CVE-2025-24802 (GCVE-0-2025-24802)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-30 19:20 – Updated: 2025-01-30 19:55
VLAI?
Summary
Plonky2 is a SNARK implementation based on techniques from PLONK and FRI. Lookup tables, whose length is not divisible by 26 = floor(num_routed_wires / 3) always include the 0 -> 0 input-output pair. Thus a malicious prover can always prove that f(0) = 0 for any lookup table f (unless its length happens to be divisible by 26). The cause of problem is that the LookupTableGate-s are padded with zeros. A workaround from the user side is to extend the table (by repeating some entries) so that its length becomes divisible by 26. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.1.
Severity ?
8.6 (High)
CWE
- CWE-1240 - Use of a Cryptographic Primitive with a Risky Implementation
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0xPolygonZero | plonky2 |
Affected:
= 1.0.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-24802",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-30T19:54:59.096334Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-30T19:55:17.620Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "plonky2",
"vendor": "0xPolygonZero",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "= 1.0.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Plonky2 is a SNARK implementation based on techniques from PLONK and FRI. Lookup tables, whose length is not divisible by 26 = floor(num_routed_wires / 3) always include the 0 -\u003e 0 input-output pair. Thus a malicious prover can always prove that f(0) = 0 for any lookup table f (unless its length happens to be divisible by 26). The cause of problem is that the LookupTableGate-s are padded with zeros. A workaround from the user side is to extend the table (by repeating some entries) so that its length becomes divisible by 26. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1240",
"description": "CWE-1240: Use of a Cryptographic Primitive with a Risky Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-30T19:20:14.250Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/security/advisories/GHSA-hj49-h7fq-px5h",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/security/advisories/GHSA-hj49-h7fq-px5h"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/commit/091047f7f10cae082716f3738ad59a583835f7b6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/commit/091047f7f10cae082716f3738ad59a583835f7b6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/blob/main/plonky2/src/plonk/prover.rs#L97",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/blob/main/plonky2/src/plonk/prover.rs#L97"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-hj49-h7fq-px5h",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Soundness issue with Plonky2 look up tables"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-24802",
"datePublished": "2025-01-30T19:20:14.250Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-23T17:11:35.838Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-30T19:55:17.620Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-24802\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-01-30T20:15:51.010\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-01-30T20:15:51.010\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Plonky2 is a SNARK implementation based on techniques from PLONK and FRI. Lookup tables, whose length is not divisible by 26 = floor(num_routed_wires / 3) always include the 0 -\u003e 0 input-output pair. Thus a malicious prover can always prove that f(0) = 0 for any lookup table f (unless its length happens to be divisible by 26). The cause of problem is that the LookupTableGate-s are padded with zeros. A workaround from the user side is to extend the table (by repeating some entries) so that its length becomes divisible by 26. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.1.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Plonky2 es una implementaci\u00f3n de SNARK basada en t\u00e9cnicas de PLONK y FRI. Las tablas de b\u00fasqueda, cuya longitud no es divisible por 26 = floor(num_routed_wires / 3) siempre incluyen el par de entrada-salida 0 -\u0026gt; 0. Por lo tanto, un probador malintencionado siempre puede probar que f(0) = 0 para cualquier tabla de b\u00fasqueda f (a menos que su longitud sea divisible por 26). La causa del problema es que las LookupTableGate-s est\u00e1n rellenas con ceros. Un workaround del lado del usuario es extender la tabla (repitiendo algunas entradas) para que su longitud sea divisible por 26. Esta vulnerabilidad se corrigi\u00f3 en 1.0.1.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":8.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":4.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-1240\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/blob/main/plonky2/src/plonk/prover.rs#L97\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/commit/091047f7f10cae082716f3738ad59a583835f7b6\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/security/advisories/GHSA-hj49-h7fq-px5h\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-24802\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-30T19:54:59.096334Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-30T19:55:11.982Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Soundness issue with Plonky2 look up tables\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-hj49-h7fq-px5h\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.6, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"0xPolygonZero\", \"product\": \"plonky2\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"= 1.0.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/security/advisories/GHSA-hj49-h7fq-px5h\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/security/advisories/GHSA-hj49-h7fq-px5h\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/commit/091047f7f10cae082716f3738ad59a583835f7b6\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/commit/091047f7f10cae082716f3738ad59a583835f7b6\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/blob/main/plonky2/src/plonk/prover.rs#L97\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2/blob/main/plonky2/src/plonk/prover.rs#L97\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Plonky2 is a SNARK implementation based on techniques from PLONK and FRI. Lookup tables, whose length is not divisible by 26 = floor(num_routed_wires / 3) always include the 0 -\u003e 0 input-output pair. Thus a malicious prover can always prove that f(0) = 0 for any lookup table f (unless its length happens to be divisible by 26). The cause of problem is that the LookupTableGate-s are padded with zeros. A workaround from the user side is to extend the table (by repeating some entries) so that its length becomes divisible by 26. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.1.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-1240\", \"description\": \"CWE-1240: Use of a Cryptographic Primitive with a Risky Implementation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-30T19:20:14.250Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-24802\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-30T19:55:17.620Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-01-23T17:11:35.838Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-30T19:20:14.250Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…