CVE-2025-58124 (GCVE-0-2025-58124)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-28 12:59 – Updated: 2025-10-07 09:33
VLAI?
Summary
Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin check-mk-api allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic.
Severity ?
6.9 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Affected: 2.2 , < 6.1.1 (semver)
Credits
Felix Eberstaller (Limes Security) Jakob Hartmann (Limes Security)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-58124",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-08-28T13:18:29.233374Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T13:18:44.095Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://exchange.checkmk.com/packages",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "check-mk-api",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "6.1.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Felix Eberstaller (Limes Security)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jakob Hartmann (Limes Security)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin check-mk-api allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-384",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T09:33:24.363Z",
        "orgId": "f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f",
        "shortName": "Checkmk"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "product"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.checkmk.com/p/check-mk-api"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Lack of TLS validation in plugin check-mk-api on Checkmk Exchange"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f",
    "assignerShortName": "Checkmk",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-58124",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-28T12:59:28.526Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-08-25T11:50:49.622Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T09:33:24.363Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-58124\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@checkmk.com\",\"published\":\"2025-08-28T13:16:09.977\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-09-23T16:07:25.177\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin check-mk-api allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security@checkmk.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":2.5}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@checkmk.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:heinlein-support:check_mk_python_api:-:*:*:*:*:checkmk:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"35764DC0-D164-4588-805B-2F98CE275619\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://exchange.checkmk.com/p/check-mk-api\",\"source\":\"security@checkmk.com\",\"tags\":[\"Product\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-58124\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-08-28T13:18:29.233374Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-28T13:18:39.474Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Lack of TLS validation in plugin check-mk-api on Checkmk Exchange\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Felix Eberstaller (Limes Security)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Jakob Hartmann (Limes Security)\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-384\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 6.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"2.2\", \"lessThan\": \"6.1.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageName\": \"check-mk-api\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://exchange.checkmk.com/packages\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://exchange.checkmk.com/p/check-mk-api\", \"tags\": [\"product\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin check-mk-api allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-295\", \"description\": \"CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f\", \"shortName\": \"Checkmk\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-10-07T09:33:24.363Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-58124\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-10-07T09:33:24.363Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-08-25T11:50:49.622Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-08-28T12:59:28.526Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Checkmk\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.