5065 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880272a8a18 by task kworker/u8:3/52 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 52 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Workqueue: btrfs-fixup btrfs_work_helper Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __lock_acquire+0x77/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5065 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 class_raw_spinlock_irqsave_constructor include/linux/spinlock.h:551 [inline] try_to_wake_up+0xb0/0x1480 kernel/sched/core.c:4154 btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker+0xc16/0xdf0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:2842 btrfs_work_helper+0x390/0xc50 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:314 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa63/0x1850 kernel/workqueue.c:3310 worker_thread+0x870/0xd30 kernel/workqueue.c:3391 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK> Allocated by task 2: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:319 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x66/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:345 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:247 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4086 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4135 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x16b/0x320 mm/slub.c:4187 alloc_task_struct_node kernel/fork.c:180 [inline] dup_task_struct+0x57/0x8c0 kernel/fork.c:1107 copy_process+0x5d1/0x3d50 kernel/fork.c:2206 kernel_clone+0x223/0x880 kernel/fork.c:2787 kernel_thread+0x1bc/0x240 kernel/fork.c:2849 create_kthread kernel/kthread.c:412 [inline] kthreadd+0x60d/0x810 kernel/kthread.c:765 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 Freed by task 61: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:579 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:247 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x59/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:264 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:230 [inline] slab_free_h ---truncated---(CVE-2024-49867)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion [BUG] Syzbot reported a NULL pointer dereference with the following crash: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. start_transaction+0x830/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:676 prepare_to_relocate+0x31f/0x4c0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3642 relocate_block_group+0x169/0xd20 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3678 ... BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -12 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000660-0x0000000000000667] RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x362/0xa80 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:926 Call Trace: <TASK> commit_fs_roots+0x2ee/0x720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1496 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xfaf/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2430 del_balance_item fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3678 [inline] reset_balance_state+0x25e/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3742 btrfs_balance+0xead/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4574 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3673 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [CAUSE] The allocation failure happens at the start_transaction() inside prepare_to_relocate(), and during the error handling we call unset_reloc_control(), which makes fs_info->balance_ctl to be NULL. Then we continue the error path cleanup in btrfs_balance() by calling reset_balance_state() which will call del_balance_item() to fully delete the balance item in the root tree. However during the small window between set_reloc_contrl() and unset_reloc_control(), we can have a subvolume tree update and created a reloc_root for that subvolume. Then we go into the final btrfs_commit_transaction() of del_balance_item(), and into btrfs_update_reloc_root() inside commit_fs_roots(). That function checks if fs_info->reloc_ctl is in the merge_reloc_tree stage, but since fs_info->reloc_ctl is NULL, it results a NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] Just add extra check on fs_info->reloc_ctl inside btrfs_update_reloc_root(), before checking fs_info->reloc_ctl->merge_reloc_tree. That DEAD_RELOC_TREE handling is to prevent further modification to the reloc tree during merge stage, but since there is no reloc_ctl at all, we do not need to bother that.(CVE-2024-49868)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: map the EBADMSG to nfserr_io to avoid warning Ext4 will throw -EBADMSG through ext4_readdir when a checksum error occurs, resulting in the following WARNING. Fix it by mapping EBADMSG to nfserr_io. nfsd_buffered_readdir iterate_dir // -EBADMSG -74 ext4_readdir // .iterate_shared ext4_dx_readdir ext4_htree_fill_tree htree_dirblock_to_tree ext4_read_dirblock __ext4_read_dirblock ext4_dirblock_csum_verify warn_no_space_for_csum __warn_no_space_for_csum return ERR_PTR(-EFSBADCRC) // -EBADMSG -74 nfserrno // WARNING [ 161.115610] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 161.116465] nfsd: non-standard errno: -74 [ 161.117315] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 780 at fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:878 nfserrno+0x9d/0xd0 [ 161.118596] Modules linked in: [ 161.119243] CPU: 1 PID: 780 Comm: nfsd Not tainted 5.10.0-00014-g79679361fd5d #138 [ 161.120684] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qe mu.org 04/01/2014 [ 161.123601] RIP: 0010:nfserrno+0x9d/0xd0 [ 161.124676] Code: 0f 87 da 30 dd 00 83 e3 01 b8 00 00 00 05 75 d7 44 89 ee 48 c7 c7 c0 57 24 98 89 44 24 04 c6 05 ce 2b 61 03 01 e8 99 20 d8 00 <0f> 0b 8b 44 24 04 eb b5 4c 89 e6 48 c7 c7 a0 6d a4 99 e8 cc 15 33 [ 161.127797] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000e2f9c0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 161.128794] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 161.130089] RDX: 1ffff1103ee16f6d RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: fffff520001c5f2a [ 161.131379] RBP: 0000000000000022 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8881f70c1827 [ 161.132664] R10: ffffed103ee18304 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000021 [ 161.133949] R13: 00000000ffffffb6 R14: ffff8881317c0000 R15: ffffc90000e2fbd8 [ 161.135244] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f7080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 161.136695] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 161.137761] CR2: 00007fcaad70b348 CR3: 0000000144256006 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 [ 161.139041] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 161.140291] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 161.141519] PKRU: 55555554 [ 161.142076] Call Trace: [ 161.142575] ? __warn+0x9b/0x140 [ 161.143229] ? nfserrno+0x9d/0xd0 [ 161.143872] ? report_bug+0x125/0x150 [ 161.144595] ? handle_bug+0x41/0x90 [ 161.145284] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 [ 161.146009] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x12/0x20 [ 161.146816] ? nfserrno+0x9d/0xd0 [ 161.147487] nfsd_buffered_readdir+0x28b/0x2b0 [ 161.148333] ? nfsd4_encode_dirent_fattr+0x380/0x380 [ 161.149258] ? nfsd_buffered_filldir+0xf0/0xf0 [ 161.150093] ? wait_for_concurrent_writes+0x170/0x170 [ 161.151004] ? generic_file_llseek_size+0x48/0x160 [ 161.151895] nfsd_readdir+0x132/0x190 [ 161.152606] ? nfsd4_encode_dirent_fattr+0x380/0x380 [ 161.153516] ? nfsd_unlink+0x380/0x380 [ 161.154256] ? override_creds+0x45/0x60 [ 161.155006] nfsd4_encode_readdir+0x21a/0x3d0 [ 161.155850] ? nfsd4_encode_readlink+0x210/0x210 [ 161.156731] ? write_bytes_to_xdr_buf+0x97/0xe0 [ 161.157598] ? __write_bytes_to_xdr_buf+0xd0/0xd0 [ 161.158494] ? lock_downgrade+0x90/0x90 [ 161.159232] ? nfs4svc_decode_voidarg+0x10/0x10 [ 161.160092] nfsd4_encode_operation+0x15a/0x440 [ 161.160959] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x718/0xe90 [ 161.161818] nfsd_dispatch+0x18e/0x2c0 [ 161.162586] svc_process_common+0x786/0xc50 [ 161.163403] ? nfsd_svc+0x380/0x380 [ 161.164137] ? svc_printk+0x160/0x160 [ 161.164846] ? svc_xprt_do_enqueue.part.0+0x365/0x380 [ 161.165808] ? nfsd_svc+0x380/0x380 [ 161.166523] ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x40 [ 161.167309] svc_process+0x1a5/0x200 [ 161.168019] nfsd+0x1f5/0x380 [ 161.168663] ? nfsd_shutdown_threads+0x260/0x260 [ 161.169554] kthread+0x1c4/0x210 [ 161.170224] ? kthread_insert_work_sanity_check+0x80/0x80 [ 161.171246] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30(CVE-2024-49875)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Initialize get_bytes_per_element's default to 1 Variables, used as denominators and maybe not assigned to other values, should not be 0. bytes_per_element_y & bytes_per_element_c are initialized by get_bytes_per_element() which should never return 0. This fixes 10 DIVIDE_BY_ZERO issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-49892)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in degamma hardware format translation Fixes index out of bounds issue in cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format function. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds the function returns false to indicate an error. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:594 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:595 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:596 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max(CVE-2024-49894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in DCN30 degamma hardware format translation This commit addresses a potential index out of bounds issue in the cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format function in the DCN30 color management module. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds, the function returns false to indicate an error. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:338 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:339 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:340 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max(CVE-2024-49895)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Fix uninit-value access of new_ea in ea_buffer syzbot reports that lzo1x_1_do_compress is using uninit-value: ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in lzo1x_1_do_compress+0x19f9/0x2510 lib/lzo/lzo1x_compress.c:178 ... Uninit was stored to memory at: ea_put fs/jfs/xattr.c:639 [inline] ... Local variable ea_buf created at: __jfs_setxattr+0x5d/0x1ae0 fs/jfs/xattr.c:662 __jfs_xattr_set+0xe6/0x1f0 fs/jfs/xattr.c:934 ===================================================== The reason is ea_buf->new_ea is not initialized properly. Fix this by using memset to empty its content at the beginning in ea_get().(CVE-2024-49900)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: check if leafidx greater than num leaves per dmap tree syzbot report a out of bounds in dbSplit, it because dmt_leafidx greater than num leaves per dmap tree, add a checking for dmt_leafidx in dbFindLeaf. Shaggy: Modified sanity check to apply to control pages as well as leaf pages.(CVE-2024-49902)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Fix uaf in dbFreeBits [syzbot reported] ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0xfe/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880229254b0 by task syz-executor357/5216 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5216 Comm: syz-executor357 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00156-gd7a5aa4b3c00 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xfe/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 dbFreeBits+0x7ea/0xd90 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2390 dbFreeDmap fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2089 [inline] dbFree+0x35b/0x680 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:409 dbDiscardAG+0x8a9/0xa20 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1650 jfs_ioc_trim+0x433/0x670 fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c:100 jfs_ioctl+0x2d0/0x3e0 fs/jfs/ioctl.c:131 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 Freed by task 5218: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:579 poison_slab_object+0xe0/0x150 mm/kasan/common.c:240 __kasan_slab_free+0x37/0x60 mm/kasan/common.c:256 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2252 [inline] slab_free mm/slub.c:4473 [inline] kfree+0x149/0x360 mm/slub.c:4594 dbUnmount+0x11d/0x190 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:278 jfs_mount_rw+0x4ac/0x6a0 fs/jfs/jfs_mount.c:247 jfs_remount+0x3d1/0x6b0 fs/jfs/super.c:454 reconfigure_super+0x445/0x880 fs/super.c:1083 vfs_cmd_reconfigure fs/fsopen.c:263 [inline] vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:292 [inline] __do_sys_fsconfig fs/fsopen.c:473 [inline] __se_sys_fsconfig+0xb6e/0xf80 fs/fsopen.c:345 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [Analysis] There are two paths (dbUnmount and jfs_ioc_trim) that generate race condition when accessing bmap, which leads to the occurrence of uaf. Use the lock s_umount to synchronize them, in order to avoid uaf caused by race condition.(CVE-2024-49903)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add NULL check for function pointer in dcn20_set_output_transfer_func This commit adds a null check for the set_output_gamma function pointer in the dcn20_set_output_transfer_func function. Previously, set_output_gamma was being checked for null at line 1030, but then it was being dereferenced without any null check at line 1048. This could potentially lead to a null pointer dereference error if set_output_gamma is null. To fix this, we now ensure that set_output_gamma is not null before dereferencing it. We do this by adding a null check for set_output_gamma before the call to set_output_gamma at line 1048.(CVE-2024-49911)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/ioapic: Handle allocation failures gracefully Breno observed panics when using failslab under certain conditions during runtime: can not alloc irq_pin_list (-1,0,20) Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC: failed to add irq-pin. Can not proceed panic+0x4e9/0x590 mp_irqdomain_alloc+0x9ab/0xa80 irq_domain_alloc_irqs_locked+0x25d/0x8d0 __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x80/0x110 mp_map_pin_to_irq+0x645/0x890 acpi_register_gsi_ioapic+0xe6/0x150 hpet_open+0x313/0x480 That's a pointless panic which is a leftover of the historic IO/APIC code which panic'ed during early boot when the interrupt allocation failed. The only place which might justify panic is the PIT/HPET timer_check() code which tries to figure out whether the timer interrupt is delivered through the IO/APIC. But that code does not require to handle interrupt allocation failures. If the interrupt cannot be allocated then timer delivery fails and it either panics due to that or falls back to legacy mode. Cure this by removing the panic wrapper around __add_pin_to_irq_node() and making mp_irqdomain_alloc() aware of the failure condition and handle it as any other failure in this function gracefully.(CVE-2024-49927)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jbd2: stop waiting for space when jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() returns error In __jbd2_log_wait_for_space(), we might call jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to recover some journal space. But if an error occurs while executing jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() (e.g., an EIO), we don't stop waiting for free space right away, we try other branches, and if j_committing_transaction is NULL (i.e., the tid is 0), we will get the following complain: ============================================ JBD2: I/O error when updating journal superblock for sdd-8. __jbd2_log_wait_for_space: needed 256 blocks and only had 217 space available __jbd2_log_wait_for_space: no way to get more journal space in sdd-8 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 139804 at fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:109 __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x251/0x2e0 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 139804 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 6.6.0+ #1 RIP: 0010:__jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x251/0x2e0 Call Trace: <TASK> add_transaction_credits+0x5d1/0x5e0 start_this_handle+0x1ef/0x6a0 jbd2__journal_start+0x18b/0x340 ext4_dirty_inode+0x5d/0xb0 __mark_inode_dirty+0xe4/0x5d0 generic_update_time+0x60/0x70 [...] ============================================ So only if jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() returns 1, i.e., there is nothing to clean up at the moment, continue to try to reclaim free space in other ways. Note that this fix relies on commit 6f6a6fda2945 ("jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when updating journal superblock fails") to make jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail return the correct error code.(CVE-2024-49959)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: remove unreasonable unlock in ocfs2_read_blocks Patch series "Misc fixes for ocfs2_read_blocks", v5. This series contains 2 fixes for ocfs2_read_blocks(). The first patch fix the issue reported by syzbot, which detects bad unlock balance in ocfs2_read_blocks(). The second patch fixes an issue reported by Heming Zhao when reviewing above fix. This patch (of 2): There was a lock release before exiting, so remove the unreasonable unlock.(CVE-2024-49965)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: cancel dqi_sync_work before freeing oinfo ocfs2_global_read_info() will initialize and schedule dqi_sync_work at the end, if error occurs after successfully reading global quota, it will trigger the following warning with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_* enabled: ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object: 00000000d8b0ce28 object type: timer_list hint: qsync_work_fn+0x0/0x16c This reports that there is an active delayed work when freeing oinfo in error handling, so cancel dqi_sync_work first. BTW, return status instead of -1 when .read_file_info fails.(CVE-2024-49966)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in DCN30 color transformation This commit addresses a potential index out of bounds issue in the cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format function in the DCN30 color management module. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds, the function returns false to indicate an error. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:180 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:181 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:182 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max(CVE-2024-49969)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations Nothing appears to limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations that clients can start. In addition, AFAICT each async COPY can copy an unlimited number of 4MB chunks, so can run for a long time. Thus IMO async COPY can become a DoS vector. Add a restriction mechanism that bounds the number of concurrent background COPY operations. Start simple and try to be fair -- this patch implements a per-namespace limit. An async COPY request that occurs while this limit is exceeded gets NFS4ERR_DELAY. The requesting client can choose to send the request again after a delay or fall back to a traditional read/write style copy. If there is need to make the mechanism more sophisticated, we can visit that in future patches.(CVE-2024-49974)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: stm32f7: Do not prepare/unprepare clock during runtime suspend/resume In case there is any sort of clock controller attached to this I2C bus controller, for example Versaclock or even an AIC32x4 I2C codec, then an I2C transfer triggered from the clock controller clk_ops .prepare callback may trigger a deadlock on drivers/clk/clk.c prepare_lock mutex. This is because the clock controller first grabs the prepare_lock mutex and then performs the prepare operation, including its I2C access. The I2C access resumes this I2C bus controller via .runtime_resume callback, which calls clk_prepare_enable(), which attempts to grab the prepare_lock mutex again and deadlocks. Since the clock are already prepared since probe() and unprepared in remove(), use simple clk_enable()/clk_disable() calls to enable and disable the clock on runtime suspend and resume, to avoid hitting the prepare_lock mutex.(CVE-2024-49985)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: fnic: Move flush_work initialization out of if block After commit 379a58caa199 ("scsi: fnic: Move fnic_fnic_flush_tx() to a work queue"), it can happen that a work item is sent to an uninitialized work queue. This may has the effect that the item being queued is never actually queued, and any further actions depending on it will not proceed. The following warning is observed while the fnic driver is loaded: kernel: WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 0 at ../kernel/workqueue.c:1524 __queue_work+0x373/0x410 kernel: <IRQ> kernel: queue_work_on+0x3a/0x50 kernel: fnic_wq_copy_cmpl_handler+0x54a/0x730 [fnic 62fbff0c42e7fb825c60a55cde2fb91facb2ed24] kernel: fnic_isr_msix_wq_copy+0x2d/0x60 [fnic 62fbff0c42e7fb825c60a55cde2fb91facb2ed24] kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x36/0x1a0 kernel: handle_irq_event_percpu+0x30/0x70 kernel: handle_irq_event+0x34/0x60 kernel: handle_edge_irq+0x7e/0x1a0 kernel: __common_interrupt+0x3b/0xb0 kernel: common_interrupt+0x58/0xa0 kernel: </IRQ> It has been observed that this may break the rediscovery of Fibre Channel devices after a temporary fabric failure. This patch fixes it by moving the work queue initialization out of an if block in fnic_probe().(CVE-2024-50025)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: do not delay dst_entries_add() in dst_release() dst_entries_add() uses per-cpu data that might be freed at netns dismantle from ip6_route_net_exit() calling dst_entries_destroy() Before ip6_route_net_exit() can be called, we release all the dsts associated with this netns, via calls to dst_release(), which waits an rcu grace period before calling dst_destroy() dst_entries_add() use in dst_destroy() is racy, because dst_entries_destroy() could have been called already. Decrementing the number of dsts must happen sooner. Notes: 1) in CONFIG_XFRM case, dst_destroy() can call dst_release_immediate(child), this might also cause UAF if the child does not have DST_NOCOUNT set. IPSEC maintainers might take a look and see how to address this. 2) There is also discussion about removing this count of dst, which might happen in future kernels.(CVE-2024-50036)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSv4: Prevent NULL-pointer dereference in nfs42_complete_copies() On the node of an NFS client, some files saved in the mountpoint of the NFS server were copied to another location of the same NFS server. Accidentally, the nfs42_complete_copies() got a NULL-pointer dereference crash with the following syslog: [232064.838881] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232064.839360] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232066.588183] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000058 [232066.588586] Mem abort info: [232066.588701] ESR = 0x0000000096000007 [232066.588862] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [232066.589084] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [232066.589216] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [232066.589340] FSC = 0x07: level 3 translation fault [232066.589559] Data abort info: [232066.589683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [232066.589842] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [232066.589967] user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00002000956ff400 [232066.590231] [0000000000000058] pgd=08001100ae100003, p4d=08001100ae100003, pud=08001100ae100003, pmd=08001100b3c00003, pte=0000000000000000 [232066.590757] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [232066.590958] Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace fscache netfs ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_stack_o2cb ocfs2_dlm vhost_net vhost vhost_iotlb tap tun ipt_rpfilter xt_multiport ip_set_hash_ip ip_set_hash_net xfrm_interface xfrm6_tunnel tunnel4 tunnel6 esp4 ah4 wireguard libcurve25519_generic veth xt_addrtype xt_set nf_conntrack_netlink ip_set_hash_ipportnet ip_set_hash_ipportip ip_set_bitmap_port ip_set_hash_ipport dummy ip_set ip_vs_sh ip_vs_wrr ip_vs_rr ip_vs iptable_filter sch_ingress nfnetlink_cttimeout vport_gre ip_gre ip_tunnel gre vport_geneve geneve vport_vxlan vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel openvswitch nf_conncount dm_round_robin dm_service_time dm_multipath xt_nat xt_MASQUERADE nft_chain_nat nf_nat xt_mark xt_conntrack xt_comment nft_compat nft_counter nf_tables nfnetlink ocfs2 ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ipmi_ssif nbd overlay 8021q garp mrp bonding tls rfkill sunrpc ext4 mbcache jbd2 [232066.591052] vfat fat cas_cache cas_disk ses enclosure scsi_transport_sas sg acpi_ipmi ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler ip_tables vfio_pci vfio_pci_core vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp llc fuse xfs libcrc32c ast drm_vram_helper qla2xxx drm_kms_helper syscopyarea crct10dif_ce sysfillrect ghash_ce sysimgblt sha2_ce fb_sys_fops cec sha256_arm64 sha1_ce drm_ttm_helper ttm nvme_fc igb sbsa_gwdt nvme_fabrics drm nvme_core i2c_algo_bit i40e scsi_transport_fc megaraid_sas aes_neon_bs [232066.596953] CPU: 6 PID: 4124696 Comm: 10.253.166.125- Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.131-9.cl9_ocfs2.aarch64 #1 [232066.597356] Hardware name: Great Wall .\x93\x8e...RF6260 V5/GWMSSE2GL1T, BIOS T656FBE_V3.0.18 2024-01-06 [232066.597721] pstate: 20400009 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [232066.598034] pc : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x220/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598327] lr : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x12c/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598595] sp : ffff8000f568fc70 [232066.598731] x29: ffff8000f568fc70 x28: 0000000000001000 x27: ffff21003db33000 [232066.599030] x26: ffff800005521ae0 x25: ffff0100f98fa3f0 x24: 0000000000000001 [232066.599319] x23: ffff800009920008 x22: ffff21003db33040 x21: ffff21003db33050 [232066.599628] x20: ffff410172fe9e40 x19: ffff410172fe9e00 x18: 0000000000000000 [232066.599914] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000004 x15: 0000000000000000 [232066.600195] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800008e685a8 x12: 00000000eac0c6e6 [232066.600498] x11: 00000000000000 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-50046)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Check null pointer before dereferencing se [WHAT & HOW] se is null checked previously in the same function, indicating it might be null; therefore, it must be checked when used again. This fixes 1 FORWARD_NULL issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-50049)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-234.0.0.133.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niommu/vt-d: Fix double list_add when enabling VMD in scalable mode\r\n\r\nWhen enabling VMD and IOMMU scalable mode, the following kernel panic\ncall trace/kernel log is shown in Eagle Stream platform (Sapphire Rapids\nCPU) during booting:\r\n\r\npci 0000:59:00.5: Adding to iommu group 42\n...\nvmd 0000:59:00.5: PCI host bridge to bus 10000:80\npci 10000:80:01.0: [8086:352a] type 01 class 0x060400\npci 10000:80:01.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x0001ffff 64bit]\npci 10000:80:01.0: enabling Extended Tags\npci 10000:80:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold\npci 10000:80:01.0: DMAR: Setup RID2PASID failed\npci 10000:80:01.0: Failed to add to iommu group 42: -16\npci 10000:80:03.0: [8086:352b] type 01 class 0x060400\npci 10000:80:03.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x0001ffff 64bit]\npci 10000:80:03.0: enabling Extended Tags\npci 10000:80:03.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:29!\ninvalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc3+ #7\nHardware name: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650V3/SB27A86647, BIOS ESE101Y-1.00 01/13/2022\nWorkqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn\nRIP: 0010:__list_add_valid.cold+0x26/0x3f\nCode: 9a 4a ab ff 4c 89 c1 48 c7 c7 40 0c d9 9e e8 b9 b1 fe ff 0f\n 0b 48 89 f2 4c 89 c1 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 f0 0c d9 9e e8 a2 b1\n fe ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 48 89 d1 4c 89 c6 4c 89 ca 48 c7 c7 98 0c d9\n 9e e8 8b b1 fe\nRSP: 0000:ff5ad434865b3a40 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000058 RBX: ff4d61160b74b880 RCX: ff4d61255e1fffa8\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000fffeffff RDI: ffffffff9fd34f20\nRBP: ff4d611d8e245c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ff5ad434865b3888\nR10: ff5ad434865b3880 R11: ff4d61257fdc6fe8 R12: ff4d61160b74b8a0\nR13: ff4d61160b74b8a0 R14: ff4d611d8e245c10 R15: ff4d611d8001ba70\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff4d611d5ea00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: ff4d611fa1401000 CR3: 0000000aa0210001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n intel_pasid_alloc_table+0x9c/0x1d0\n dmar_insert_one_dev_info+0x423/0x540\n ? device_to_iommu+0x12d/0x2f0\n intel_iommu_attach_device+0x116/0x290\n __iommu_attach_device+0x1a/0x90\n iommu_group_add_device+0x190/0x2c0\n __iommu_probe_device+0x13e/0x250\n iommu_probe_device+0x24/0x150\n iommu_bus_notifier+0x69/0x90\n blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0x80\n device_add+0x3db/0x7b0\n ? arch_memremap_can_ram_remap+0x19/0x50\n ? memremap+0x75/0x140\n pci_device_add+0x193/0x1d0\n pci_scan_single_device+0xb9/0xf0\n pci_scan_slot+0x4c/0x110\n pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x3a/0x290\n vmd_enable_domain.constprop.0+0x63e/0x820\n vmd_probe+0x163/0x190\n local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80\n work_for_cpu_fn+0x13/0x20\n process_one_work+0x1e2/0x3b0\n worker_thread+0x1c4/0x3a0\n ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370\n kthread+0xc7/0xf0\n ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20\n ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\nModules linked in:\n---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n...\nKernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception\nKernel Offset: 0x1ca00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)\n---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---\r\n\r\nThe following \u0026apos;lspci\u0026apos; output shows devices \u0026apos;10000:80:*\u0026apos; are subdevices of\nthe VMD device 0000:59:00.5:\r\n\r\n $ lspci\n ...\n 0000:59:00.5 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation Volume Management Device NVMe RAID Controller (rev 20)\n ...\n 10000:80:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352a (rev 03)\n 10000:80:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352b (rev 03)\n 10000:80:05.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352c (rev 03)\n 10000:80:07.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 352d (rev 03)\n 10000:81:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Intel Corporation NVMe Datacenter SSD [3DNAND, Beta Rock Controller]\n 10000:82:00\n---truncated---(CVE-2022-48916)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: mt7621: Add sentinel to quirks table Current driver is missing a sentinel in the struct soc_device_attribute array, which causes an oops when assessed by the soc_device_match(mt7621_pcie_quirks_match) call. This was only exposed once the CONFIG_SOC_MT7621 mt7621 soc_dev_attr was fixed to register the SOC as a device, in: commit 7c18b64bba3b (\u0026quot;mips: ralink: mt7621: do not use kzalloc too early\u0026quot;) Fix it by adding the required sentinel.(CVE-2022-48952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntb: intel: Fix the NULL vs IS_ERR() bug for debugfs_create_dir() The debugfs_create_dir() function returns error pointers. It never returns NULL. So use IS_ERR() to check it.(CVE-2023-52917)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: pci: cx23885: check cx23885_vdev_init() return cx23885_vdev_init() can return a NULL pointer, but that pointer is used in the next line without a check. Add a NULL pointer check and go to the error unwind if it is NULL.(CVE-2023-52918)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nof: module: prevent NULL pointer dereference in vsnprintf()\r\n\r\nIn of_modalias(), we can get passed the str and len parameters which would\ncause a kernel oops in vsnprintf() since it only allows passing a NULL ptr\nwhen the length is also 0. Also, we need to filter out the negative values\nof the len parameter as these will result in a really huge buffer since\nsnprintf() takes size_t parameter while ours is ssize_t...\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the Svace static\nanalysis tool.(CVE-2024-35878)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndma: xilinx_dpdma: Fix locking\r\n\r\nThere are several places where either chan-\u0026gt;lock or chan-\u0026gt;vchan.lock was\nnot held. Add appropriate locking. This fixes lockdep warnings like\r\n\r\n[ 31.077578] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 31.077831] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 40 at drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c:834 xilinx_dpdma_chan_queue_transfer+0x274/0x5e0\n[ 31.077953] Modules linked in:\n[ 31.078019] CPU: 2 PID: 40 Comm: kworker/u12:1 Not tainted 6.6.20+ #98\n[ 31.078102] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT)\n[ 31.078169] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func\n[ 31.078272] pstate: 600000c5 (nZCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n[ 31.078377] pc : xilinx_dpdma_chan_queue_transfer+0x274/0x5e0\n[ 31.078473] lr : xilinx_dpdma_chan_queue_transfer+0x270/0x5e0\n[ 31.078550] sp : ffffffc083bb2e10\n[ 31.078590] x29: ffffffc083bb2e10 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffff880165a168\n[ 31.078754] x26: ffffff880164e920 x25: ffffff880164eab8 x24: ffffff880164d480\n[ 31.078920] x23: ffffff880165a148 x22: ffffff880164e988 x21: 0000000000000000\n[ 31.079132] x20: ffffffc082aa3000 x19: ffffff880164e880 x18: 0000000000000000\n[ 31.079295] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000\n[ 31.079453] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffffff8802263dc0 x12: 0000000000000001\n[ 31.079613] x11: 0001ffc083bb2e34 x10: 0001ff880164e98f x9 : 0001ffc082aa3def\n[ 31.079824] x8 : 0001ffc082aa3dec x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000516\n[ 31.079982] x5 : ffffffc7f8d43000 x4 : ffffff88003c9c40 x3 : ffffffffffffffff\n[ 31.080147] x2 : ffffffc7f8d43000 x1 : 00000000000000c0 x0 : 0000000000000000\n[ 31.080307] Call trace:\n[ 31.080340] xilinx_dpdma_chan_queue_transfer+0x274/0x5e0\n[ 31.080518] xilinx_dpdma_issue_pending+0x11c/0x120\n[ 31.080595] zynqmp_disp_layer_update+0x180/0x3ac\n[ 31.080712] zynqmp_dpsub_plane_atomic_update+0x11c/0x21c\n[ 31.080825] drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes+0x20c/0x684\n[ 31.080951] drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail+0x5c/0xb0\n[ 31.081139] commit_tail+0x234/0x294\n[ 31.081246] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1f8/0x210\n[ 31.081363] drm_atomic_commit+0x100/0x140\n[ 31.081477] drm_client_modeset_commit_atomic+0x318/0x384\n[ 31.081634] drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x8c/0x24c\n[ 31.081725] drm_client_modeset_commit+0x34/0x5c\n[ 31.081812] __drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x104/0x168\n[ 31.081899] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x50/0x70\n[ 31.081971] fbcon_init+0x538/0xc48\n[ 31.082047] visual_init+0x16c/0x23c\n[ 31.082207] do_bind_con_driver.isra.0+0x2d0/0x634\n[ 31.082320] do_take_over_console+0x24c/0x33c\n[ 31.082429] do_fbcon_takeover+0xbc/0x1b0\n[ 31.082503] fbcon_fb_registered+0x2d0/0x34c\n[ 31.082663] register_framebuffer+0x27c/0x38c\n[ 31.082767] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x5c0/0x91c\n[ 31.082939] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x50/0x74\n[ 31.083012] drm_fbdev_dma_client_hotplug+0xb8/0x108\n[ 31.083115] drm_client_register+0xa0/0xf4\n[ 31.083195] drm_fbdev_dma_setup+0xb0/0x1cc\n[ 31.083293] zynqmp_dpsub_drm_init+0x45c/0x4e0\n[ 31.083431] zynqmp_dpsub_probe+0x444/0x5e0\n[ 31.083616] platform_probe+0x8c/0x13c\n[ 31.083713] really_probe+0x258/0x59c\n[ 31.083793] __driver_probe_device+0xc4/0x224\n[ 31.083878] driver_probe_device+0x70/0x1c0\n[ 31.083961] __device_attach_driver+0x108/0x1e0\n[ 31.084052] bus_for_each_drv+0x9c/0x100\n[ 31.084125] __device_attach+0x100/0x298\n[ 31.084207] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20\n[ 31.084292] bus_probe_device+0xd8/0xdc\n[ 31.084368] deferred_probe_work_func+0x11c/0x180\n[ 31.084451] process_one_work+0x3ac/0x988\n[ 31.084643] worker_thread+0x398/0x694\n[ 31.084752] kthread+0x1bc/0x1c0\n[ 31.084848] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n[ 31.084932] irq event stamp: 64549\n[ 31.084970] hardirqs last enabled at (64548): [\u0026lt;ffffffc081adf35c\u0026gt;] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x80/0x90\n[ 31.085157]\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35990)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock() in instance_destroy_rcu()\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported that nf_reinject() could be called without rcu_read_lock() :\r\n\r\nWARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02060-g5c1672705a1a #0 Not tainted\r\n\r\nnet/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:263 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\r\n\r\nother info that might help us debug this:\r\n\r\nrcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n2 locks held by syz-executor.4/13427:\n #0: ffffffff8e334f60 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]\n #0: ffffffff8e334f60 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2190 [inline]\n #0: ffffffff8e334f60 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_core+0xa86/0x1830 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2471\n #1: ffff88801ca92958 (\u0026amp;inst-\u0026gt;lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]\n #1: ffff88801ca92958 (\u0026amp;inst-\u0026gt;lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: nfqnl_flush net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:405 [inline]\n #1: ffff88801ca92958 (\u0026amp;inst-\u0026gt;lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: instance_destroy_rcu+0x30/0x220 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:172\r\n\r\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 0 PID: 13427 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02060-g5c1672705a1a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x221/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6712\n nf_reinject net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:323 [inline]\n nfqnl_reinject+0x6ec/0x1120 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:397\n nfqnl_flush net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:410 [inline]\n instance_destroy_rcu+0x1ae/0x220 net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:172\n rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2196 [inline]\n rcu_core+0xafd/0x1830 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2471\n handle_softirqs+0x2d6/0x990 kernel/softirq.c:554\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:588 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:428 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0xf4/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:637\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:649\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-36286)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: core: Fix NULL module pointer assignment at card init\r\n\r\nThe commit 81033c6b584b (\u0026quot;ALSA: core: Warn on empty module\u0026quot;)\nintroduced a WARN_ON() for a NULL module pointer passed at snd_card\nobject creation, and it also wraps the code around it with \u0026apos;#ifdef\nMODULE\u0026apos;. This works in most cases, but the devils are always in\ndetails. \u0026quot;MODULE\u0026quot; is defined when the target code (i.e. the sound\ncore) is built as a module; but this doesn\u0026apos;t mean that the caller is\nalso built-in or not. Namely, when only the sound core is built-in\n(CONFIG_SND=y) while the driver is a module (CONFIG_SND_USB_AUDIO=m),\nthe passed module pointer is ignored even if it\u0026apos;s non-NULL, and\ncard-\u0026gt;module remains as NULL. This would result in the missing module\nreference up/down at the device open/close, leading to a race with the\ncode execution after the module removal.\r\n\r\nFor addressing the bug, move the assignment of card-\u0026gt;module again out\nof ifdef. The WARN_ON() is still wrapped with ifdef because the\nmodule can be really NULL when all sound drivers are built-in.\r\n\r\nNote that we keep \u0026apos;ifdef MODULE\u0026apos; for WARN_ON(), otherwise it would\nlead to a false-positive NULL module check. Admittedly it won\u0026apos;t catch\nperfectly, i.e. no check is performed when CONFIG_SND=y. But, it\u0026apos;s no\nreal problem as it\u0026apos;s only for debugging, and the condition is pretty\nrare.(CVE-2024-38605)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoundwire: cadence: fix invalid PDI offset\r\n\r\nFor some reason, we add an offset to the PDI, presumably to skip the\nPDI0 and PDI1 which are reserved for BPT.\r\n\r\nThis code is however completely wrong and leads to an out-of-bounds\naccess. We were just lucky so far since we used only a couple of PDIs\nand remained within the PDI array bounds.\r\n\r\nA Fixes: tag is not provided since there are no known platforms where\nthe out-of-bounds would be accessed, and the initial code had problems\nas well.\r\n\r\nA follow-up patch completely removes this useless offset.(CVE-2024-38635)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nriscv: prevent pt_regs corruption for secondary idle threads\r\n\r\nTop of the kernel thread stack should be reserved for pt_regs. However\nthis is not the case for the idle threads of the secondary boot harts.\nTheir stacks overlap with their pt_regs, so both may get corrupted.\r\n\r\nSimilar issue has been fixed for the primary hart, see c7cdd96eca28\n(\u0026quot;riscv: prevent stack corruption by reserving task_pt_regs(p) early\u0026quot;).\nHowever that fix was not propagated to the secondary harts. The problem\nhas been noticed in some CPU hotplug tests with V enabled. The function\nsmp_callin stored several registers on stack, corrupting top of pt_regs\nstructure including status field. As a result, kernel attempted to save\nor restore inexistent V context.(CVE-2024-38667)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvmet: fix a possible leak when destroy a ctrl during qp establishment\r\n\r\nIn nvmet_sq_destroy we capture sq-\u0026gt;ctrl early and if it is non-NULL we\nknow that a ctrl was allocated (in the admin connect request handler)\nand we need to release pending AERs, clear ctrl-\u0026gt;sqs and sq-\u0026gt;ctrl\n(for nvme-loop primarily), and drop the final reference on the ctrl.\r\n\r\nHowever, a small window is possible where nvmet_sq_destroy starts (as\na result of the client giving up and disconnecting) concurrently with\nthe nvme admin connect cmd (which may be in an early stage). But *before*\nkill_and_confirm of sq-\u0026gt;ref (i.e. the admin connect managed to get an sq\nlive reference). In this case, sq-\u0026gt;ctrl was allocated however after it was\ncaptured in a local variable in nvmet_sq_destroy.\nThis prevented the final reference drop on the ctrl.\r\n\r\nSolve this by re-capturing the sq-\u0026gt;ctrl after all inflight request has\ncompleted, where for sure sq-\u0026gt;ctrl reference is final, and move forward\nbased on that.\r\n\r\nThis issue was observed in an environment with many hosts connecting\nmultiple ctrls simoutanuosly, creating a delay in allocating a ctrl\nleading up to this race window.(CVE-2024-42152)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndev/parport: fix the array out-of-bounds risk\r\n\r\nFixed array out-of-bounds issues caused by sprintf\nby replacing it with snprintf for safer data copying,\nensuring the destination buffer is not overflowed.\r\n\r\nBelow is the stack trace I encountered during the actual issue:\r\n\r\n[ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4]Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector:\nKernel stack is corrupted in: do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 [parport]\n[ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,5]CPU: 4 PID: 5118 Comm:\nQThread Tainted: G S W O 5.10.97-arm64-desktop #7100.57021.2\n[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,6]TGID: 5087 Comm: EFileApp\n[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,7]Hardware name: HUAWEI HUAWEI QingYun\nPGUX-W515x-B081/SP1PANGUXM, BIOS 1.00.07 04/29/2024\n[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,8]Call trace:\n[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,9] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0\n[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,0] show_stack+0x14/0x20\n[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,1] dump_stack+0xd4/0x10c\n[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,2] panic+0x1d8/0x3bc\n[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,3] __stack_chk_fail+0x2c/0x38\n[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4] do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 [parport](CVE-2024-42301)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nexfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set\r\n\r\nWhen accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array\nis allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is\nallocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases,\na deadlock for sbi-\u0026gt;s_lock between the two processes may occur.\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n kswapd\n balance_pgdat\n lock(fs_reclaim)\n exfat_iterate\n lock(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_lock)\n exfat_readdir\n exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry\n exfat_get_dentry_set\n __exfat_get_dentry_set\n kmalloc_array\n ...\n lock(fs_reclaim)\n ...\n evict\n exfat_evict_inode\n lock(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_lock)\r\n\r\nTo fix this, let\u0026apos;s allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.(CVE-2024-42315)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: virt_wifi: avoid reporting connection success with wrong SSID\r\n\r\nWhen user issues a connection with a different SSID than the one\nvirt_wifi has advertised, the __cfg80211_connect_result() will\ntrigger the warning: WARN_ON(bss_not_found).\r\n\r\nThe issue is because the connection code in virt_wifi does not\ncheck the SSID from user space (it only checks the BSSID), and\nvirt_wifi will call cfg80211_connect_result() with WLAN_STATUS_SUCCESS\neven if the SSID is different from the one virt_wifi has advertised.\nEventually cfg80211 won\u0026apos;t be able to find the cfg80211_bss and generate\nthe warning.\r\n\r\nFixed it by checking the SSID (from user space) in the connection code.(CVE-2024-43841)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diFree(CVE-2024-43858)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/nouveau: prime: fix refcount underflow\r\n\r\nCalling nouveau_bo_ref() on a nouveau_bo without initializing it (and\nhence the backing ttm_bo) leads to a refcount underflow.\r\n\r\nInstead of calling nouveau_bo_ref() in the unwind path of\ndrm_gem_object_init(), clean things up manually.\r\n\r\n(cherry picked from commit 1b93f3e89d03cfc576636e195466a0d728ad8de5)(CVE-2024-43867)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndevres: Fix memory leakage caused by driver API devm_free_percpu()\r\n\r\nIt will cause memory leakage when use driver API devm_free_percpu()\nto free memory allocated by devm_alloc_percpu(), fixed by using\ndevres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within devm_free_percpu().(CVE-2024-43871)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/client: fix null pointer dereference in drm_client_modeset_probe\r\n\r\nIn drm_client_modeset_probe(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to modeset-\u0026gt;mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer\ndereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-43894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: pm: only decrement add_addr_accepted for MPJ req\r\n\r\nAdding the following warning ...\r\n\r\n WARN_ON_ONCE(msk-\u0026gt;pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)\r\n\r\n... before decrementing the add_addr_accepted counter helped to find a\nbug when running the \u0026quot;remove single subflow\u0026quot; subtest from the\nmptcp_join.sh selftest.\r\n\r\nRemoving a \u0026apos;subflow\u0026apos; endpoint will first trigger a RM_ADDR, then the\nsubflow closure. Before this patch, and upon the reception of the\nRM_ADDR, the other peer will then try to decrement this\nadd_addr_accepted. That\u0026apos;s not correct because the attached subflows have\nnot been created upon the reception of an ADD_ADDR.\r\n\r\nA way to solve that is to decrement the counter only if the attached\nsubflow was an MP_JOIN to a remote id that was not 0, and initiated by\nthe host receiving the RM_ADDR.(CVE-2024-45009)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: dwc3: core: Prevent USB core invalid event buffer address access\r\n\r\nThis commit addresses an issue where the USB core could access an\ninvalid event buffer address during runtime suspend, potentially causing\nSMMU faults and other memory issues in Exynos platforms. The problem\narises from the following sequence.\n 1. In dwc3_gadget_suspend, there is a chance of a timeout when\n moving the USB core to the halt state after clearing the\n run/stop bit by software.\n 2. In dwc3_core_exit, the event buffer is cleared regardless of\n the USB core\u0026apos;s status, which may lead to an SMMU faults and\n other memory issues. if the USB core tries to access the event\n buffer address.\r\n\r\nTo prevent this hardware quirk on Exynos platforms, this commit ensures\nthat the event buffer address is not cleared by software when the USB\ncore is active during runtime suspend by checking its status before\nclearing the buffer address.(CVE-2024-46675)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\r\n\r\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \u0026quot;write\u0026quot; into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\r\n\r\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\r\n\r\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\r\n\r\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen.(CVE-2024-46689)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: fix mc_data out-of-bounds read warning\r\n\r\nClear warning that read mc_data[i-1] may out-of-bounds.(CVE-2024-46722)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix out-of-bounds read of df_v1_7_channel_number\r\n\r\nCheck the fb_channel_number range to avoid the array out-of-bounds\nread error(CVE-2024-46724)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhwmon: (nct6775-core) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes\r\n\r\nDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large\nnegative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user.\nFix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46757)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: added NULL check at start of dc_validate_stream\r\n\r\n[Why]\nprevent invalid memory access\r\n\r\n[How]\ncheck if dc and stream are NULL(CVE-2024-46802)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: x86: Acquire kvm-\u0026gt;srcu when handling KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS\r\n\r\nGrab kvm-\u0026gt;srcu when processing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, as KVM will forcibly\nleave nested VMX/SVM if SMM mode is being toggled, and leaving nested VMX\nreads guest memory.\r\n\r\nNote, kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events() can also be called from KVM_RUN\nvia sync_regs(), which already holds SRCU. I.e. trying to precisely use\nkvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock() around the problematic SMM code would cause\nproblems. Acquiring SRCU isn\u0026apos;t all that expensive, so for simplicity,\ngrab it unconditionally for KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS.\r\n\r\n =============================\n WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Not tainted\n -----------------------------\n include/linux/kvm_host.h:1027 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\r\n\r\n other info that might help us debug this:\r\n\r\n rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n 1 lock held by repro/1071:\n #0: ffff88811e424430 (\u0026amp;vcpu-\u0026gt;mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]\r\n\r\n stack backtrace:\n CPU: 15 PID: 1071 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0x90\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x13f/0x1a0\n kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x168/0x190 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_read_guest+0x3e/0x90 [kvm]\n nested_vmx_load_msr+0x6b/0x1d0 [kvm_intel]\n load_vmcs12_host_state+0x432/0xb40 [kvm_intel]\n vmx_leave_nested+0x30/0x40 [kvm_intel]\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events+0x15d/0x2b0 [kvm]\n kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x1107/0x1750 [kvm]\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]\n ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm]\n ? lock_acquire+0xba/0x2d0\n ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x40c/0x6f0\n ? lock_release+0xb7/0x270\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0\n do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x170\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n RIP: 0033:0x7ff11eb1b539\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-46830)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nspi: nxp-fspi: fix the KASAN report out-of-bounds bug\r\n\r\nChange the memcpy length to fix the out-of-bounds issue when writing the\ndata that is not 4 byte aligned to TX FIFO.\r\n\r\nTo reproduce the issue, write 3 bytes data to NOR chip.\r\n\r\ndd if=3b of=/dev/mtd0\n[ 36.926103] ==================================================================\n[ 36.933409] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nxp_fspi_exec_op+0x26ec/0x2838\n[ 36.940514] Read of size 4 at addr ffff00081037c2a0 by task dd/455\n[ 36.946721]\n[ 36.948235] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 455 Comm: dd Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-gc7b0e37c8434 #1070\n[ 36.956185] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QM MEK (DT)\n[ 36.961260] Call trace:\n[ 36.963723] dump_backtrace+0x90/0xe8\n[ 36.967414] show_stack+0x18/0x24\n[ 36.970749] dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90\n[ 36.974451] print_report+0x114/0x5cc\n[ 36.978151] kasan_report+0xa4/0xf0\n[ 36.981670] __asan_report_load_n_noabort+0x1c/0x28\n[ 36.986587] nxp_fspi_exec_op+0x26ec/0x2838\n[ 36.990800] spi_mem_exec_op+0x8ec/0xd30\n[ 36.994762] spi_mem_no_dirmap_read+0x190/0x1e0\n[ 36.999323] spi_mem_dirmap_write+0x238/0x32c\n[ 37.003710] spi_nor_write_data+0x220/0x374\n[ 37.007932] spi_nor_write+0x110/0x2e8\n[ 37.011711] mtd_write_oob_std+0x154/0x1f0\n[ 37.015838] mtd_write_oob+0x104/0x1d0\n[ 37.019617] mtd_write+0xb8/0x12c\n[ 37.022953] mtdchar_write+0x224/0x47c\n[ 37.026732] vfs_write+0x1e4/0x8c8\n[ 37.030163] ksys_write+0xec/0x1d0\n[ 37.033586] __arm64_sys_write+0x6c/0x9c\n[ 37.037539] invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258\n[ 37.041327] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c\n[ 37.046244] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c\n[ 37.049589] el0_svc+0x38/0x78\n[ 37.052681] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158\n[ 37.057077] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194\n[ 37.060775]\n[ 37.062274] Allocated by task 455:\n[ 37.065701] kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x54\n[ 37.069570] kasan_save_track+0x20/0x3c\n[ 37.073438] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x40/0x54\n[ 37.077736] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xb8\n[ 37.081515] __kmalloc_noprof+0x158/0x2f8\n[ 37.085563] mtd_kmalloc_up_to+0x120/0x154\n[ 37.089690] mtdchar_write+0x130/0x47c\n[ 37.093469] vfs_write+0x1e4/0x8c8\n[ 37.096901] ksys_write+0xec/0x1d0\n[ 37.100332] __arm64_sys_write+0x6c/0x9c\n[ 37.104287] invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258\n[ 37.108064] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c\n[ 37.112972] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c\n[ 37.116319] el0_svc+0x38/0x78\n[ 37.119401] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158\n[ 37.123788] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194\n[ 37.127474]\n[ 37.128977] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff00081037c2a0\n[ 37.128977] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8\n[ 37.141177] The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of\n[ 37.141177] allocated 3-byte region [ffff00081037c2a0, ffff00081037c2a3)\n[ 37.153465]\n[ 37.154971] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:\n[ 37.160559] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x89037c\n[ 37.168596] flags: 0xbfffe0000000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)\n[ 37.175149] page_type: 0xfdffffff(slab)\n[ 37.179021] raw: 0bfffe0000000000 ffff000800002500 dead000000000122 0000000000000000\n[ 37.186788] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080800080 00000001fdffffff 0000000000000000\n[ 37.194553] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\n[ 37.200144]\n[ 37.201647] Memory state around the buggy address:\n[ 37.206460] ffff00081037c180: fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc\n[ 37.213701] ffff00081037c200: fa fc fc fc 05 fc fc fc 03 fc fc fc 02 fc fc fc\n[ 37.220946] \u0026gt;ffff00081037c280: 06 fc fc fc 03 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n[ 37.228186] ^\n[ 37.232473] ffff00081037c300: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n[ 37.239718] ffff00081037c380: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n[ 37.246962] ==============================================================\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-46853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI: keystone: Add workaround for Errata #i2037 (AM65x SR 1.0)\r\n\r\nErrata #i2037 in AM65x/DRA80xM Processors Silicon Revision 1.0\n(SPRZ452D_July 2018_Revised December 2019 [1]) mentions when an\ninbound PCIe TLP spans more than two internal AXI 128-byte bursts,\nthe bus may corrupt the packet payload and the corrupt data may\ncause associated applications or the processor to hang.\r\n\r\nThe workaround for Errata #i2037 is to limit the maximum read\nrequest size and maximum payload size to 128 bytes. Add workaround\nfor Errata #i2037 here.\r\n\r\nThe errata and workaround is applicable only to AM65x SR 1.0 and\nlater versions of the silicon will have this fixed.\r\n\r\n[1] -\u0026gt; https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz452i/sprz452i.pdf(CVE-2024-47667)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix state management in error path of log writing function\r\n\r\nAfter commit a694291a6211 (\u0026quot;nilfs2: separate wait function from\nnilfs_segctor_write\u0026quot;) was applied, the log writing function\nnilfs_segctor_do_construct() was able to issue I/O requests continuously\neven if user data blocks were split into multiple logs across segments,\nbut two potential flaws were introduced in its error handling.\r\n\r\nFirst, if nilfs_segctor_begin_construction() fails while creating the\nsecond or subsequent logs, the log writing function returns without\ncalling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction(), so the writeback flag set on\npages/folios will remain uncleared. This causes page cache operations to\nhang waiting for the writeback flag. For example,\ntruncate_inode_pages_final(), which is called via nilfs_evict_inode() when\nan inode is evicted from memory, will hang.\r\n\r\nSecond, the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag set on normal inodes remain uncleared. \nAs a result, if the next log write involves checkpoint creation, that\u0026apos;s\nfine, but if a partial log write is performed that does not, inodes with\nNILFS_I_COLLECTED set are erroneously removed from the \u0026quot;sc_dirty_files\u0026quot;\nlist, and their data and b-tree blocks may not be written to the device,\ncorrupting the block mapping.\r\n\r\nFix these issues by uniformly calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction()\non failure of each step in the loop in nilfs_segctor_do_construct(),\nhaving it clean up logs and segment usages according to progress, and\ncorrecting the conditions for calling nilfs_redirty_inodes() to ensure\nthat the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag is cleared.(CVE-2024-47669)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: check skb is non-NULL in tcp_rto_delta_us() We have some machines running stock Ubuntu 20.04.6 which is their 5.4.0-174-generic kernel that are running ceph and recently hit a null ptr dereference in tcp_rearm_rto(). Initially hitting it from the TLP path, but then later we also saw it getting hit from the RACK case as well. Here are examples of the oops messages we saw in each of those cases: Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.780353] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.787572] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.792971] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.798362] PGD 0 P4D 0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.801164] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.805091] CPU: 0 PID: 9180 Comm: msgr-worker-1 Tainted: G W 5.4.0-174-generic #193-Ubuntu Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.814996] Hardware name: Supermicro SMC 2x26 os-gen8 64C NVME-Y 256G/H12SSW-NTR, BIOS 2.5.V1.2U.NVMe.UEFI 05/09/2023 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.825952] RIP: 0010:tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.830656] Code: 87 ca 04 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d c3 c3 49 8b bc 24 40 06 00 00 eb 8d 48 bb cf f7 53 e3 a5 9b c4 20 4c 89 ef e8 0c fe 0e 00 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 8b 78 20 48 c1 ef 03 48 89 f8 41 8b bc 24 80 04 00 00 48 f7 e3 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.849665] RSP: 0018:ffffb75d40003e08 EFLAGS: 00010246 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.855149] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 20c49ba5e353f7cf RCX: 0000000000000000 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.862542] RDX: 0000000062177c30 RSI: 000000000000231c RDI: ffff9874ad283a60 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.869933] RBP: ffffb75d40003e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff987605e20aa8 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.877318] R10: ffffb75d40003f00 R11: ffffb75d4460f740 R12: ffff9874ad283900 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.884710] R13: ffff9874ad283a60 R14: ffff9874ad283980 R15: ffff9874ad283d30 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.892095] FS: 00007f1ef4a2e700(0000) GS:ffff987605e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.900438] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.906435] CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000003e450ba003 CR4: 0000000000760ef0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.913822] PKRU: 55555554 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.916786] Call Trace: Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.919488] Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.921765] ? show_regs.cold+0x1a/0x1f Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.925859] ? __die+0x90/0xd9 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.929169] ? no_context+0x196/0x380 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.933088] ? ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x4e0/0x4e0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.938216] ? ip6_sublist_rcv_finish+0x3d/0x50 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.943000] ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x50/0x1a0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.947873] ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x16/0x20 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.952486] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x267/0x450 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.957104] ? ipv6_list_rcv+0x112/0x140 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.961279] ? __do_page_fault+0x58/0x90 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.965458] ? do_page_fault+0x2c/0xe0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.969465] ? page_fault+0x34/0x40 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.973217] ? tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.977313] ? tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.981408] tcp_send_loss_probe+0x10b/0x220 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.985937] tcp_write_timer_handler+0x1b4/0x240 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.990809] tcp_write_timer+0x9e/0xe0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.994814] ? tcp_write_timer_handler+0x240/0x240 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.999866] call_timer_fn+0x32/0x130 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.003782] __run_timers.part.0+0x180/0x280 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.008309] ? recalibrate_cpu_khz+0x10/0x10 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.012841] ? native_x2apic_icr_write+0x30/0x30 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.017718] ? lapic_next_even ---truncated---(CVE-2024-47684)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_reject_ipv6: fix nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() syzbot reported that nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() was possibly sending garbage on the four reserved tcp bits (th-\u0026gt;res1) Use skb_put_zero() to clear the whole TCP header, as done in nf_reject_ip_tcphdr_put() BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x688/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:255 nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x688/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:255 nf_send_reset6+0xd84/0x15b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:344 nft_reject_inet_eval+0x3c1/0x880 net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.c:48 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x438/0x22a0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_inet+0x41a/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:161 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x29b/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x4ad/0xa50 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xe7/0x980 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0xa5a/0x19b0 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x1ce/0x800 kernel/softirq.c:554 __do_softirq+0x14/0x1a kernel/softirq.c:588 do_softirq+0x9a/0x100 kernel/softirq.c:455 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9f/0xb0 kernel/softirq.c:382 local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline] rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2692/0x5610 net/core/dev.c:4450 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline] neigh_resolve_output+0x9ca/0xae0 net/core/neighbour.c:1565 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:542 [inline] ip6_finish_output2+0x2347/0x2ba0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:141 __ip6_finish_output net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:215 [inline] ip6_finish_output+0xbb8/0x14b0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:226 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:303 [inline] ip6_output+0x356/0x620 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:247 dst_output include/net/dst.h:450 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_xmit+0x1ba6/0x25d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:366 inet6_csk_xmit+0x442/0x530 net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c:135 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x3b07/0x4880 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1484 [inline] tcp_connect+0x35b6/0x7130 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4143 tcp_v6_connect+0x1bcc/0x1e40 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:333 __inet_stream_connect+0x2ef/0x1730 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:679 inet_stream_connect+0x6a/0xd0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:750 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2061 [inline] __sys_connect+0x606/0x690 net/socket.c:2078 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2088 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2085 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x91/0xe0 net/socket.c:2085 x64_sys_call+0x27a5/0x3ba0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:43 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was stored to memory at: nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x60c/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:249 nf_send_reset6+0xd84/0x15b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:344 nft_reject_inet_eval+0x3c1/0x880 net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.c:48 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x438/0x22a0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_inet+0x41a/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:161 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x29b/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core ---truncated---(CVE-2024-47685)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: return -EINVAL when namelen is 0 When we have a corrupted main.sqlite in /var/lib/nfs/nfsdcld/, it may result in namelen being 0, which will cause memdup_user() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR. When we access the name.data that has been assigned the value of ZERO_SIZE_PTR in nfs4_client_to_reclaim(), null pointer dereference is triggered. [ T1205] ================================================================== [ T1205] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] Read of size 1 at addr 0000000000000010 by task nfsdcld/1205 [ T1205] [ T1205] CPU: 11 PID: 1205 Comm: nfsdcld Not tainted 5.10.0-00003-g2c1423731b8d #406 [ T1205] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 [ T1205] Call Trace: [ T1205] dump_stack+0x9a/0xd0 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] __kasan_report.cold+0x34/0x84 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 [ T1205] nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_release_lockowner+0x410/0x410 [ T1205] cld_pipe_downcall+0x5ca/0x760 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_cld_tracking_exit+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ T1205] ? down_write_killable_nested+0x170/0x170 [ T1205] ? avc_policy_seqno+0x28/0x40 [ T1205] ? selinux_file_permission+0x1b4/0x1e0 [ T1205] rpc_pipe_write+0x84/0xb0 [ T1205] vfs_write+0x143/0x520 [ T1205] ksys_write+0xc9/0x170 [ T1205] ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xfe/0x110 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa2/0x110 [ T1205] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ T1205] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1 [ T1205] RIP: 0033:0x7fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] Code: 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 514 [ T1205] RSP: 002b:00007fff8c4b7248 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000042b RCX: 00007fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] RDX: 000000000000042b RSI: 00007fff8c4b75f0 RDI: 0000000000000008 [ T1205] RBP: 00007fdbdb761bb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000042b [ T1205] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 00007fff8c4b75f0 R15: 0000000000000000 [ T1205] ================================================================== Fix it by checking namelen.(CVE-2024-47692)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rtrs-clt: Reset cid to con_num - 1 to stay in bounds In the function init_conns(), after the create_con() and create_cm() for loop if something fails. In the cleanup for loop after the destroy tag, we access out of bound memory because cid is set to clt_path-\u0026gt;s.con_num. This commits resets the cid to clt_path-\u0026gt;s.con_num - 1, to stay in bounds in the cleanup loop later.(CVE-2024-47695)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2832: fix an out-of-bounds write error Ensure index in rtl2832_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access. dev-\u0026gt;filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index \u0026gt; 32 to index \u0026gt;= 32 to resolve this issue. [hverkuil: added fixes tag, rtl2830_pid_filter -\u0026gt; rtl2832_pid_filter in logmsg](CVE-2024-47698)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: bcm: Clear bo-\u0026gt;bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry(). syzbot reported a warning in bcm_release(). [0] The blamed change fixed another warning that is triggered when connect() is issued again for a socket whose connect()ed device has been unregistered. However, if the socket is just close()d without the 2nd connect(), the remaining bo-\u0026gt;bcm_proc_read triggers unnecessary remove_proc_entry() in bcm_release(). Let\u0026apos;s clear bo-\u0026gt;bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry() in bcm_notify(). [0] name \u0026apos;4986\u0026apos; WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5234 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5234 Comm: syz-executor606 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00178-g5517ae241919 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Code: ff eb 05 e8 cb 1e 5e ff 48 8b 5c 24 10 48 c7 c7 e0 f7 aa 8e e8 2a 38 8e 09 90 48 c7 c7 60 3a 1b 8c 48 89 de e8 da 42 20 ff 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 48 8b 44 24 18 48 c7 44 24 40 0e 36 e0 45 49 c7 04 07 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000345fa20 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 2a2d0aee2eb64600 RBX: ffff888032f1f548 RCX: ffff888029431e00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000345fb08 R08: ffffffff8155b2f2 R09: 1ffff1101710519a R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed101710519b R12: ffff888011d38640 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fcfb52722f0 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; bcm_release+0x250/0x880 net/can/bcm.c:1578 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline] do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:882 do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1031 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1042 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1040 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1040 x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fcfb51ee969 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcfb51ee93f. RSP: 002b:00007ffce0109ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fcfb51ee969 RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R08: ffffffffffffffb8 R09: 0000555500000000 R10: 0000555500000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fcfb5271ee0 R15: 00007fcfb51bf160 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-47709)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sock_map: Add a cond_resched() in sock_hash_free() Several syzbot soft lockup reports all have in common sock_hash_free() If a map with a large number of buckets is destroyed, we need to yield the cpu when needed.(CVE-2024-47710)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add null check for set_output_gamma in dcn30_set_output_transfer_func This commit adds a null check for the set_output_gamma function pointer in the dcn30_set_output_transfer_func function. Previously, set_output_gamma was being checked for nullity at line 386, but then it was being dereferenced without any nullity check at line 401. This could potentially lead to a null pointer dereference error if set_output_gamma is indeed null. To fix this, we now ensure that set_output_gamma is not null before dereferencing it. We do this by adding a nullity check for set_output_gamma before the call to set_output_gamma at line 401. If set_output_gamma is null, we log an error message and do not call the function. This fix prevents a potential null pointer dereference error. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn30/dcn30_hwseq.c:401 dcn30_set_output_transfer_func() error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;mpc-\u0026gt;funcs-\u0026gt;set_output_gamma\u0026apos; could be null (see line 386) drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn30/dcn30_hwseq.c 373 bool dcn30_set_output_transfer_func(struct dc *dc, 374 struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx, 375 const struct dc_stream_state *stream) 376 { 377 int mpcc_id = pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;plane_res.hubp-\u0026gt;inst; 378 struct mpc *mpc = pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;stream_res.opp-\u0026gt;ctx-\u0026gt;dc-\u0026gt;res_pool-\u0026gt;mpc; 379 const struct pwl_params *params = NULL; 380 bool ret = false; 381 382 /* program OGAM or 3DLUT only for the top pipe*/ 383 if (pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;top_pipe == NULL) { 384 /*program rmu shaper and 3dlut in MPC*/ 385 ret = dcn30_set_mpc_shaper_3dlut(pipe_ctx, stream); 386 if (ret == false \u0026amp;\u0026amp; mpc-\u0026gt;funcs-\u0026gt;set_output_gamma) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If this is NULL 387 if (stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func.type == TF_TYPE_HWPWL) 388 params = \u0026amp;stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func.pwl; 389 else if (pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func.type == 390 TF_TYPE_DISTRIBUTED_POINTS \u0026amp;\u0026amp; 391 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format( 392 \u0026amp;stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func, 393 \u0026amp;mpc-\u0026gt;blender_params, false)) 394 params = \u0026amp;mpc-\u0026gt;blender_params; 395 /* there are no ROM LUTs in OUTGAM */ 396 if (stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func.type == TF_TYPE_PREDEFINED) 397 BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER(); 398 } 399 } 400 --\u0026gt; 401 mpc-\u0026gt;funcs-\u0026gt;set_output_gamma(mpc, mpcc_id, params); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Then it will crash 402 return ret; 403 }(CVE-2024-47720)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix spin_unlock_irqrestore() called with IRQs enabled Fix missuse of spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() when spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() was hold. This was discovered through the lock debugging, and the corresponding log is as follows: raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled WARNING: CPU: 96 PID: 2074 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10 warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 ... Call trace: warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x84/0xc8 add_qp_to_list+0x11c/0x148 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp_common.constprop.0+0x240/0x780 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp+0x98/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] create_qp+0x138/0x258 ib_create_qp_kernel+0x50/0xe8 create_mad_qp+0xa8/0x128 ib_mad_port_open+0x218/0x448 ib_mad_init_device+0x70/0x1f8 add_client_context+0xfc/0x220 enable_device_and_get+0xd0/0x140 ib_register_device.part.0+0xf4/0x1c8 ib_register_device+0x34/0x50 hns_roce_register_device+0x174/0x3d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_init+0xfc/0x2c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] __hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x7c/0x1d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x9c/0x180 [hns_roce_hw_v2](CVE-2024-47735)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: call cache_put if xdr_reserve_space returns NULL If not enough buffer space available, but idmap_lookup has triggered lookup_fn which calls cache_get and returns successfully. Then we missed to call cache_put here which pairs with cache_get. Reviwed-by: Jeff Layton \u0026lt;jlayton@kernel.org\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-47737)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix potential oob read in nilfs_btree_check_delete() The function nilfs_btree_check_delete(), which checks whether degeneration to direct mapping occurs before deleting a b-tree entry, causes memory access outside the block buffer when retrieving the maximum key if the root node has no entries. This does not usually happen because b-tree mappings with 0 child nodes are never created by mkfs.nilfs2 or nilfs2 itself. However, it can happen if the b-tree root node read from a device is configured that way, so fix this potential issue by adding a check for that case.(CVE-2024-47757)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/timerlat: Fix a race during cpuhp processing There is another found exception that the \u0026quot;timerlat/1\u0026quot; thread was scheduled on CPU0, and lead to timer corruption finally: ``` ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object: ffff888237c2e108 object type: hrtimer hint: timerlat_irq+0x0/0x220 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 426 at lib/debugobjects.c:518 debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 426 Comm: timerlat/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #45 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ... Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; ? __warn+0x7c/0x110 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1d0 ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20 ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? __pfx_timerlat_irq+0x10/0x10 __debug_object_init+0x110/0x150 hrtimer_init+0x1d/0x60 timerlat_main+0xab/0x2d0 ? __pfx_timerlat_main+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xb7/0xe0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt; ``` After tracing the scheduling event, it was discovered that the migration of the \u0026quot;timerlat/1\u0026quot; thread was performed during thread creation. Further analysis confirmed that it is because the CPU online processing for osnoise is implemented through workers, which is asynchronous with the offline processing. When the worker was scheduled to create a thread, the CPU may has already been removed from the cpu_online_mask during the offline process, resulting in the inability to select the right CPU: T1 | T2 [CPUHP_ONLINE] | cpu_device_down() osnoise_hotplug_workfn() | | cpus_write_lock() | takedown_cpu(1) | cpus_write_unlock() [CPUHP_OFFLINE] | cpus_read_lock() | start_kthread(1) | cpus_read_unlock() | To fix this, skip online processing if the CPU is already offline.(CVE-2024-49866)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: wait for fixup workers before stopping cleaner kthread during umount During unmount, at close_ctree(), we have the following steps in this order: 1) Park the cleaner kthread - this doesn\u0026apos;t destroy the kthread, it basically halts its execution (wake ups against it work but do nothing); 2) We stop the cleaner kthread - this results in freeing the respective struct task_struct; 3) We call btrfs_stop_all_workers() which waits for any jobs running in all the work queues and then free the work queues. Syzbot reported a case where a fixup worker resulted in a crash when doing a delayed iput on its inode while attempting to wake up the cleaner at btrfs_add_delayed_iput(), because the task_struct of the cleaner kthread was already freed. This can happen during unmount because we don\u0026apos;t wait for any fixup workers still running before we call kthread_stop() against the cleaner kthread, which stops and free all its resources. Fix this by waiting for any fixup workers at close_ctree() before we call kthread_stop() against the cleaner and run pending delayed iputs. The stack traces reported by syzbot were the following: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x77/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5065 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880272a8a18 by task kworker/u8:3/52 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 52 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Workqueue: btrfs-fixup btrfs_work_helper Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __lock_acquire+0x77/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5065 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 class_raw_spinlock_irqsave_constructor include/linux/spinlock.h:551 [inline] try_to_wake_up+0xb0/0x1480 kernel/sched/core.c:4154 btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker+0xc16/0xdf0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:2842 btrfs_work_helper+0x390/0xc50 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:314 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa63/0x1850 kernel/workqueue.c:3310 worker_thread+0x870/0xd30 kernel/workqueue.c:3391 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt; Allocated by task 2: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:319 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x66/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:345 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:247 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4086 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4135 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x16b/0x320 mm/slub.c:4187 alloc_task_struct_node kernel/fork.c:180 [inline] dup_task_struct+0x57/0x8c0 kernel/fork.c:1107 copy_process+0x5d1/0x3d50 kernel/fork.c:2206 kernel_clone+0x223/0x880 kernel/fork.c:2787 kernel_thread+0x1bc/0x240 kernel/fork.c:2849 create_kthread kernel/kthread.c:412 [inline] kthreadd+0x60d/0x810 kernel/kthread.c:765 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 Freed by task 61: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:579 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:247 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x59/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:264 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:230 [inline] slab_free_h ---truncated---(CVE-2024-49867)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion [BUG] Syzbot reported a NULL pointer dereference with the following crash: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. start_transaction+0x830/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:676 prepare_to_relocate+0x31f/0x4c0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3642 relocate_block_group+0x169/0xd20 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3678 ... BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -12 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000660-0x0000000000000667] RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x362/0xa80 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:926 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; commit_fs_roots+0x2ee/0x720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1496 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xfaf/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2430 del_balance_item fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3678 [inline] reset_balance_state+0x25e/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3742 btrfs_balance+0xead/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4574 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3673 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [CAUSE] The allocation failure happens at the start_transaction() inside prepare_to_relocate(), and during the error handling we call unset_reloc_control(), which makes fs_info-\u0026gt;balance_ctl to be NULL. Then we continue the error path cleanup in btrfs_balance() by calling reset_balance_state() which will call del_balance_item() to fully delete the balance item in the root tree. However during the small window between set_reloc_contrl() and unset_reloc_control(), we can have a subvolume tree update and created a reloc_root for that subvolume. Then we go into the final btrfs_commit_transaction() of del_balance_item(), and into btrfs_update_reloc_root() inside commit_fs_roots(). That function checks if fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl is in the merge_reloc_tree stage, but since fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl is NULL, it results a NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] Just add extra check on fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl inside btrfs_update_reloc_root(), before checking fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl-\u0026gt;merge_reloc_tree. That DEAD_RELOC_TREE handling is to prevent further modification to the reloc tree during merge stage, but since there is no reloc_ctl at all, we do not need to bother that.(CVE-2024-49868)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: map the EBADMSG to nfserr_io to avoid warning Ext4 will throw -EBADMSG through ext4_readdir when a checksum error occurs, resulting in the following WARNING. Fix it by mapping EBADMSG to nfserr_io. nfsd_buffered_readdir iterate_dir // -EBADMSG -74 ext4_readdir // .iterate_shared ext4_dx_readdir ext4_htree_fill_tree htree_dirblock_to_tree ext4_read_dirblock __ext4_read_dirblock ext4_dirblock_csum_verify warn_no_space_for_csum __warn_no_space_for_csum return ERR_PTR(-EFSBADCRC) // -EBADMSG -74 nfserrno // WARNING [ 161.115610] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 161.116465] nfsd: non-standard errno: -74 [ 161.117315] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 780 at fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c:878 nfserrno+0x9d/0xd0 [ 161.118596] Modules linked in: [ 161.119243] CPU: 1 PID: 780 Comm: nfsd Not tainted 5.10.0-00014-g79679361fd5d #138 [ 161.120684] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qe mu.org 04/01/2014 [ 161.123601] RIP: 0010:nfserrno+0x9d/0xd0 [ 161.124676] Code: 0f 87 da 30 dd 00 83 e3 01 b8 00 00 00 05 75 d7 44 89 ee 48 c7 c7 c0 57 24 98 89 44 24 04 c6 05 ce 2b 61 03 01 e8 99 20 d8 00 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 8b 44 24 04 eb b5 4c 89 e6 48 c7 c7 a0 6d a4 99 e8 cc 15 33 [ 161.127797] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000e2f9c0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 161.128794] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 161.130089] RDX: 1ffff1103ee16f6d RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: fffff520001c5f2a [ 161.131379] RBP: 0000000000000022 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8881f70c1827 [ 161.132664] R10: ffffed103ee18304 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000021 [ 161.133949] R13: 00000000ffffffb6 R14: ffff8881317c0000 R15: ffffc90000e2fbd8 [ 161.135244] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f7080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 161.136695] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 161.137761] CR2: 00007fcaad70b348 CR3: 0000000144256006 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 [ 161.139041] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 161.140291] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 161.141519] PKRU: 55555554 [ 161.142076] Call Trace: [ 161.142575] ? __warn+0x9b/0x140 [ 161.143229] ? nfserrno+0x9d/0xd0 [ 161.143872] ? report_bug+0x125/0x150 [ 161.144595] ? handle_bug+0x41/0x90 [ 161.145284] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 [ 161.146009] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x12/0x20 [ 161.146816] ? nfserrno+0x9d/0xd0 [ 161.147487] nfsd_buffered_readdir+0x28b/0x2b0 [ 161.148333] ? nfsd4_encode_dirent_fattr+0x380/0x380 [ 161.149258] ? nfsd_buffered_filldir+0xf0/0xf0 [ 161.150093] ? wait_for_concurrent_writes+0x170/0x170 [ 161.151004] ? generic_file_llseek_size+0x48/0x160 [ 161.151895] nfsd_readdir+0x132/0x190 [ 161.152606] ? nfsd4_encode_dirent_fattr+0x380/0x380 [ 161.153516] ? nfsd_unlink+0x380/0x380 [ 161.154256] ? override_creds+0x45/0x60 [ 161.155006] nfsd4_encode_readdir+0x21a/0x3d0 [ 161.155850] ? nfsd4_encode_readlink+0x210/0x210 [ 161.156731] ? write_bytes_to_xdr_buf+0x97/0xe0 [ 161.157598] ? __write_bytes_to_xdr_buf+0xd0/0xd0 [ 161.158494] ? lock_downgrade+0x90/0x90 [ 161.159232] ? nfs4svc_decode_voidarg+0x10/0x10 [ 161.160092] nfsd4_encode_operation+0x15a/0x440 [ 161.160959] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x718/0xe90 [ 161.161818] nfsd_dispatch+0x18e/0x2c0 [ 161.162586] svc_process_common+0x786/0xc50 [ 161.163403] ? nfsd_svc+0x380/0x380 [ 161.164137] ? svc_printk+0x160/0x160 [ 161.164846] ? svc_xprt_do_enqueue.part.0+0x365/0x380 [ 161.165808] ? nfsd_svc+0x380/0x380 [ 161.166523] ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x40 [ 161.167309] svc_process+0x1a5/0x200 [ 161.168019] nfsd+0x1f5/0x380 [ 161.168663] ? nfsd_shutdown_threads+0x260/0x260 [ 161.169554] kthread+0x1c4/0x210 [ 161.170224] ? kthread_insert_work_sanity_check+0x80/0x80 [ 161.171246] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30(CVE-2024-49875)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Initialize get_bytes_per_element\u0026apos;s default to 1 Variables, used as denominators and maybe not assigned to other values, should not be 0. bytes_per_element_y \u0026amp; bytes_per_element_c are initialized by get_bytes_per_element() which should never return 0. This fixes 10 DIVIDE_BY_ZERO issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-49892)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in degamma hardware format translation Fixes index out of bounds issue in `cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format` function. The issue could occur when the index \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is out of bounds the function returns false to indicate an error. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:594 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:595 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:596 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max(CVE-2024-49894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in DCN30 degamma hardware format translation This commit addresses a potential index out of bounds issue in the `cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format` function in the DCN30 color management module. The issue could occur when the index \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is out of bounds, the function returns false to indicate an error. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:338 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:339 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:340 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max(CVE-2024-49895)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Fix uninit-value access of new_ea in ea_buffer syzbot reports that lzo1x_1_do_compress is using uninit-value: ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in lzo1x_1_do_compress+0x19f9/0x2510 lib/lzo/lzo1x_compress.c:178 ... Uninit was stored to memory at: ea_put fs/jfs/xattr.c:639 [inline] ... Local variable ea_buf created at: __jfs_setxattr+0x5d/0x1ae0 fs/jfs/xattr.c:662 __jfs_xattr_set+0xe6/0x1f0 fs/jfs/xattr.c:934 ===================================================== The reason is ea_buf-\u0026gt;new_ea is not initialized properly. Fix this by using memset to empty its content at the beginning in ea_get().(CVE-2024-49900)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: check if leafidx greater than num leaves per dmap tree syzbot report a out of bounds in dbSplit, it because dmt_leafidx greater than num leaves per dmap tree, add a checking for dmt_leafidx in dbFindLeaf. Shaggy: Modified sanity check to apply to control pages as well as leaf pages.(CVE-2024-49902)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Fix uaf in dbFreeBits [syzbot reported] ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0xfe/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880229254b0 by task syz-executor357/5216 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5216 Comm: syz-executor357 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00156-gd7a5aa4b3c00 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xfe/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 dbFreeBits+0x7ea/0xd90 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2390 dbFreeDmap fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2089 [inline] dbFree+0x35b/0x680 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:409 dbDiscardAG+0x8a9/0xa20 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1650 jfs_ioc_trim+0x433/0x670 fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c:100 jfs_ioctl+0x2d0/0x3e0 fs/jfs/ioctl.c:131 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 Freed by task 5218: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:579 poison_slab_object+0xe0/0x150 mm/kasan/common.c:240 __kasan_slab_free+0x37/0x60 mm/kasan/common.c:256 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2252 [inline] slab_free mm/slub.c:4473 [inline] kfree+0x149/0x360 mm/slub.c:4594 dbUnmount+0x11d/0x190 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:278 jfs_mount_rw+0x4ac/0x6a0 fs/jfs/jfs_mount.c:247 jfs_remount+0x3d1/0x6b0 fs/jfs/super.c:454 reconfigure_super+0x445/0x880 fs/super.c:1083 vfs_cmd_reconfigure fs/fsopen.c:263 [inline] vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:292 [inline] __do_sys_fsconfig fs/fsopen.c:473 [inline] __se_sys_fsconfig+0xb6e/0xf80 fs/fsopen.c:345 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [Analysis] There are two paths (dbUnmount and jfs_ioc_trim) that generate race condition when accessing bmap, which leads to the occurrence of uaf. Use the lock s_umount to synchronize them, in order to avoid uaf caused by race condition.(CVE-2024-49903)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add NULL check for function pointer in dcn20_set_output_transfer_func This commit adds a null check for the set_output_gamma function pointer in the dcn20_set_output_transfer_func function. Previously, set_output_gamma was being checked for null at line 1030, but then it was being dereferenced without any null check at line 1048. This could potentially lead to a null pointer dereference error if set_output_gamma is null. To fix this, we now ensure that set_output_gamma is not null before dereferencing it. We do this by adding a null check for set_output_gamma before the call to set_output_gamma at line 1048.(CVE-2024-49911)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/ioapic: Handle allocation failures gracefully Breno observed panics when using failslab under certain conditions during runtime: can not alloc irq_pin_list (-1,0,20) Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC: failed to add irq-pin. Can not proceed panic+0x4e9/0x590 mp_irqdomain_alloc+0x9ab/0xa80 irq_domain_alloc_irqs_locked+0x25d/0x8d0 __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x80/0x110 mp_map_pin_to_irq+0x645/0x890 acpi_register_gsi_ioapic+0xe6/0x150 hpet_open+0x313/0x480 That\u0026apos;s a pointless panic which is a leftover of the historic IO/APIC code which panic\u0026apos;ed during early boot when the interrupt allocation failed. The only place which might justify panic is the PIT/HPET timer_check() code which tries to figure out whether the timer interrupt is delivered through the IO/APIC. But that code does not require to handle interrupt allocation failures. If the interrupt cannot be allocated then timer delivery fails and it either panics due to that or falls back to legacy mode. Cure this by removing the panic wrapper around __add_pin_to_irq_node() and making mp_irqdomain_alloc() aware of the failure condition and handle it as any other failure in this function gracefully.(CVE-2024-49927)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jbd2: stop waiting for space when jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() returns error In __jbd2_log_wait_for_space(), we might call jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to recover some journal space. But if an error occurs while executing jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() (e.g., an EIO), we don\u0026apos;t stop waiting for free space right away, we try other branches, and if j_committing_transaction is NULL (i.e., the tid is 0), we will get the following complain: ============================================ JBD2: I/O error when updating journal superblock for sdd-8. __jbd2_log_wait_for_space: needed 256 blocks and only had 217 space available __jbd2_log_wait_for_space: no way to get more journal space in sdd-8 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 139804 at fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:109 __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x251/0x2e0 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 139804 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 6.6.0+ #1 RIP: 0010:__jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x251/0x2e0 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; add_transaction_credits+0x5d1/0x5e0 start_this_handle+0x1ef/0x6a0 jbd2__journal_start+0x18b/0x340 ext4_dirty_inode+0x5d/0xb0 __mark_inode_dirty+0xe4/0x5d0 generic_update_time+0x60/0x70 [...] ============================================ So only if jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() returns 1, i.e., there is nothing to clean up at the moment, continue to try to reclaim free space in other ways. Note that this fix relies on commit 6f6a6fda2945 (\u0026quot;jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when updating journal superblock fails\u0026quot;) to make jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail return the correct error code.(CVE-2024-49959)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: remove unreasonable unlock in ocfs2_read_blocks Patch series \u0026quot;Misc fixes for ocfs2_read_blocks\u0026quot;, v5. This series contains 2 fixes for ocfs2_read_blocks(). The first patch fix the issue reported by syzbot, which detects bad unlock balance in ocfs2_read_blocks(). The second patch fixes an issue reported by Heming Zhao when reviewing above fix. This patch (of 2): There was a lock release before exiting, so remove the unreasonable unlock.(CVE-2024-49965)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: cancel dqi_sync_work before freeing oinfo ocfs2_global_read_info() will initialize and schedule dqi_sync_work at the end, if error occurs after successfully reading global quota, it will trigger the following warning with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_* enabled: ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object: 00000000d8b0ce28 object type: timer_list hint: qsync_work_fn+0x0/0x16c This reports that there is an active delayed work when freeing oinfo in error handling, so cancel dqi_sync_work first. BTW, return status instead of -1 when .read_file_info fails.(CVE-2024-49966)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in DCN30 color transformation This commit addresses a potential index out of bounds issue in the `cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format` function in the DCN30 color management module. The issue could occur when the index \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is out of bounds, the function returns false to indicate an error. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:180 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:181 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:182 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max(CVE-2024-49969)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations Nothing appears to limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations that clients can start. In addition, AFAICT each async COPY can copy an unlimited number of 4MB chunks, so can run for a long time. Thus IMO async COPY can become a DoS vector. Add a restriction mechanism that bounds the number of concurrent background COPY operations. Start simple and try to be fair -- this patch implements a per-namespace limit. An async COPY request that occurs while this limit is exceeded gets NFS4ERR_DELAY. The requesting client can choose to send the request again after a delay or fall back to a traditional read/write style copy. If there is need to make the mechanism more sophisticated, we can visit that in future patches.(CVE-2024-49974)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: stm32f7: Do not prepare/unprepare clock during runtime suspend/resume In case there is any sort of clock controller attached to this I2C bus controller, for example Versaclock or even an AIC32x4 I2C codec, then an I2C transfer triggered from the clock controller clk_ops .prepare callback may trigger a deadlock on drivers/clk/clk.c prepare_lock mutex. This is because the clock controller first grabs the prepare_lock mutex and then performs the prepare operation, including its I2C access. The I2C access resumes this I2C bus controller via .runtime_resume callback, which calls clk_prepare_enable(), which attempts to grab the prepare_lock mutex again and deadlocks. Since the clock are already prepared since probe() and unprepared in remove(), use simple clk_enable()/clk_disable() calls to enable and disable the clock on runtime suspend and resume, to avoid hitting the prepare_lock mutex.(CVE-2024-49985)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: fnic: Move flush_work initialization out of if block After commit 379a58caa199 (\u0026quot;scsi: fnic: Move fnic_fnic_flush_tx() to a work queue\u0026quot;), it can happen that a work item is sent to an uninitialized work queue. This may has the effect that the item being queued is never actually queued, and any further actions depending on it will not proceed. The following warning is observed while the fnic driver is loaded: kernel: WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 0 at ../kernel/workqueue.c:1524 __queue_work+0x373/0x410 kernel: \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt; kernel: queue_work_on+0x3a/0x50 kernel: fnic_wq_copy_cmpl_handler+0x54a/0x730 [fnic 62fbff0c42e7fb825c60a55cde2fb91facb2ed24] kernel: fnic_isr_msix_wq_copy+0x2d/0x60 [fnic 62fbff0c42e7fb825c60a55cde2fb91facb2ed24] kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x36/0x1a0 kernel: handle_irq_event_percpu+0x30/0x70 kernel: handle_irq_event+0x34/0x60 kernel: handle_edge_irq+0x7e/0x1a0 kernel: __common_interrupt+0x3b/0xb0 kernel: common_interrupt+0x58/0xa0 kernel: \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt; It has been observed that this may break the rediscovery of Fibre Channel devices after a temporary fabric failure. This patch fixes it by moving the work queue initialization out of an if block in fnic_probe().(CVE-2024-50025)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: do not delay dst_entries_add() in dst_release() dst_entries_add() uses per-cpu data that might be freed at netns dismantle from ip6_route_net_exit() calling dst_entries_destroy() Before ip6_route_net_exit() can be called, we release all the dsts associated with this netns, via calls to dst_release(), which waits an rcu grace period before calling dst_destroy() dst_entries_add() use in dst_destroy() is racy, because dst_entries_destroy() could have been called already. Decrementing the number of dsts must happen sooner. Notes: 1) in CONFIG_XFRM case, dst_destroy() can call dst_release_immediate(child), this might also cause UAF if the child does not have DST_NOCOUNT set. IPSEC maintainers might take a look and see how to address this. 2) There is also discussion about removing this count of dst, which might happen in future kernels.(CVE-2024-50036)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSv4: Prevent NULL-pointer dereference in nfs42_complete_copies() On the node of an NFS client, some files saved in the mountpoint of the NFS server were copied to another location of the same NFS server. Accidentally, the nfs42_complete_copies() got a NULL-pointer dereference crash with the following syslog: [232064.838881] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232064.839360] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232066.588183] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000058 [232066.588586] Mem abort info: [232066.588701] ESR = 0x0000000096000007 [232066.588862] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [232066.589084] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [232066.589216] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [232066.589340] FSC = 0x07: level 3 translation fault [232066.589559] Data abort info: [232066.589683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [232066.589842] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [232066.589967] user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00002000956ff400 [232066.590231] [0000000000000058] pgd=08001100ae100003, p4d=08001100ae100003, pud=08001100ae100003, pmd=08001100b3c00003, pte=0000000000000000 [232066.590757] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [232066.590958] Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace fscache netfs ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_stack_o2cb ocfs2_dlm vhost_net vhost vhost_iotlb tap tun ipt_rpfilter xt_multiport ip_set_hash_ip ip_set_hash_net xfrm_interface xfrm6_tunnel tunnel4 tunnel6 esp4 ah4 wireguard libcurve25519_generic veth xt_addrtype xt_set nf_conntrack_netlink ip_set_hash_ipportnet ip_set_hash_ipportip ip_set_bitmap_port ip_set_hash_ipport dummy ip_set ip_vs_sh ip_vs_wrr ip_vs_rr ip_vs iptable_filter sch_ingress nfnetlink_cttimeout vport_gre ip_gre ip_tunnel gre vport_geneve geneve vport_vxlan vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel openvswitch nf_conncount dm_round_robin dm_service_time dm_multipath xt_nat xt_MASQUERADE nft_chain_nat nf_nat xt_mark xt_conntrack xt_comment nft_compat nft_counter nf_tables nfnetlink ocfs2 ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ipmi_ssif nbd overlay 8021q garp mrp bonding tls rfkill sunrpc ext4 mbcache jbd2 [232066.591052] vfat fat cas_cache cas_disk ses enclosure scsi_transport_sas sg acpi_ipmi ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler ip_tables vfio_pci vfio_pci_core vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp llc fuse xfs libcrc32c ast drm_vram_helper qla2xxx drm_kms_helper syscopyarea crct10dif_ce sysfillrect ghash_ce sysimgblt sha2_ce fb_sys_fops cec sha256_arm64 sha1_ce drm_ttm_helper ttm nvme_fc igb sbsa_gwdt nvme_fabrics drm nvme_core i2c_algo_bit i40e scsi_transport_fc megaraid_sas aes_neon_bs [232066.596953] CPU: 6 PID: 4124696 Comm: 10.253.166.125- Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.131-9.cl9_ocfs2.aarch64 #1 [232066.597356] Hardware name: Great Wall .\\x93\\x8e...RF6260 V5/GWMSSE2GL1T, BIOS T656FBE_V3.0.18 2024-01-06 [232066.597721] pstate: 20400009 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [232066.598034] pc : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x220/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598327] lr : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x12c/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598595] sp : ffff8000f568fc70 [232066.598731] x29: ffff8000f568fc70 x28: 0000000000001000 x27: ffff21003db33000 [232066.599030] x26: ffff800005521ae0 x25: ffff0100f98fa3f0 x24: 0000000000000001 [232066.599319] x23: ffff800009920008 x22: ffff21003db33040 x21: ffff21003db33050 [232066.599628] x20: ffff410172fe9e40 x19: ffff410172fe9e00 x18: 0000000000000000 [232066.599914] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000004 x15: 0000000000000000 [232066.600195] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800008e685a8 x12: 00000000eac0c6e6 [232066.600498] x11: 00000000000000 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-50046)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Check null pointer before dereferencing se [WHAT \u0026amp; HOW] se is null checked previously in the same function, indicating it might be null; therefore, it must be checked when used again. This fixes 1 FORWARD_NULL issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-50049)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2321",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:47Z",
"published": "2024-11-01T11:07:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2321"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48916"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52918"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42301"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42315"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43841"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43858"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45009"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47695"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47720"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49866"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49911"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49927"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49974"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50025"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50036"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50049"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-48916",
"CVE-2022-48952",
"CVE-2023-52917",
"CVE-2023-52918",
"CVE-2024-35878",
"CVE-2024-35990",
"CVE-2024-36286",
"CVE-2024-38605",
"CVE-2024-38635",
"CVE-2024-38667",
"CVE-2024-42152",
"CVE-2024-42301",
"CVE-2024-42315",
"CVE-2024-43841",
"CVE-2024-43858",
"CVE-2024-43867",
"CVE-2024-43871",
"CVE-2024-43894",
"CVE-2024-45009",
"CVE-2024-46675",
"CVE-2024-46689",
"CVE-2024-46722",
"CVE-2024-46724",
"CVE-2024-46757",
"CVE-2024-46802",
"CVE-2024-46830",
"CVE-2024-46853",
"CVE-2024-47667",
"CVE-2024-47669",
"CVE-2024-47684",
"CVE-2024-47685",
"CVE-2024-47692",
"CVE-2024-47695",
"CVE-2024-47698",
"CVE-2024-47709",
"CVE-2024-47710",
"CVE-2024-47720",
"CVE-2024-47735",
"CVE-2024-47737",
"CVE-2024-47757",
"CVE-2024-49866",
"CVE-2024-49867",
"CVE-2024-49868",
"CVE-2024-49875",
"CVE-2024-49892",
"CVE-2024-49894",
"CVE-2024-49895",
"CVE-2024-49900",
"CVE-2024-49902",
"CVE-2024-49903",
"CVE-2024-49911",
"CVE-2024-49927",
"CVE-2024-49959",
"CVE-2024-49965",
"CVE-2024-49966",
"CVE-2024-49969",
"CVE-2024-49974",
"CVE-2024-49985",
"CVE-2024-50025",
"CVE-2024-50036",
"CVE-2024-50046",
"CVE-2024-50049"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.