CVE-2024-9310 (GCVE-0-2024-9310)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-22 18:41 – Updated: 2025-02-12 20:41
VLAI?
Title
Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) II has a Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability
Summary
By utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs).
CWE
  • CWE-807 - Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Assigner
References
Credits
Giacomo Longo and Enrico Russo of Genova University reported these vulnerabilities to CISA. Martin Strohmeier and Vincent Lenders of armasuisse reported these vulnerabilities to CISA. Alessio Merlo of Centre for High Defense Studies reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-9310",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-22T19:14:28.005852Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:41:24.185Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Collision Avoidance Systems",
          "vendor": "Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) II",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Giacomo Longo and Enrico Russo of Genova University reported these vulnerabilities to CISA. Martin Strohmeier and Vincent Lenders of armasuisse reported these vulnerabilities to CISA. Alessio Merlo of Centre for High Defense Studies reported these vulnerabilities to CISA."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eBy utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs).\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003c/span\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "By utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs)."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT",
            "baseScore": 6,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-807",
              "description": "CWE-807 Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-01-22T18:41:09.294Z",
        "orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
        "shortName": "icscert"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "government-resource"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-021-01"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) II has a Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eAfter consulting with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the researchers regarding these vulnerabilities, it has been concluded that CVE-2024-11166 can be fully mitigated by upgrading to ACAS X or by upgrading the associated transponder to comply with RTCA DO-181F.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCurrently, there is no mitigation available for CWE-2024-9310.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese vulnerabilities in the TCAS II standard are exploitable in a lab environment. However, they require very specific conditions to be met and are unlikely to be exploited outside of a lab setting.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOrganizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNo known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time. These vulnerabilities are not exploitable remotely. These vulnerabilities have a high attack complexity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "After consulting with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the researchers regarding these vulnerabilities, it has been concluded that CVE-2024-11166 can be fully mitigated by upgrading to ACAS X or by upgrading the associated transponder to comply with RTCA DO-181F.\n\nCurrently, there is no mitigation available for CWE-2024-9310.\n\nThese vulnerabilities in the TCAS II standard are exploitable in a lab environment. However, they require very specific conditions to be met and are unlikely to be exploited outside of a lab setting.\n\nOrganizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.\n\nNo known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time. These vulnerabilities are not exploitable remotely. These vulnerabilities have a high attack complexity."
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
    "assignerShortName": "icscert",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-9310",
    "datePublished": "2025-01-22T18:41:09.294Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-09-27T22:45:50.842Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:41:24.185Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-9310\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov\",\"published\":\"2025-01-22T19:15:10.277\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-01-22T19:15:10.277\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"By utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs).\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Al utilizar radios definidas por software y un flujo de procesamiento personalizado de baja latencia, se pueden transmitir se\u00f1ales de RF con datos de ubicaci\u00f3n falsificados a objetivos a\u00e9reos. Esto puede provocar la aparici\u00f3n de aeronaves falsas en las pantallas y potencialmente activar avisos de resoluci\u00f3n no deseados.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-807\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-021-01\",\"source\":\"ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-9310\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-22T19:14:28.005852Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-12T20:33:53.961Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) II has a Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Giacomo Longo and Enrico Russo of Genova University reported these vulnerabilities to CISA. Martin Strohmeier and Vincent Lenders of armasuisse reported these vulnerabilities to CISA. Alessio Merlo of Centre for High Defense Studies reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 6, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) II\", \"product\": \"Collision Avoidance Systems\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"7.1\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-021-01\", \"tags\": [\"government-resource\"]}], \"workarounds\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"After consulting with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the researchers regarding these vulnerabilities, it has been concluded that CVE-2024-11166 can be fully mitigated by upgrading to ACAS X or by upgrading the associated transponder to comply with RTCA DO-181F.\\n\\nCurrently, there is no mitigation available for CWE-2024-9310.\\n\\nThese vulnerabilities in the TCAS II standard are exploitable in a lab environment. However, they require very specific conditions to be met and are unlikely to be exploited outside of a lab setting.\\n\\nOrganizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.\\n\\nNo known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time. These vulnerabilities are not exploitable remotely. These vulnerabilities have a high attack complexity.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAfter consulting with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the researchers regarding these vulnerabilities, it has been concluded that CVE-2024-11166 can be fully mitigated by upgrading to ACAS X or by upgrading the associated transponder to comply with RTCA DO-181F.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCurrently, there is no mitigation available for CWE-2024-9310.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese vulnerabilities in the TCAS II standard are exploitable in a lab environment. However, they require very specific conditions to be met and are unlikely to be exploited outside of a lab setting.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOrganizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNo known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time. These vulnerabilities are not exploitable remotely. These vulnerabilities have a high attack complexity.\u003c/p\u003e\\n\\n\u003cbr\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"By utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs).\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003eBy utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/span\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-807\", \"description\": \"CWE-807 Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6\", \"shortName\": \"icscert\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-22T18:41:09.294Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-9310\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-12T20:41:24.185Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-09-27T22:45:50.842Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-22T18:41:09.294Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"icscert\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…