CVE-2025-12970 (GCVE-0-2025-12970)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-24 14:39 – Updated: 2025-11-28 17:45
VLAI?
Summary
The extract_name function in Fluent Bit in_docker input plugin copies container names into a fixed size stack buffer without validating length. An attacker who can create containers or control container names, can supply a long name that overflows the buffer, leading to process crash or arbitrary code execution.
Severity ?
8.8 (High)
CWE
- CWE-121 - Stack-based Buffer Overflow
Assigner
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FluentBit | Fluent Bit |
Affected:
4.0.14
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12970",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-24T16:59:58.423891Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-24T17:00:03.177Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Fluent Bit",
"vendor": "FluentBit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.14"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Fluent Bit",
"vendor": "FluentBit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.1.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The extract_name function in Fluent Bit in_docker input plugin copies container names into a fixed size stack buffer without validating length. An attacker who can create containers or control container names, can supply a long name that overflows the buffer, leading to process crash or arbitrary code execution."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-28T17:45:48.338Z",
"orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
"shortName": "certcc"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://fluentbit.io/blog/2025/10/28/security-vulnerabilities-addressed-in-fluent-bit-v4.1-and-backported-to-v4.0/"
},
{
"url": "https://www.oligo.security/blog/critical-vulnerabilities-in-fluent-bit-expose-cloud-environments-to-remote-takeover"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "CVE-2025-12970",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "VINCE 3.0.29",
"env": "prod",
"origin": "https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2025-12970"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
"assignerShortName": "certcc",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12970",
"datePublished": "2025-11-24T14:39:52.569Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-10T17:54:00.525Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-28T17:45:48.338Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-12970\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cret@cert.org\",\"published\":\"2025-11-24T15:15:46.507\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-11-28T18:15:46.240\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The extract_name function in Fluent Bit in_docker input plugin copies container names into a fixed size stack buffer without validating length. An attacker who can create containers or control container names, can supply a long name that overflows the buffer, leading to process crash or arbitrary code execution.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-120\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:treasuredata:fluent_bit:4.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4D0EA105-B741-4E44-828A-9300B09A7A79\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://fluentbit.io/blog/2025/10/28/security-vulnerabilities-addressed-in-fluent-bit-v4.1-and-backported-to-v4.0/\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.oligo.security/blog/critical-vulnerabilities-in-fluent-bit-expose-cloud-environments-to-remote-takeover\",\"source\":\"cret@cert.org\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-12970\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-11-24T16:59:58.423891Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-24T16:59:52.768Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"CVE-2025-12970\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"FluentBit\", \"product\": \"Fluent Bit\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"4.0.14\"}]}, {\"vendor\": \"FluentBit\", \"product\": \"Fluent Bit\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"4.1.1\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://fluentbit.io/blog/2025/10/28/security-vulnerabilities-addressed-in-fluent-bit-v4.1-and-backported-to-v4.0/\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.oligo.security/blog/critical-vulnerabilities-in-fluent-bit-expose-cloud-environments-to-remote-takeover\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"env\": \"prod\", \"engine\": \"VINCE 3.0.29\", \"origin\": \"https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2025-12970\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The extract_name function in Fluent Bit in_docker input plugin copies container names into a fixed size stack buffer without validating length. An attacker who can create containers or control container names, can supply a long name that overflows the buffer, leading to process crash or arbitrary code execution.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b\", \"shortName\": \"certcc\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-28T17:45:48.338Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-12970\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-28T17:45:48.338Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-11-10T17:54:00.525Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-11-24T14:39:52.569Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"certcc\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…