cve-2024-52296
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-11-12 15:58
Modified
2024-11-19 17:01
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == '\0') as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/commit/24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/security/advisories/GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
goToMain libosdp Version: < 2.4.0
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-52296",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-11-19T17:01:45.739953Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-11-19T17:01:59.287Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "libosdp",
          "vendor": "goToMain",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 2.4.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == \u0027\\0\u0027) as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-476",
              "description": "CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-11-12T15:58:28.434Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/security/advisories/GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/security/advisories/GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/commit/24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/commit/24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "libosdp has a null pointer deref in osdp_reply_name"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-52296",
    "datePublished": "2024-11-12T15:58:28.434Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-11-06T19:00:26.395Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-11-19T17:01:59.287Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == \u0027\\\\0\u0027) as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"libosdp es una implementaci\\u00f3n de IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) y proporciona una librer\\u00eda C con soporte para C++, Rust y Python3. En ospd_common.c, en la funci\\u00f3n osdp_reply_name, cualquier id de respuesta entre REPLY_ACK y REPLY_XRD es v\\u00e1lido, pero la matriz de nombres no declara todo el rango. En el caso de un id de respuesta indefinido dentro del rango, el nombre ser\\u00e1 nulo (nombre = nombres[id_de_respuesta - REPLY_ACK];). Un nombre nulo provocar\\u00e1 un bloqueo en la siguiente l\\u00ednea: si (nombre[0] == \u0027\\\\0\u0027) ya que null[0] no es v\\u00e1lido. Como esta l\\u00f3gica no se limita a una conexi\\u00f3n segura, el atacante puede activar esta vulnerabilidad sin ning\\u00fan conocimiento previo. Este problema se solucion\\u00f3 en 2.4.0.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2024-52296",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-13T17:01:58.603",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}",
      "published": "2024-11-12T16:15:26.030",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/commit/24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/security/advisories/GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-476\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-52296\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2024-11-12T16:15:26.030\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-13T17:01:58.603\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == \u0027\\\\0\u0027) as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"libosdp es una implementaci\u00f3n de IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) y proporciona una librer\u00eda C con soporte para C++, Rust y Python3. En ospd_common.c, en la funci\u00f3n osdp_reply_name, cualquier id de respuesta entre REPLY_ACK y REPLY_XRD es v\u00e1lido, pero la matriz de nombres no declara todo el rango. En el caso de un id de respuesta indefinido dentro del rango, el nombre ser\u00e1 nulo (nombre = nombres[id_de_respuesta - REPLY_ACK];). Un nombre nulo provocar\u00e1 un bloqueo en la siguiente l\u00ednea: si (nombre[0] == \u0027\\\\0\u0027) ya que null[0] no es v\u00e1lido. Como esta l\u00f3gica no se limita a una conexi\u00f3n segura, el atacante puede activar esta vulnerabilidad sin ning\u00fan conocimiento previo. Este problema se solucion\u00f3 en 2.4.0.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-476\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/commit/24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/security/advisories/GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-52296\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-11-19T17:01:45.739953Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-11-19T17:01:54.480Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"libosdp has a null pointer deref in osdp_reply_name\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"goToMain\", \"product\": \"libosdp\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 2.4.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/security/advisories/GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/security/advisories/GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/commit/24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/commit/24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == \u0027\\\\0\u0027) as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-476\", \"description\": \"CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-11-12T15:58:28.434Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-52296\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-11-19T17:01:59.287Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-11-06T19:00:26.395Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-11-12T15:58:28.434Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.