CVE-2025-13872 (GCVE-0-2025-13872)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-02 09:51 – Updated: 2025-12-02 16:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet Opinio
Summary
Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of
ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26 rev12562 on
Web-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests
to an arbitrary destination.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-12-02 16:50 UTC
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/changelog.html | release-notes |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ObjectPlanet | Opinio |
Affected:
7.26 rev12562
cpe:2.3:a:objectplanet:opinio:7.26_rev12562:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Date Public
2025-07-31 08:54
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-02T16:50:34.265761Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T16:55:02.348Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"modules": [
"The feature to import a survey"
],
"product": "Opinio",
"vendor": "ObjectPlanet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.26 rev12562"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:objectplanet:opinio:7.26_rev12562:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dominique Righetto"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-07-31T08:54:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\n\nBlind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eObjectPlanet\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eOpinio\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;7.26 rev12562\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;on \u003cem\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination.\n\n\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio\u00a07.26 rev12562\u00a0on \n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-664",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T09:51:59.865Z",
"orgId": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"shortName": "TCS-CERT"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/changelog.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-01T09:10:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability discovery"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-10T14:22:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability Report to TCS-CERT"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-19T15:33:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability Report to Vendor through email : opinio@support.objectplanet.com"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-24T15:34:00.000Z",
"value": "Feedback asked to vendor, check if the vendor received the PoC in an encrypted archive"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-10T15:32:00.000Z",
"value": "New follow-up email was send to the vendor"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-13T15:37:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor confirmed the reception of the PoC, vendor asked to wait 90-day period before publishing (responsible disclosure), and will try to fix the vulnerability"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-14T15:37:00.000Z",
"value": "Answer to vendor to acknowledge 90 days period"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-03-10T15:38:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor informed us that they will realse the fix by the end of this month"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-23T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "An email was sent to check where they stand on the release and fixes for the reported issues"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-21T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "A feedback was requested from vendor regarding their progreess"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-30T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "A feedback was requested from vendor regarding their progreess"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-07-31T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "The vendor released the newer fixed version which is the Opinio Version 7.27"
}
],
"title": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"assignerShortName": "TCS-CERT",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13872",
"datePublished": "2025-12-02T09:51:59.865Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-02T09:17:04.605Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T16:55:02.348Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-13872",
"date": "2026-09-21",
"epss": "0.00306",
"percentile": "0.23478"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"modules": [
"The feature to import a survey"
],
"product": "Opinio",
"vendor": "ObjectPlanet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.26 rev12562"
}
]
}
],
"source": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:objectplanet:opinio:7.26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6684DC3A-4DF1-4417-913C-EE8E169B75B5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio\u00a07.26 rev12562\u00a0on \n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"lastModified": "2026-09-03T03:15:24.410",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-02T16:50:34.265761Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-02T10:16:01.877",
"references": [
{
"source": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"tags": [
"Release Notes"
],
"url": "https://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/changelog.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-12-03T10:04:56+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-13872",
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"initial_release_date": "2025-07-31T08:54:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-13872.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-02T16:50:34.265761Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T16:50:33.197Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"modules": [
"The feature to import a survey"
],
"product": "Opinio",
"vendor": "ObjectPlanet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.26 rev12562"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:objectplanet:opinio:7.26_rev12562:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dominique Righetto"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-07-31T08:54:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\n\nBlind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eObjectPlanet\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eOpinio\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;7.26 rev12562\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;on \u003cem\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination.\n\n\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio\u00a07.26 rev12562\u00a0on \n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-664",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T09:51:59.865Z",
"orgId": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"shortName": "TCS-CERT"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/changelog.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-01T09:10:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability discovery"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-10T14:22:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability Report to TCS-CERT"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-19T15:33:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability Report to Vendor through email : opinio@support.objectplanet.com"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-24T15:34:00.000Z",
"value": "Feedback asked to vendor, check if the vendor received the PoC in an encrypted archive"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-10T15:32:00.000Z",
"value": "New follow-up email was send to the vendor"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-13T15:37:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor confirmed the reception of the PoC, vendor asked to wait 90-day period before publishing (responsible disclosure), and will try to fix the vulnerability"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-14T15:37:00.000Z",
"value": "Answer to vendor to acknowledge 90 days period"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-03-10T15:38:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor informed us that they will realse the fix by the end of this month"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-23T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "An email was sent to check where they stand on the release and fixes for the reported issues"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-21T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "A feedback was requested from vendor regarding their progreess"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-30T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "A feedback was requested from vendor regarding their progreess"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-07-31T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "The vendor released the newer fixed version which is the Opinio Version 7.27"
}
],
"title": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"assignerShortName": "TCS-CERT",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13872",
"datePublished": "2025-12-02T09:51:59.865Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-02T09:17:04.605Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T16:55:02.348Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…