CVE-2025-12587 (GCVE-0-2025-12587)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-25 07:28 – Updated: 2025-11-25 14:23
VLAI?
Title
Peer Publish <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
Summary
The Peer Publish plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the website management pages. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add, modify, or delete website configurations via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-352 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Assigner
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| webgarh | Peer Publish |
Affected:
* , ≤ 1.0
(semver)
|
Credits
dayea song
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12587",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T14:23:26.432809Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T14:23:55.289Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Peer Publish",
"vendor": "webgarh",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "*",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "dayea song"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Peer Publish plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the website management pages. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add, modify, or delete website configurations via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-352",
"description": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T07:28:27.819Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/fffa6c31-8da0-48d7-b603-64f50950787b?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peer-publish/tags/1.0/admin/admin-pages/newwebsite.php#L17"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peer-publish/tags/1.0/admin/admin-pages/websites.php#L20"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-24T19:07:03.000+00:00",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Peer Publish \u003c= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12587",
"datePublished": "2025-11-25T07:28:27.819Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-31T22:27:24.251Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T14:23:55.289Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-12587\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"published\":\"2025-11-25T08:15:48.913\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-11-25T22:16:16.690\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The Peer Publish plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the website management pages. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add, modify, or delete website configurations via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-352\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peer-publish/tags/1.0/admin/admin-pages/newwebsite.php#L17\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peer-publish/tags/1.0/admin/admin-pages/websites.php#L20\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/fffa6c31-8da0-48d7-b603-64f50950787b?source=cve\",\"source\":\"security@wordfence.com\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-12587\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-11-25T14:23:26.432809Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-25T14:23:48.687Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Peer Publish \u003c= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"dayea song\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"webgarh\", \"product\": \"Peer Publish\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"1.0\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-11-24T19:07:03.000+00:00\", \"value\": \"Disclosed\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/fffa6c31-8da0-48d7-b603-64f50950787b?source=cve\"}, {\"url\": \"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peer-publish/tags/1.0/admin/admin-pages/newwebsite.php#L17\"}, {\"url\": \"https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peer-publish/tags/1.0/admin/admin-pages/websites.php#L20\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The Peer Publish plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the website management pages. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add, modify, or delete website configurations via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-352\", \"description\": \"CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599\", \"shortName\": \"Wordfence\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-25T07:28:27.819Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-12587\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-25T14:23:55.289Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-10-31T22:27:24.251Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-11-25T07:28:27.819Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Wordfence\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…