cve-2024-6827
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-03-20 10:09
Modified
2025-03-20 18:32
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
0.04%
(0.10881)
Summary
Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
benoitc | benoitc/gunicorn |
Version: unspecified < |
{ containers: { adp: [ { metrics: [ { other: { content: { id: "CVE-2024-6827", options: [ { Exploitation: "poc", }, { Automatable: "yes", }, { "Technical Impact": "partial", }, ], role: "CISA Coordinator", timestamp: "2025-03-20T17:52:37.458445Z", version: "2.0.3", }, type: "ssvc", }, }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2025-03-20T18:32:51.799Z", orgId: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", shortName: "CISA-ADP", }, title: "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", }, ], cna: { affected: [ { product: "benoitc/gunicorn", vendor: "benoitc", versions: [ { lessThanOrEqual: "latest", status: "affected", version: "unspecified", versionType: "custom", }, ], }, ], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse.", }, ], metrics: [ { cvssV3_0: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 7.5, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", version: "3.0", }, }, ], problemTypes: [ { descriptions: [ { cweId: "CWE-444", description: "CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests", lang: "en", type: "CWE", }, ], }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2025-03-20T10:09:55.725Z", orgId: "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a", shortName: "@huntr_ai", }, references: [ { url: "https://huntr.com/bounties/1b4f8f38-39da-44b6-9f98-f618639d0dd7", }, ], source: { advisory: "1b4f8f38-39da-44b6-9f98-f618639d0dd7", discovery: "EXTERNAL", }, title: "HTTP Request Smuggling in benoitc/gunicorn", }, }, cveMetadata: { assignerOrgId: "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a", assignerShortName: "@huntr_ai", cveId: "CVE-2024-6827", datePublished: "2025-03-20T10:09:55.725Z", dateReserved: "2024-07-16T23:32:47.872Z", dateUpdated: "2025-03-20T18:32:51.799Z", state: "PUBLISHED", }, dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-6827\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"published\":\"2025-03-20T10:15:33.357\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-03-20T10:15:33.357\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La versión 21.2.0 de Gunicorn no valida correctamente el valor del encabezado \\\"Transfer-Encoding\\\" según lo especificado en los estándares RFC, lo que lleva al método de respaldo predeterminado \\\"Content-Length\\\", lo que la hace vulnerable al contrabando de solicitudes TE.CL. Esta vulnerabilidad puede provocar envenenamiento de caché, exposición de datos, manipulación de sesiones, SSRF, XSS, denegación de servicio (DoS), vulneración de la integridad de los datos, elusión de seguridad, fuga de información y abuso de la lógica de negocio.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-444\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://huntr.com/bounties/1b4f8f38-39da-44b6-9f98-f618639d0dd7\",\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\"}]}}", vulnrichment: { containers: "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-6827\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-03-20T17:52:37.458445Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-20T17:52:38.879Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"HTTP Request Smuggling in benoitc/gunicorn\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"1b4f8f38-39da-44b6-9f98-f618639d0dd7\", \"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_0\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.0\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"benoitc\", \"product\": \"benoitc/gunicorn\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"unspecified\", \"versionType\": \"custom\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"latest\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://huntr.com/bounties/1b4f8f38-39da-44b6-9f98-f618639d0dd7\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-444\", \"description\": \"CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a\", \"shortName\": \"@huntr_ai\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-20T10:09:55.725Z\"}}}", cveMetadata: "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-6827\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-20T18:32:51.799Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-07-16T23:32:47.872Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-03-20T10:09:55.725Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"@huntr_ai\"}", dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.