GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2025-3877 (GCVE-0-2025-3877)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-05-14 16:56 – Updated: 2025-06-11 12:10
VLAI

This CVE was marked as fixed, but due to other code landing - was not actually fixed. It was subsequently fixed in CVE-2025-5986.

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-06-11T12:10:53.177Z",
        "orgId": "f16b083a-5664-49f3-a51e-8d479e5ed7fe",
        "shortName": "mozilla"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This CVE was marked as fixed, but due to other code landing - was not actually fixed.  It was subsequently fixed in CVE-2025-5986."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f16b083a-5664-49f3-a51e-8d479e5ed7fe",
    "assignerShortName": "mozilla",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-3877",
    "datePublished": "2025-05-14T16:56:43.402Z",
    "dateRejected": "2025-06-11T12:10:53.177Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-22T17:02:56.161Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-06-11T12:10:53.177Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-3877\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@mozilla.org\",\"published\":\"2025-05-14T17:15:48.567\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-06-11T13:15:24.007\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: This CVE was marked as fixed, but due to other code landing - was not actually fixed.  It was subsequently fixed in CVE-2025-5986.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "None",
      "current_release_date": "2026-08-06T13:19:01+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-3877",
      "id": "CVE-2025-3877",
      "initial_release_date": "2025-05-14T16:56:43.402000+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "118",
      "product_status:known_affected": "5",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "thunderbird: Unsolicited File Download, Disk Space Exhaustion, and Credential Leakage via mailbox:/// Links",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-3877.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "important",
      "current_release_date": "2025-07-08T23:35:37Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-3877",
      "id": "CVE-2025-3877",
      "initial_release_date": "2025-05-16T02:54:52Z",
      "product_status:recommended": "39",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2025-3877",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2025-3877.json",
      "version": "13"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"f16b083a-5664-49f3-a51e-8d479e5ed7fe\", \"shortName\": \"mozilla\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-11T12:10:53.177Z\"}, \"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This CVE was marked as fixed, but due to other code landing - was not actually fixed.  It was subsequently fixed in CVE-2025-5986.\"}]}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-3877\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"f16b083a-5664-49f3-a51e-8d479e5ed7fe\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mozilla\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-04-22T17:02:56.161Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-05-14T16:56:43.402Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-11T12:10:53.177Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2025-06-11T12:10:53.177Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.