CVE-2025-58123 (GCVE-0-2025-58123)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-28 12:59 – Updated: 2025-08-28 13:20
VLAI?
Title
Lack of TLS validation in plugin BGP Monitoring on Checkmk Exchange
Summary
Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin BGP Monitoring allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic.
Severity ?
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Credits
Felix Eberstaller (Limes Security)
Jakob Hartmann (Limes Security)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58123",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-28T13:19:11.654054Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T13:20:27.456Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://exchange.checkmk.com/packages",
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "BGP Monitoring"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Felix Eberstaller (Limes Security)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jakob Hartmann (Limes Security)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin BGP Monitoring allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-384",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T12:59:25.737Z",
"orgId": "f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f",
"shortName": "Checkmk"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://exchange.checkmk.com/p/bgp-mon"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Lack of TLS validation in plugin BGP Monitoring on Checkmk Exchange"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f",
"assignerShortName": "Checkmk",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58123",
"datePublished": "2025-08-28T12:59:25.737Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-25T11:50:49.622Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T13:20:27.456Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-58123\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@checkmk.com\",\"published\":\"2025-08-28T13:16:09.743\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-09-23T16:14:52.880\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin BGP Monitoring allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security@checkmk.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":2.5}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@checkmk.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:oetiker:bgp_monitoring:-:*:*:*:*:checkmk:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FDD35B95-B2F0-4F32-8F43-EFE5AB1D1C0E\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://exchange.checkmk.com/p/bgp-mon\",\"source\":\"security@checkmk.com\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-58123\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-08-28T13:19:11.654054Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-28T13:19:18.694Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Lack of TLS validation in plugin BGP Monitoring on Checkmk Exchange\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Felix Eberstaller (Limes Security)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Jakob Hartmann (Limes Security)\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-384\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 6.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"packageName\": \"BGP Monitoring\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://exchange.checkmk.com/packages\", \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://exchange.checkmk.com/p/bgp-mon\", \"tags\": [\"product\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin BGP Monitoring allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-295\", \"description\": \"CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f\", \"shortName\": \"Checkmk\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-28T12:59:25.737Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-58123\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-28T13:20:27.456Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-08-25T11:50:49.622Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-08-28T12:59:25.737Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Checkmk\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…