cve-2025-22150
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-01-21 17:46
Modified
2025-02-12 20:41
Severity ?
6.8 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Summary
Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975
security-advisories@github.comhttps://hackerone.com/reports/2913312
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
nodejs undici Version: >= 4.5.0, < 5.28.5
Version: >= 6.0.0, < 6.21.1
Version: >= 7.0.0, < 7.2.3
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
   containers: {
      adp: [
         {
            metrics: [
               {
                  other: {
                     content: {
                        id: "CVE-2025-22150",
                        options: [
                           {
                              Exploitation: "poc",
                           },
                           {
                              Automatable: "no",
                           },
                           {
                              "Technical Impact": "total",
                           },
                        ],
                        role: "CISA Coordinator",
                        timestamp: "2025-01-21T18:34:22.789606Z",
                        version: "2.0.3",
                     },
                     type: "ssvc",
                  },
               },
            ],
            providerMetadata: {
               dateUpdated: "2025-02-12T20:41:22.041Z",
               orgId: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
               shortName: "CISA-ADP",
            },
            title: "CISA ADP Vulnrichment",
         },
      ],
      cna: {
         affected: [
            {
               product: "undici",
               vendor: "nodejs",
               versions: [
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: ">= 4.5.0, < 5.28.5",
                  },
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: ">= 6.0.0, < 6.21.1",
                  },
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: ">= 7.0.0, < 7.2.3",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         descriptions: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.",
            },
         ],
         metrics: [
            {
               cvssV3_1: {
                  attackComplexity: "HIGH",
                  attackVector: "NETWORK",
                  availabilityImpact: "NONE",
                  baseScore: 6.8,
                  baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
                  confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
                  integrityImpact: "HIGH",
                  privilegesRequired: "NONE",
                  scope: "UNCHANGED",
                  userInteraction: "REQUIRED",
                  vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
                  version: "3.1",
               },
            },
         ],
         problemTypes: [
            {
               descriptions: [
                  {
                     cweId: "CWE-330",
                     description: "CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values",
                     lang: "en",
                     type: "CWE",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         providerMetadata: {
            dateUpdated: "2025-01-21T17:46:58.872Z",
            orgId: "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
            shortName: "GitHub_M",
         },
         references: [
            {
               name: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975",
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
               ],
               url: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975",
            },
            {
               name: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0",
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0",
            },
            {
               name: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a",
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a",
            },
            {
               name: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385",
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385",
            },
            {
               name: "https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312",
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312",
            },
            {
               name: "https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f",
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f",
            },
            {
               name: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113",
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113",
            },
         ],
         source: {
            advisory: "GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975",
            discovery: "UNKNOWN",
         },
         title: "Undici Uses Insufficiently Random Values",
      },
   },
   cveMetadata: {
      assignerOrgId: "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
      assignerShortName: "GitHub_M",
      cveId: "CVE-2025-22150",
      datePublished: "2025-01-21T17:46:58.872Z",
      dateReserved: "2024-12-30T03:00:33.654Z",
      dateUpdated: "2025-02-12T20:41:22.041Z",
      state: "PUBLISHED",
   },
   dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
   dataVersion: "5.1",
   "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
      nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-22150\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-01-21T18:15:14.887\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-01-21T18:15:14.887\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":5.2}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-330\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
      vulnrichment: {
         containers: "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-22150\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-21T18:34:22.789606Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-12T20:33:10.324Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Undici Uses Insufficiently Random Values\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"nodejs\", \"product\": \"undici\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \">= 4.5.0, < 5.28.5\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \">= 6.0.0, < 6.21.1\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \">= 7.0.0, < 7.2.3\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312\", \"name\": \"https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f\", \"name\": \"https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-330\", \"description\": \"CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-21T17:46:58.872Z\"}}}",
         cveMetadata: "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-22150\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-12T20:41:22.041Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-12-30T03:00:33.654Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-21T17:46:58.872Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
         dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
         dataVersion: "5.1",
      },
   },
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.